Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pentaho
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. SoWhy 13:31, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Pentaho (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Spammy article about apparently non-notable software organization Orange Mike | Talk 16:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 17:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 17:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Was useful to me. -- 128.138.149.172 (talk) 00:29, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 02:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Here is coverage: http://www.internetnews.com/software/article.php/3813671 User:David_Wallace_Croft
- response - One article does not constitute significant coverage. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:17, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 17:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - While article is overly congratulatory, Pentaho's somewhat more than "non-notable". http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/173105/lucideras_bi_tech_finds_new_home_at_pentaho.html Bill Paulson —Preceding undated comment added 18:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC). — billpaulson (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Delete Meets none of the WP:ORG criteria. - 2/0 (cont.) 23:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Found a few good GNews hits: [1] [2] [3] [4] --Cybercobra (talk) 02:08, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.