Wikipedia:COI in 5W
(Redirected from User:Gryllida/doc/5W/COI)
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
This page describes the situation of Conflict of interest, also known as COI.
Who?
[edit]- You're affected by the conflict of interest, if you're affiliated with subject of an article you're working on, including but not limited to these examples:
- Directly:
- I work for this company.
- An example is paid editing.
- I am the article subject.
- I work for this company.
- Indirectly:
- My friend works for this company.
- The article subject is my relative.
- Directly:
Where?
[edit]- Article main-space, discussions and collaboration.
What?
[edit]- Do not write articles which you have a conflict of interest with.
- Read notability inclusion criteria. If qualify, use WP:REQ to request an article to be created for you by a volunteer familiar with the topic.
- The list is categorized by topics and volunteers specialized in topics work through the list regularly.
- You can work with any topics in the requested articles queue you're comfortable with. You will get help with writing articles you have no conflict of interest with — at talk pages, and on IRC.
When?
[edit]- When authoring an article (writing an article from scratch).
- When contributing to an article (adding more data).
- When discussing a topic at Wikipedia.
Why?
[edit]- Overheads are caused by the conflict of your goals (promoting your subject) with Wikipedia goals (shaping an encyclopedia, not an international dumping ground).
- The overheads might discourage you from perceiving Wikipedia as a productive environment, and hinder you from contributing to it.
- If often takes couple orders of magnitude more time and effort, both for you and for the helpers, to get you create and publish an article, than for a specialized contributor to process it from the requested articles queue.
- The time could be spent on processing the WP:REQ queue instead.
- A Wikipedia article does not help to optimize an article subject appearance in search results. If article subject is not discussed in external sources, a Wikipedia article would not make a significant difference. See SEO for techniques to get the article subject website more visible on the web, promote it elsewhere if it doesn't have a website — create more references, and a Wikipedia article only then, after multiple third-party sources refer to the article subject.
- Some people point out that the Infobox, which shows up at the right of search results when users query for the article title, is wonderful and makes a difference. However, please do note that the search results themselves remain unaffected: the infobox and the search results are retrieved independently of each-other.
How?
[edit]- Always disclose your conflict of interest when due.
- Read all links given to you carefully. They merely ensure efficient work on everything in long-term.