Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Talk:Ga-Rei

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reassessment of Article

[edit]

How can you request a reassesment? I think it's better than stub-class now. --Arsenal666 (talk) 17:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Up to B class, any editor can do the assessment his- or herself. You're right, this is now well past Stub and into Start. It's not B yet -- that will take more plot (no more than three or so paragraphs, though), publication information, and at least the start of a Reception/Reviews section. I've gone ahead and changed it here and removed the stub template on the article. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, any information that can be found about licensing in other languages (including Korean and Chinese) that would be Really Useful to add to the infobox. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. problem is, Ga-rei isn't a particularly popular manga, and I'm not Japanese, so I don't have access to any japanese manga reviews. I'll try Anime News Network.

--Arsenal666 (talk) 21:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not even listed there! I only have access to Ga-rei scanlations, as it isn't licensed in Europe, and scanlations tend to be intermittent. There hasn't been a new chapter since 27/12/07. Sorry for moaning, but it really is impossible unless you geta native japanese peron.

--Arsenal666 (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it looks like we'll have to be patient.... —Quasirandom (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
New scanlations have been released. Releases were stopped because of an apparent licensing attempt by Tokyopop. However, this was found to be untrue, and thus scanlation groups have resumed scanlations.
- Riwoz (talk) 23:56, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Character split

[edit]

That part needs to be split since there are two sets. One for the manga and the other for Ga-rei Zero, the anime. Ominae (talk) 08:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to Ominae. Raymondwy (talk) 00:07, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

+1 as the mangaka wasn't involved in the script & the plot writing of the anime so there will be some discrepancies in the characters profiles. In addition the anime is a prequel and an original work apart from manga.--KrebMarkt 19:20, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The character section needs cleanup. It has a lot of OR and likely after that cleanup it may not be long enough. It's also divided impropely in-universe style and has a number of issues of adding minor characters. So yea, splitting is premature until that section is cleaned up per WP:AVOIDSPLIT.Jinnai 22:17, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The manga and anime versions are usually kept in the same article instead of being split into separate articles; it's as simple as mentioning the manga version first, in one paragraph, and the anime version in the next paragraph. Flyer22 (talk) 08:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Izumi is Yomi!

[edit]

In the latest chapter, when Kagura gets some of her memories back and calls Izumi Yomi, Izumi's eyes become slit-pupiled like Yomi's were as an onryō! 75.157.70.71 (talk) 14:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I read the raws too, Yomi is Izumi, she eventually gets her memories back. We need to get rid of the character split. Also, Yomi joins the group as an exorcist, so she's not an antagonist anymore... 70.187.133.113 (talk) 05:06, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
While it may be seven years too late, Izumi is not Yomi. Yomi's soul was placed into Izumi's body during the Kyubi incident, and in the final arc they separate from each other. 142.231.71.145 (talk) 06:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review(s)

[edit]

--KrebMarkt (talk) 20:12, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ga-Rei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:09, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]