A budget cycle is the process of planning, preparing, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating a budget for a specific period of time, usually a year. A budget is a financial plan that shows how an organization intends to allocate its resources to achieve its goals and objectives. A budget cycle is important for organizations because it helps them to:
- Align their activities with their mission and vision
- Communicate their priorities and expectations to their stakeholders
- Coordinate and control their operations and performance
- Evaluate their results and identify areas for improvement
- adapt to changing circumstances and opportunities
The budget cycle consists of several stages that vary depending on the type and size of the organization, but generally include the following:
1. Budget preparation: This is the stage where the organization defines its strategic goals and objectives, identifies its sources of income and expenditure, and estimates its revenues and costs for the upcoming period. The budget preparation involves collecting and analyzing data, forecasting future trends, and setting targets and indicators. The budget preparation may also involve consultation and negotiation with different departments, units, or external parties, such as donors, partners, or regulators.
2. Budget approval: This is the stage where the organization submits its proposed budget to the relevant authority or body for review and approval. The budget approval may involve scrutiny, discussion, and modification of the budget proposal, depending on the level of authority and autonomy of the organization. The budget approval may also require compliance with certain rules, standards, or procedures, such as legal, accounting, or auditing requirements.
3. Budget implementation: This is the stage where the organization executes its budget according to the approved plan. The budget implementation involves allocating and disbursing funds, managing cash flow, and recording and reporting transactions. The budget implementation may also involve adjusting the budget to cope with unforeseen events, such as emergencies, crises, or opportunities.
4. Budget monitoring: This is the stage where the organization tracks and measures its progress and performance against the budget plan. The budget monitoring involves collecting and analyzing data, comparing actual results with expected results, and identifying and explaining variances. The budget monitoring may also involve feedback and communication with different stakeholders, such as managers, staff, or beneficiaries.
5. Budget evaluation: This is the stage where the organization assesses and evaluates the outcomes and impacts of its budget. The budget evaluation involves reviewing and reporting the achievements and challenges of the budget, as well as the lessons learned and best practices. The budget evaluation may also involve recommendations and suggestions for improvement and innovation.
Some examples of how different organizations use the budget cycle are:
- A non-governmental organization (NGO) that works on humanitarian and development projects may use the budget cycle to plan and implement its programs, report and account for its funds, and demonstrate its impact and accountability to its donors and beneficiaries.
- A small business that sells products or services may use the budget cycle to plan and manage its sales, expenses, and profits, and to monitor and evaluate its market position and competitiveness.
- A government agency that provides public services may use the budget cycle to allocate and distribute its resources, coordinate and control its activities, and measure and improve its efficiency and effectiveness.
What is a budget cycle and why is it important for organizations - Budget cycle: what are the stages and best practices of the budgeting process
Planning: How to set budget goals, objectives, and assumptions based on strategic priorities and external factors?
1. Strategic Alignment: When setting budget goals and objectives, it is essential to align them with the organization's strategic priorities. This ensures that financial resources are allocated in a manner that supports the overall vision and mission. For example, if the strategic priority is to expand into new markets, the budget goals may include allocating funds for market research, product development, and marketing campaigns.
2. External Factors: External factors such as economic conditions, industry trends, and regulatory changes play a significant role in budget planning. Organizations need to consider these factors to make informed assumptions about revenue projections, cost estimates, and resource allocation. For instance, if the industry is experiencing a downturn, budget goals may focus on cost reduction and efficiency improvements.
3. Data Analysis: To set realistic budget goals, organizations should analyze historical data, market research, and financial forecasts. This analysis helps in identifying trends, patterns, and potential risks that can impact budget planning. By leveraging data-driven insights, organizations can make informed decisions and set achievable objectives.
4. Prioritization: Budget planning involves making choices and prioritizing initiatives based on their strategic importance and expected impact. A numbered list can be used to prioritize budget goals and objectives, providing a clear hierarchy of focus areas. For example:
A. Invest in research and development to drive innovation and product differentiation.
B. Allocate resources for employee training and development to enhance skills and productivity.
C. enhance customer experience through investments in technology and customer support.
D. Optimize operational efficiency by streamlining processes and reducing waste.
5. Scenario Analysis: Budget planning should also consider different scenarios and potential outcomes. By conducting scenario analysis, organizations can assess the impact of various factors on budget goals and make contingency plans. For instance, if there is a sudden increase in raw material prices, the budget may need to be adjusted to accommodate the additional costs.
6. Communication and Collaboration: Effective budget planning requires collaboration between different departments and stakeholders. By involving key individuals in the process, organizations can gather diverse perspectives and ensure buy-in for the budget goals and assumptions. Regular communication and feedback loops help in refining the budget plan and addressing any concerns or challenges.
Setting budget goals, objectives, and assumptions based on strategic priorities and external factors is a critical aspect of the budgeting process. By aligning these elements, analyzing data, prioritizing initiatives, and considering different scenarios, organizations can create a robust budget plan that supports their strategic objectives. Remember, each organization's budgeting process may vary based on its unique circumstances and goals.
How to set budget goals, objectives, and assumptions based on strategic priorities and external factors - Budget cycle: what are the stages and best practices of the budgeting process
The approval stage of the budget cycle is a crucial step that determines whether the budget proposals are accepted, rejected, or modified by the relevant stakeholders and authorities. The approval process may vary depending on the type, size, and complexity of the organization, but it usually involves presenting the budget proposals to the senior management, board of directors, shareholders, or external regulators for their review and feedback. The approval stage may also require negotiating with different parties, resolving conflicts, and making adjustments to the budget proposals based on the feedback received. The approval stage may take several rounds of revisions and discussions before the final budget is approved and authorized. In this section, we will discuss some of the best practices and tips for presenting, reviewing, and approving the budget proposals effectively and efficiently.
Some of the best practices and tips for the approval stage are:
1. Prepare a clear and concise presentation of the budget proposals. The presentation should highlight the main objectives, assumptions, and results of the budget proposals, as well as the key challenges, risks, and opportunities. The presentation should also include relevant charts, graphs, tables, and other visual aids to illustrate the budget proposals and support the arguments. The presentation should be tailored to the audience and their level of understanding and interest in the budget proposals. For example, the senior management may be more interested in the strategic and financial aspects of the budget proposals, while the board of directors may be more concerned about the governance and compliance issues. The presentation should also anticipate and address the potential questions and objections that the audience may have.
2. Engage the audience and solicit their feedback. The presentation should not be a one-way communication, but rather a dialogue and a collaboration with the audience. The presenter should invite the audience to ask questions, share their opinions, and provide their suggestions and recommendations. The presenter should also listen actively and respectfully to the feedback and respond accordingly. The presenter should acknowledge the positive feedback and appreciate the constructive criticism. The presenter should also be open to different perspectives and viewpoints and try to understand the rationale and motivations behind them. The presenter should also be prepared to defend and justify the budget proposals with evidence and logic, as well as to compromise and negotiate when necessary.
3. Follow up and document the approval process. The presentation should not be the end of the approval process, but rather the beginning of a continuous and iterative process. The presenter should follow up with the audience and keep them updated on the progress and status of the budget proposals. The presenter should also document the feedback, comments, and decisions made during the approval process and incorporate them into the budget proposals. The presenter should also communicate and coordinate with the other stakeholders and departments involved in the budget cycle and ensure that the budget proposals are aligned and consistent with the overall organizational goals and strategies. The presenter should also seek the formal and final approval and authorization of the budget proposals from the appropriate authorities and obtain the necessary signatures and documents.
Execution is the stage of the budget cycle where the approved budget is put into action and the actual revenues and expenditures are recorded and tracked. This stage involves various tasks and responsibilities for different stakeholders, such as budget managers, accountants, auditors, and oversight bodies. The main objectives of this stage are to ensure that the budget is implemented in accordance with the approved plan, to monitor the progress and performance of the budget activities, and to control and adjust the budget as needed to respond to changing circumstances. In this section, we will discuss some of the best practices and challenges of the execution stage from different perspectives, and provide some examples of how to execute the budget effectively and efficiently.
Some of the best practices and challenges of the execution stage are:
1. Budget allocation and distribution. This involves dividing the approved budget into smaller units and assigning them to different departments, programs, or projects. The budget allocation should be based on the strategic priorities and objectives of the organization, and should reflect the expected costs and benefits of each unit. The budget distribution should be timely, transparent, and consistent, and should allow for some flexibility and discretion for the budget managers. A challenge of this task is to balance the trade-offs between centralization and decentralization, and between stability and responsiveness, of the budget allocation and distribution process.
2. Budget execution reporting and monitoring. This involves collecting, analyzing, and reporting the actual revenues and expenditures of the budget units, and comparing them with the planned budget. The budget execution reporting and monitoring should provide accurate, reliable, and timely information on the financial and operational performance of the budget activities, and should identify any deviations, problems, or risks that may affect the budget outcomes. A challenge of this task is to ensure the quality and consistency of the data and the reporting standards, and to avoid information overload or gaps.
3. Budget control and adjustment. This involves reviewing and evaluating the budget execution reports and monitoring results, and taking corrective actions or making adjustments to the budget as necessary. The budget control and adjustment should aim to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the budget activities, and to ensure the alignment of the budget with the strategic goals and the changing environment. A challenge of this task is to maintain the credibility and legitimacy of the budget, and to avoid excessive or arbitrary changes that may undermine the budget planning and approval process.
Some examples of how to execute the budget effectively and efficiently are:
- Using performance-based budgeting. This is a budgeting approach that links the budget allocation and distribution to the expected results and outcomes of the budget activities, rather than to the inputs or outputs. This can help to incentivize and reward the budget managers and staff for achieving the desired performance, and to hold them accountable for the use of the budget resources. Performance-based budgeting can also help to monitor and evaluate the impact and value of the budget activities, and to adjust the budget accordingly.
- Using online budget execution systems. This is a budgeting tool that uses information and communication technology to automate and streamline the budget execution reporting and monitoring process. This can help to reduce the administrative burden and costs of the budget execution, and to improve the timeliness, accuracy, and accessibility of the budget information. Online budget execution systems can also help to enhance the transparency and accountability of the budget execution, and to facilitate the feedback and participation of the stakeholders.
- Using contingency reserves and supplementary budgets. These are budgeting mechanisms that allow for some flexibility and responsiveness of the budget to unforeseen or emergent situations, such as natural disasters, economic shocks, or policy changes. Contingency reserves are funds that are set aside in the approved budget to cover unexpected or unplanned expenses, while supplementary budgets are additional funds that are requested and approved after the budget execution has started. These mechanisms can help to cope with the uncertainty and volatility of the budget environment, and to ensure the continuity and sustainability of the budget activities.
FasterCapital helps you in applying for business loans on a global scale, preparing your documents and connecting you with lenders
The last stage of the budget cycle is evaluation, which involves assessing the performance and results of the budget execution and comparing them with the planned objectives and targets. evaluation is a crucial step to ensure accountability, transparency, and learning from the budget process. Evaluation can be done using both financial and non-financial indicators, which measure different aspects of the budget outcomes and impacts. Financial indicators focus on the quantitative aspects of the budget, such as revenues, expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and debt. Non-financial indicators capture the qualitative aspects of the budget, such as efficiency, effectiveness, equity, sustainability, and social impact. In this section, we will discuss how to measure, analyze, and report the budget outcomes and impacts using financial and non-financial indicators. We will also provide some insights from different point of views, such as the government, the parliament, the civil society, and the citizens.
Some of the steps involved in measuring, analyzing, and reporting the budget outcomes and impacts using financial and non-financial indicators are:
1. Selecting the appropriate indicators: The first step is to select the indicators that are relevant, reliable, valid, and feasible to measure the budget outcomes and impacts. The indicators should be aligned with the budget objectives and targets, and reflect the priorities and preferences of the stakeholders. The indicators should also be consistent, comparable, and verifiable over time and across different budget units and programs. Some examples of financial indicators are: revenue collection rate, expenditure execution rate, budget balance, debt-to-GDP ratio, and fiscal space. Some examples of non-financial indicators are: cost-benefit ratio, cost-effectiveness ratio, output-outcome ratio, poverty reduction rate, and human development index.
2. Collecting the data: The second step is to collect the data that are needed to calculate the indicators. The data should be accurate, timely, comprehensive, and disaggregated by relevant categories, such as sector, region, gender, and income group. The data should be sourced from credible and independent sources, such as the national statistics office, the central bank, the supreme audit institution, the international organizations, and the civil society organizations. The data should also be accessible and transparent to the public and the stakeholders.
3. Analyzing the data: The third step is to analyze the data and interpret the indicators. The analysis should be objective, rigorous, and evidence-based. The analysis should also be contextualized and nuanced, taking into account the external and internal factors that may affect the budget outcomes and impacts, such as the economic situation, the political environment, the institutional capacity, and the social dynamics. The analysis should also be comparative and evaluative, benchmarking the indicators against the planned targets, the historical trends, the international standards, and the best practices. The analysis should also be inclusive and participatory, involving the feedback and input of the stakeholders, especially the beneficiaries and the affected groups.
4. Reporting the findings: The fourth step is to report the findings and communicate the indicators. The reporting should be clear, concise, and coherent. The reporting should also be informative, persuasive, and actionable, highlighting the main messages, the key recommendations, and the follow-up actions. The reporting should also be tailored and diversified, using different formats and channels, such as reports, dashboards, infographics, podcasts, and webinars, to reach different audiences, such as the government, the parliament, the civil society, and the citizens. The reporting should also be timely and regular, following a predefined schedule and frequency, such as quarterly, annually, or biennially.
How to measure, analyze, and report the budget outcomes and impacts using financial and non financial indicators - Budget cycle: what are the stages and best practices of the budgeting process
Revision is an essential part of the budget cycle, as it allows the budget managers and stakeholders to monitor the performance of the budget and make necessary adjustments based on the changing needs and circumstances of the organization. Revision can be done at different stages of the budget cycle, such as during the execution, evaluation, or audit phases. Revision can also be triggered by external factors, such as economic shocks, natural disasters, or policy changes. Revision can have significant impacts on the budget outcomes, as it can affect the allocation of resources, the achievement of objectives, and the accountability of the budget actors. Therefore, revision should be done in a transparent, rational, and participatory manner, following some best practices and principles. In this section, we will discuss how to identify, justify, and incorporate budget changes and adjustments, and provide some examples from different perspectives.
Some of the best practices and principles for budget revision are:
1. Identify the need and the scope of revision. The first step is to determine whether there is a need for revision, and what is the extent and nature of the revision. This can be done by comparing the actual budget performance with the planned budget targets, and identifying any gaps, deviations, or risks. The need for revision can also arise from external factors, such as changes in the macroeconomic environment, the political situation, the legal framework, or the social demands. The scope of revision can vary from minor adjustments to major amendments, depending on the magnitude and the impact of the changes. For example, a minor adjustment can be a reallocation of funds within a budget line, while a major amendment can be a change in the budget ceiling or the budget structure.
2. Justify the revision with evidence and analysis. The second step is to provide a clear and convincing rationale for the revision, supported by evidence and analysis. The revision should be based on sound and objective criteria, such as efficiency, effectiveness, equity, or sustainability. The revision should also be aligned with the strategic goals and priorities of the organization, and reflect the changing needs and preferences of the stakeholders. The revision should be justified with relevant data, indicators, benchmarks, and projections, as well as with feedback from the budget users and beneficiaries. For example, a revision can be justified by showing that the budget allocation is not sufficient to meet the demand, or that the budget execution is not achieving the desired outcomes, or that the budget is not responsive to the emerging challenges or opportunities.
3. Incorporate the revision with consultation and communication. The third step is to implement the revision with consultation and communication with the relevant budget actors and stakeholders. The revision should be done in a participatory and inclusive manner, involving the budget managers, the budget committees, the oversight bodies, the civil society, and the public. The revision should be communicated in a timely and transparent manner, explaining the reasons, the methods, and the implications of the revision. The revision should also be documented and reported, following the established rules and procedures. The revision should be subject to review and approval by the appropriate authorities, such as the executive, the legislature, or the auditor. For example, a revision can be incorporated by submitting a supplementary budget proposal to the parliament, or by issuing a budget circular to the spending units, or by publishing a budget revision report on the website.
One of the most important and challenging aspects of the budgeting process is ensuring that the budget is aligned with the organizational goals, policies, and standards, and that it reflects the actual financial situation and performance of the entity. This is where the audit stage comes in. Auditing is the systematic and independent examination of the budget documents, data, and processes to verify their compliance, accuracy, and accountability. Auditing can be done internally by the entity's own staff or externally by independent auditors or reviewers. The purpose of auditing is to provide assurance, feedback, and recommendations to the budget managers, stakeholders, and decision-makers on how to improve the quality and effectiveness of the budgeting process. In this section, we will discuss the following topics:
- The benefits and challenges of auditing the budget
- The types and methods of budget audits
- The best practices and standards for conducting budget audits
- The common audit findings and recommendations for budget improvement
### The benefits and challenges of auditing the budget
Auditing the budget has several benefits for the entity and its stakeholders, such as:
- It enhances the credibility and transparency of the budget by providing an independent and objective assessment of its validity, reliability, and completeness.
- It improves the accountability and responsibility of the budget managers and staff by ensuring that they follow the established rules, procedures, and guidelines, and that they report and document their budget activities and results accurately and timely.
- It increases the efficiency and effectiveness of the budget by identifying and correcting any errors, discrepancies, or weaknesses in the budget data, assumptions, calculations, or processes, and by suggesting ways to optimize the use of resources and achieve the desired outcomes.
- It fosters the learning and improvement of the budget by providing constructive feedback and recommendations on how to enhance the budget design, formulation, execution, monitoring, and evaluation, and by highlighting the best practices and lessons learned from the budget experience.
However, auditing the budget also poses some challenges and difficulties, such as:
- It requires a significant amount of time, effort, and resources to conduct a thorough and comprehensive audit of the budget, especially if the budget is complex, large, or dynamic.
- It may encounter resistance or lack of cooperation from the budget managers or staff, who may perceive the audit as a threat, a criticism, or a burden, and who may be reluctant to share information, data, or documents, or to accept the audit findings or recommendations.
- It may face limitations or constraints in accessing, verifying, or analyzing the budget information, data, or documents, due to factors such as confidentiality, security, availability, quality, or compatibility.
- It may generate conflicts or disputes among the budget stakeholders, who may have different views, interests, or expectations regarding the budget, and who may disagree with the audit results, conclusions, or suggestions.
### The types and methods of budget audits
There are different types and methods of budget audits, depending on the scope, purpose, and approach of the audit. Some of the common types and methods are:
- compliance audit: This type of audit focuses on checking whether the budget complies with the relevant laws, regulations, policies, standards, or agreements, and whether the budget transactions and activities are authorized, recorded, and reported properly. A compliance audit can be done by using methods such as document review, transaction testing, or sampling.
- Performance audit: This type of audit focuses on assessing whether the budget achieves its objectives and goals, and whether the budget resources are used efficiently, effectively, and economically. A performance audit can be done by using methods such as benchmarking, cost-benefit analysis, or outcome measurement.
- Financial audit: This type of audit focuses on verifying whether the budget reflects the true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the entity, and whether the budget data and statements are accurate, complete, and consistent. A financial audit can be done by using methods such as reconciliation, verification, or validation.
- Operational audit: This type of audit focuses on evaluating whether the budget processes and systems are well-designed, well-implemented, and well-controlled, and whether they support the budget objectives and goals. An operational audit can be done by using methods such as process mapping, risk assessment, or control testing.
### The best practices and standards for conducting budget audits
To ensure the quality and effectiveness of the budget audits, the following best practices and standards should be followed by the auditors and the audited entities:
- Planning: The audit should be planned carefully and systematically, by defining the audit objectives, scope, criteria, methodology, timeline, and resources, and by communicating and coordinating with the relevant stakeholders.
- Execution: The audit should be executed professionally and diligently, by collecting and analyzing the relevant information, data, and documents, and by applying the appropriate audit techniques and tools.
- Reporting: The audit should be reported clearly and comprehensively, by presenting the audit findings, conclusions, and recommendations, and by supporting them with sufficient evidence and logic.
- Follow-up: The audit should be followed up promptly and effectively, by monitoring and evaluating the implementation and impact of the audit recommendations, and by providing feedback and assistance to the audited entities.
### The common audit findings and recommendations for budget improvement
Some of the common audit findings and recommendations for budget improvement are:
- Budget alignment: The audit may find that the budget is not aligned with the organizational vision, mission, values, strategies, or plans, or that the budget does not reflect the priorities, needs, or expectations of the stakeholders. The audit may recommend that the budget should be reviewed and revised to ensure its alignment and relevance, and that the budget should be linked to the performance indicators and targets of the entity.
- Budget accuracy: The audit may find that the budget contains errors, inconsistencies, or discrepancies in the data, assumptions, calculations, or projections, or that the budget does not match the actual financial situation or performance of the entity. The audit may recommend that the budget should be corrected and updated to ensure its accuracy and reliability, and that the budget should be reconciled and verified with the financial records and statements of the entity.
- Budget accountability: The audit may find that the budget is not managed or reported in a transparent, timely, or comprehensive manner, or that the budget transactions and activities are not authorized, documented, or justified properly. The audit may recommend that the budget should be improved and enhanced to ensure its accountability and responsibility, and that the budget should be subject to regular and independent audits and reviews.
FasterCapital's team includes highly experienced and skilled professional programmers and designers who work with you on building your product!
The budget cycle is a complex and dynamic process that involves various stages, actors, and challenges. It is essential to understand the best practices of the budgeting process and how to apply them in different contexts and scenarios. In this section, we will summarize the main points, lessons learned, and recommendations for future budget cycles based on the insights from different point of views. We will also provide some examples to illustrate the key ideas and concepts.
Some of the main points, lessons learned, and recommendations for future budget cycles are:
- 1. Align the budget cycle with the strategic plan and objectives of the organization. The budget cycle should be aligned with the vision, mission, goals, and priorities of the organization. This will ensure that the budget reflects the needs and expectations of the stakeholders and supports the achievement of the desired outcomes. The budget cycle should also be flexible enough to accommodate changes and uncertainties in the internal and external environment.
- 2. Involve the relevant stakeholders in the budget cycle. The budget cycle should be participatory and inclusive, involving the input and feedback of the various stakeholders, such as managers, employees, customers, suppliers, partners, donors, and regulators. This will enhance the transparency, accountability, and legitimacy of the budget process and foster a sense of ownership and commitment among the stakeholders. The budget cycle should also facilitate communication and coordination among the stakeholders and resolve any conflicts or disagreements that may arise.
- 3. Use appropriate tools and techniques for the budget cycle. The budget cycle should use the best available tools and techniques for the budget preparation, execution, monitoring, and evaluation. These may include software, models, frameworks, methods, indicators, and benchmarks. The tools and techniques should be suitable for the size, complexity, and nature of the organization and the budget. They should also be reliable, accurate, and user-friendly. The budget cycle should also incorporate the latest data and information and use evidence-based decision making.
- 4. monitor and evaluate the budget cycle and its outcomes. The budget cycle should be regularly monitored and evaluated to assess its performance, efficiency, effectiveness, and impact. The budget cycle should use the established indicators and criteria to measure the progress and results of the budget and compare them with the planned objectives and targets. The budget cycle should also identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the budget process and its outcomes and provide feedback and recommendations for improvement. The budget cycle should also report and communicate the findings and lessons learned to the stakeholders and the public.
An example of how to apply these best practices in the budget cycle is the case of the World Health Organization (WHO). The WHO is an international organization that aims to promote health, prevent diseases, and respond to health emergencies. The WHO has a biennial budget cycle that covers two fiscal years and is aligned with its strategic plan and objectives. The WHO involves its member states, regional offices, technical units, partners, and donors in the budget cycle and uses various tools and techniques, such as the results-based budgeting, the program budget web portal, and the budget space model. The WHO also monitors and evaluates its budget cycle and its outcomes using the program budget performance assessment, the financial report and audited financial statements, and the independent evaluation. The WHO reports and communicates its budget cycle and its outcomes to its governing bodies, such as the World Health Assembly and the Executive Board, and to the public through its website and publications. The WHO's budget cycle is an example of a complex and dynamic process that follows the best practices of the budgeting process and adapts to the changing needs and challenges of the global health context.
Read Other Blogs