User talk:NQ

On an extended wiki-break. - NQ (talk) 17:44, 12 November 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading. 
Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.

To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).

WatchlistResetConfirm

Hi :) I think your script is pretty cool, so I filed a bug to get it implemented in MediaWiki itself: phab:T150045. Legoktm (talk) 18:08, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! That’s great news especially considering that I know very little js and almost everything is copied word for word from the API and OOjs-ui documentation and examples. :) - NQ (talk) 20:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to dual-license your script as GPL v2 or later? That's the standard license for MediaWiki, and would mean I can just copy all of your code for inclusion in MediaWiki instead of re-implementing it (and I'm not even sure how to do that given how straightforward/simple it is...). Thanks! Legoktm (talk) 08:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License? You’re giving me way too much credit for something cobbled together from existing documentation. Please feel free to copy it over and delete the script when it's implemented. :) - NQ (talk) 18:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless, it would help me out a ton if you could make a clear statement like "I agree to dual-license my WatchlistResetConfirm script as GPL v2 or later". Even if you don't think it has value, I definitely do :-) Legoktm (talk) 10:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Legoktm: done. Also, I hereby agree to dual-license my WatchlistResetConfirm script as GPL v2 or later. :) Cheers. - NQ (talk) 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Woohoo, it's going to be included in the next MediaWiki deployment, which means it should be on the English Wikipedia on Thursday :) Legoktm (talk) 02:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

and explain the string of your latest edits like this one. Materialscientist (talk) 22:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: It was requested at AN by the bot owner. Please undo all of your undos. --Majora (talk) 22:43, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see the reason now (haven't read the AN thread yet), but it is not that simple. See for example this edit [1] which justly removed a duplicated url. Materialscientist (talk) 22:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Yes and the AN thread clearly says that a lot of the edits were probably fine. But the owner doesn't have the time to go through them all to make sure. So in the spirit of caution they asked for all edits to be undone while they fix the bot. It will be rerun when it is fixed. NQ was just doing what was asked of them. --Majora (talk) 22:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no complaints against NQ anymore, but, I go through those "fine" edits and restore them (well, my first edit was mass-revert and might have missed some errors, but those errors are minor - the removed pmids will be restored by citation bot). Materialscientist (talk) 22:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Good thing I used my alt account. You ran the script on all my contributions causing all my prior edits to be rolled back. Now I'll have to go through those "fine" edits and restore them. :) - NQ (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, mass-rollback was a mistake, but as I said above, there is no big deal - the worst thing I saw is removal of url link to pmid with no pmid present. Materialscientist (talk) 22:59, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well that was exactly the problem. The bot shouldn't have done that, and finding those corner cases would be pretty time consuming. I'm rerunning the bot with the correct logic now, so they'll all get taken care of overnight, and correctly this time. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 23:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A sidenote - this busy time is not best for cosmetic mass changes like those. Can this be done around a weekend? This is spamming watchlists quite a bit. Materialscientist (talk) 23:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, NQ. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week seeking nominations (and a new facilitator)

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

In addition, the WikiProject is seeking a new facilitator/coordinator to handle the logistics of the award. Please contact L235 if you are interested in helping with the logistics of running the award in any capacity. Remove your name from here to unsubscribe from further EotW-related messages. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^[1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^[2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:53, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Five years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Diffconverter

Hi NQ, and thank you for User:NQ/custom-scripts/diffconverter.js! I know very little about js, but would it be possible that the line

var difftemplate = "{" + "{diff|" + article + anchor + "|" + diff + "|" + oldid + "|" + "}" + "}";

would be better if it read

var difftemplate = "{" + "{diff|" + article + anchor + "|" + diff + "|" + oldid + "|" + label + "}" + "}";

Thanks, — Sam Sailor 14:40, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NQ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello NQ! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emerald Insight

Hello,

Do you have access to Emerald Insight?

I noticed that you helped an editor on the Resources Exchange board access a source from it.

If so, perhaps you would be able to help me.

I seek this source, to improve the Svedka article.

https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/case.darden.2016.000009

I've emailed the authors and posted to the Resources Exchange board multiple times to no avail.

Thanks,

Benjamin (talk) 04:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Benjaminikuta, NQ hasn't edited since December 2016, so he won't be answering your query. You could try emailing him, but he generally doesn't check that email account when he is on a long wiki-break. Softlavender (talk) 06:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

editToken

Hello 84,

Your scripts User:84/nrhp-chrome/ReorderNRHPlist.js, User:84/nrhp-chrome/NRHPmap.js, User:84/nrhp-chrome/UpdateNRHPProgress.js and User:84/nrhp-chrome/AddCommonsCatLinks.js are no longer functional because they attempt to get an editToken from mw.user.tokens. The scripts should instead get a csrfToken. editTokens were removed from mw.user.tokens on October 3, 2019 at Phabricator during this edit as they were redundant to csrfTokens.– BrandonXLF (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also your scripts User:NQ/custom-scripts/reset.js, User:NQ/WatchlistResetConfirm.js and User:NQ/custom-scripts/inlinediffs.js have the same issue.– BrandonXLF (talk) 00:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[1]

[2]