Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marion Fernhout

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No arguments to keep - defaulting to delete Kevin (talk) 21:43, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marion Fernhout

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although it may be a case of FUTON bias, I don't see much anything on this person. No books, no news. I can't even find a reliable source for them on the net. I have to assume that the one book cited has a lot of info on the person, perhaps all the info in the article, but even if it does that is only one source and so does not constitute significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Odie5533 (talk) 18:38, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see a claim of notability here -Drdisque (talk) 04:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.