Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Eventoff
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 03:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Matt Eventoff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The references do not show the claimed notability. Ref 1 in particular is particularly meaningless. DGG ( talk ) 00:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with haste. NN. Josh Parris 03:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It falls just on the safe side of blatantly spamful, and Gnews does find him frequently quoted in the media. However, lacks significant coverage in secondary sources - being quoted a lot doesn't count, unless you're a professor, which this guy is not. Fails WP:BIO. RayTalk 05:08, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.