A100422 Garcia
A100422 Garcia
A100422 Garcia
Uso de sedimentos y suelos (paleosuelos) en rellenos de construcción del sitio arqueológico La Joya,
ABSTRACT
Veracruz, México: evidencias micromorfológicas
1
Posgrado en Ciencias de la Tierra, Instituto ABSTRACT RESUMEN
de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma
de México, 04510, CDMX, Mexico.
In this paper, we study the materials used for En este trabajo, se estudiaron los materiales usados
the construction of earthen structure in the para la construcción de una estructura de tierra en el
2
Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, La Joya archaeological site, on the Gulf of
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, sitio arqueológico de La Joya, en la costa del Golfo de
Mexico coast, built on top of a paleodune, México, construida del Preclásico tardío (400 AC)
04510, CDMX, Mexico. from the Late Preclassic (400 BC) to the Classic
period (AD 100-1000). The first constructions al periodo Clásico (100-1000 DC). Las primeras
3
Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional arise around 100 BC, on a paleodune top construcciones se levantaron alrededor del 100 AC,
Autónoma de México, 04510, CDMX, Mex- rising slightly above the surrounding alluvial sobre la cima de una paleoduna, ligeramente arriba
ico. terraces of the Jamapa river; then it grows into de las terrazas aluviales circundantes del río Jamapa;
a 15-ha monumental compound. The total entonces, el sitio crece hasta adquirir un complejo
* Corresponding author: (E. Solleiro-Rebolledo) construction volume reaches 250,000 m3, all monumental de 15 ha. La construcción total alcanza
solleiro@geologia.unam.mx made of earth, surrounded by large artificial un volumen de 250,000 m3, toda hecha de tierra,
water pounds (reservoirs). To understand the rodeada de grandes pozas artificiales de agua (aljibes).
kind of components found in the structures Para entender el tipo de componentes encontrados en
and their provenance, we compare the micro-
morphological features of the materials from las estructuras y su procedencia, se comparó la micro-
the earthen constructions with the sediments morfología de los materiales de las construcciones de
and paleosols located in the surrounding areas. tierra con los sedimentos y paleosuelos localizados en
Samples were taken from the fills of three first los alrededores. Se tomaron muestras de rellenos de tres
building stages, as well as from a natural soil etapas constructivas, así como de un perfil natural de
profile and the natural paleosol horizons found suelos y de los horizontes de paleosuelos encontrados
beneath the structures. Micromorphological debajo de las estructuras. Las características micro-
features found in fills permit to establish the morfológicas encontradas en los rellenos permiten
the earthen structures were constructed (Laporte attention is given to the gleys developed at the bot-
et al., 2015); the techniques applied for the con- tom of artificial water reservoirs and those present
struction (Khokhlova and Nagler, 2020). in the third building stage of the monumental
In Mexico, first micromorphological works architectural compound of the site of La Joya.
related to archaeological problems appear more The aim of this work is to corroborate the archae-
recently, and particularly applied to cultivated ological interpretation using micromorphological
soils (McClung et al., 2004) and for paleoenvi- analyses of samples from the fills of structures of
ronmental reconstruction (Solleiro-Rebolledo different age, from the reservoir, from the natural
et al., 2006). Though scarce, the application of paleosols buried below the structures and from the
micromorphology to study pre-Hispanic archi- paleodune sediments.
tecture has contributed to the understanding and
identification of the kind of materials used for the
construction. Nevertheless, most of these studies 2. Materials and methods
have been dedicated to stone-faced structures as
in Teotihuacan (Barba et al., 2009; Blancas et al., 2.1. GEOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGICAL CONTEXT
2019), or in the Mixteca Alta, Oaxaca (Finsten et
al., 1996), and relate to stuccos (Straulino et al., The site is on the coastal floodplain of the Gulf of
2013). The application of micromorphology to Mexico, central Veracruz, in a subhumid tropical
the earthen structures is limited. However, there climate Aw2(w), with summer rains averaging 1500
are some works on adobes of the Cholula Pyra- mm per year (García, 1970). It is located at 4.5 m
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a100422
Figure 1 a) Sketch map of La Joya, with the monumental compound (based on the 1937 sketch) surrounded by reservoirs (mapped in
2004). The level curves are drawn every 2 m. Solid black areas indicate remained sectors in 2008. Arrows indicate the water circulation
pattern of the hydraulic system. Solid pentagons indicate the location of the sampling areas: natural soil in La Joya profile 1; Btb
horizon developed on a paleodune sediment; the reservoir (samples R), and the fills (RP and B samples); b) photography of the site with
a view of the North Platform; c) detail of destruction of the site by the extraction of the earth to make bricks.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a100422
2.2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE archaeologically almost sterile loam and sand for
LA JOYA SITE fill. These material extractions are inferred due to
the presence of three large borrow pits forming
La Joya is a monumental earthen architecture site a U-shape contour around the monumental com-
in the central part of the Gulf Coast area of Meso- pound. These borrow pits were then turned into
america (Figure 1b), of the regional culture known artificial water ponds by connecting them from the
as Remojadas, spanning the Late Preclassic (400 southwest to the Jamapa river to a hydraulic system
BC) to the Classic period (AD 100-1000) (Daneels capturing the river overflow and allowing excess
and Guerrero-Baca, 2011). The first constructions water to drain to the north, back into the river
arise around 100 BC, on a paleodune, large and (Figure 1a). The purpose of these reservoirs, here
massive enough to divert the course of the Jamapa as in other sites of the region, was to restrict access
river southward. The paleodune top barely rises to the ceremonial center, forcing visitors to enter
above the surrounding alluvial terraces of the by one side only. During the third stage, between
Jamapa river. Over the centuries, the site grew AD 400 and 700, large amounts of construction
into a 15-ha monumental compound, totaling a fill were used to enlarge the buildings and specially
construction volume of 250,000 m3, all made of to raise the plaza level of the whole complex 2 m
earth, surrounded by large water pounds (Daneels above the surrounding river terrace level. These
2016) (Figure 1). The site has been systematically fills consist of grey sediments sometimes mixed
destroyed in a proportion of 95% by the extraction with sand (the latter referred to as “leopardo” in
of earth to make bricks (Figure 1c), as estimated the Daneels (2005) excavation report, due to the
from the comparison between a 1937 sketch map aspect of the sandy yellow fill spotted with dark
(Escalona, 1937) and a 2004 topographical map, clay blocks). During the fourth building stage (AD
leaving only portions of three buildings with their 700-1000), the construction fills were mainly of
profiles exposed (marked in solid black areas in the loams (some clayey, some sandy), interpreted as
Figure 1a). An archaeological project registered being of probable alluvial origin.
the artificial profiles made by the brickmakers, When the site was abandoned around AD 1000,
Micromorphology of construction fills and soils in La Joya Mexico
defining the architectural sequence of the remain- the buildings started to degrade and the ruins
ing buildings (Daneels, 2005) and their correlation were covered by tropical vegetation, exploited for
at the conserved plaza levels (Daneels, 2008). In slash-and-burn agriculture and, after the Spanish
the following years, large sectors were excavated Conquest, for cattle grazing and brick making (up
of the Pyramid and the North and East Platforms to now) (Daneels, 2005). The fills in the reservoir
to define the function of the buildings and their contain ceramics from different periods, allowing
chronology, both by ceramic association and to date the construction and use of the reservoirs:
radiocarbon dating (Daneels, 2008). This allowed The lowest levels contain Middle Classic sherds
to define that the site was built on top of a paleo- (AD 300-700), intermediate levels contain Late
dune surrounded by alluvial terraces deposited Middle Classic (AD 500-700) and Late Classic
by the Jamapa and Cotaxtla rivers, with 4 main (AD 700-1000) sherds, while the uppermost lev-
construction stages (Daneels and Guerrero-Baca, els (to 50 cm below surface) have Postclassic (AD
2011). In the first (100 BC-AD 200), the North 1000-1500) and modern material (Daneels, 2005).
Platform was made of dark brown loam, rich
in organic matter and ceramic debris of earlier 2.3. COLLECTION OF THE MATERIALS
occupation which was interpreted as topsoil gath-
ered from the site surface to form the fill of the To corroborate the archaeological interpretation
platform. During the second stage, by AD 300, the of the building sequence, we obtained 12 oriented
North Platform was enlarged, and the first stage and unaltered samples from: the fills of the North
of the Pyramid and the East Platform built, using platform (RP1 to RP3 and B3-B4 samples); the
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a100422
3.1. DESCRIPTION OF THE EARTHEN STRUCTURES light brown loam, with very few sherds. Sample B3
PROFILES was taken from the fill of the platform supporting
the so-called audience hall, a building used for spe-
At the North platform (number 2 in Figure 1), the cial assembly purposes (Figure 1a), 120 to 125 cm
fills of the first construction stage were analyzed below modern surface, and 35 cm above the floor
(Figure 2). These fills (samples RP1- RP3) are of the first building stage, at -7.50 m below datum.
below 90 cm of a later construction fill and rest The samples of the third building stage come from
directly on a buried ABb horizon. The three fills the fill of the plaza area to the West of the East
are similar: they have brownish colors, a clayey Platform (labeled 3 in Figure 1a), about 350 m to
silty texture, they are compact and show a suban- the south of the pyramid (labeled 1 in Figure 1a).
gular blocky structure. Differences are observed This fill contains sand mixed with clayey blocks
in the amount of artifacts, being abundant in the of gray sediments, from which B1 and B2 sam-
upper fills (RP1 and RP2) and decreasing in the ples were taken (Figure 3b), 120 to 140 cm below
lower fill (RP3). modern surface, and 80 cm above the plaza floor
Also in the North Platform, we sampled another placed during the second building stage. Sample
building of the first and second construction stages B1 is greyish and clayey, while sample B2 is a yel-
(Figure 3a). The first building fill consists of a dark lowish sand.
sandy loam with abundant charcoal flecks, sherds, At the western edge of the East reservoir (num-
obsidian, and animal bones. Sample B4 was taken ber 5 in Figure 1a), a profile was exposed during
from this layer, at 205 to 210 cm below modern recent land works. The size of the East reservoir is
surface and 40 cm below the floor sealing the first 500x75x2 m, totaling a volume of at least 75,000
Micromorphology of construction fills and soils in La Joya Mexico
Figure 2 Fills from the first construction stage at the North platform.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a100422
m3; presently it is silted in and used as dry sea- is a thin horizontal layer of yellow gray gley, 10
son cattle pasture, holding water only during the cm thick (stratum 4- sample R2), very similar to
summer rains or major river floods. The profile the stratum 5 but with abundant iron concretions.
RESULTS
measures 2.30 m from surface to phreatic level and The stratum 3 (sample R3) is a 55 cm thick-hori-
consists of 6 strata (Figure 4). The one at the bot- zontal layer of light blue gray gley with abundant
tom is a sterile yellow sandy clay layer which corre- iron concretions dispersed in the stratum. We
sponds to a Btb horizon formed from a paleodune observe small sherds of ceramic types dating to
sediment, apparently 30 cm above the phreatic AD 700-1000 as well as daub fragments, possibly
level. Overlying the Btb horizon, a horizontal of burnt roofs. Overlying this layer, a change is
blue-gray layer, 65 cm thick, with some iron oxide clearly observed, as the 40 cm thick-stratum 2 has
concretions is observed (Sample R1). Directly on dark brown colors (sample R4). It has clayey loam
top of this stratum, there are two layers of large texture, with few sherds.
sherds, lying horizontally. The first one contains At the top of the sequence the stratum 1 (sam-
ceramic types dating to AD 100-300, and halfway ple R5) is again a layer of gray gley with large
up, while the second one has smaller sherds of iron oxide concretions, with some sherds of AD
types dating to AD 500-700. Above them, there 100-700 types mixed with modern plastic garbage.
Figure 3 Fills of: a. first and second construction stages, at the North platform; b. third construction stage, at the Plaza area.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a100422
This layer is 30 cm thick but is only present in the structure. The 2Bt horizons (2Btb3 and 2Btgb4)
profile along the shore of the reservoir, disappear- are reddish brown. They have a loamy texture and
ing upslope. The great similarity of this stratum a subangular blocky structure. Thin clay coatings
RESULTS
with the lowest gley horizon (stratum 5) and the and Fe-Mn nodules and mottles are visible with a
field evidence of modern infrastructure work, 10X-lens. The lowermost horizons are brownish
suggest that this layer is the result of the backhoe and yellowish. They are more sandy and less struc-
digging through the profile, heaping the mixed tured. Vertical fractures are observable, which
residues on the side, and compacting them on the enter down the profile, evidencing vertic features.
surface by driving over it. This layer is absent from Ceramic fragments are also seen along the profile,
a reservoir trench dug in 2005 some 200 m to the however, they can be the result of vertical trans-
north (Figure 1a, Daneels, 2005). portation along the vertical fractures, as they are
mainly found along them, sometimes together
3.2. MORPHOLOGY OF THE NATURAL PROFILE with modern materials from the surface, or from
the activities of modern brick workers, active at
The natural profile (La Joya profile 1) is located this level of the profile.
immediately southwards from the profile where Most earthen structures rest on an archaeologi-
the B1 and B2 samples were obtained (Figure 1a) cally sterile layer which corresponds to a yellowish
and has a total depth of 3.40 m (Figure 5), however brown Btb horizon of a buried paleosol, with a
the first 1.70 m corresponds to a soil formed in a subangular blocky structure and clayey loam tex-
sediment, as part of the 2 m fill placed over the ture, presumably formed on a paleodune surface;
surface during the third building stage; it contains in some areas, as in the East and North Platforms,
abundant ceramics from the Middle and initial a humic horizon (ABb horizon), rich in archae-
Late Classic (AD 400 and 700). At 1.90 m, a poly- ological material, is found (Figure 2). It shows a
cyclic paleosol is found. It has Aib, ABib1, 2ABb2, dark brown color, a clayey loam texture and a
2Btb3, 2Btgb4, 2BCb5, 2Cb6 horizons (Figure 5). subangular blocky structure.
The Aib and ABib1 horizons are dark brown with
Micromorphology of construction fills and soils in La Joya Mexico
an angular blocky structure and a loamy texture. 3.3. MICROMORPHOLOGY OF THE FILLS IN THE
The uppermost Aib horizon is thin probably EARTH BUILDINGS
due to natural erosion or because of anthropic
remotion. The 2ABb2 horizon is reddish brown, The fills at the North Platform (RP1 to RP3, first
slightly more clayey; it has a subangular blocky construction stage), contain abundant artifacts:
Figure 4 Materials of the reservoir, showing in the bottom the Btb horizon of the natural surface.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a100422
pieces of ceramic where volcanic components coatings (Figure 7a and 7c). Sample B3 (second
are identified (Figure 6a, RP1); fragments of soils building stage) is massive (Figure 7d).
where oriented clay coatings are visible (Figure 6b, The groundmass is reddish brown, impreg-
RESULTS
RP1) as well as Fe nodules (Figure 6c, RP2). Some nated with iron oxides (Figure 7d) containing
areas present soil fragments that are crushed and reworked clay coatings. High amounts of fine
pressed, consequently they have abrupt boundar- sand are observed (Figure 7d and 7e) composed
ies with the groundmass (Figure 6c). Unweathered mainly by quartz with some content of pyroxenes,
volcanic glass particles are also found (Figure 6d, and plagioclases. There are also rounded dark
RP2). aggregates incorporated in the lighter groundmass
Sample B4, obtained from the North Platform (Figure 7d and 7e) and porous areas where char-
(first stage of construction) has a subangular blocky coal fragments are present (Figure 7f).
structure (Figure 7a) with sand grains, mainly The B1 and B2 samples come from the third
constituted by quartz, plagioclases and pyroxenes building stage fill. The B2 sample has a massive to
(Figure 7a). There are abundant anthropic arti- subangular blocky structure with abundant pores
facts, like obsidian flakes (Figure 7b), ceramics and fractures. The groundmass is sandy (Figure
and charcoal (Figure 7b) as well as reworked clay 8a) with particles averaging 0.14 mm; fine clayey
Figure 5 Natural soil profile (La Joya profile 1) showing the modern soil and the buried polycyclic paleosol.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a100422
material exhibits a granostriated b-fabric (Figure groundmass with planar voids (Figure 9a). Some
8a). The thin section also shows the presence of areas have lighter colors, that together with the
root fragments, charcoal (Figure 8a) and soil frag- presence of Fe-Mn complex nodules (Figure 9a)
RESULTS
ments where clay coatings are clearly observed indicate redoximorphic characteristics.
(Figure 8b, c). The B1 sample is more clayey and The overlying stratum (sample R2) is more
has an angular blocky structure with planar voids clayey, with a subangular blocky structure (Figure
and fissures (Figure 8d), fragmented clay coatings 9b). Abundant planar voids and fissures, together
(Figure 8d), fine sand lenses and small sherd frag- with elongated pores are observed (Figure 9b).
ments. The average size of the sand particles is In this layer, Fe nodules are also detected. Addi-
0.12 mm in diameter. Another common feature tionally, dusty clay coatings are present, which are
is the presence of deformed and impure clay weakly oriented (Figure 9c).
coatings (Figure 8e and 8f). The samples from Sample R3, from the stratum 3, is more sandy
the reservoir have the following features: R1 sam- and poorly structured (Figure 9d). The particles
ple, at the bottom of the reservoir, has a clayey are mostly subrounded and are mainly consti-
Micromorphology of construction fills and soils in La Joya Mexico
Figure 6 Micromorphology of the fills of the first construction stage: a. ceramic fragment where volcanic materials are observed in
RP1, plane-polarized light (PPL); b. illuvial clay coatings from a soil fragment in RP1, cross polarized light (XPL); c. dark soil fragment,
crushed and compacted in RP2 (PPL); rounded Fe concretions are observed in the dark groundmass; d. volcanic glass fragment in a sand
groundmass in RP2 (PPL).
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a100422
tuted by volcanic rock fragments and plagioclases. components include volcanic glass and fragments
Rounded soil aggregates, having thick clay coat- of ceramic. In contrast, the uppermost stratum,
ings, some of them fragmented, are also present sample R5, is highly compact (Figure 9g). The
RESULTS
(Figure 9e). The sample R4, located near the groundmass is composed by reddish clay with few
surface, has also a coarse texture and is less com- biogenic pores, and a high content of iron mottles
pact (Figure 9f). The sand particles are floating with diffuse limits (Figure 9g). The sand mineral
in a silty-clay groundmass (Figure 9f). The coarse particles are subrounded. Although the general
Figure 7 Micromorphology of the fills of the first and second construction stages at North platform. B4 sample: a. subangular blocky
structure (PPL); b. Obsidian flakes and charcoal (PPL); c. Re-worked, fragmented clay coatings in a sandy groundmass (XPL); B3 sample:
d. rounded fragments made up fine sand in a fine sand groundmass with dark spots of Fe-oxides (PPL); e. same as d, (XPL); f. porous
areas with charcoal and Fe oxides nodules (XPL).
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a100422
appearance is clayey and compact, there are areas ture with planar fractures (Figure 10a). The coarse
with coarser textures where fragmented clay coat- particles include rock fragments of andesite,
ings are observed (Figure 9h). plagioclase, pyroxenes, micas, and some amphi-
RESULTS
Figure 8 Micromorphology of the third construction stage. B2 sample: sandy groundmass with a granostriated b-fabric with charcoal
fragments (PPL); b. soil fragments with clay coatings in a sandy groundmass (XPL); B1 sample: c. compact soil fragments in a sandy
groundmass (PPL); d. compact soil aggregates with a subangular blocky structure, with clay coatings; e. compact clayey aggregates with
dirty and deformed clay coatings (PPL); f. same as e, with XPL.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a100422
RESULTS
Micromorphology of construction fills and soils in La Joya Mexico
Figure 9 Micromorphology of the reservoir. a. R1 sample clayey groundmass with planar voids and Fe-Mn complex nodules (PPL); R2
sample: b. subangular blocky structure with planar voids, fissures, and elongated pores (PPL); c. dusty clay coatings, weakly oriented
(PPL); R3 sample: d. sandy and poorly structured groundmass (PPL); e. rounded soil aggregates, having thick clay coatings (PPL); R4
sample: f. coarse texture with subangular mineral grains (PPL); g. sand particles are floating in a silty-clay groundmass (PPL). R5 sample:
h. compact and clayey groundmass, impregnated with Fe; areas with coarser textures where fragmented clay coatings are present (PPL).
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a100422
Figure 10 Micromorphology of the natural paleosols: a. Btb horizon under the earthen constructions, showing a subangular blocky
structure with planar fractures and fragments of andesite (PPL); b. illuvial clay coatings in the Btb horizon (XPL); c. ABb horizon showing
a dark groundmass where fine particles are aligned and deformed (PPL); d. bone and charcoal fragments in the ABb horizon (PPL);
e. angular blocky structure of the ABib1 horizon (PPL); f. two generations of in situ clay coatings of strong birefringence: one with a
reddish color and another with a yellowish color in the 2Btb3 horizon (XPL); g. two generations of clay coatings accompanied by Fe
oxides nodules and accumulations in the 2Btgb4 (PPL); h. altered sand grains with complex and single Fe nodules (PPL); i. plagioclases,
volcanic rock fragments covered by thin clay coatings (PPL).
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a100422
evidencing crushing and compaction of the mate- 2Btb3, 2Btgb4, 2BCb5, 2Cb6) is characterized to
DISCUSSION
rial. In this horizon, we also observed bone and show a reddish-brown color, with a high amount
charcoal fragments (Figure 10d). of sand, but with an evident increase of clay in
The ABib1 horizon of the natural profile exca- the 2ABb2 and in the 2Btb3 and 2Btgb4 horizons
vated in the south of the main pyramid (Figure (García-Zeferino, 2020), contrasting to the domi-
5) shows a dark groundmass where angular blocks nance of sand fraction in the 2Cb6 horizon, what
are clearly defined (Figure 10e). The Bt horizons suggests the clay has been formed by pedogenesis.
in this profile (2Btb3, 2Btgb4) shows two genera- Thin sections support this suggestion as thick in
tions of undisturbed clay coatings of strong bire- situ clay coatings are observed in the Bt horizons
fringence: one with a reddish color and another of the buried paleosol (Figures 10b, 10f and 10g).
with a yellowish color (Figure 10f and 10g). In Even more, in this paleosol, different generations
the 2Btgb4, there are abundant redoximorphic of clay coatings are identified, which are related
features as single Fe nodules, complex Fe nodules to a long time of landscape stability, necessary to
(Figure 10h) and Fe coatings (Figure 10h). The firstly, form the clay from the sand (parent mate-
2Cb6 horizon shows the presence of sand grains rial from the paleodune), secondly to illuviate the
with different degrees of alteration. They consist clay along the profile. Studies of soil formation
of plagioclases, rock fragments, pyroxenes, and on dune sediments indicate a long-time span for
quartz (Figure 10i). The horizon has a granostri- the formation of Bt horizons (Phillips, 2007). The
ated b-fabric with thin clay coatings around the coatings reduce the soil porosity, producing redox-
minerals (Figure 10i). imorphic conditions (Buurman et al., 1998), which
are observed in form of Fe-Mn segregations and
concretions (Figures 10g, 10h and 10i). In con-
4. Discussion trast, the micromorphology of weakly developed
soils on sandy sediments in different parts of the
4.1. NATURAL PALEOPEDOGENESIS IN LA JOYA world show the presence of fresh single grains only
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE impregnated with organic matter or a microstruc-
these horizons show evidence of human use, as horizon, rich in human refuse, was extracted and
DISCUSSION
stability of the construction (Daneels et al., 2018). the earth of the reservoirs (presence of compact
The sample B4, also from the North Platform, has clay, impure and deformed clay coatings, planar
similar characteristics of the Btb and Btgb hori- voids and fissures Figure 9d, 9e), we suggest that
zons: it has a subangular blocky structure, like the the sediment from the reservoir was used during
one observed in the natural horizon (Figure 7a, the third construction stage; this supports the
10a,10e), reworked clay coatings (Figure 7a, 7c) as archaeological observations that some fill mate-
well as reddish areas impregnated with iron oxides rial was extracted from this area.
(Figure 7d). Although the pedofeatures found in the strata
The fill also contains sherds, obsidian, and of the reservoir share similarities with those of
charcoal, which are not associated to the Btb the natural soils, there are transformations due
horizon fragments. Therefore, it is not likely that to the permanent waterlogged conditions of
the inhabitants of the site mixed these materials the reservoir. The oldest strata (samples R1 and
intentionally with the soil. It is probable that the R2) are compact with illuvial clay pedofeatures,
artifacts were unintentionally integrated to the nat- like those observed in the buried Bt horizon,
ural soils, as residues (residential and agricultural however in the case of the reservoir, they seem
trash) of the early occupation period of the site, to be deformed (Figure 9b), not limpid and
that became integrated to the surficial A horizon weakly oriented with diffuse boundaries with the
before the start of the site’s monumental construc- groundmass (Figure 9a, 9b) that probably fit in
tions. This confirms the archaeological inference the concept of flood coatings (Singh et al., 1998;
that when the first building stage began, this A Boixadera et al., 2003). Therefore, it is probable
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a100422
DISCUSSION / CONCLUSIONS
that the source for these strata is the paleosol probable sources from which the material was
affected by the water of the reservoir. The third obtained. The size and form of the particles was
stratum (sample R3) has a coarser texture. The important to evaluate the use of paleodune and
sand grains are surrounded by dusty clay mixed coastal sediments versus the sediments from the
with limpid clay fragments (Figure 9d). Its miner- alluvial terraces. Additionally, it was possible to
alogy (volcanic rock fragments and plagioclases) correlate specific features found in a natural soil
and grain size indicate this material proceeds from buried below the structures and the fills used in
the 2BCb5 and 2Cb6 horizons of the paleosol every construction stage.
(Figure 10h, 10i). In the first construction stage, the features of
The stratum 2 (sample R4) is similar to the R3, the fills coincide with those observed in the natural
but here, the material is mixed with ceramics and soil, particularly to the Btb, Btgb and Ab horizons,
volcanic glass. Particularly concerning the volcanic and even to the sands of the paleodune; while
glass, we have not seen it in the paleosol, but it can the second construction stage included material
be transported by the rivers Jamapa and Cotaxtla, from the natural soil as well as from the alluvial
proceeding from the Pico de Orizaba volcano, sediments.
which had intensive activity during the Holocene Besides these natural sources, anthropic mate-
(Carrasco-Núñez, 2000). In consequence, the rials (charcoal, bones, ceramic) were observed in
results support the previous interpretation derived the fills. Nevertheless, the archaeological evidence
from the archaeological stratigraphic reconstruc- has shown that the artifacts were not intentionally
tion, that these sediments are of fluvial origin added to these early fills. On the contrary, they
(Daneels, 2005). Additionally, the coastal sediments were integrated into the soils as residues of the
of Veracruz are rich in quartz, with some amounts first occupation period of the site. Later, the surfi-
of plagioclases and volcanic lithics (Armstrong-Al- cial organic horizon enriched with this residential
trin et al., 2015). In consequence, these sediments and agriculture trash was used for the construc-
can also be a source for the sandy material found tion. This conclusion is based in the fact the Btb
in the stratum. The uppermost material found in horizon, also employed as building material, lacks
REFERENCES
org/10.1016/S1040-6182(98)90225-7 of Mexico: APT Bulletin 42, 11-18.
Carranza-Edwards, A., Rosales-Hoz, L., 1995, Daneels, A., Love, M., Ávalos-Beltrán, E.,
Grain size trends and provenance of 2018, Control de presión interna de
southwestern Gulf of Mexico beach sands: rellenos en basamentos de la Mesoamérica
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 32, prehispánica, in Neves, C., Salcedo-
2009-2014. https://doi.org/10.1139/ Gutiérrez, Z., Borges-Faria, O. (eds.),
e95-153 Memorias 18 Seminario Iberoamericano
Carrasco-Núñez, G., 2000, Structure and proximal de Arquitectura y Construcción con
stratigraphy of Citlaltépetl volcano (Pico de Tierra: Tierra, Cultura, Habitat Resiliente
Orizaba), Mexico, in Delgado-Granados, y Desarrollo Sostenible: La Antigua,
H., Aguirre-Díaz, G.J., Stock, J.M.,(eds.), Guatemala, USAC-CII/PROTERRA,
Cenozoic tectonics and volcanism of Mexico: 36-45.
USA, Geological Society of America Devos, Y., Wouters, B., Vrydaghs, L., Tys, D.,
Special Paper, 334, 247-262. https://doi. Bellens, T., Schryvers, A., 2013, A soil
org/10.1130/0-8137-2334-5.247 micromorphological study on the origins of
Courty, M.-A., 1991, Soil micromorphology in the early medieval trading centre of Antwerp
archaeology: Proceedings of the British (Belgium): Quaternary International, 315,
Academy, 77, 39-59. 167-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
Courty, M.-A., Goldberg, P., Macphail, R.I., 1989, quaint.2013.07.014
Soils and micromorphology in archaeology: Driese, S.G., Nordt, L.C., Waters, M.R., Keene,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, J.L., 2013, Analysis of site formation history
344p. and potential disturbance of stratigraphic
Da Costa, M.L., Kern D.C., 1999, Geochemical context in vertisols at the Debra L. Friedkin
signatures of tropical soils with Archaeological Site in Central Texas, USA:
archaeological black earth in the Amazon, Geoarchaeology, An International Journal,
REFERENCES
pre-Hispanic Mexican adobe earth bricks org/10.1016/j.quaint.2006.05.003
from Cholula, Mexico: Microchemical Solleiro-Rebolledo, E., Sedov, S., Terhorst, B.,
Journal, 126, 349–358. http://dx.doi. López-Martínez, R., Díaz-Ortega, J., Díaz-
org/10.1016/j.microc.2015.12.033 Hernández, Y., Valera-Fernández, D.,
Phillips, J.D., 2007, Development of texture Cabadas-Báez, H., Tsukamoto, S., 2021,
contrast soils by a combination of Late Quaternary paleosols and landscape
bioturbation and translocation: Catena, evolution in dune systems of Veracruz at
70, 92-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. the Gulf of Mexico coast: Quaternary
catena.2006.08.002 International, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Rivera-Uria, Y., Sedov, S, Solleiro-Rebolledo, quaint.2021.05.016
E., Pérez-Pérez, J., McClung, E., González, Stoops, G., Langohr, R., Van Ranst, E., 2020,
A., Gama-Castro, J., 2007, Degradación Micromorphology of soils and palaeosoils
ambiental en el valle de Teotihuacan: in Belgium. An inventory and meta-
evidencias geológicas y paleopedológicas: analysis: Catena, 194, 104718. https://doi.
Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104718
59, 203-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/ Straulino, L., Sedov, S., Michelet, D., Balanzario,
BSGM2007v59n2a5 S., 2013, Weathering of carbonate
Silva-Mora, L., 2009, Petrographic analysis of materials in ancient Maya constructions
25 samples from La Joya, Municipio de (Río Bec and Dzibanché): Limestone and
Medellín, Veracruz: México, Universidad stucco deterioration patterns: Quaternary
Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto International, 315, 87-100. http://dx.doi.
de Geología, Unpublished Report. org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.06.019
Singh, L.P., Parkash, B., Singhvi, A.K., 1998, Sulas, F., Kristiansen, S.M., Wynne-Jones, S.,
Evolution of the Lower Gangetic Plain 2019, Soil geochemistry, phytoliths and
landforms and soils in West Bengal, artefacts from an early Swahili daub