Šamuḫa
 Settlement mound as seen from the west | |
  Shown within Turkey | |
| Location | Sivas Province, Turkey |
|---|---|
| Region | Anatolia |
| Coordinates | 39°36′52″N 36°31′02″E / 39.61444°N 36.51722°E |
| Type | Settlement |
| History | |
| Cultures | Hittite |
| Site notes | |
| Condition | In ruins |
Šamuḫa is an ancient settlement near the village of Kayalı Pinar, c. 40 km west of Sivas, in the Sivas Province of Turkey. Located on the northern bank of Kizil Irmak river, it was a city of the Hittites, a religious centre and, for a few years, a military capital for the empire. Samuha's faith was syncretistic. Rene Lebrun in 1976 called Samuha the "religious foyer of the Hittite Empire".
History
[edit]Middle Bronze
[edit]
Excavations revealed that the town was already inhabited during the ancient Assyrian trading colonies period (Karum period). Two residences (House of Tamura and House of Tatali) have been excavated.[1] This period ended with the big fire in the settlement. After the Karum period city was destroyed, the Hittites built a new city with a palace complex.[2]
Late Bronze
[edit]Samuha was a primary base of field operations for the Hittites while the Kaskas were plundering the Hatti heartland, including the historic capital Hattusa, during the 14th century BC under kings Tudhaliya I-III and Suppiluliuma I. During this period, the religions of Samuha and Sapinuwa became influenced by the faith of the Hurrians.
Excavations at Sapinuwa have revealed that at the beginning of this time, Sapinuwa held the archives for the kingdom. Under either Tudhaliya I or Tudhaliya II, Sapinuwa was burnt. Hattusili III later recorded of this time that Azzi had "made Samuha its frontier".
Samuha then became the base for the reconquests of Tudhaliya III and his then-general Suppiluliuma. The Deeds of Suppiluliuma report that he brought Kaska captives back to Samuha after a campaign toward Hayasa (connected somehow with Azzi) on Tudhaliya's behalf. Tudhaliya III himself centralised the faith of Kizzuwatna to Samuha.
Mursili appointed his youngest son Hattusili III priest of the local goddess, referred to as 'Ishtar of Samuha', identified in scholarship as either Sausga or the similar deity DINGIR.GE6 The Hittites of Hattusa worshipped the goddess of Samuha as a protective deity. Samuha was an important cult site of this goddess.
Samuha disappears from the historical record after Hattusili III.[3]
Location
[edit]In years past, scholars have been divided on the location of Samuha.[4] Some maintained it was on the banks of the Euphrates river. Others believe it was located on the Halys river, presently called the Kızılırmak River. The Kızılırmak River is closer to Hattusa. Its headwaters are near the city of Sivas, 130 miles (209 km) away. The river flows to the east, south of Hattusa, then turns north to the west of Hattusa, discharging into the Black Sea.
More recently (2021) there's more consensus that Samuha was located in Kayalipinar on the Kizilirmak river.[5] This location is reflected in the coordinates given in this article.
Euphrates location theory
[edit]Hittite records indicate that Samuha was located on a navigable river, which tends to support the Euphrates location. Oliver Gurney notes in the above-cited work that the Halys river is also navigable in sections. He favored the Euphrates location, noting that the Murad Su, the present day Murat River had river traffic in 1866. The Murat river is a tributary of the Euphrates river. Both proposed locations are south of the Kaskian incursion that overtook Hattusa and required the Hittite leadership to move to Samuha.
Kayalipinar location
[edit]Mursili II talks of stopping in Samuha on his way home from the Kaska lands in his Ten Year Annals (KBo 34 iii 45), which would argue strongly against a location on or near the Euphrates. Already in 1959, Gurney and Garstang [6] provided a very extended discussion about how Hittite documents seem to contradict a location for Samuha along the Euphrates, locating it instead along the Kizilirmak near modern Sivas, perhaps at Zara.
They further pointed out that the town of Pittiyariga, often mentioned in the same texts as Samuha, which is associated with the upper Euphrates areas, must be further east yet.[7]
This whole issue was discussed in a great detail by Gurney and Garstang in their 1959 book, which was written long before the recent excavations at Kayalipinar provided more clarity on the matter.
As of 2020, excavations by Andreas and Vuslat Müller-Karpe in Kayalıpınar, Yıldızeli have revealed cuneiform archives that strongly connect the site's identity with Samuha.[8]
Cuneiform texts
[edit]Numerous important cuneiform texts were found in recent excavations. The first tablet fragment in Kayalıpınar was found in 1999, which prompted more archaeological research on the settlement mound.
Already in the first year of renewed excavations in 2005, further fragments of cuneiform tablets were found, which multiplied from year to year. Over a hundred tablets were found in 2015.[9]
Most of the texts are written in Hittite; they often contain Luwian glosses and Hurrian expressions. Seven texts found are in Hurrian language. There are also two karum period commercial documents written in Old Assyrian.[10]
See also
[edit]References
[edit].svg){kind=small}
- ^ A. Müller-Karpe et al., Untersuchungen in Kayalıpınar 2017 und 2018 (German) MDOG 151, 2019
- ^ Andreas Müller-Karpe: The East: Archeology. The Upper Land, Azzi-Hayaša, Išuwa; in: Mark Weeden, Lee. Z. Ullmann (ed.): Hittite Landscape and Geography, Brill 2014. ISBN 978-90-04-34174-6. p.60
- ^ It is not mentioned by Trevor Bryce (2012), "The World of The Neo-Hittite Kingdoms." after that time
- ^ Gurney O.R. The Upper Land, matum elitum // Hittite Studies in Honor of Harry A. Hoffner Jr. On the Occasion of His 65th Birthday. Eds. Gregory McMahon and Gary M. Beckman. Winona Lake, 2003. P. 123-125
- ^ General map of the main 2nd millennium LBA Hittite sites, including Samuha as #8 on the map, from Alvise Matessi (2021), The ways of an empire: Continuity and change of route landscapes across the Taurus during the Hittite Period (ca. 1650–1200 BCE). researchgate.net
- ^ 1959, pp. 35ff
- ^ J. Garstang and O. R. Gurney The Geography of the Hittite Empire. British Institute of Archeology at Ankara, 1959
- ^ Andreas Müller-Karpe: Kayalıpınar in Ostkappadokien. Ein neuer hethitischer Tontafelfundplatz. In: Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orientgesellschaft 132, 2000; Andreas and Vuslat Müller-Karpe: Untersuchungen in Kayalıpınar 2019. In: Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orientgesellschaft. 152, 2020, pp. 191–235
- ^ The texts found up to 2017 were published in 2019 and given the sigla KpT 1.1-100
- ^ Michele Cammarosano: Kultinventare aus Kalyalıpınar (Šamuḫa), in: Elisabeth Rieken (Hrsg.): Keilschrifttafeln aus Kayalıpınar 1. Textfunde aus den Jahren 1999–2017. Harrassowitz Verlag 2019. ISBN 978-3-447-11220-8