Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Paul Lam

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In this Hong Kong name, the surname is Lam. In accordance with Hong Kong custom, the Western-style name is Paul Lam and the Chinese-style name is Lam Ting-kwok.
The Honourable
Paul Lam
SBS SC JP
林定國
5th Secretary for Justice of Hong Kong
Incumbent
Assumed office
1 July 2022
Appointed byJohn Lee
Preceded byTeresa Cheng
Personal details
Born1968 (age 55–56)
Hong Kong
SpouseSheila Yuen Suk-ming[1][2]
Alma materUniversity of Hong Kong (LLB; PCLL)
University of Nottingham (LLM)
ProfessionBarrister
Paul Lam Ting-kwok
Traditional Chinese林定國
Simplified Chinese林定国
Transcriptions

Paul Lam Ting-kwok SBS SC JP (Chinese: 林定國; born 1968) is a Hong Kong Senior Counsel, currently serving as the 5th Secretary for Justice since July 2022.

Education

[edit]

Lam was educated at Wah Yan College, Hong Kong. He obtained a Bachelor of Laws (with Second Class Honour Division One) in 1990 and a Postgraduate Certificate in Laws in 1991 from the University of Hong Kong. Thereafter, he obtained a Master of Laws in International Law (with distinction) from the University of Nottingham in 1992.[3][4]

[edit]

Lam was called to the Hong Kong Bar in 1992.[5] Lam's private practice as a barrister at Parkside Chambers was in general civil proceedings, including commercial law, land law, property and trust law, probate and estate administration, personal injury, medical negligence and defamation cases.[6][3][4][7]

On 26 March 2013, Lam was appointed Senior Counsel by the Chief Justice, Geoffrey Ma. Lam took silk on 11 May 2013.[5]

Lam served as Vice Chairman of the Hong Kong Bar Association from 2014 to 2016 and as Chairman in 2017.[8] He was also a member of the Special Committee on Discipline and the Special Committee on Pupillage and Limited Practice of the Hong Kong Bar Association.[7]

Lam was elected as the Head of Parkside Chambers, succeeding Clive Grossman SC with effect from 1 September 2018.[9]

In 2019, Lam was appointed as an arbitrator of the Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration for a period of 3 years from 21 February 2019 to 20 February 2022.[10] Lam has also been appointed as an arbitrator of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission from 1 May 2021 to 30 April 2026.[4]

In 2019, Lam was appointed as Professor at the China University of Political Science and Law.[11]

In 2021, Lam passed the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Legal Professional Examination.[6][12]

Public service

[edit]

Tribunals and statutory bodies

[edit]

Lam served as a member of the Board of Review (Inland Revenue Ordinance) between 2006 and 2014.[4][13][14][15]

Lam was a member of the Appeal Board Panel (Town Planning) from 19 December 2007 to 19 December 2013 and Deputy Chairman from 19 December 2015 to 19 December 2021.[4][16][17][18][19][20][21]

Lam was an adjudicator of the Registration of Persons Tribunal between 1 December 2008 and 1 December 2014.[4][22][23][24]

Lam was a member of the Amusement Game Centres Appeal Board from 30 May 2010 to 29 May 2016 and Chairman from 30 May 2016 to 29 May 2020.[4][25][26][27][28][29]

On 16 May 2014, Lam was appointed by the Chief Executive, Leung Chun-ying, as Deputy Chairman of the Administrative Apeals Board for a term of 3 years with effect from 1 June 2014.[30] He was later appointed as Chairman of the Administrative Apeals Board for a term of 3 years with effect from 11 June 2016,[31] and subsequently re-appointed by the Chief Executive, Carrie Lam, for a term of 3 years with effect from 11 June 2019.[32]

Lam was appointed to the Criminal and Law Enforcement Injuries Compensation Boards for a term of 2 years from 19 June 2014 to 18 June 2016.[33] He was subsequently re-appointed and his term was extended to 18 June 2020.[34][35]

Lam was appointed as a member of the Air Transport Licensing Authority for a term from 1 August 2016 to 31 July 2022.[4][36][37]

Lam was appointed as a member of the Trade and Industry Advisory Board from 1 September 2017 to 31 December 2021.[4][38][39]

On 7 December 2018, Lam was appointed as Chairman of the Consumer Council for a term of 2 years from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020.[40][41] On 11 December 2020, Lam was re-appointed for a further term of 2 years from 1 January 2021.[42][43]

[edit]

Lam served as a member of the Complaints Committee of the Independent Commission Against Corruption between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018.[4]

Since 1 January 2019, Lam has served as a member of the Operations Review Committee of the Independent Commission Against Corruption.[4][44]

Lam was a member of the Panel of Witness Protection Review Board from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020.[4][45]

Lam was appointed as a member of the Independent Police Complaints Council from 4 September 2019 to 3 September 2021.[46]

Judicial post

[edit]

Lam sat part-time as a Deputy High Court Judge in the Court of First Instance in March–April 2015, February–March 2016, March–April 2017, April–May 2018, February–March and November–December 2019, June–July and December 2020, February–March 2021 and April–May 2022.[4][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]

While sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge in March 2015, Lam presided over the trial in Lau Oi Kiu v Man Chun Shing and Hau Chi Keung. In his judgment, Lam found that "Hau was a poor witness. He was impatient, defensive and argumentative". Lam held that Hau was involved in the dumping of waste in the land possessed by Lau since early July 2009 and that Hau was liable to Lau for acts of trespass. Lam observed that the "overall impression is that they [i.e. Man and Hau] were contemptuous of the law, and adopted the attitude of “catch me if you can and if you dare”. Their conduct has no place in Hong Kong where the rule of law is of paramount importance".[58]

While sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge in March 2019, Lam presided over the trial in Lai Yiu Mun Susanna v Tsang Kai Choy Paul and others. During the trial, Lam received an email from a door tenant of Parkside Chambers in relation to the case. In view of the contents of the email, Lam decided to recuse himself because "Considering all relevant circumstances as a whole, I was driven to the conclusion that a reasonable, fair-minded and well-informed observer would conclude that there a real possibility (not probability) that I would be influenced subconsciously by extraneous considerations arising out of the content of the Email due to my association with the Sender". In explaining his decision, Lam further stated that "What is at stake is the rule of law. I cannot emphasize more how important it is, at this time in Hong Kong, and indeed as is always the case, to maintain and enhance public confidence in the judiciary and the judicial system as a whole. Public confidence depends on the public’s perception of how the system works in practice. This is why both the reality and the appearance are equally important".[59][60]

While sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge in June 2020, Lam delivered a decision in Wismettac Asian Foods, Inc. v United Top Properties Limited and others where he reviewed the conflicting case-law on the issue of whether a vesting order can be granted by the court in email fraud cases. He took the view that the word "trustee" in section 52(1)(e) of the Trustee Ordinance (Cap. 29) is broad enough to empower the court to grant a vesting order.[61][62]

Justice of the Peace

[edit]

On 1 October 2020, Lam was appointed as a Justice of the Peace.[63][64]

Think tank

[edit]

Lam is an advisor to the Our Hong Kong Foundation.[65][66]

He is also an honorary advisor to the International Youth Legal Exchange Foundation.[4]

Secretary for Justice

[edit]

On 19 June 2022, Lam was appointed (pursuant to Article 15 of the Basic Law) by the Central People's Government, on the nomination of the Chief Executive-elect of Hong Kong John Lee, as the 5th Secretary for Justice of Hong Kong (taking office on 1 July 2022 in the 6th Government of the Hong Kong SAR).[6][67]

On 20 June 2022, the Hong Kong Bar Association issued a statement welcoming Lam's appointment and expressing "confidence that he will defend the rule of law and the independence of the Judiciary".[68]

In July 2022, Lam stated that the National Security Law is in line with the protection of human rights and freedoms offered by the Basic Law. He said that it is legitimate to restrict freedom of speech in a reasonable manner in order to safeguard national security.[69]

In July 2022, the United States' Congressional-Executive Commission on China recommended that Lam be sanctioned by the US government due to the perception that Lam is "widely expected to continue to oversee the tough prosecutorial approach of his predecessor, Teresa Cheng Yuek-wah, against opposition figures, activists and protesters."[70] Lam said that he would not be concerned about any sanctions.[71] Later, he said he was enraged by the report and that the Department of Justice coworkers "share a bitter hatred of the enemy", and that the Hong Kong government would protect them from sanctions.[72]

In August 2022, Lam ordered a non-jury trial for the city's largest national security case, despite trial by jury being used for 177 years; Lam cited "involvement of foreign elements" as the reason to not have a jury.[73]

In August 2022, Lam criticized Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan.[74] Lam and other government officials were criticized by Lew Mon-hung for "crossing the line" with his statements on Taiwan, as the Basic Law stipulates that diplomatic affairs of Hong Kong are to be handled by mainland China's Foreign Ministry.[75][76]

In October 2022, after losing a court battle, the government changed the law to give the Secretary of Health the power to invalidate COVID-19 vaccine exemption passes.[77] Lam defended the government and said that the ruling shows Hong Kong is governed by the rule of law.[77] Lam also said that he wanted to "tell a good story of Hong Kong's judiciary" anywhere around the world, and dismissed concerns about Hong Kong falling 3 spots in the World Justice Project Rule of Law Index to #22, saying it was not significant.[77]

On 31 October 2022, Lam said that everyone in Hong Kong must know how to respect and safeguard the constitution.[78]

In November 2022, Lam said that in reference to telling stories about Hong Kong, "We're not brainwashing people, or saying something polished or fabricated."[79] Lam also said that people who protested in the 2019-2020 Hong Kong protest did not understand the legal system.[79]

In December 2022, Lam sent a certificate to the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, "demanding" that the case be held without a jury.[80] Lam claimed it should be held without a jury for three reasons, saying "involvement of foreign factors in the case, protection of personal safety jurors and their family members, and/or if the trial is to be conducted with a jury, there is a real risk that the due administration of justice might be impaired."[80]

In January 2023, Lam wrote in a newspaper and said Western countries were slandering Hong Kong's judicial system, and said "We must strengthen our defence and fight back, both internally and externally."[81]

In April 2023, according to RTHK in reference to the national security law, "Lam said with fewer than 30 people convicted since the legislation was introduced nearly three years ago, everyone would agree that the law affects only an extremely small number of people, when compared to the local population of seven million."[82] However, 249 people had been arrested, with an editorial stating that fewer than 30 convictions could be a sign of deficiency within the legal system.[82]

In May 2023, in regards to Article 23, Lam said "People who are anxious [about it]... what are they afraid of? What did they hear that made them scared?"[83] Lam also said "People are most afraid of that which they don't know. Sometimes they're imaginary fears, sometimes they really have reason to be scared... don't let negative emotions override rational analysis."[83]

In May 2023, Lam said that those found not guilty under the national security law could be arrested again if the government decides to appeal the not guilty verdict.[84]

In May 2023, Lam refused to answer say if mourning victims of the Tiananmen Square massacre would be illegal, and said "I won't assess whether an act is definitely legal or illegal based on hypothetical questions, but I think I shall take this chance to reiterate some existing laws of Hong Kong, which the public should know, and I also believe already know."[85]

In July 2023, Lam filed complaints against two overseas democrats, saying they "made use of their professional capacity as a Hong Kong barrister and a Hong Kong solicitor to lend perceived credibility and authority to their smearing of Hong Kong's judicial system and rule of law, and made slanderous remarks against Hong Kong judges and prosecutors."[86]

In February 2024, Lam warned that media outlets which interview wanted activists may risk abetting the activists.[87]

Glory to Hong Kong

[edit]

In June 2023, Lam applied for an injunction to make the song Glory to Hong Kong illegal.[88] In July 2023, the High Court rejected the proposed ban on the song.[89]

Jimmy Lai case

[edit]

In August 2022, Lam announced that Jimmy Lai's trial would not use a jury, but be heard by 3 national security judges instead.[90]

In September 2022, Lam opposed an attempt by Lai to hire a lawyer from the UK,[91] with the Department of Justice saying it does not comment on individual cases.[90] In October 2022, the High Court rejected Lam's opposition, and allowed Lai to hire a UK lawyer.[92] Later on 27 October 2022, Lam appealed the High Court's decision, saying the UK lawyer would not add anything significant to the trial.[93][94] On 9 November 2022, the Lam lost his appeal, with the High Court allowing Lai to hire the lawyer.[95] The High Court also ordered Lam to pay for the legal cost of the appeal.[96]

After Lam and the Department of Justice lost its appeal, former Chief Executive CY Leung criticized the court's decision, and said its judges were "looking to the West for teaching and command" on national security.[97] Lam was asked why he did not respond to Leung's comments and "defend the dignity of the judicial system," and Lam responded that he had no comment.[97]

On 15 November 2022, Lam and the Department of Justice filed a "final" appeal, with the hope of not allowing Lai to use the UK lawyer.[98][99] In its filing, the DoJ said that hiring foreign lawyers was "incompatible with the overall objective and design of the national security law."[100] The DoJ was represented by Rimsky Yuen.[99] On 21 November 2022, the DoJ again lost its appeal.[100]

On 22 November 2022, the DoJ confirmed that it filed yet another appeal to block Lai from using the UK lawyer.[101]

On 28 November 2022, the Court of Final Appeal ruled that "no appropriate basis has been made out" in Lam's appeal, allowing Lai to hire Tim Owen.[102] The judges wrote that "The secretary for justice had fundamentally changed his case only at the stage of seeking leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal, had raised undefined and unsubstantiated issues said to involve national security which were not mentioned or explored in the courts below, and no appropriate basis had been made out for the grant of leave to appeal."[103]

After the decision was announced, John Lee said he would ask the NPCSC to interpret the national security law, in an attempt to block foreign lawyers from being used in national security cases.[102] Lee said that Lam would also seek to adjourn Lai's case from the original 1 December 2022 date until a later time, pending the NPCSC's decision.[104] When Lee was asked whether Lam should be held accountable for losing multiple appeals against Lai, Lee defended Lam's contributions to the city.[104]

Lai's lawyers said that the multiple appeals by Lam had impeded their preparation for the trial.[104]

On 21 December 2022, Lam was ordered to pay HK$855,000 in legal fees to Lai, after Lam failed multiple times to block Lai from hiring Owen.[105]

Foreign lawyers

[edit]

In 2021, the DoJ tried to hire a foreign lawyer to represent the government in a national security case.[106] With the Jimmy Lai case, the DoJ said in 2022 that foreign lawyers should be banned from national security cases.[100] HKU professor Simon Young Ngai-man commented and said it was difficult to see why foreign lawyers were a greater national security risk and should be banned, when local Hong Kong barristers could also have multiple citizenships and passports.[107]

Professor Johannes Chan Man-mun, former law dean at HKU, said "How about senior civil servants, senior members of the disciplinary forces, other professionals such as accountants and so on who may have access to sensitive confidential information or state secrets? Are there to be requirements that holders of foreign nationality should not be allowed to hold these positions then? If judges holding foreign nationality are not restricted from trying national security cases, why should lawyers of foreign nationality be restricted from representing their client in national security cases?"[108]

Professor Chan also said "No matter how hard the government tries to tell the international community about the rule of law in Hong Kong, the interpretation would send a completely contradictory message."[108]

Hong Kong's first Secretary of Justice, Elsie Leung, privately shared that she backed the Court of Final Appeal's decision and that the NPCSC interpretation was not necessary, citing Xi Jinping's message that Hong Kong maintain the use of the common law system.[109]

In January 2023, after the NPCSC ruled that the Chief Executive had the power to ban foreign lawyers, Lam supported the decision and said "The interpretation is, by definition, a clarification of the original intent and purpose of those provisions; it does not confer any new power on anyone."[110]

On 24 January 2023, Lam promised that legislation to block foreign lawyers would be implemented in the first half of 2023, and that he would listen to "constructive" viewpoints.[111]

Award

[edit]

On 1 July 2021, Lam was awarded the Silver Bauhinia Star by the Chief Executive, Carrie Lam, "in recognition of his significant contribution to the promotion of consumer rights protection through his chairmanship of the Consumer Council, as well as the development of trade and industries in Hong Kong".[112][113]

Personal life

[edit]

Lam and his family own 3 properties.[114][1][2]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Annual Declaration as a Principal Official under the Political Appointment System" (PDF). www.doj.gov.hk. Department of Justice (Hong Kong). 1 July 2022. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 August 2022.
  2. ^ a b "Annual Declaration of Registrable Interests as a Member of the Executive Council" (PDF). www.ceo.gov.hk. Executive Council of Hong Kong. 1 July 2022. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 August 2022.
  3. ^ a b "Paul T K Lam SBS, SC, JP". www.parksidechambers.com.hk. Parkside Chambers. 19 June 2022. Archived from the original on 19 June 2022.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n "Curriculum Vitae" (PDF). www.parksidechambers.com.hk. Parkside Chambers. 19 June 2022. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 June 2022.
  5. ^ a b "Senior Counsel appointed". www.info.gov.hk. Government of Hong Kong. 26 March 2013.
  6. ^ a b c "Principal Officials of Sixth-term HKSAR Government appointed". www.info.gov.hk. Government of Hong Kong. 19 June 2022.
  7. ^ a b "Mr Paul Lam, SC, Vice Chairman, Hong Kong Bar Association". www.doj.gov.hk. Department of Justice. Archived from the original on 19 June 2022.
  8. ^ "Past Officers". www.hkba.org. Hong Kong Bar Association. Archived from the original on 19 June 2022.
  9. ^ "Head of Chambers". www.parksidechambers.com.hk. Parkside Chambers. 1 September 2018. Archived from the original on 19 June 2022.
  10. ^ "Paul Lam SC and Osmond Lam appointed as arbitrators of the Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration". www.parksidechambers.com.hk. Parkside Chambers. 9 April 2019.
  11. ^ "Members appointed to professorships". www.parksidechambers.com.hk. Parkside Chambers. 11 July 2019. Archived from the original on 19 June 2022.
  12. ^ "Greater Bay Area Legal Professional Exam 2021". www.parksidechambers.com.hk. Parkside Chambers. 1 October 2021. Archived from the original on 19 June 2022.
  13. ^ "G.N. 6356" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 49, Vol. 9, 9 December 2005)
  14. ^ "G.N. 8257" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 51, Vol. 12, 19 December 2008)
  15. ^ "G.N. 16" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 1, Vol. 16, 6 January 2012)
  16. ^ "G.N. 8110" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 50, Vol. 11, 14 December 2007)
  17. ^ "G.N. 7300" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 48, Vol. 13, 27 November 2009)
  18. ^ "G.N. 8166" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 50, Vol. 15, 16 December 2011)
  19. ^ "G.N. 9708" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 51, Vol. 19, 18 December 2015)
  20. ^ "G.N. 9366" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 50, Vol. 21, 15 December 2017)
  21. ^ "G.N. 7973" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 50, Vol. 23, 13 December 2019)
  22. ^ "G.N. 8007" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 48, Vol. 12, 28 November 2008)
  23. ^ "G.N. 7659" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 49, Vol. 14, 10 December 2010)
  24. ^ "G.N. 7640" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 48, Vol. 16, 30 November 2012)
  25. ^ "G.N. 2985" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 21, Vol. 14, 28 May 2010)
  26. ^ "G.N. 3518" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 21, Vol. 16, 25 May 2012)
  27. ^ "G.N. 3215" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 24, Vol. 18, 13 June 2014)
  28. ^ "G.N. 3202" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 23, Vol. 20, 10 June 2016)
  29. ^ "G.N. 3906" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 22, Vol. 22, 1 June 2018)
  30. ^ "G.N. 2754" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 20, Vol. 18, 16 May 2014)
  31. ^ "G.N. 3078" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 22, Vol. 20, 3 June 2016)
  32. ^ "G.N. 3159" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 20, Vol. 23, 17 May 2019)
  33. ^ "G.N. 3356" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 24, Vol. 18, 13 June 2014)
  34. ^ "G.N. 3209" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 23, Vol. 20, 10 June 2016)
  35. ^ "G.N. 4153" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 24, Vol. 22, 15 June 2018)
  36. ^ "G.N. 4185" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 30, Vol. 20, 29 July 2016)
  37. ^ "G.N. 5645" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 30, Vol. 22, 27 July 2018)
  38. ^ "G.N. 6396" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 35, Vol. 21, 1 September 2017)
  39. ^ "G.N. 8279" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 52, Vol. 23, 27 December 2019)
  40. ^ "Appointments of Chairman and members to Consumer Council announced". www.info.gov.hk. Government of Hong Kong. 7 December 2018.
  41. ^ "G.N. 9025" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 49, Vol. 22, 7 December 2018)
  42. ^ "Appointments of Chairman and members to Consumer Council announced". www.info.gov.hk. Government of Hong Kong. 11 December 2020.
  43. ^ "G.N. 7205" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 50, Vol. 24, 11 December 2020)
  44. ^ "Operations Review Committee". www.icac.org.hk. Independent Commission Against Corruption. 1 January 2022. Archived from the original on 19 June 2022.
  45. ^ "G.N. 9337" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 51, Vol. 22, 21 December 2018)
  46. ^ "G.N. 5653" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 36, Vol. 23, 6 September 2019)
  47. ^ "G.N. 1795" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 9, Vol. 19, 27 February 2015)
  48. ^ "G.N. 756" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 6, Vol. 20, 12 February 2016)
  49. ^ "G.N. 1284" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 11, Vol. 21, 17 March 2017)
  50. ^ "G.N. 2487" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 15, Vol. 22, 13 April 2018)
  51. ^ "G.N. 1217" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 7, Vol. 23, 15 February 2019)
  52. ^ "G.N. 7058" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 47, Vol. 23, 22 November 2019)
  53. ^ "G.N. 3075" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 24, Vol. 24, 12 June 2020)
  54. ^ "G.N. 3933" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 29, Vol. 24, 17 July 2020)
  55. ^ "G.N. 7201" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 50, Vol. 24, 11 December 2020)
  56. ^ "G.N. 808" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 7, Vol. 25, 19 February 2021)
  57. ^ "G.N. 1860" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 16, Vol. 26, 22 April 2022)
  58. ^ Lau Oi Kiu v Man Chun Shing and Hau Chi Keung, HCA 1930/2012, reported at [2015] 4 HKC 73
  59. ^ Lai Yiu Mun Susanna v Tsang Kai Choy Paul and others, HCA 142/2017, reported at [2019] 2 HKLRD 359
  60. ^ Hui, Sophie (6 March 2019). "Judge recuses in property fight". The Standard. Archived from the original on 19 June 2022. Retrieved 19 June 2022.
  61. ^ Wismettac Asian Foods, Inc. v United Top Properties Limited and others, HCA 252/2020, reported at [2020] 3 HKLRD 732
  62. ^ "Court of First Instance grants vesting order in email fraud case". www.parksidechambers.com.hk. Parkside Chambers. 15 July 2020. Archived from the original on 19 June 2022.
  63. ^ "G.N.(E.) 152" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 87, Vol. 24 (Extraordinary), 1 October 2020)
  64. ^ "Appendix: Justices of the Peace appointments" (PDF). Government of Hong Kong. 1 October 2020.
  65. ^ "Mr. Paul Ting-Kwok LAM, SBS, SC, JP". www.ourhkfoundation.org.hk. Our Hong Kong Foundation. Archived from the original on 19 June 2022.
  66. ^ "Advisors". www.ourhkfoundation.org.hk. Our Hong Kong Foundation. Archived from the original on 19 June 2022.
  67. ^ "Secretary for Justice, Mr Paul T K Lam, SBS, SC, JP". Department of Justice (Hong Kong). 1 July 2022. Archived from the original on 3 July 2022.
  68. ^ "Statement of the Hong Kong Bar Association in respect of the appointment of Mr. Paul TK Lam SC as the Secretary for Justice" (PDF). www.hkba.org. Hong Kong Bar Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 June 2022.
  69. ^ "'I'll promote rule of law': Paul Lam - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Retrieved 2022-07-09.
  70. ^ Standard, The. "US panel suggests additional sanctions on Hong Kong justice chief, prosecutors". The Standard. Retrieved 2022-07-13.
  71. ^ "US report intimidates Hong Kong prosecutors: govt - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Retrieved 2022-07-13.
  72. ^ Standard, The. "Paul Lam slams US as a "bully" for suggesting sanctions". The Standard. Retrieved 2022-07-17.
  73. ^ Standard, The. "Non-jury trial ordered for Hong Kong's largest national security case: AFP". The Standard. Retrieved 2022-08-16.
  74. ^ Leung, Hillary (2022-08-03). "'Gross interference': Hong Kong top officials, gov't departments, lawmakers condemn Nancy Pelosi's Taiwan visit". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-08-25.
  75. ^ Standard, The. "HK shouldn't 'snatch' but attract overseas talents: Lew Mon-hung". The Standard. Retrieved 2022-08-25.
  76. ^ "Poor communication is costing Hong Kong government public trust". South China Morning Post. 2022-08-24. Retrieved 2022-08-25.
  77. ^ a b c "Paul Lam defends law change in jab exemptions saga - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Retrieved 2022-10-28.
  78. ^ "We will teach people to respect the constitution: SJ - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Retrieved 2022-10-31.
  79. ^ a b Standard, The. "Brainwashing 'not story line'". The Standard. Retrieved 2022-11-06.
  80. ^ a b Chau, Candice (2022-12-05). "National security case against Hong Kong Tiananmen vigil group to be tried without jury, Chow Hang-tung says". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-12-08.
  81. ^ "DoJ to speed up law adaptation work - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Retrieved 2023-01-04.
  82. ^ a b Hamlett, Tim (2023-04-07). "Who was 'affected' by Hong Kong's national security law? More than 30 of us, Mr Lam". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2023-04-22.
  83. ^ a b Leung, Hillary (2023-05-22). "'What are they afraid of?': Hong Kong security chief questions public concern over passing of city's own security law". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2023-05-22.
  84. ^ Chau, Candice (2023-05-23). "Justice Sec: Those found not guilty under security law at Hong Kong High Court could be detained again if gov't appeals". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2023-05-23.
  85. ^ "Hong Kong's Justice Sec. refuses to say if mourning Tiananmen crackdown is illegal, but points to security law". Hong Kong Free Press. 2023-05-24. Retrieved 2023-05-27.
  86. ^ Chau, Candice (2023-07-11). "Hong Kong justice minister files complaints to legal bodies against 2 wanted democrats". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2023-07-11.
  87. ^ Ho, Kelly (2024-02-05). "Media ought consider legal risks of activist interviews - justice chief". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2024-02-06.
  88. ^ "Hong Kong should be 'very sensitive' when drafting local security law to safeguard nat'l security, justice sec. says - Hong Kong Free Press HKFP". Hong Kong Free Press. Retrieved 2023-06-12.
  89. ^ Chau, Candice (2023-07-28). "Hong Kong court rejects gov't application for ban on pro-democracy protest song". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2023-07-28.
  90. ^ a b Standard, The. "Hong Kong authorities reject Jimmy Lai request for UK lawyer". The Standard. Retrieved 2022-10-01.
  91. ^ Chau, Candice (2022-09-30). "Hong Kong media tycoon Jimmy Lai's bid to hire UK lawyer for national security case opposed by justice minister". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-10-01.
  92. ^ Chau, Candice (2022-10-19). "Hong Kong court allows media tycoon Jimmy Lai to hire UK lawyer for national security trial". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-10-19.
  93. ^ Chau, Candice (2022-11-03). "Hong Kong justice dep't appeals against court decision to let UK lawyer represent media tycoon Jimmy Lai". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-11-03.
  94. ^ "Court allows UK lawyer to represent Jimmy Lai - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Retrieved 2022-11-10.
  95. ^ Leung, Hillary (2022-11-09). "Hong Kong justice dep't loses appeal against court decision to let UK lawyer represent media tycoon Jimmy Lai". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-11-09.
  96. ^ Standard, The. "UK's Timothy Owen KC to defend Jimmy Lai in December's national security trial". The Standard. Retrieved 2022-11-09.
  97. ^ a b Ho, Kelly (2022-11-11). "'Inappropriate' to comment on criticism of appeal court ruling to let Jimmy Lai hire UK lawyer, Hong Kong justice chief says". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-11-11.
  98. ^ Chau, Candice (2022-11-15). "Hong Kong justice dep't seeks final appeal against decision to let UK lawyer represent media tycoon Jimmy Lai". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-11-15.
  99. ^ a b Lee, Peter (2022-11-21). "Hong Kong court dismisses justice secretary's bid to block Jimmy Lai from hiring UK lawyer for nat'l security trial". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-11-23.
  100. ^ a b c "Court upholds UK lawyer admission in Jimmy Lai case - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Retrieved 2022-11-21.
  101. ^ Chau, Candice (2022-11-22). "Justice dep't applies to appeal to Hong Kong's top court to block Jimmy Lai from hiring UK lawyer". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-11-22.
  102. ^ a b Chau, Candice (2022-11-28). "BREAKING: Hong Kong asks Beijing to intervene after top court blocks bid to stop media tycoon Jimmy Lai from hiring UK lawyer". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
  103. ^ "Govt loses fight to ban UK lawyer in Jimmy Lai case - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
  104. ^ a b c "Hong Kong asks Beijing to interpret national security law after Jimmy Lai victory". South China Morning Post. 2022-11-28. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
  105. ^ "Hong Kong government ordered to pay Jimmy Lai's HK$855,000 legal fees". South China Morning Post. 2022-12-21. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  106. ^ Cheng, Selina (2021-01-20). "British barrister acting for Hong Kong gov't to withdraw from case against high profile democrats". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
  107. ^ "'Beijing unlikely to allow foreign lawyers in Hong Kong's national security cases'". South China Morning Post. 2022-11-27. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
  108. ^ a b "Hong Kong wants Beijing to interpret national security law. Here's why it matters". South China Morning Post. 2022-11-29. Retrieved 2022-11-29.
  109. ^ "NSL interpretation controversy unresolved in Hong Kong's pro-establishment camp". South China Morning Post. 2022-11-30. Retrieved 2022-12-01.
  110. ^ "SJ backs recent move to interpret security law - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Retrieved 2023-01-16.
  111. ^ "Overseas lawyers could be 'banned from Hong Kong security trials within 6 months'". South China Morning Post. 2023-01-24. Retrieved 2023-01-24.
  112. ^ "G.N.(E.) 410" Hong Kong Government Gazette (No. 175, Vol. 25 (Extraordinary), 1 July 2021)
  113. ^ "Appendix: 2021 Honours List" (PDF). Government of Hong Kong. 1 July 2021.
  114. ^ Standard, The. "Financial Services Secretary tops the interests declaration with seven properties". The Standard. Retrieved 2022-08-11.
Legal offices
Preceded by
Winnie Tam
 Chairman of Hong Kong Bar Association
2017 		Succeeded by
Political offices
Preceded by Secretary for Justice
2022–present 		Incumbent
Order of precedence
Preceded by
Paul Chan
Financial Secretary
 Hong Kong order of precedence
Secretary for Justice 		Succeeded by
Andrew Leung
President of the Legislative Council
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Lam&oldid=1250802042"