1. Introduction to Cost Allocation in Target Costing
2. Understanding Cost Reduction Targets
3. Identifying Cost Drivers in Target Costing
4. Allocating Costs to Specific Components or Activities
5. Analyzing Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships
6. Implementing Cost Reduction Strategies
7. Monitoring and Evaluating Cost Reduction Progress
One of the key challenges in target costing is how to allocate the target cost among the various components, processes, and activities involved in producing a product or service. cost allocation is the process of assigning a common cost to two or more cost objects, such as products, departments, or customers. Cost allocation can have a significant impact on the profitability and competitiveness of a firm, as well as the motivation and behavior of its managers and employees. In this section, we will explore the following aspects of cost allocation in target costing:
1. The objectives and principles of cost allocation in target costing. We will discuss why cost allocation is necessary and what criteria should be used to allocate costs in a way that supports the target costing philosophy and goals.
2. The methods and techniques of cost allocation in target costing. We will review some of the common methods of cost allocation, such as direct tracing, driver tracing, and allocation bases, and how they can be applied in target costing. We will also examine some of the advanced techniques of cost allocation, such as activity-based costing, value engineering, and cost tables, and how they can help achieve cost reduction targets.
3. The challenges and issues of cost allocation in target costing. We will identify some of the potential problems and pitfalls of cost allocation, such as cross-subsidization, cost distortion, and goal incongruence, and how they can be avoided or minimized in target costing. We will also discuss some of the ethical and social implications of cost allocation, such as fairness, transparency, and stakeholder involvement.
Let us begin with the first aspect: the objectives and principles of cost allocation in target costing.
One of the main objectives of target costing is to achieve cost reduction targets for a product or service. cost reduction targets are the difference between the target cost and the current cost of a product or service. Target cost is the maximum amount of cost that can be incurred on a product or service, based on the expected selling price and the desired profit margin. Current cost is the actual amount of cost that is incurred on a product or service, based on the current design and production process. Cost reduction targets are important because they indicate the amount of cost savings that need to be achieved to make the product or service profitable and competitive in the market. However, achieving cost reduction targets is not an easy task. It requires a systematic and collaborative approach that involves different stakeholders and perspectives. In this section, we will discuss some of the key aspects of understanding and achieving cost reduction targets, such as:
1. identifying the cost drivers and cost elements. The first step in achieving cost reduction targets is to identify the factors that influence the cost of a product or service. These factors are called cost drivers, and they can be classified into two types: value-added and non-value-added. Value-added cost drivers are those that contribute to the functionality, quality, and customer satisfaction of a product or service. Non-value-added cost drivers are those that do not add any value to the product or service, but are incurred due to inefficiencies, waste, or errors. For example, the cost of materials, labor, and overhead are value-added cost drivers, while the cost of rework, scrap, and inventory are non-value-added cost drivers. The cost of a product or service can also be broken down into different cost elements, such as direct materials, direct labor, variable overhead, fixed overhead, and selling and administrative expenses. By identifying the cost drivers and cost elements, the cost reduction team can analyze the current cost structure and identify the areas where cost savings can be achieved.
2. Setting the cost reduction targets and allocating them to different cost elements. The next step in achieving cost reduction targets is to set the specific and measurable goals for cost savings and allocate them to different cost elements. The cost reduction targets should be based on the target cost, the current cost, and the expected market conditions. The cost reduction targets should also be realistic and attainable, considering the technical and operational feasibility of the product or service. The cost reduction targets can be allocated to different cost elements using different methods, such as proportional allocation, differential allocation, or priority-based allocation. Proportional allocation is a method where the cost reduction targets are allocated to each cost element in proportion to its share of the current cost. Differential allocation is a method where the cost reduction targets are allocated to each cost element based on the difference between its current cost and its target cost. Priority-based allocation is a method where the cost reduction targets are allocated to each cost element based on its importance and potential for cost savings. For example, the cost reduction team may decide to allocate more cost reduction targets to the non-value-added cost drivers or the cost elements that have a high degree of variability or uncertainty.
3. implementing the cost reduction strategies and monitoring the results. The final step in achieving cost reduction targets is to implement the cost reduction strategies and monitor the results. The cost reduction strategies are the actions that are taken to reduce the cost of a product or service, such as redesigning the product or service, improving the production process, eliminating the waste or defects, negotiating with the suppliers or customers, or outsourcing or insourcing some activities. The cost reduction strategies should be aligned with the value proposition and the customer requirements of the product or service. The cost reduction strategies should also be evaluated and prioritized based on their feasibility, effectiveness, and impact. The cost reduction team should monitor the results of the cost reduction strategies by measuring the actual cost savings and comparing them with the cost reduction targets. The cost reduction team should also identify the gaps, challenges, and opportunities for further improvement and take corrective or preventive actions accordingly.
In the section "Identifying Cost Drivers in Target Costing" within the blog "Cost Allocation in Target Costing: How to Achieve Cost Reduction Targets," we delve into the crucial aspect of identifying the key factors that drive costs in target costing. This section aims to provide comprehensive insights from various perspectives to help organizations effectively analyze and manage their cost structure.
1. understanding Cost drivers:
To begin, it is essential to understand that cost drivers are the underlying factors that significantly influence the overall cost of a product or service. These drivers can vary across different industries and organizations. By identifying and analyzing these drivers, companies can gain valuable insights into where costs are incurred and how they can be optimized.
Direct cost drivers are the factors that have a direct impact on the cost of producing a specific product or delivering a service. These drivers can include raw material costs, labor expenses, energy consumption, and equipment maintenance. By closely monitoring and managing these drivers, organizations can make informed decisions to reduce costs and improve profitability.
3. Indirect Cost Drivers:
Indirect cost drivers are the factors that indirectly affect the overall cost structure of a product or service
Identifying Cost Drivers in Target Costing - Cost Allocation in Target Costing: How to Achieve Cost Reduction Targets
One of the key steps in target costing is to allocate costs to specific components or activities that contribute to the total cost of a product or service. This helps to identify the cost drivers and the opportunities for cost reduction. However, cost allocation is not a simple or straightforward process. It involves making assumptions and judgments about how costs are related to different factors, such as volume, quality, complexity, or functionality. Different methods of cost allocation may result in different outcomes and implications for decision making. Therefore, it is important to understand the advantages and disadvantages of various cost allocation methods and choose the one that best suits the purpose and context of target costing. In this section, we will discuss some of the common cost allocation methods and their applications in target costing. We will also provide some examples and insights from different perspectives, such as the customer, the supplier, and the manager.
Some of the common cost allocation methods are:
1. Direct tracing: This method assigns costs directly to the components or activities that cause them, based on observable and measurable factors. For example, the cost of materials can be traced directly to the components that use them, based on the quantity and price of the materials. This method is the most accurate and reliable, as it reflects the actual consumption of resources. However, it is also the most costly and time-consuming, as it requires detailed data collection and analysis. Moreover, it is not applicable to all types of costs, especially those that are shared or indirect, such as overheads or depreciation.
2. Driver tracing: This method assigns costs to the components or activities based on the proportion of a cost driver that they use or generate. A cost driver is a factor that influences or determines the level of a cost, such as the number of units produced, the number of hours worked, the number of machine hours used, or the number of quality inspections performed. For example, the cost of labor can be allocated to the components based on the number of hours worked on each component. This method is less accurate and reliable than direct tracing, as it relies on assumptions and estimates about the relationship between the cost and the driver. However, it is more feasible and practical, as it requires less data and computation. It is also more suitable for allocating indirect costs that are affected by multiple factors.
3. Activity-based costing (ABC): This method assigns costs to the components or activities based on the activities that they perform or require, and the resources that are consumed by those activities. An activity is a set of tasks or processes that adds value to a product or service, such as design, manufacturing, testing, or delivery. For example, the cost of quality can be allocated to the components based on the activities that are involved in ensuring or improving the quality, such as inspection, rework, or warranty. This method is more refined and sophisticated than driver tracing, as it captures the complexity and diversity of the activities and the resources that they use. However, it is also more complex and costly, as it requires identifying and measuring the activities and the resources, and establishing the links between them. It is also more suitable for allocating indirect costs that are driven by activities rather than output.
4. Arbitrary allocation: This method assigns costs to the components or activities based on some arbitrary or predetermined basis, such as a percentage, a rate, or a lump sum. For example, the cost of overheads can be allocated to the components based on a percentage of the direct costs, a rate per unit, or a fixed amount. This method is the least accurate and reliable, as it does not reflect the actual or causal relationship between the costs and the components or activities. However, it is also the simplest and cheapest, as it requires minimal data and calculation. It is also more suitable for allocating indirect costs that are not influenced by any specific factor or activity.
Each of these methods has its own strengths and weaknesses, and none of them is universally superior or inferior to the others. The choice of the cost allocation method depends on the purpose and context of target costing, such as the type and nature of the costs, the level and scope of the analysis, the availability and quality of the data, the trade-off between accuracy and simplicity, and the impact on the decision making and the behavior of the stakeholders. For example, if the goal of target costing is to reduce the cost of a specific component or activity, then direct tracing or driver tracing may be more appropriate, as they provide more detailed and relevant information about the cost drivers and the cost reduction opportunities. However, if the goal of target costing is to reduce the overall cost of a product or service, then activity-based costing or arbitrary allocation may be more appropriate, as they provide a broader and simpler view of the cost structure and the cost behavior. In any case, the cost allocation method should be consistent, transparent, and fair, and should align with the strategic objectives and the customer expectations of target costing.
Allocating Costs to Specific Components or Activities - Cost Allocation in Target Costing: How to Achieve Cost Reduction Targets
One of the key aspects of cost allocation in target costing is to analyze the cost-volume-profit (CVP) relationships of different products and activities. CVP analysis helps managers to understand how changes in sales volume, selling price, variable costs, and fixed costs affect the profitability of a business. CVP analysis can also help managers to identify the break-even point, the margin of safety, and the target profit level for each product or activity. In this section, we will discuss how to perform CVP analysis and how to use it for cost reduction purposes. We will also look at some of the limitations and assumptions of CVP analysis and how to overcome them.
To perform CVP analysis, we need to know the following information:
1. The selling price per unit of the product or activity.
2. The variable cost per unit of the product or activity. Variable costs are those that change in proportion to the volume of output, such as direct materials, direct labor, and variable overhead.
3. The fixed cost of the product or activity. Fixed costs are those that do not change with the volume of output, such as rent, depreciation, and salaries.
4. The sales volume or output level of the product or activity.
Using these information, we can calculate the following measures:
- Contribution margin: The difference between the selling price and the variable cost per unit. It represents the amount of revenue that contributes to covering the fixed costs and generating profit.
- contribution margin ratio: The ratio of the contribution margin to the selling price. It represents the percentage of revenue that contributes to covering the fixed costs and generating profit.
- Break-even point: The sales volume or output level at which the total revenue equals the total cost. It represents the minimum level of sales or output that is required to avoid losses.
- Margin of safety: The difference between the actual or expected sales volume or output and the break-even point. It represents the amount of sales or output that can decrease before the business incurs losses.
- Target profit: The desired level of profit that the business wants to achieve. It can be expressed as a dollar amount or a percentage of sales or output.
- Required sales or output: The sales volume or output level that is required to achieve the target profit.
Let us illustrate these concepts with an example. Suppose a company produces and sells a product that has the following information:
- Selling price: $50 per unit
- Variable cost: $30 per unit
- Fixed cost: $100,000 per month
- Sales volume: 5,000 units per month
We can calculate the contribution margin, the contribution margin ratio, the break-even point, the margin of safety, and the required sales or output for this product as follows:
- Contribution margin = Selling price - Variable cost = $50 - $30 = $20 per unit
- contribution margin ratio = Contribution margin / Selling price = $20 / $50 = 0.4 or 40%
- break-even point = fixed cost / Contribution margin = $100,000 / $20 = 5,000 units
- Margin of safety = Actual or expected sales - Break-even point = 5,000 - 5,000 = 0 units
- Target profit = 10% of sales = 0.1 x ($50 x 5,000) = $25,000
- Required sales or output = (Fixed cost + Target profit) / Contribution margin = ($100,000 + $25,000) / $20 = 6,250 units
From this example, we can see that the company is currently breaking even, meaning that it is not making any profit or loss. To achieve its target profit of 10%, it needs to increase its sales or output by 1,250 units. Alternatively, it can try to reduce its variable costs or fixed costs, or increase its selling price, to improve its profitability.
CVP analysis can help managers to make decisions regarding cost allocation and cost reduction in target costing. For example, managers can use CVP analysis to:
- evaluate the profitability and risk of different products or activities and allocate resources accordingly.
- Determine the optimal product mix or activity mix that maximizes the overall profit of the business.
- Set the target cost for each product or activity based on the target profit and the market price.
- Identify the cost drivers and the cost behavior of each product or activity and implement cost reduction strategies accordingly.
- Monitor and control the actual performance of each product or activity and compare it with the budgeted or planned performance.
However, CVP analysis also has some limitations and assumptions that need to be considered. Some of these are:
- CVP analysis assumes that the selling price, the variable cost, and the fixed cost are constant and known. In reality, these factors may change due to market conditions, inflation, competition, or other factors.
- CVP analysis assumes that the sales volume or output is the only factor that affects the revenue and the cost. In reality, there may be other factors that influence the revenue and the cost, such as quality, customer satisfaction, innovation, or efficiency.
- CVP analysis assumes that the sales volume or output and the cost are linearly related. In reality, there may be nonlinear relationships due to economies of scale, learning curves, or capacity constraints.
- CVP analysis assumes that the products or activities are independent and have no interdependencies or synergies. In reality, there may be interactions or trade-offs between the products or activities that affect the revenue and the cost.
To overcome these limitations and assumptions, managers need to use CVP analysis with caution and supplement it with other tools and techniques, such as sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis, or simulation. These tools and techniques can help managers to incorporate uncertainty, variability, and complexity into their decision-making process and improve the accuracy and reliability of their CVP analysis.
Implementing cost reduction strategies is a crucial aspect of achieving cost reduction targets in target costing. In this section, we will delve into various insights and perspectives on how organizations can effectively reduce costs.
1. Analyzing and optimizing processes: One effective strategy is to thoroughly analyze existing processes and identify areas where inefficiencies and redundancies exist. By streamlining and optimizing these processes, organizations can eliminate unnecessary costs and improve overall efficiency. For example, implementing lean manufacturing principles can help identify and eliminate waste in production processes.
2. Supplier negotiation and collaboration: Collaborating closely with suppliers can lead to cost savings. By negotiating favorable terms, such as bulk discounts or longer payment terms, organizations can reduce procurement costs. Additionally, exploring alternative suppliers and sourcing options can help identify cost-effective alternatives without compromising quality.
3. Value engineering: Value engineering involves reevaluating product design and specifications to identify opportunities for cost reduction without sacrificing functionality or quality.
Implementing Cost Reduction Strategies - Cost Allocation in Target Costing: How to Achieve Cost Reduction Targets
Monitoring and evaluating cost reduction progress is a crucial aspect of implementing target costing strategies. By closely tracking the progress made in reducing costs, organizations can ensure that they are on track to achieve their cost reduction targets. This section aims to provide comprehensive insights into the monitoring and evaluation process, highlighting different perspectives and strategies.
1. Establishing key Performance indicators (KPIs): To effectively monitor cost reduction progress, it is essential to define relevant KPIs. These indicators can vary depending on the organization's specific goals and objectives. Examples of KPIs commonly used in cost reduction monitoring include cost savings achieved, percentage reduction in costs, and cost variance analysis.
2. Regular Performance Reviews: Conducting regular performance reviews allows organizations to assess their progress in achieving cost reduction targets. These reviews can be conducted on a monthly, quarterly, or annual basis, depending on the organization's needs. During these reviews, key stakeholders can analyze the actual cost reduction achieved, identify any challenges or bottlenecks, and make necessary adjustments to the cost reduction strategies.
3. cost Tracking systems: Implementing robust cost tracking systems is essential for effective monitoring. These systems enable organizations to capture and analyze cost data accurately. By tracking costs at various levels, such as product, process, or department, organizations can identify areas where cost reduction efforts are yielding positive results and areas that require further attention.
4. Benchmarking: Benchmarking involves comparing an organization's cost reduction progress with industry standards or best practices. This allows organizations to gain insights into their relative performance and identify areas for improvement. Benchmarking can be done internally, by comparing different departments or projects within the organization, or externally, by comparing against industry peers.
5. continuous Improvement initiatives: To ensure sustained cost reduction progress, organizations should foster a culture of continuous improvement. This involves encouraging employees to identify and implement innovative cost-saving ideas. By regularly soliciting feedback from employees and providing them with the necessary resources and support, organizations can drive ongoing cost reduction efforts.
6. Cost Reduction Reporting: Effective communication of cost reduction progress is vital for transparency and accountability. Organizations should develop comprehensive cost reduction reports that highlight the achieved cost savings, challenges faced, and future plans. These reports can be shared with key stakeholders, including senior management, investors, and employees, to keep them informed and engaged in the cost reduction journey.
Monitoring and Evaluating Cost Reduction Progress - Cost Allocation in Target Costing: How to Achieve Cost Reduction Targets
One of the main challenges in cost allocation is to ensure that the allocated costs reflect the actual consumption of resources by the products or services. Cost allocation is a process of assigning common costs to different cost objects, such as products, departments, or customers. In target costing, cost allocation is essential to determine the cost gap between the current cost and the target cost of a product, and to identify the areas where cost reduction is needed. However, cost allocation is not a simple task, as it involves many decisions and trade-offs. In this section, we will discuss some of the common challenges in cost allocation and how to overcome them.
Some of the challenges in cost allocation are:
1. choosing the appropriate cost drivers. A cost driver is a factor that causes or influences the amount of a common cost. For example, the number of machine hours, the number of labor hours, or the number of units produced can be used as cost drivers for allocating overhead costs. The choice of cost drivers affects the accuracy and fairness of cost allocation. Ideally, the cost driver should have a strong causal relationship with the common cost, so that the allocated cost reflects the actual resource consumption by the cost object. However, in practice, it may be difficult to find such a cost driver, or it may be too costly or complex to measure it. Therefore, managers may have to use proxy or surrogate cost drivers, such as sales volume, that are easier to measure but less accurate. This may lead to distorted or inaccurate cost allocation, which may affect the cost reduction efforts in target costing. To overcome this challenge, managers should try to use multiple cost drivers that capture the different aspects of resource consumption, such as volume, complexity, and diversity. They should also update the cost drivers periodically to reflect the changes in the cost structure and the production environment.
2. Choosing the appropriate cost pools. A cost pool is a group of common costs that are allocated using the same cost driver. For example, all the costs related to the maintenance of machines can be grouped into a cost pool and allocated using the number of machine hours as the cost driver. The choice of cost pools affects the simplicity and accuracy of cost allocation. If there are too many cost pools, the cost allocation process may become too complex and costly to implement. If there are too few cost pools, the cost allocation may become too simplistic and inaccurate, as it may ignore the differences in the nature and behavior of the common costs. For example, if all the overhead costs are grouped into one cost pool and allocated using the number of units produced as the cost driver, this may ignore the fact that some overhead costs are fixed and some are variable, or that some overhead costs are related to the production volume and some are related to the production complexity. To overcome this challenge, managers should try to balance the trade-off between simplicity and accuracy, and use a cost allocation method that matches the cost pools with the appropriate cost drivers. For example, they can use activity-based costing (ABC), which is a method of allocating costs based on the activities that cause or consume the costs, rather than the products or services that use the activities. ABC can provide more accurate and relevant cost information for target costing, as it can capture the differences in the cost structure and the resource consumption of different products or services.
3. Dealing with the behavioral and ethical issues. cost allocation is not only a technical process, but also a social and political process, as it affects the performance evaluation and the resource allocation of different managers, departments, or units. Therefore, cost allocation may create conflicts or disputes among the stakeholders, who may have different interests and preferences. For example, some managers may prefer a cost allocation method that minimizes their allocated costs and maximizes their profits, while others may prefer a cost allocation method that reflects their actual resource consumption and contribution. Some managers may also try to manipulate the cost allocation process or the cost drivers to influence the outcomes in their favor. These behavioral and ethical issues may undermine the credibility and the effectiveness of cost allocation, and may hamper the cost reduction efforts in target costing. To overcome this challenge, managers should try to involve the stakeholders in the cost allocation process, and communicate the objectives and the rationale of the cost allocation method. They should also establish clear and consistent rules and criteria for cost allocation, and monitor and audit the cost allocation process and the outcomes. They should also align the incentives and the rewards with the cost reduction goals, and encourage cooperation and collaboration among the stakeholders.
Overcoming Challenges in Cost Allocation - Cost Allocation in Target Costing: How to Achieve Cost Reduction Targets
In this blog, we have discussed the concept and process of cost allocation in target costing, and how it can help firms achieve their cost reduction targets. We have also explored the benefits and challenges of different cost allocation methods, such as activity-based costing, direct costing, and value engineering. In this section, we will summarize the main points and key takeaways from our discussion, and provide some recommendations for managers and practitioners who want to implement cost allocation in target costing effectively.
Some of the key takeaways from our discussion are:
- Cost allocation is the process of assigning costs to different products, services, or activities based on their consumption of resources or contribution to value creation. Cost allocation is essential for target costing, which is a strategic approach to set and achieve cost reduction targets based on customer requirements and market conditions.
- Cost allocation in target costing has two main objectives: to identify and eliminate non-value-added costs, and to allocate the remaining costs to products or services based on their relative profitability or strategic importance. By doing so, cost allocation in target costing can help firms improve their cost competitiveness, customer satisfaction, and profitability.
- There are different methods of cost allocation in target costing, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Some of the most common methods are:
1. Activity-based costing (ABC): This method allocates costs based on the activities that cause them, and the amount of resources consumed by each activity. ABC can provide more accurate and detailed information about the cost drivers and the value-added activities, but it can also be complex and costly to implement and maintain.
2. Direct costing: This method allocates costs based on the direct relationship between the costs and the products or services. Direct costing can be simple and easy to apply, but it can also ignore the indirect and overhead costs that are not directly traceable to the products or services, and thus distort the true cost and profitability of each product or service.
3. Value engineering: This method allocates costs based on the functions or features that provide value to the customers, and the willingness of the customers to pay for them. Value engineering can help firms identify and eliminate the unnecessary or excessive costs that do not contribute to customer value, but it can also require a high level of customer involvement and market research, and it can be difficult to measure and quantify the value of each function or feature.
- Cost allocation in target costing is not a one-time or static process, but a dynamic and continuous process that requires constant monitoring and adjustment. Firms need to update their cost information and allocation criteria regularly, and align them with the changing customer needs and market conditions. Firms also need to involve all the relevant stakeholders, such as suppliers, designers, engineers, and marketers, in the cost allocation process, and foster a culture of cost awareness and cost reduction across the organization.
- Cost allocation in target costing can be a powerful tool to achieve cost reduction targets, but it can also pose some challenges and risks. Some of the potential challenges and risks are:
- Cost allocation in target costing can create conflicts and trade-offs between different products, services, or activities, as they compete for the limited resources and cost allowances. Firms need to balance the needs and interests of different stakeholders, and ensure that the cost allocation process is fair and transparent.
- Cost allocation in target costing can lead to overemphasis on cost reduction, and neglect of other aspects of quality, innovation, and customer satisfaction. Firms need to maintain a holistic and balanced view of their performance, and avoid compromising their long-term competitiveness and sustainability for short-term cost savings.
- Cost allocation in target costing can be influenced by human factors, such as biases, errors, or manipulation. Firms need to ensure that the cost data and allocation methods are reliable and valid, and that the cost allocation process is audited and controlled.
We hope that this blog has provided you with some useful insights and information about cost allocation in target costing, and how it can help you achieve your cost reduction targets. If you have any questions or feedback, please feel free to contact us. Thank you for reading!
Conclusion and Key Takeaways - Cost Allocation in Target Costing: How to Achieve Cost Reduction Targets
Read Other Blogs