Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

p300-CBP coactivator family

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from CBP/p300)
E1A binding protein p300
Crystallographic structure of the histone acetyltransferase domain of EP300 (rainbow colored, N-terminus = blue, C-terminus = red) complexed with the inhibitor lysine-CoA (space-filling model, carbon = white, oxygen = red, nitrogen = blue, phosphorus = orange).[1]
Identifiers
SymbolEP300
Alt. symbolsp300
NCBI gene2033
HGNC3373
OMIM602700
PDB3biy
RefSeqNM_001429
UniProtQ09472
Other data
EC number2.3.1.48
LocusChr. 22 q13.2
Search for
StructuresSwiss-model
DomainsInterPro
CREB binding protein (CBP)
Structure of the TAZ2 domain (amino acids 1764–1850) of the mouse CREBBP protein. Based on PyMOL rendering of the structure PDB 1f81
Identifiers
SymbolCREBBP
Alt. symbolsCBP, RSTS
NCBI gene1387
HGNC2348
OMIM600140
PDB3dwy
RefSeqNM_004380
UniProtQ92793
Other data
EC number2.3.1.48
LocusChr. 16 p13.3
Search for
StructuresSwiss-model
DomainsInterPro

The p300-CBP coactivator family in humans is composed of two closely related transcriptional co-activating proteins (or coactivators):

  1. p300 (also called EP300 or E1A binding protein p300)
  2. CBP (also known as CREB-binding protein or CREBBP)

Both p300 and CBP interact with numerous transcription factors and act to increase the expression of their target genes.[2][3]

Protein structure

[edit]

p300 and CBP have similar structures. Both contain five protein interaction domains: the nuclear receptor interaction domain (RID), the KIX domain (CREB and MYB interaction domain), the cysteine/histidine regions (TAZ1/CH1 and TAZ2/CH3) and the interferon response binding domain (IBiD). The last four domains, KIX, TAZ1, TAZ2 and IBiD of p300, each bind tightly to a sequence spanning both transactivation domains 9aaTADs of transcription factor p53.[4] In addition p300 and CBP each contain a protein or histone acetyltransferase (PAT/HAT) domain and a bromodomain that binds acetylated lysines and a PHD finger motif with unknown function.[5] The conserved domains are connected by long stretches of unstructured linkers.

Regulation of gene expression

[edit]

p300 and CBP are thought to increase gene expression in three ways:

  1. by relaxing the chromatin structure at the gene promoter through their intrinsic histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity.[6]
  2. recruiting the basal transcriptional machinery including RNA polymerase II to the promoter.
  3. acting as adaptor molecules.[7]

p300 regulates transcription by directly binding to transcription factors (see external reference for explanatory image). This interaction is managed by one or more of the p300 domains: the nuclear receptor interaction domain (RID), the CREB and MYB interaction domain (KIX), the cysteine/histidine regions (TAZ1/CH1 and TAZ2/CH3) and the interferon response binding domain (IBiD). The last four domains, KIX, TAZ1, TAZ2 and IBiD of p300, each bind tightly to a sequence spanning both transactivation domains 9aaTADs of transcription factor p53.[8]

Enhancer regions, which regulate gene transcription, are known to be bound by p300 and CBP, and ChIP-seq for these proteins has been used to predict enhancers.[9][10][11][12]

Work done by Heintzman and colleagues[13] showed that 70% of the p300 binding occurs in open chromatin regions as seen by the association with DNase I hypersensitive sites. Furthermore, they have described that most p300 binding (75%) occurs far away from transcription start sites (TSSs) and these binding sites are also associated with enhancer regions as seen by H3K4me1 enrichment. They have also found some correlation between p300 and RNAPII binding at enhancers, which can be explained by the physical interaction with promoters or by enhancer RNAs.

Function in G protein signaling

[edit]

An example of a process involving p300 and CBP is G protein signaling. Some G proteins stimulate adenylate cyclase that results in elevation of cAMP. cAMP stimulates PKA, which consists of four subunits, two regulatory and two catalytic. Binding of cAMP to the regulatory subunits causes release of the catalytic subunits. These subunits can then enter the nucleus to interact with transcriptional factors, thus affecting gene transcription. The transcription factor CREB, which interacts with a DNA sequence called a cAMP response element (or CRE), is phosphorylated on a serine (Ser 133) in the KID domain. This modification is PKA mediated, and promotes the interaction of the KID domain of CREB with the KIX domain of CBP or p300 and enhances transcription of CREB target genes, including genes that aid gluconeogenesis. This pathway can be initiated by adrenaline activating β-adrenergic receptors on the cell surface.[14]

Clinical significance

[edit]

Mutations in CBP, and to a lesser extent p300, are the cause of Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome,[15] which is characterized by severe mental retardation. These mutations result in the loss of one copy of the gene in each cell, which reduces the amount of CBP or p300 protein by half. Some mutations lead to the production of a very short, nonfunctional version of the CBP or p300 protein, while others prevent one copy of the gene from making any protein at all. Although researchers do not know how a reduction in the amount of CBP or p300 protein leads to the specific features of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, it is clear that the loss of one copy of the CBP or p300 gene disrupts normal development.

Defects in CBP HAT activity appears to cause problems in long-term memory formation.[16]

CBP and p300 have also been found to be involved in multiple rare chromosomal translocations that are associated with acute myeloid leukemia.[7] For example, researchers have found a translocation between chromosomes 8 and 22 (in the region containing the p300 gene) in several people with a cancer of blood cells called acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Another translocation, involving chromosomes 11 and 22, has been found in a small number of people who have undergone cancer treatment. This chromosomal change is associated with the development of AML following chemotherapy for other forms of cancer.

Mutations in the p300 gene have been identified in several other types of cancer. These mutations are somatic, which means they are acquired during a person's lifetime and are present only in certain cells. Somatic mutations in the p300 gene have been found in a small number of solid tumors, including cancers of the colon and rectum, stomach, breast and pancreas. Studies suggest that p300 mutations may also play a role in the development of some prostate cancers, and could help predict whether these tumors will increase in size or spread to other parts of the body. In cancer cells, p300 mutations prevent the gene from producing any functional protein. Without p300, cells cannot effectively restrain growth and division, which can allow cancerous tumors to form.

Mouse models

[edit]

CBP and p300 are critical for normal embryonic development, as mice completely lacking either CBP or p300 protein, die at an early embryonic stage.[17][18] In addition, mice which lack one functional copy (allele) of both the CBP and p300 genes (i.e. are heterozygous for both CBP and p300) and thus have half of the normal amount of both CBP and p300, also die early in embryogenesis.[17] This indicates that the total amount of CBP and p300 protein is critical for embryo development. Data suggest that some cell types can tolerate loss of CBP or p300 better than the whole organism can. Mouse B cells or T cells lacking either CBP and p300 protein develop fairly normally, but B or T cells that lack both CBP and p300 fail to develop in vivo.[2][19] Together, the data indicate that, while individual cell types require different amounts of CBP and p300 to develop or survive and some cell types are more tolerant of loss of CBP or p300 than the whole organism, it appears that many, if not all cell types may require at least some p300 or CBP to develop.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ PDB: 3BIY​; Liu X, Wang L, Zhao K, Thompson PR, Hwang Y, Marmorstein R, Cole PA (Feb 2008). "The structural basis of protein acetylation by the p300/CBP transcriptional coactivator". Nature. 451 (7180): 846–50. Bibcode:2008Natur.451..846L. doi:10.1038/nature06546. PMID 18273021. S2CID 4426988.
  2. ^ a b Kasper LH, Fukuyama T, Biesen MA, Boussouar F, Tong C, de Pauw A, Murray PJ, van Deursen JM, Brindle PK (Feb 2006). "Conditional knockout mice reveal distinct functions for the global transcriptional coactivators CBP and p300 in T-cell development". Molecular and Cellular Biology. 26 (3): 789–809. doi:10.1128/MCB.26.3.789-809.2006. PMC 1347027. PMID 16428436.
  3. ^ Vo N, Goodman RH (Apr 2001). "CREB-binding protein and p300 in transcriptional regulation". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 276 (17): 13505–8. doi:10.1074/jbc.R000025200. PMID 11279224. S2CID 41294840.
  4. ^ The prediction for 9aaTADs (for both acidic and hydrophilic transactivation domains) is available online from ExPASy http://us.expasy.org/tools/ Archived 2010-07-16 at the Wayback Machine and EMBnet Spain "EMBnet Austria: Detect 9aaTAD Pattern". Archived from the original on 2013-07-04. Retrieved 2013-07-04.
  5. ^ Spiegelman BM, Heinrich R (Oct 2004). "Biological control through regulated transcriptional coactivators". Cell. 119 (2): 157–67. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.037. PMID 15479634. S2CID 14668705.
  6. ^ Jin Q, Yu LR, Wang L, Zhang Z, Kasper LH, Lee JE, Wang C, Brindle PK, Dent SY, Ge K (Jan 2011). "Distinct roles of GCN5/PCAF-mediated H3K9ac and CBP/p300-mediated H3K18/27ac in nuclear receptor transactivation". The EMBO Journal. 30 (2): 249–62. doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.318. PMC 3025463. PMID 21131905.
  7. ^ a b Goodman RH, Smolik S (Jul 2000). "CBP/p300 in cell growth, transformation, and development". Genes & Development. 14 (13): 1553–77. doi:10.1101/gad.14.13.1553. PMID 10887150. S2CID 28477108.
  8. ^ Teufel DP, Freund SM, Bycroft M, Fersht AR (Apr 2007). "Four domains of p300 each bind tightly to a sequence spanning both transactivation subdomains of p53". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (17): 7009–14. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.7009T. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702010104. PMC 1855428. PMID 17438265.; Piskacek S, Gregor M, Nemethova M, Grabner M, Kovarik P, Piskacek M (Jun 2007). "Nine-amino-acid transactivation domain: establishment and prediction utilities". Genomics. 89 (6): 756–68. doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.02.003. PMID 17467953.
  9. ^ Wang Z, Zang C, Cui K, Schones DE, Barski A, Peng W, Zhao K (Sep 2009). "Genome-wide mapping of HATs and HDACs reveals distinct functions in active and inactive genes". Cell. 138 (5): 1019–31. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.049. PMC 2750862. PMID 19698979.
  10. ^ Heintzman ND, Hon GC, Hawkins RD, Kheradpour P, Stark A, Harp LF, Ye Z, Lee LK, Stuart RK, Ching CW, Ching KA, Antosiewicz-Bourget JE, Liu H, Zhang X, Green RD, Lobanenkov VV, Stewart R, Thomson JA, Crawford GE, Kellis M, Ren B (May 2009). "Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression". Nature. 459 (7243): 108–12. Bibcode:2009Natur.459..108H. doi:10.1038/nature07829. PMC 2910248. PMID 19295514.
  11. ^ Visel A, Blow MJ, Li Z, Zhang T, Akiyama JA, Holt A, Plajzer-Frick I, Shoukry M, Wright C, Chen F, Afzal V, Ren B, Rubin EM, Pennacchio LA (Feb 2009). "ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers". Nature. 457 (7231): 854–8. Bibcode:2009Natur.457..854V. doi:10.1038/nature07730. PMC 2745234. PMID 19212405.
  12. ^ Blow MJ, McCulley DJ, Li Z, Zhang T, Akiyama JA, Holt A, Plajzer-Frick I, Shoukry M, Wright C, Chen F, Afzal V, Bristow J, Ren B, Black BL, Rubin EM, Visel A, Pennacchio LA (Sep 2010). "ChIP-Seq identification of weakly conserved heart enhancers". Nature Genetics. 42 (9): 806–10. doi:10.1038/ng.650. PMC 3138496. PMID 20729851.
  13. ^ Heintzman ND, Stuart RK, Hon G, Fu Y, Ching CW, Hawkins RD, Barrera LO, Van Calcar S, Qu C, Ching KA, Wang W, Weng Z, Green RD, Crawford GE, Ren B (Mar 2007). "Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome". Nature Genetics. 39 (3): 311–8. doi:10.1038/ng1966. PMID 17277777. S2CID 1595885.
  14. ^ Mayr B, Montminy M (Aug 2001). "Transcriptional regulation by the phosphorylation-dependent factor CREB". Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2 (8): 599–609. doi:10.1038/35085068. PMID 11483993. S2CID 1056720.
  15. ^ Petrij F, Giles RH, Dauwerse HG, Saris JJ, Hennekam RC, Masuno M, Tommerup N, van Ommen GJ, Goodman RH, Peters DJ (Jul 1995). "Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome caused by mutations in the transcriptional co-activator CBP". Nature. 376 (6538): 348–51. Bibcode:1995Natur.376..348P. doi:10.1038/376348a0. PMID 7630403. S2CID 4254507.
  16. ^ Korzus E, Rosenfeld MG, Mayford M (Jun 2004). "CBP histone acetyltransferase activity is a critical component of memory consolidation". Neuron. 42 (6): 961–72. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.06.002. PMC 8048715. PMID 15207240. S2CID 15775956.
  17. ^ a b Yao TP, Oh SP, Fuchs M, Zhou ND, Ch'ng LE, Newsome D, Bronson RT, Li E, Livingston DM, Eckner R (May 1998). "Gene dosage-dependent embryonic development and proliferation defects in mice lacking the transcriptional integrator p300". Cell. 93 (3): 361–72. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81165-4. PMID 9590171. S2CID 620460.
  18. ^ Tanaka Y, Naruse I, Hongo T, Xu M, Nakahata T, Maekawa T, Ishii S (Jul 2000). "Extensive brain hemorrhage and embryonic lethality in a mouse null mutant of CREB-binding protein". Mechanisms of Development. 95 (1–2): 133–45. doi:10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00360-9. PMID 10906457. S2CID 7141012.
  19. ^ Xu W, Fukuyama T, Ney PA, Wang D, Rehg J, Boyd K, van Deursen JM, Brindle PK (Jun 2006). "Global transcriptional coactivators CREB-binding protein and p300 are highly essential collectively but not individually in peripheral B cells". Blood. 107 (11): 4407–16. doi:10.1182/blood-2005-08-3263. PMC 1895794. PMID 16424387.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=P300-CBP_coactivator_family&oldid=1222158726"