Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Talk:Superchick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name

[edit]

If you look at the album artwork to Beauty From Pain 1.1 (and I think the original Beauty From Pain), there's no [ ] around the k anymore. Is the title of the article fine as it is?--Autumn Forrester 15:35, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Why is there an article for the song 'Hero' but no article for the album it's in Last One Picked? This doesn;t make much sense. Jcpizzadude 13:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold! Take a look at the articles for their other albums, then write the article Last One Picked yourself. I am sure other editors will join in once you start it. Ursasapien (talk) 03:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Superchick.jpg

[edit]

Image:Superchick.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Superchicklogo.png

[edit]

Image:Superchicklogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:54, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RegenerationSuperchick.jpg

[edit]

Image:RegenerationSuperchick.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

It's a good thing that the photo is under CC-BY, but only three of the six members can be seen. If anyone has something better, please upload it.

Also, the album gallery was not fair use, I had to remove it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Perrier (talkcontribs) 21:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some much better photos that you can use (all CC-by licensed by the photographer): http://www.flickr.com/photos/breezy421/sets/72157608512530962/ Kaldari (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Complaints rarely get a response from me, because my response is "so take a better picture if you don't like it". Either that or search flickr for free use images. Constructive comments like Kaldari's work much better. I've sent the photographer a flickrmail asking if she took these pictures herself or if they were stills from a video. Do you think she took them? If it works out, it sounds like we found a great new source for Christian images thanks to your help! THANK YOU, Kaldari! Royalbroil 21:45, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Superchick Collection

[edit]

Superchick released a new, digital-only album here:

It consists of 46 songs, and I suspect that it simply a way for Inpop to push Superchick on streaming. The album art was used as the band's website background some time ago. --LABcrabs (talk) 23:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]