Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Stanton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 21:54, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amber Stanton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was considering requesting an A7 but thought I'd bring it here to generate a discussion. A google search throws up nothing substantial- IMDb and several other places mention the role in CSI:NY but this is the only corroboration of any role and, I'm afraid, a supporting role in a single episode of a TV series does not make an actress notable. HJMitchell You rang? 16:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No indication that this person meets WP:ENT. There also appears to be few or no reliable secondary sources. Utility Monster (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy pending substantial coverage in reliable independent sources sufficient to meet Wikipedia guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:20, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:07, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Without any indication to the contrary, her theater credits may have been (and probably were) local productions; most of her film credits could have been (and probably were) student films and undistributed shorts. Her only credit for a significant production is the CSI:NY credit, but that's only for a single episode, and one bit part in a single episode of a TV show (and judging from her billing on the IMDb page, it probably was a bit part) isn't nearly enough to make her notable. She's just one of literally hundreds of thousands of comparably non-notable actors and actresses. —Smeazel (talk) 20:51, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.