User talk:RichG

welcome

Welcome!

Hello, RichG, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! DS 23:17, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User block

Thanks :), and: he had other contributions in between which I had to delete. Cheers. Lectonar 13:25, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict

Sorry for the editing conflict on Metabotropic glutamate receptor! --RichG 07:14, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. - nevermind, I thought my edits cut yours out. Good luck with the research.--RichG 07:54, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for improving the page! I'm new around here so the help is welcome. --Delldot 16:20, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

metabotropic glu receptor dubiousness

There is a statement in Metabotropic glutamate receptor,

   "Rather than having much direct effect on postsynaptic potential, mGluRs serve to modulate the function of other receptors (Chu and Hablitz, 2000). "

~~I believe this to be in error. Though I cannot access the full article by Chu and Hablitz, metabotropic receptors do not modify other receptors.~~ They usually modulate cAMP which leads to changes in ion channels - and through this they do change the postsynaptic potential. --RichG 10:33, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure if what I wrote is exactly what they meant, but here's the part of the article I got it from (the beginning of the intro):

"Glutamate is the principle excitatory neurotransmitter in the neocortex. It activates both ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). The former is involved in fast synaptic transmission whereas the latter play a modulatory role." (Chu and Hablitz, 2000).

and later in the discussion:

"Specific agonists for group II and III mGluRs failed to evoke a significant inward current, suggesting that these mGluRs are not involved in this postsynaptic response. This is consistent with results from electrophysiological studies showing a predominantly presynaptic effect of these receptors."

Would it be a copyvio if I cut and paste the text of the chu article and email it to you? I'm surprised that you say that metabotropic r's don't modulate other r's because it was my understanding that they have a big role in modulating plasticity and excitability and so on. But the chu paper does say that they do have an effect on EPSP and IPSP, so the wording on that should be changed. Also, this article is old so new info might be available. Maybe we should just take that line out for now until someone has conclusive evidence. It's not that important of a point. Anyway, you're free to edit my work as you see fit. --Delldot 19:03, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A little help

Sorry to bug you, but I'm having trouble with this page I'm working on, wound healing phases. I can't get the footnotes to match up to the numbers of the references; the numbers are automatically generated and just go in order in the article, so if I cite the same thing twice, it gets two different numbers. I've looked everywhere for how to get the numbers to correspond to those in the refs, can you tell me? Thanks! Delldot 14:47, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks, that's a big help. So you think I should take some of the refs out? like maybe just leave one citation per thing and take out the rest? I don't really know how to go about it. I will take a look at neuropsychopharmacology, but I doubt I'll be any help to you. Delldot 04:00, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the pictures you added to Mexican jumping beans. --HappyCamper 00:43, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to review

Cool! I'll get right on that (in the next couple days). Peace, Delldot 02:03, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience

Rich: I'm trying to revive the temporarily defunct Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience. Because of your past edits on neuroscience related articles in the past, I thought I'd let you know. Cheers. :) Semiconscious (talk · home) 06:40, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Psychology Wiki

.

Just letting people know about the new Wiki, hosted by Wikia so kind of a daughter wiki of wikipedia. Mostly Zen 20:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Normal order

Would you like to help out on the normal order page? --HappyCamper 16:03, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of end-time ministries

Speedy deletion of List of end-time ministries

A tag has been placed on List of end-time ministries, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Collection of external Links

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. exolon 12:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ExitTG.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ExitTG.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clinical science

The article Clinical science has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not add any additional information already covered in articles on medicine, nursing, pharmacology, etc.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 23:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

Medical articles on Wikipedia must be cited by the best available evidence and written in a consistent format. We typically use review articles. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN, additionally, the Citation Template Generator will aid in the formatting of references; all one needs to do is cut and paste the results. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 22:25, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, RichG. You have new messages at E8's talk page.
Message added 19:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

E8 (talk) 19:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RichG. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RichG. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cold Therapy

Hello RichG,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cold Therapy for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Was there something unclear about the instructions above "please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top", or the instructions in the speedy deletion message on the article itself, saying "do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself"? In future, please leave someone else to remove the tag if appropriate. --David Biddulph (talk) 00:58, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of maintenance templates

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cold Therapy, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. --David Biddulph (talk) 01:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I DID resolve the problem, and the person who put the tag agrees. As for the sources tag, I put a reference and I even read "when and how to remove this tag" RichG (talk) 01:17, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't talk nonsense. The article still has no references. You have one external link (to a page in which neither the word "cold" nor the word "therapy" appear). Please read about references, and learn the differences between those and external links. --David Biddulph (talk) 01:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are right about references and links, but sorry, you didn't look carefully enough. The link does discuss cold therapy. Here is a copy of part of it: "Cold Therapy Click HERE and HERE to Watch the Videos Developed by Sam Vaknin, Cold Therapy is based on two premises: (1) That narcissistic disorders are actually forms of complex post-traumatic conditions; and (2) That narcissists are the outcomes of arrested development and attachment dysfunctions. Consequently, Cold Therapy borrows techniques from child psychology and from treatment modalities used to deal with PTSD. Cold Therapy consists of the re-traumatization of the narcissistic client in a hostile, non-holding environment which resembles the ambience of the original trauma. The adult patient successfully tackles this second round of hurt and thus resolves early childhood conflicts and achieves closure rendering his now maladaptive narcissistic defenses redundant, unnecessary, and obsolete. Cold Therapy makes use of proprietary techniques such as erasure (suppressing the client’s speech and free expression and gaining clinical information and insights from his reactions to being so stifled). Other techniques include: grandiosity reframing, guided imagery, negative iteration, other-scoring, happiness map, mirroring, escalation, role play, assimilative confabulation, hypervigilant referencing, and re-parenting. Cold Therapy Lecture Notes Introduction to Cold Therapy (German) Cold Therapy, Warmly Recommended"RichG (talk) 01:37, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your external link is to http://samvak.tripod.com/faq77.html%7CNarcissistic and the text you quote above does not occur on that page. Perhaps you intended to link to somewhere else? --David Biddulph (talk) 01:52, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh.. thank you and sorry! Yes I had a "|" in the link causing a mistake. Now it is fixed. RichG (talk) 02:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cold Therapy

The article Cold Therapy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources given to demonstrate notability of this particular technique, nor are any readily apparent. Possible promotion concerns given that the only thing resembling a source is a link to a page by the purported creator of this method (Sam Vaknin) and because the original content of the page was copyvio from that link. Regardless, seemingly niche psychological therapy about which there are not a mass of reliable secondary sources fails WP:GNG. Given the lack of third-party sources I think this fails a merge into Sam Vaknin but that's a reasonable fallback.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RichG. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]