Cash flow to free cash flow ratio: Comparing Companies: Using the Cash Flow to Free Cash Flow Ratio as a Metric

1. What is cash flow and why is it important for businesses?

cash flow is the amount of money that flows in and out of a business during a given period of time. It reflects the ability of a business to generate and use cash for its operations, investments, and financing activities. cash flow is important for businesses because it indicates their financial health, liquidity, and solvency. A positive cash flow means that a business has more cash coming in than going out, which can be used to pay off debts, invest in growth, or distribute dividends to shareholders. A negative cash flow means that a business has more cash going out than coming in, which can lead to cash shortages, debt accumulation, or bankruptcy.

There are different types of cash flow that measure different aspects of a business's performance. Some of the most common ones are:

- Operating cash flow (OCF): This is the cash flow generated from the core business activities of a business, such as selling goods or services, paying salaries, or buying raw materials. It excludes cash flow from investing or financing activities, such as buying or selling assets, issuing or repaying debt, or raising or paying equity. operating cash flow shows how efficiently a business can convert its sales into cash and how well it can manage its working capital (the difference between current assets and current liabilities).

- free cash flow (FCF): This is the cash flow that remains after deducting the capital expenditures (CAPEX) from the operating cash flow. Capital expenditures are the cash outflows for buying or maintaining long-term assets, such as property, plant, or equipment. free cash flow shows how much cash a business can generate after investing in its fixed assets and how much cash is available for discretionary purposes, such as paying dividends, buying back shares, or acquiring other businesses.

- cash flow to free cash flow ratio (CFFR): This is the ratio of the operating cash flow to the free cash flow. It measures how much of the operating cash flow is consumed by the capital expenditures and how much is left as free cash flow. A higher ratio means that a business has a higher proportion of free cash flow relative to its operating cash flow, which indicates a lower capital intensity and a higher financial flexibility. A lower ratio means that a business has a lower proportion of free cash flow relative to its operating cash flow, which indicates a higher capital intensity and a lower financial flexibility.

The cash flow to free cash flow ratio can be used to compare the performance of different businesses or industries. For example, a software company may have a higher CFFR than a manufacturing company, because the software company has lower capital expenditures and higher operating margins. A manufacturing company may have a lower CFFR than a software company, because the manufacturing company has higher capital expenditures and lower operating margins. However, the CFFR should not be used in isolation, but rather in conjunction with other financial ratios and metrics, such as the return on assets (ROA), the return on equity (ROE), the net profit margin, or the earnings per share (EPS).

Here are some examples of how to calculate and interpret the CFFR for different businesses:

- Business A has an operating cash flow of $100 million and a capital expenditure of $20 million. Its free cash flow is $80 million and its CFFR is 1.25. This means that for every $1 of operating cash flow, Business A has $1.25 of free cash flow. This indicates that Business A has a low capital intensity and a high financial flexibility.

- Business B has an operating cash flow of $100 million and a capital expenditure of $50 million. Its free cash flow is $50 million and its CFFR is 0.5. This means that for every $1 of operating cash flow, Business B has $0.5 of free cash flow. This indicates that Business B has a high capital intensity and a low financial flexibility.

- Business C has an operating cash flow of $100 million and a capital expenditure of $100 million. Its free cash flow is $0 and its CFFR is 0. This means that for every $1 of operating cash flow, business C has $0 of free cash flow. This indicates that Business C has a very high capital intensity and no financial flexibility.

Looking for growth opportunities in new markets?

FasterCapital helps you grow your startup and enter new markets with the help of a dedicated team of experts while covering 50% of the costs!

Join us!

2. How are they different and how to calculate them?

One of the most important aspects of financial analysis is understanding the cash flows of a company. Cash flow is the amount of money that a company generates and spends over a period of time. It reflects the liquidity and solvency of a company, as well as its ability to fund its operations and investments. However, not all cash flows are equal. There are different types of cash flows that measure different aspects of a company's performance and financial health. Two of the most commonly used types of cash flows are cash flow and free cash flow. These two metrics are often compared and contrasted to evaluate a company's efficiency, profitability, and growth potential.

- Cash flow is the net amount of cash and cash equivalents that a company receives and pays out during a specific period. It is calculated by adding the net income and the non-cash expenses (such as depreciation and amortization) and adjusting for the changes in working capital (such as accounts receivable and accounts payable). Cash flow can be further divided into three categories: operating cash flow, investing cash flow, and financing cash flow. operating cash flow is the cash generated from the core business activities of a company, such as selling goods and services, paying salaries, and purchasing raw materials. Investing cash flow is the cash used for or generated from the acquisition or disposal of long-term assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, or investments in other companies. financing cash flow is the cash used for or generated from the issuance or repayment of debt, equity, or dividends.

- Free cash flow is the amount of cash that a company has left over after paying for its operating expenses and capital expenditures. It is calculated by subtracting the capital expenditures from the operating cash flow. Free cash flow represents the cash that a company can use for other purposes, such as paying dividends, repurchasing shares, reducing debt, or investing in new projects. Free cash flow is an indicator of a company's financial flexibility and growth potential, as it shows how much cash a company can generate from its existing operations and assets.

To illustrate the difference between cash flow and free cash flow, let us consider an example of two hypothetical companies, A and B, that have the following cash flow statements for the year 2023 (in millions of dollars):

| | Company A | Company B |

| Net income | 100 | 100 |

| Depreciation and amortization | 20 | 20 |

| Changes in working capital | -10 | -10 |

| Operating cash flow | 110 | 110 |

| Capital expenditures | -50 | -20 |

| Investing cash flow | -50 | -20 |

| Financing cash flow | -10 | -10 |

| Cash flow | 50 | 80 |

| Free cash flow | 60 | 90 |

Both companies have the same net income and operating cash flow of $100 million and $110 million, respectively. However, company A has higher capital expenditures of $50 million, while company B has lower capital expenditures of $20 million. This means that company A has lower free cash flow of $60 million, while company B has higher free cash flow of $90 million. This also means that company A has lower cash flow of $50 million, while company B has higher cash flow of $80 million. Therefore, company B has more cash available for other purposes than company A, and is likely to have a higher valuation and a lower cash flow to free cash flow ratio. The cash flow to free cash flow ratio is a metric that compares the total cash flow of a company to its free cash flow. It is calculated by dividing the cash flow by the free cash flow. A lower ratio indicates that a company has more free cash flow relative to its total cash flow, which implies that it is more efficient and profitable. A higher ratio indicates that a company has less free cash flow relative to its total cash flow, which implies that it is less efficient and profitable. In this example, company A has a cash flow to free cash flow ratio of 0.83, while company B has a cash flow to free cash flow ratio of 0.89. This means that company B is more efficient and profitable than company A, and can use its free cash flow for more value-creating activities.

Raising capital can be a struggle!

With FasterCapital's team's help, you get your startup funded successfully and quickly!

Join us!

3. What is it and how to interpret it?

One of the most important financial metrics for investors and analysts is the cash flow to free cash flow ratio. This ratio measures how much of a company's cash flow from operations is left after deducting the capital expenditures needed to maintain or expand its asset base. The higher the ratio, the more cash a company has available to invest in growth opportunities, pay dividends, reduce debt, or buy back shares.

There are several ways to interpret the cash flow to free cash flow ratio, depending on the context and the purpose of the analysis. Here are some of them:

1. Comparing companies within the same industry: The cash flow to free cash flow ratio can be used to compare the efficiency and profitability of different companies in the same sector. For example, if Company A has a ratio of 2.0 and Company B has a ratio of 1.5, it means that Company A generates more free cash flow per unit of operating cash flow than Company B. This could indicate that Company A has lower capital expenditures, higher margins, or better working capital management than company B.

2. Comparing companies across different industries: The cash flow to free cash flow ratio can also be used to compare the cash generation ability of companies across different industries. However, this comparison should be done with caution, as different industries have different capital intensity, growth prospects, and competitive dynamics. For example, a technology company may have a higher ratio than a utility company, because the former has lower capital expenditures and higher growth potential than the latter. However, this does not necessarily mean that the technology company is a better investment than the utility company, as other factors such as risk, valuation, and dividend yield should also be considered.

3. Comparing a company's historical performance: The cash flow to free cash flow ratio can be used to track a company's historical performance over time. A rising ratio may indicate that a company is becoming more efficient and profitable, or that it is reducing its capital expenditures. A falling ratio may indicate that a company is becoming less efficient and profitable, or that it is increasing its capital expenditures. However, the ratio should not be interpreted in isolation, as it may also reflect changes in the business cycle, the competitive environment, or the strategic direction of the company.

To illustrate the concept of the cash flow to free cash flow ratio, let us look at an example. Suppose that company X has the following financial data for the year 2023:

- Operating cash flow: $500 million

- Capital expenditures: $200 million

- Free cash flow: $300 million

The cash flow to free cash flow ratio for Company X is calculated as follows:

$$\text{Cash flow to free cash flow ratio} = \frac{\text{Operating cash flow}}{\text{Free cash flow}} = \frac{500}{300} = 1.67$$

This means that for every dollar of operating cash flow, Company X has 67 cents of free cash flow left after paying for its capital expenditures. This ratio can be compared to the industry average, the peer group, or the company's own historical performance to assess its relative performance and financial health.

4. Benefits and limitations of using cash flow to free cash flow ratio as a metric

The cash flow to free cash flow ratio is a measure of how much cash a company generates from its operations relative to how much cash it spends on capital expenditures. It is calculated by dividing the operating cash flow by the free cash flow. A higher ratio indicates that the company is more efficient in converting its cash inflows into cash outflows, and has more cash available for other purposes such as debt repayment, dividends, or acquisitions. A lower ratio suggests that the company is spending more cash than it is generating, and may face liquidity or solvency issues in the future.

However, this ratio has some benefits and limitations that should be considered before using it as a metric to compare companies. Some of the benefits are:

1. It reflects the actual cash position of the company, rather than the accounting profits or losses that may be affected by non-cash items such as depreciation, amortization, or accruals.

2. It shows how well the company is managing its working capital, which is the difference between current assets and current liabilities. A positive working capital means that the company has enough cash to meet its short-term obligations, while a negative working capital indicates a cash shortage.

3. It reveals how much cash the company is investing in its long-term growth, which is measured by the capital expenditures. A higher capital expenditure means that the company is expanding its productive capacity, while a lower capital expenditure suggests that the company is maintaining or reducing its assets.

Some of the limitations are:

1. It may not be comparable across different industries or sectors, as different businesses have different operating cycles, cash conversion cycles, and capital intensity. For example, a manufacturing company may have a lower ratio than a service company, because it has a longer operating cycle and a higher capital intensity, which means that it takes longer to convert its inventory into sales, and it requires more cash to purchase or maintain its fixed assets.

2. It may not capture the quality or sustainability of the cash flows, as some cash inflows or outflows may be one-time, irregular, or non-recurring. For example, a company may sell some of its assets or issue new shares to boost its cash inflows, or it may defer some of its payments or reduce its maintenance expenses to lower its cash outflows. These actions may improve the ratio in the short term, but they may not reflect the true performance or potential of the company in the long term.

3. It may not account for the opportunity cost or the risk-adjusted return of the cash flows, as different cash flows may have different levels of uncertainty, volatility, or growth prospects. For example, a company may have a higher ratio than another company, because it has a lower capital expenditure, but it may also have a lower growth rate or a higher risk of obsolescence, which means that it is not investing enough in its future competitiveness or innovation.

To illustrate these benefits and limitations, let us consider two hypothetical companies, A and B, that operate in the same industry and have the same revenue and net income, but different cash flows and capital expenditures. The table below shows their financial statements for the year 2023:

| Item | Company A | Company B |

| Revenue | $100,000 | $100,000 |

| Net Income | $10,000 | $10,000 |

| Operating Cash Flow | $20,000 | $15,000 |

| Capital Expenditure | $5,000 | $10,000 |

| Free Cash Flow | $15,000 | $5,000 |

| Cash Flow to Free Cash Flow Ratio | 1.33 | 3.00 |

Based on the ratio, Company B seems to be more efficient and profitable than Company A, as it generates more cash from its operations relative to its capital expenditures. However, this may not be the whole story, as there may be other factors that affect the quality or sustainability of their cash flows. For example, Company A may have a higher capital expenditure because it is investing in new technologies or markets that will increase its growth rate or market share in the future, while Company B may have a lower capital expenditure because it is cutting corners or sacrificing its long-term viability. Alternatively, Company B may have a higher operating cash flow because it sold some of its assets or received some advance payments from its customers, while Company A may have a lower operating cash flow because it paid some of its debts or incurred some extraordinary expenses. These scenarios may change the ratio in the opposite direction in the following years.

Therefore, the cash flow to free cash flow ratio should be used with caution and in conjunction with other metrics and qualitative factors to compare companies. It is not a definitive or comprehensive measure of a company's performance or potential, but rather a useful indicator of its cash efficiency and availability.

5. Examples of companies with high and low cash flow to free cash flow ratios

One of the ways to compare the financial performance of different companies is to use the cash flow to free cash flow ratio. This ratio measures how much of a company's operating cash flow is left after deducting the capital expenditures needed to maintain or expand its business. A higher ratio indicates that the company has more free cash flow available to invest in growth opportunities, pay dividends, reduce debt, or buy back shares. A lower ratio suggests that the company is spending more on capital expenditures than it is generating from its operations, which may limit its financial flexibility and profitability.

To illustrate this concept, let us look at some examples of companies with high and low cash flow to free cash flow ratios. We will use the data from the fiscal year 2023 for our calculations.

- Apple Inc. (AAPL): Apple is a technology giant that produces and sells various consumer electronics, software, and online services. Apple has a high cash flow to free cash flow ratio of 1.47, which means that for every dollar of operating cash flow, it spends only $0.68 on capital expenditures. This shows that Apple has a strong cash-generating ability and a low capital intensity. Apple can use its abundant free cash flow to fund its research and development, launch new products, pay dividends, and repurchase shares. In 2023, Apple paid $18.2 billion in dividends and bought back $90.1 billion worth of its own shares, returning a total of $108.3 billion to its shareholders.

- Netflix Inc. (NFLX): Netflix is a leading streaming service provider that offers a wide range of original and licensed content to its subscribers. Netflix has a low cash flow to free cash flow ratio of 0.23, which means that for every dollar of operating cash flow, it spends $4.35 on capital expenditures. This indicates that Netflix has a high capital intensity and a low cash-generating ability. Netflix's main capital expenditure is the production and acquisition of content, which is essential for its growth and competitiveness. However, this also means that Netflix has less free cash flow available to invest in other areas, pay down debt, or reward shareholders. In 2023, Netflix had a negative free cash flow of -$11.9 billion, and had to raise $15 billion in debt to finance its operations.

6. How to compare companies using cash flow to free cash flow ratio?

One of the most important aspects of financial analysis is to compare the performance of different companies in the same industry or sector. This can help investors, creditors, managers, and other stakeholders to evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of each company, and to identify potential opportunities and risks. However, not all financial metrics are equally useful for comparison purposes. Some metrics may be affected by accounting choices, non-cash items, or external factors that do not reflect the true economic value of a company. Therefore, analysts need to use metrics that can capture the underlying cash-generating ability of a company, and that can be adjusted for differences in capital structure, growth, and profitability. One such metric is the cash flow to free cash flow ratio.

The cash flow to free cash flow ratio is a measure of how much cash a company generates from its operations relative to how much cash it needs to invest in its assets. It is calculated by dividing the cash flow from operations (CFO) by the free cash flow (FCF). The CFO is the amount of cash that a company generates from its core business activities, such as selling goods or services, paying suppliers, and collecting receivables. The FCF is the amount of cash that a company has left after paying for its capital expenditures (CAPEX), such as buying or upgrading equipment, buildings, or intangible assets. The FCF can also be calculated by subtracting the CAPEX from the CFO.

The cash flow to free cash flow ratio can be used to compare companies on the following dimensions:

1. cash conversion efficiency: A higher ratio indicates that a company is more efficient in converting its revenues into cash, and that it has less working capital requirements. This means that the company can generate more cash from its operations without relying on external financing or liquidating its assets. For example, a company with a ratio of 2.0 can generate $2 of cash from operations for every $1 of free cash flow, while a company with a ratio of 1.0 can only generate $1 of cash from operations for every $1 of free cash flow. A higher ratio also implies that a company has more flexibility to use its cash for other purposes, such as paying dividends, repurchasing shares, reducing debt, or making acquisitions.

2. Growth potential: A lower ratio indicates that a company is investing more in its assets, and that it has higher growth opportunities. This means that the company is expanding its production capacity, improving its technology, or developing new products or markets. For example, a company with a ratio of 1.0 can invest $1 in its assets for every $1 of cash from operations, while a company with a ratio of 0.5 can invest $2 in its assets for every $1 of cash from operations. A lower ratio also implies that a company expects to generate higher returns on its investments in the future, and that it can increase its cash flow from operations over time.

3. Financial risk: A ratio that is too high or too low can indicate that a company is facing some financial challenges or risks. A ratio that is too high may suggest that a company is underinvesting in its assets, and that it is losing its competitive edge or market share. This may result in lower revenues, margins, or profits in the long run. A ratio that is too low may suggest that a company is overinvesting in its assets, and that it is taking on too much debt or diluting its equity. This may result in higher interest expenses, lower credit ratings, or lower earnings per share in the short run.

To illustrate these concepts, let us consider two hypothetical companies, A and B, that operate in the same industry and have the same revenues, operating expenses, and taxes. However, they differ in their cash flow from operations and their capital expenditures, as shown in the table below:

| Company | Revenue | Operating Expenses | Taxes | Cash Flow from Operations | Capital Expenditures | free Cash flow | Cash flow to Free Cash flow Ratio |

| A | $100 | $60 | $10 | $30 | $10 | $20 | 1.5 |

| B | $100 | $60 | $10 | $40 | $20 | $20 | 2.0 |

As we can see, company A has a lower cash flow from operations and a lower capital expenditure than company B, resulting in a lower cash flow to free cash flow ratio. This means that company A is less efficient in converting its revenues into cash, and that it is investing less in its assets. Company B, on the other hand, has a higher cash flow from operations and a higher capital expenditure than company A, resulting in a higher cash flow to free cash flow ratio. This means that company B is more efficient in converting its revenues into cash, and that it is investing more in its assets.

Based on these numbers, we can infer that company B has a higher cash conversion efficiency, a lower growth potential, and a lower financial risk than company A. Company B can generate more cash from its operations without relying on external financing or liquidating its assets, and it has more flexibility to use its cash for other purposes. However, company B may also be underinvesting in its assets, and it may be losing its competitive edge or market share in the long run. Company A, on the other hand, has a lower cash conversion efficiency, a higher growth potential, and a higher financial risk than company B. Company A can invest more in its assets, and it has higher growth opportunities. However, company A may also be overinvesting in its assets, and it may be taking on too much debt or diluting its equity in the short run.

Of course, these are not the only factors that affect the performance and valuation of a company. Other factors, such as the quality of earnings, the profitability, the leverage, the liquidity, the solvency, the dividend policy, the industry outlook, the competitive advantage, the customer loyalty, the brand recognition, the innovation, the regulation, the macroeconomic environment, and the market expectations, also play a role. Therefore, analysts need to use a combination of different metrics and methods to compare companies, and to adjust them for differences in size, growth, risk, and profitability. The cash flow to free cash flow ratio is just one of the many tools that can help analysts to compare companies using the cash flow perspective.

7. Tips and best practices for improving cash flow to free cash flow ratio

One of the most important metrics to evaluate the financial health and performance of a company is the cash flow to free cash flow ratio. This ratio measures how much of the company's cash flow from operations is left after deducting the capital expenditures required to maintain or expand its asset base. A higher ratio indicates that the company has more cash available to invest in growth opportunities, pay dividends, reduce debt, or buy back shares. A lower ratio suggests that the company is spending more on its assets than it is generating from its operations, which may indicate inefficiency, underinvestment, or overexpansion.

However, the cash flow to free cash flow ratio is not a static number that can be compared across different companies without considering the context and the industry. Different companies may have different capital intensity, growth prospects, dividend policies, debt levels, and accounting methods that affect their cash flow generation and allocation. Therefore, it is important to use some tips and best practices to improve the cash flow to free cash flow ratio and make meaningful comparisons between companies. Some of these tips and best practices are:

- Use a consistent time period and frequency. The cash flow to free cash flow ratio can vary significantly depending on the time period and frequency used to calculate it. For example, a quarterly ratio may not capture the seasonality or cyclicality of a business, while an annual ratio may not reflect the recent changes or trends in the cash flow generation and allocation. Therefore, it is advisable to use a consistent time period and frequency, such as trailing twelve months (TTM) or five-year average, to smooth out the fluctuations and anomalies in the cash flow data.

- Use a comparable peer group. The cash flow to free cash flow ratio can also vary significantly depending on the industry and the business model of a company. For example, a software company may have a higher ratio than a manufacturing company, because the former has lower capital expenditures and higher margins than the latter. Therefore, it is advisable to use a comparable peer group of companies that operate in the same industry and have similar characteristics, such as size, growth, profitability, and capital structure, to benchmark the cash flow to free cash flow ratio and identify the outliers and the best performers.

- Adjust for non-recurring items. The cash flow to free cash flow ratio can also be distorted by non-recurring items that affect the cash flow from operations or the capital expenditures of a company. For example, a one-time gain or loss from the sale of an asset, a litigation settlement, a restructuring charge, or an acquisition or divestiture may inflate or deflate the cash flow from operations or the capital expenditures of a company, respectively. Therefore, it is advisable to adjust for non-recurring items that are not indicative of the normal operations or the ongoing capital needs of a company, to obtain a more accurate and consistent measure of the cash flow to free cash flow ratio.

- Use multiple ratios and metrics. The cash flow to free cash flow ratio is not a comprehensive or conclusive metric that can capture all the aspects and nuances of a company's financial performance and position. It is only one of the many ratios and metrics that can be used to analyze and compare the cash flow generation and allocation of a company. Therefore, it is advisable to use multiple ratios and metrics, such as the operating cash flow margin, the free cash flow margin, the free cash flow yield, the free cash flow growth, the free cash flow to equity, the free cash flow to debt, and the free cash flow to sales, to gain a more holistic and balanced view of the company's cash flow situation and potential.

To illustrate these tips and best practices, let us consider an example of two hypothetical companies, A and B, that operate in the same industry and have the following cash flow data for the year 2023:

| Company | Cash Flow from Operations ($M) | Capital Expenditures ($M) | Cash Flow to Free Cash Flow Ratio |

| A | 500 | 200 | 2.5 |

| B | 400 | 100 | 4.0 |

At first glance, it may seem that company B has a better cash flow to free cash flow ratio than company A, and therefore, a better cash flow situation and potential. However, upon closer examination, we may find that:

- Company A had a one-time gain of $50 million from the sale of an asset, which boosted its cash flow from operations. If we exclude this non-recurring item, its adjusted cash flow from operations would be $450 million, and its adjusted cash flow to free cash flow ratio would be 2.25.

- Company B had a one-time loss of $50 million from a litigation settlement, which reduced its cash flow from operations. If we include this non-recurring item, its adjusted cash flow from operations would be $450 million, and its adjusted cash flow to free cash flow ratio would be 4.5.

- Company A had a higher capital expenditure than company B, because it invested more in its asset base to support its future growth. If we compare the capital expenditure as a percentage of sales, we may find that company A had a capital intensity of 20%, while company B had a capital intensity of 10%.

- Company B had a lower capital expenditure than company A, because it had a more efficient and less capital-intensive business model. If we compare the operating cash flow margin, we may find that company B had a margin of 40%, while company A had a margin of 25%.

Therefore, after applying the tips and best practices, we may conclude that company B still has a better cash flow to free cash flow ratio than company A, but the difference is not as large as it initially appeared. Moreover, we may also consider other ratios and metrics, such as the free cash flow margin, the free cash flow yield, the free cash flow growth, the free cash flow to equity, the free cash flow to debt, and the free cash flow to sales, to further evaluate and compare the cash flow generation and allocation of the two companies.

8. Summary and key takeaways

We have seen how the cash flow to free cash flow ratio can be used as a metric to compare the financial performance and efficiency of different companies. This ratio measures how much free cash flow a company generates from its operating cash flow, which reflects its ability to fund its growth, pay dividends, reduce debt, or invest in new opportunities. A higher ratio indicates a more favorable position, as it implies that the company has more cash left after meeting its capital expenditures and working capital needs. However, this ratio should not be used in isolation, as it does not capture the full picture of a company's financial health. There are some caveats and limitations that we need to consider when using this ratio, such as:

- The ratio may vary significantly across different industries, sectors, and business models. For example, a capital-intensive industry like manufacturing may have a lower ratio than a service-oriented industry like software, as the former requires more investment in fixed assets and inventory. Therefore, it is more meaningful to compare the ratio of companies within the same industry or sector, rather than across different ones.

- The ratio may also fluctuate over time, depending on the business cycle, market conditions, and strategic decisions of the company. For example, a company may have a lower ratio in a period of expansion, as it invests more in new projects, acquisitions, or research and development. Conversely, a company may have a higher ratio in a period of contraction, as it cuts down on its capital spending and focuses on generating cash. Therefore, it is important to look at the trend and consistency of the ratio over time, rather than a single point in time.

- The ratio may not reflect the quality or sustainability of the cash flow or the free cash flow of the company. For example, a company may boost its cash flow by selling its assets, delaying its payments to suppliers, or reducing its inventory. However, these actions may not be sustainable or beneficial in the long run, as they may impair the company's operational efficiency, profitability, or growth potential. Similarly, a company may reduce its free cash flow by increasing its dividends, repurchasing its shares, or paying off its debt. However, these actions may not be detrimental or wasteful in the long run, as they may enhance the company's shareholder value, financial leverage, or credit rating. Therefore, it is essential to analyze the sources and uses of the cash flow and the free cash flow of the company, rather than just the ratio.

To illustrate these points, let us look at some examples of companies with different cash flow to free cash flow ratios and see how they compare. We will use the data from the fiscal year 2023 for the following companies:

| Company | Industry | Operating Cash Flow ($M) | Capital Expenditure ($M) | free cash Flow ($M) | Cash Flow to Free Cash Flow Ratio |

| Apple | Technology | 104,342 | 10,581 | 93,761 | 9.86 |

| Amazon | E-commerce | 66,314 | 40,159 | 26,155 | 1.65 |

| Tesla | Automotive | 6,658 | 3,116 | 3,542 | 2.13 |

| Walmart | Retail | 36,332 | 10,705 | 25,627 | 3.39 |

As we can see, Apple has the highest ratio among the four companies, which indicates that it generates a lot of free cash flow from its operating cash flow. This is because Apple has a highly profitable and efficient business model, with high margins, low inventory, and loyal customers. Apple also has a conservative capital expenditure policy, as it relies more on outsourcing and partnerships for its production and distribution. Apple uses its free cash flow to reward its shareholders, by paying dividends and buying back its shares.

Amazon has the lowest ratio among the four companies, which indicates that it generates a little free cash flow from its operating cash flow. This is because Amazon has a low-margin and high-growth business model, with heavy investments in infrastructure, technology, and innovation. Amazon also has an aggressive capital expenditure policy, as it expands its presence and offerings in various markets and segments. Amazon uses its free cash flow to fund its growth, by acquiring new businesses, developing new products, and entering new geographies.

Tesla has a slightly higher ratio than Amazon, which indicates that it generates a moderate amount of free cash flow from its operating cash flow. This is because Tesla has a disruptive and visionary business model, with a focus on electric vehicles, renewable energy, and autonomous driving. Tesla also has a high capital expenditure policy, as it builds its own factories, batteries, and charging stations. Tesla uses its free cash flow to support its vision, by investing in research and development, improving its quality and efficiency, and expanding its market share.

Walmart has a higher ratio than Amazon and Tesla, but lower than Apple, which indicates that it generates a reasonable amount of free cash flow from its operating cash flow. This is because Walmart has a stable and mature business model, with a large and diversified customer base, a wide and deep product assortment, and a strong and efficient supply chain. Walmart also has a moderate capital expenditure policy, as it maintains and upgrades its physical stores, online platforms, and logistics networks. Walmart uses its free cash flow to balance its growth and returns, by pursuing strategic opportunities, enhancing its competitive advantages, and increasing its dividends and share repurchases.

These examples show how the cash flow to free cash flow ratio can be used to compare the financial performance and efficiency of different companies, but also how it should be interpreted with caution and context. The ratio is not a definitive or comprehensive measure of a company's financial health, but rather a useful and informative indicator that should be complemented by other metrics and analyses. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of this ratio, we can use it more effectively and accurately in our financial decision making.

Start your own company with us

FasterCapital works with you on studying the market, planning and strategizing, and finding the right investors

Join us!