User talk:LuckyWikipedian

Welcome!

Hello, LuckyWikipedian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Family Research Council. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 72Dino (talk) 19:39, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Please discuss your desired edits on the talk page [[1]] KillerChihuahua^?!? 19:41, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I respectfully second that. I was forced to revert your desired edits, so I'd like you to justify them in a conversation. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 21:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Family Research Council shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 21:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. KillerChihuahua^?!? 21:31, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3RR report.

I reported you here. You may wish to explain yourself. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 21:37, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:42, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did to Talk:Family Research Council. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Slow down, sign your posts, and work with other editors. We all want the best article possible, and we can only get that if we all work together. KillerChihuahua^?!? 21:44, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hey, I predict that you're going to be blocked and I apologize for that. Blocking is a crude, stupid mechanism, but we don't seem to have better tools available. It'll only be for a day, so I recommend you cool off a bit, avoid complaining on this talk page (trust me: the admins will not be the leas bit sympathetic and it will only be used against you in the future), and avoid editing the article at all when you return. Instead, calmly visit the talk page and discuss what you want instead of changing the article. No, you won't get everything you're asking for, but we're actually reasonable, so you'll get some. For example, I kept your change about stem cells.

Anyhow, take this as advice from someone who's gone through some of this. I hope you come out of this as a productive editor, not an embittered edit warrior. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 21:49, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Nyttend (talk) 01:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talking

Since you returned, you've reverted various articles but made no attempt to talk about them and gain consensus. This is edit-warring. I will not hesitate to report you again once it becomes actionable, and your next block will be even longer. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 14:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]