This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kyrashargo.
I declined the speedy delete request (for lack of content) because I noticed it was added only 2 minutes after the article was first created, which may not have given the author enough time to add any significant content. If it remains in an empty state after a day or so, it can be deleted then. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 23:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Considering the purpose of this article, which is to teach new wiki users what articles should not look like and help us learn to identify pieces that need improvement, I think this article does its job. There are lots of places where it could be improved but that's the point.SocietySloth (talk) 17:17, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article lacks an objective tone, as there are times where it makes arguments but does not use any sources to back them up. In addition, the article has noticeably few citations even with such long paragraphs. Lastly, there are syntax errors, and the writing overall is not very strong. Cheesesteaklover16 (talk) 03:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]