Aviation Training Policy: Key Components of Effective Aviation Training Policy

1. Why Aviation Training Policy Matters?

aviation training policy is a crucial factor that influences the quality, safety, and efficiency of the aviation industry. It encompasses the principles, guidelines, and standards that govern how aviation personnel are trained, assessed, and certified to perform their roles and responsibilities. Aviation training policy affects not only the individual performance of pilots, air traffic controllers, engineers, and other aviation professionals, but also the collective performance of the aviation system as a whole. Therefore, it is essential to understand the key components of effective aviation training policy and how they can be implemented and evaluated to achieve the desired outcomes.

Some of the key components of effective aviation training policy are:

1. Alignment with the aviation system goals and objectives. Aviation training policy should be aligned with the overall goals and objectives of the aviation system, such as enhancing safety, security, efficiency, sustainability, and innovation. Aviation training policy should also reflect the needs and expectations of the aviation stakeholders, such as regulators, operators, customers, and the public. For example, aviation training policy should ensure that aviation personnel are trained to comply with the relevant regulations and standards, as well as to meet the operational and service requirements of the aviation industry.

2. Adaptability to the changing aviation environment. Aviation training policy should be adaptable to the changing aviation environment, such as the emergence of new technologies, the evolution of operational procedures, the diversification of customer demands, and the occurrence of unforeseen events. Aviation training policy should enable aviation personnel to acquire the necessary knowledge, skills, and attitudes to cope with the dynamic and complex aviation situations. For example, aviation training policy should incorporate the use of advanced simulation, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence to enhance the realism, interactivity, and feedback of aviation training.

3. accountability for the aviation training outcomes. Aviation training policy should establish clear and measurable criteria and indicators for evaluating the aviation training outcomes, such as the competence, performance, and satisfaction of aviation personnel. Aviation training policy should also assign roles and responsibilities for monitoring, reviewing, and improving the aviation training process and results. For example, aviation training policy should involve the participation and collaboration of the aviation trainers, trainees, managers, and regulators to ensure the quality and effectiveness of aviation training.

2. Goals, Objectives, and Principles

A well-designed aviation training policy is essential for ensuring the safety, efficiency, and sustainability of the aviation industry. It guides the development, implementation, and evaluation of aviation training programs and activities across various domains and levels. To achieve this, an aviation training policy needs to be based on a clear and coherent framework that defines its goals, objectives, and principles. These elements provide the direction, purpose, and values of the policy, as well as the criteria for measuring its effectiveness and impact.

The framework of an aviation training policy can be articulated as follows:

- Goals: These are the broad and long-term outcomes that the policy aims to achieve. They reflect the vision and mission of the aviation industry and its stakeholders, as well as the global and regional trends and challenges that affect it. For example, some possible goals of an aviation training policy are:

1. To enhance the quality and relevance of aviation training in accordance with the international standards and best practices.

2. To foster a culture of continuous learning and improvement among aviation personnel and organizations.

3. To promote the development and recognition of aviation competencies and qualifications across the industry.

4. To facilitate the mobility and employability of aviation professionals within and across regions.

5. To support the innovation and diversification of aviation training methods and modalities.

- Objectives: These are the specific and measurable results that the policy intends to accomplish within a defined timeframe. They derive from the goals and specify the expected outputs and outcomes of the policy. They also indicate the target groups and beneficiaries of the policy, as well as the indicators and methods for monitoring and evaluating its progress and performance. For example, some possible objectives of an aviation training policy are:

1. To establish a comprehensive and coherent aviation training system that covers all domains and levels of aviation training, from initial to recurrent, from basic to advanced, and from operational to managerial.

2. To develop and implement a competency-based approach to aviation training that defines the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required for each aviation function and role, and aligns them with the relevant qualifications and certifications.

3. To enhance the capacity and quality of aviation training providers and instructors, and ensure their accreditation and certification by the competent authorities and bodies.

4. To create and maintain a database and a network of aviation training resources and opportunities, and facilitate their access and exchange among aviation personnel and organizations.

5. To encourage and support the participation and collaboration of all stakeholders in the design, delivery, and evaluation of aviation training programs and activities.

- Principles: These are the fundamental and ethical values and norms that underpin the policy and guide its implementation and operation. They reflect the principles of the aviation industry and its stakeholders, as well as the principles of good governance and policy-making. They also serve as the basis for resolving any conflicts or dilemmas that may arise in the course of the policy execution. For example, some possible principles of an aviation training policy are:

1. Safety: The policy prioritizes the safety of the aviation operations and personnel, and ensures that the aviation training programs and activities comply with the safety regulations and standards.

2. Quality: The policy strives for excellence and consistency in the aviation training programs and activities, and ensures that they meet the needs and expectations of the aviation industry and its stakeholders.

3. Relevance: The policy responds to the current and emerging demands and challenges of the aviation industry and its environment, and ensures that the aviation training programs and activities are aligned with the strategic goals and objectives of the industry.

4. Equity: The policy ensures equal access and opportunity for all aviation personnel and organizations to participate and benefit from the aviation training programs and activities, regardless of their background, status, or location.

5. Transparency: The policy ensures openness and accountability in the aviation training programs and activities, and provides clear and timely information and feedback to the aviation personnel and organizations, as well as to the public and other stakeholders.

3. Curriculum, Assessment, and Certification

Here is a possible segment that meets your requirements:

One of the main challenges in aviation training is to design and implement a policy that ensures the quality, consistency, and relevance of the training programs for the aviation personnel. A well-defined aviation training policy should address three essential components: curriculum, assessment, and certification. These components are interrelated and mutually reinforcing, and they aim to achieve the following objectives:

- Curriculum: The curriculum is the set of learning outcomes, content, methods, and resources that guide the delivery of the training program. The curriculum should be aligned with the needs and expectations of the aviation industry, the regulatory authorities, and the learners. The curriculum should also be flexible and adaptable to accommodate the changes and innovations in the aviation sector. The curriculum should be based on sound pedagogical principles and best practices, and it should incorporate feedback and evaluation mechanisms to ensure its effectiveness and improvement.

- Assessment: The assessment is the process of measuring and verifying the achievement of the learning outcomes by the learners. The assessment should be valid, reliable, fair, and transparent, and it should provide timely and constructive feedback to the learners and the instructors. The assessment should also be aligned with the curriculum and the certification standards, and it should use a variety of methods and tools to capture the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of the learners. The assessment should be conducted by qualified and competent assessors, and it should follow ethical and professional guidelines.

- Certification: The certification is the formal recognition of the completion and attainment of the training program by the learners. The certification should be based on the assessment results and the fulfillment of the eligibility criteria. The certification should also be recognized and accepted by the aviation industry, the regulatory authorities, and the relevant stakeholders. The certification should be issued by authorized and accredited bodies, and it should be maintained and updated through continuous professional development and recertification processes.

An example of how these components are applied in practice is the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) TRAINAIR PLUS Program, which is a global network of training organizations that adhere to the ICAO standards and guidelines for aviation training. The TRAINAIR PLUS Program provides a framework and a methodology for developing and delivering quality aviation training courses, using the following steps:

1. Conduct a training needs analysis to identify the gaps and the requirements for the training course.

2. Design the training course using the ICAO competency-based training methodology, which defines the learning outcomes, the content, the methods, and the resources for the course.

3. Develop the training course materials, such as the instructor guide, the learner guide, the presentations, the exercises, and the assessments, using the ICAO standardized training packages format and template.

4. Validate the training course by conducting a pilot course with a representative sample of learners and instructors, and collecting feedback and data to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of the course.

5. Implement the training course by delivering it to the target audience, using qualified and certified instructors and appropriate facilities and equipment.

6. Evaluate the training course by measuring and analyzing the results and the impact of the course, using quantitative and qualitative methods and indicators.

7. Update the training course by incorporating the feedback and the lessons learned from the evaluation, and making the necessary revisions and improvements to the course.

By following these steps, the TRAINAIR PLUS Program ensures that the aviation training courses are consistent with the three components of the aviation training policy: curriculum, assessment, and certification.

4. Roles, Responsibilities, and Resources

One of the most crucial aspects of developing and maintaining an effective aviation training policy is ensuring its proper implementation. This involves assigning clear roles and responsibilities to various stakeholders, allocating adequate resources, and monitoring and evaluating the outcomes. In this section, we will discuss some of the key elements of aviation training policy implementation and provide some examples of best practices from different contexts.

- Roles and responsibilities: Depending on the scope and nature of the aviation training policy, different actors may have different roles and responsibilities in its implementation. These may include:

- Policy makers: They are responsible for setting the vision, goals, and objectives of the aviation training policy, as well as the legal and regulatory framework that supports it. They also need to communicate and coordinate with other relevant authorities and agencies, such as civil aviation, education, labor, and security.

- aviation training providers: They are responsible for designing, delivering, and assessing the aviation training programs that comply with the policy standards and requirements. They also need to ensure the quality and relevance of the training content, methods, and instructors, as well as the safety and security of the training facilities and equipment.

- Aviation personnel: They are responsible for participating in the aviation training programs that are relevant to their roles and functions, as well as maintaining and updating their skills and competencies. They also need to adhere to the professional and ethical standards of the aviation industry and follow the rules and regulations of the aviation authorities.

- Aviation employers: They are responsible for providing opportunities and support for their employees to access and complete the aviation training programs that are required for their jobs. They also need to ensure that their workforce is qualified, competent, and diverse, as well as provide feedback and incentives for their performance and development.

- Aviation customers: They are responsible for choosing and using the aviation services that meet their needs and expectations, as well as providing feedback and complaints when necessary. They also need to respect and cooperate with the aviation personnel and authorities, and follow the safety and security procedures of the aviation industry.

- Resources: implementing an aviation training policy requires adequate and sustainable resources, both human and financial. These may include:

- Human resources: They include the aviation training instructors, managers, coordinators, evaluators, and other staff who are involved in the implementation of the aviation training policy. They need to have the appropriate qualifications, skills, and experience, as well as receive regular training and development opportunities. They also need to be motivated, engaged, and recognized for their work and contributions.

- Financial resources: They include the funds that are allocated and spent for the implementation of the aviation training policy. They need to be sufficient, transparent, and accountable, as well as aligned with the policy priorities and objectives. They also need to be diversified, flexible, and efficient, as well as leverage the potential of public-private partnerships and other sources of funding.

- Monitoring and evaluation: Implementing an aviation training policy requires regular and systematic monitoring and evaluation of the processes and outcomes. This involves collecting and analyzing relevant data and information, as well as reporting and disseminating the results and recommendations. The main purposes of monitoring and evaluation are to:

- Measure the progress and performance of the aviation training policy implementation against the predefined indicators and targets, as well as identify the strengths and weaknesses, successes and challenges, and gaps and opportunities.

- Ensure the quality and effectiveness of the aviation training policy implementation, as well as the compliance and consistency with the policy standards and requirements, and the satisfaction and feedback of the stakeholders.

- Support the learning and improvement of the aviation training policy implementation, as well as the innovation and adaptation to the changing needs and demands of the aviation industry and society.

Some examples of monitoring and evaluation tools and methods that can be used for aviation training policy implementation are:

- Surveys and questionnaires: They can be used to collect quantitative and qualitative data and information from various stakeholders, such as aviation training providers, personnel, employers, and customers, on their perceptions, opinions, and experiences of the aviation training policy implementation.

- Interviews and focus groups: They can be used to collect in-depth and detailed data and information from selected stakeholders, such as policy makers, aviation training managers, and instructors, on their insights, perspectives, and challenges of the aviation training policy implementation.

- Observations and assessments: They can be used to collect direct and objective data and information from the aviation training programs, facilities, and equipment, on their quality, relevance, and safety of the aviation training policy implementation.

- Documents and reports: They can be used to collect secondary and existing data and information from various sources, such as aviation authorities, agencies, and organizations, on their policies, regulations, and statistics of the aviation training policy implementation.

5. Methods, Indicators, and Feedback

One of the essential aspects of any aviation training policy is how it is evaluated for its effectiveness, efficiency, and relevance. Evaluation is the process of collecting and analyzing data to measure the performance and impact of the policy and its implementation. evaluation can also provide feedback to the policy makers and stakeholders, enabling them to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the policy, and to make adjustments or improvements as needed. Evaluation can be conducted at different levels, such as individual, organizational, or system-wide, and can use various methods and indicators, depending on the purpose and scope of the evaluation. Some of the common methods and indicators for aviation training policy evaluation are:

- 1. Surveys and questionnaires: These are instruments that collect data from the target population, such as trainees, instructors, managers, or customers, using standardized or customized questions. Surveys and questionnaires can be administered online, by phone, by mail, or in person, and can measure aspects such as satisfaction, attitudes, opinions, perceptions, knowledge, skills, or behaviors. Surveys and questionnaires can provide quantitative or qualitative data, depending on the type and format of the questions. For example, a survey can ask trainees to rate their satisfaction with the training program on a scale of 1 to 5, or to provide open-ended feedback on what they liked or disliked about the program.

- 2. Tests and assessments: These are instruments that measure the learning outcomes or competencies of the trainees, such as knowledge, skills, abilities, or attitudes, using objective or subjective criteria. Tests and assessments can be administered before, during, or after the training, and can be written, oral, practical, or simulated. Tests and assessments can provide quantitative or qualitative data, depending on the scoring and grading methods. For example, a test can measure the trainees' knowledge of aviation regulations by asking them to answer multiple-choice questions, or an assessment can measure their flying skills by observing them in a flight simulator.

- 3. Interviews and focus groups: These are methods that collect data from a sample of the target population, such as trainees, instructors, managers, or customers, using structured, semi-structured, or unstructured questions. Interviews and focus groups can be conducted face-to-face, by phone, or online, and can elicit in-depth information, insights, experiences, or perspectives from the participants. Interviews and focus groups can provide qualitative data, which can be analyzed using thematic, content, or discourse analysis. For example, an interview can ask instructors to share their views on the strengths and weaknesses of the training policy, or a focus group can ask customers to discuss their expectations and satisfaction with the service quality of the aviation company.

- 4. Observations and audits: These are methods that collect data from the actual or simulated situations, environments, or processes related to the training policy, such as classrooms, workplaces, or flights, using direct or indirect observation, recording, or auditing techniques. Observations and audits can be conducted by external or internal evaluators, and can capture the behaviors, interactions, conditions, or outcomes of the training policy and its implementation. Observations and audits can provide quantitative or qualitative data, depending on the type and level of detail of the observation or audit. For example, an observation can record the number and duration of training sessions, the attendance and participation of trainees, or the use of instructional materials and equipment, or an audit can check the compliance of the training policy with the regulatory standards and requirements.

6. Barriers, Gaps, and Opportunities

The development and implementation of effective aviation training policy is not without its challenges. There are various barriers, gaps, and opportunities that need to be addressed and explored in order to ensure that the aviation industry can meet the current and future demands of safety, security, efficiency, and sustainability. Some of the key challenges that aviation training policy faces are:

- The lack of harmonization and standardization of aviation training across regions and countries. Different aviation authorities and organizations may have different requirements, regulations, and guidelines for aviation training, which can create confusion, inconsistency, and inefficiency in the delivery and recognition of aviation training. For example, a pilot who is trained and certified in one country may not be able to operate in another country without undergoing additional training or assessment. This can limit the mobility and flexibility of aviation personnel and increase the costs and time of aviation training.

- The rapid changes and innovations in aviation technology and operations. Aviation is a dynamic and evolving industry that constantly introduces new technologies, systems, and procedures to improve performance and safety. However, this also poses a challenge for aviation training policy, which needs to keep pace with the changes and ensure that aviation personnel are adequately trained and competent to use and adapt to the new technologies and operations. For example, the introduction of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) or drones has created new opportunities and risks for aviation, which require new skills and knowledge for UAS operators and other aviation stakeholders.

- The diversity and complexity of aviation stakeholders and their needs. Aviation is a multi-faceted and inter-connected industry that involves a wide range of stakeholders, such as airlines, airports, air navigation service providers, regulators, manufacturers, educators, researchers, and passengers. Each stakeholder has different roles, responsibilities, interests, and expectations for aviation training, which can create conflicts, gaps, and overlaps in aviation training policy. For example, airlines may prioritize the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of aviation training, while regulators may emphasize the safety and quality of aviation training.

- The shortage and retention of qualified and experienced aviation personnel. Aviation is a highly specialized and demanding industry that requires a high level of skill, knowledge, and experience for aviation personnel. However, there is a growing shortage and retention problem of qualified and experienced aviation personnel, especially in some regions and sectors of aviation, such as pilots, air traffic controllers, and maintenance technicians. This can affect the quality and safety of aviation operations and services, as well as the sustainability and growth of the aviation industry. Some of the factors that contribute to the shortage and retention problem are the aging workforce, the high costs and barriers of entry to aviation training, the lack of career development and progression opportunities, and the competition from other industries.

These challenges present both difficulties and opportunities for aviation training policy. On one hand, they require aviation training policy to be more adaptive, responsive, and collaborative, and to address the needs and expectations of various aviation stakeholders. On the other hand, they also provide opportunities for aviation training policy to leverage the potential and benefits of new technologies, methods, and partnerships, and to enhance the quality and effectiveness of aviation training. Therefore, aviation training policy needs to adopt a holistic, strategic, and innovative approach that can overcome the barriers, fill the gaps, and seize the opportunities that the aviation industry faces.

I've been an entrepreneur and venture capitalist in the cryptocurrency industry for a long time, working with numerous projects.

Brock Pierce

7. Examples, Lessons, and Recommendations

An effective aviation training policy is not only a set of rules and regulations, but also a reflection of the best practices that have been developed and implemented by various stakeholders in the aviation industry. These best practices are based on the experiences, lessons, and recommendations of experts, practitioners, and researchers who have contributed to the advancement of aviation training and education. In this section, we will explore some of the best practices that can guide the design, delivery, and evaluation of aviation training policy, as well as the benefits and challenges of adopting them.

Some of the best practices that can be considered for aviation training policy are:

1. Aligning training objectives with organizational goals and needs. This means that the training policy should clearly define the purpose, scope, and expected outcomes of the training, as well as how they relate to the strategic vision and mission of the organization. For example, a training policy for an airline company should specify how the training will enhance the safety, efficiency, and customer satisfaction of its operations. By aligning training objectives with organizational goals and needs, the training policy can ensure the relevance, effectiveness, and sustainability of the training program.

2. Involving stakeholders in the development and implementation of the training policy. This means that the training policy should be based on the input and feedback of the various stakeholders who are affected by or involved in the training, such as managers, instructors, trainees, customers, regulators, and partners. For example, a training policy for a civil aviation authority should involve the representatives of the aviation operators, service providers, and associations in the policy formulation and review process. By involving stakeholders in the training policy, the training policy can ensure the buy-in, ownership, and accountability of the training program.

3. Adopting a competency-based and learner-centered approach to training. This means that the training policy should focus on the development and assessment of the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that are required for the performance of the job or role, rather than on the completion of the course or program. It also means that the training policy should consider the needs, preferences, and characteristics of the learners, such as their prior knowledge, learning styles, motivation, and feedback. For example, a training policy for a flight crew should specify the competencies that are expected from the pilots and cabin crew, as well as the methods and criteria for measuring their achievement. It should also provide the learners with the flexibility, support, and guidance to achieve their learning goals. By adopting a competency-based and learner-centered approach to training, the training policy can ensure the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of the training program.

4. Integrating theory and practice in the training content and methods. This means that the training policy should balance the provision of theoretical knowledge and practical skills in the training, as well as the use of various training methods and media, such as classroom instruction, simulation, e-learning, and on-the-job training. For example, a training policy for an air traffic controller should include both the theoretical aspects of air traffic management and the practical aspects of air traffic control, as well as the use of different training scenarios, tools, and environments. By integrating theory and practice in the training, the training policy can ensure the comprehensiveness, applicability, and transferability of the training program.

5. Evaluating the impact and outcomes of the training. This means that the training policy should establish a systematic and continuous process of collecting, analyzing, and reporting the data and information that are related to the inputs, processes, outputs, and outcomes of the training, such as the resources, activities, results, and impacts. For example, a training policy for an aviation maintenance technician should include the indicators and measures of the effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction of the training, as well as the impact of the training on the performance, safety, and quality of the maintenance work. By evaluating the impact and outcomes of the training, the training policy can ensure the improvement, innovation, and accountability of the training program.

These best practices are not exhaustive, nor are they mutually exclusive. They can be adapted, combined, and customized according to the specific context and needs of the organization and the training program. However, they can serve as a useful reference and benchmark for developing and implementing a robust and responsive aviation training policy that can meet the current and future challenges and opportunities of the aviation industry.

Do you want to improve your marketing strategies?

FasterCapital's team studies your growth objectives and improves your marketing strategies to gain more customers and increase brand awareness

Join us!

8. Trends, Innovations, and Implications

As the aviation industry evolves, so does the need for effective aviation training policy that can address the current and future challenges and opportunities. Aviation training policy is not a static document, but a dynamic and adaptive process that requires constant monitoring, evaluation, and revision. In this section, we will explore some of the trends, innovations, and implications that will shape the aviation training policy in the coming years. Some of the key aspects that we will discuss are:

- The impact of digital transformation and automation on aviation training. Digital technologies such as artificial intelligence, big data, cloud computing, and blockchain are transforming the aviation industry and creating new possibilities and demands for aviation training. For example, AI can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of aviation training by providing personalized and adaptive learning, feedback, and assessment. Automation can also reduce the workload and increase the safety of aviation operations, but it also poses new challenges for human-machine interaction and trust. Aviation training policy needs to consider how to leverage the benefits of digital transformation and automation, while also ensuring the competence and resilience of the human factor.

- The need for competency-based and outcome-oriented aviation training. Competency-based training (CBT) is an approach that focuses on the acquisition and demonstration of specific knowledge, skills, and attitudes that are required for performing a task or a role. Outcome-oriented training (OOT) is an approach that defines the expected results or outcomes of the training, and measures the achievement of those outcomes. Both CBT and OOT are aligned with the principles of adult learning and the standards of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Aviation training policy needs to adopt and implement CBT and OOT as the main frameworks for designing, delivering, and evaluating aviation training programs.

- The role of innovation and collaboration in aviation training. innovation and collaboration are essential for advancing the quality and effectiveness of aviation training. Innovation refers to the introduction of new or improved methods, products, or services that can enhance the aviation training process or outcomes. Collaboration refers to the cooperation and coordination among different stakeholders, such as regulators, operators, educators, researchers, and learners, that can foster the exchange of information, resources, and best practices. Aviation training policy needs to encourage and support innovation and collaboration in aviation training, by creating a conducive environment, providing incentives and recognition, and facilitating communication and networking.

Raising capital is challenging. We can help!

FasterCapital's team works on matching you with the right funding sources and presents your startup to them through warm introductions

Join us!

9. Summary, Key Takeaways, and Call to Action

In this article, we have explored the key components of effective aviation training policy, which are essential for ensuring the safety, quality, and efficiency of the aviation industry. We have discussed how aviation training policy should be aligned with the strategic goals and objectives of the organization, the regulatory requirements and standards, and the needs and expectations of the stakeholders. We have also examined how aviation training policy should be designed, implemented, evaluated, and revised in a systematic and continuous manner, using evidence-based methods and best practices. Furthermore, we have highlighted some of the benefits and challenges of developing and maintaining a robust aviation training policy, as well as some of the recommendations and tips for overcoming the potential barriers and pitfalls.

To conclude, we would like to emphasize the following key takeaways and call to action for the readers:

- Aviation training policy is not a one-time event, but a dynamic and ongoing process that requires constant monitoring, review, and improvement.

- Aviation training policy should be based on a clear vision, mission, and values, as well as a comprehensive analysis of the internal and external environment, the gaps and opportunities, and the risks and uncertainties.

- Aviation training policy should be flexible and adaptable, allowing for adjustments and modifications in response to the changing needs and demands of the aviation industry and the learning environment.

- Aviation training policy should be collaborative and participatory, involving the input and feedback of all the relevant stakeholders, such as the management, the instructors, the learners, the customers, the regulators, and the partners.

- Aviation training policy should be transparent and accountable, ensuring that the roles and responsibilities, the processes and procedures, the outcomes and impacts, and the costs and benefits are clearly defined and communicated to all the parties involved.

- Aviation training policy should be supported by adequate resources, such as human, financial, technological, and infrastructural resources, as well as by a strong organizational culture, leadership, and commitment.

We hope that this article has provided you with valuable insights and guidance on how to develop and implement effective aviation training policy for your organization. We encourage you to take action and apply the principles and practices that we have shared with you, and to share your experiences and results with us and other readers. We believe that by working together, we can create a more safe, reliable, and competitive aviation industry for the present and the future. Thank you for reading and happy flying!

If you want to be an entrepreneur, it's not a job, it's a lifestyle. It defines you. Forget about vacations, about going home at 6 pm - last thing at night you'll send emails, first thing in the morning you'll read emails, and you'll wake up in the middle of the night. But it's hugely rewarding as you're fulfilling something for yourself.

Niklas Zennstrom