Expected Shortfall: ES: Startups and Expected Shortfall: ES: Navigating Risk in the Business World

1. What is Expected Shortfall (ES) and why is it important for startups?

One of the most crucial aspects of running a successful startup is managing risk. Risk is the uncertainty of future outcomes, and it can have positive or negative effects on the performance and survival of a business. However, not all risks are equal, and some are more severe and impactful than others. Therefore, it is important for startups to measure and manage their risk exposure using appropriate tools and methods. One such tool is Expected Shortfall (ES), which is a measure of the worst-case scenario loss that a startup can face in a given period of time with a certain probability. ES is also known as Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) or Tail Value at Risk (TVaR), and it is widely used in the financial industry to assess the risk of portfolios and investments.

ES is important for startups for several reasons:

- ES captures the tail risk of a startup, which is the risk of extreme events that have low probability but high impact. For example, a startup may face a tail risk of losing its key customers, suppliers, or partners due to unforeseen circumstances, such as a pandemic, a natural disaster, or a cyberattack. ES can help startups quantify and prepare for such scenarios, and avoid being caught off guard by unexpected losses.

- ES is more informative and robust than other risk measures, such as Value at Risk (VaR). VaR is the maximum loss that a startup can expect to incur in a given period of time with a certain probability. However, VaR does not account for the magnitude of losses beyond the threshold, and it can underestimate the true risk of a startup. For example, if a startup has a VaR of $100,000 at 95% confidence level, it means that there is a 5% chance that the startup will lose more than $100,000 in a given period of time. But how much more? It could be $101,000 or $1,000,000, and VaR does not tell us anything about that. ES, on the other hand, tells us the average loss that the startup will incur in the worst 5% of cases, which is more informative and realistic than VaR.

- ES is consistent and coherent with the principles of risk management, such as subadditivity and diversification. Subadditivity means that the risk of a portfolio is less than or equal to the sum of the risks of its components. Diversification means that combining different assets or businesses can reduce the overall risk of a portfolio. These principles are desirable for startups, as they can help them optimize their risk-return trade-off and achieve higher efficiency and profitability. However, VaR does not always satisfy these principles, and it can lead to misleading and inconsistent results. For example, VaR can increase when two assets or businesses are combined, even if they are negatively correlated and have lower risk individually. This is known as the VaR paradox, and it can discourage startups from diversifying their portfolios and activities. ES, on the other hand, always satisfies these principles, and it can encourage startups to diversify and reduce their risk exposure.

To illustrate the concept of ES, let us consider a simple example of a startup that sells a software product. The startup has a monthly revenue of $50,000, and its monthly costs are $40,000. The startup faces a risk of losing some of its customers due to competition, dissatisfaction, or churn. The probability distribution of the monthly customer loss rate is shown in the table below:

| Customer loss rate (%) | Probability (%) |

| 0 | 50 | | 10 | 30 | | 20 | 10 | | 30 | 5 | | 40 | 3 | | 50 | 2 |

The table shows that the startup has a 50% chance of losing no customers, a 30% chance of losing 10% of its customers, and so on. The expected monthly customer loss rate is 8%, which means that the startup can expect to lose 8% of its customers on average every month. The expected monthly profit of the startup is $10,000, which is the difference between the revenue and the costs.

Now, let us calculate the VaR and the ES of the startup at 95% confidence level. The VaR is the maximum loss that the startup can expect to incur in 95% of the cases, which means that there is a 5% chance of exceeding the VaR. To find the VaR, we need to find the customer loss rate that corresponds to the 5% probability. This can be done by adding up the probabilities from the table until we reach 5%. The result is 30%, which means that the startup has a 5% chance of losing 30% or more of its customers in a given month. The VaR is the loss that the startup will incur if it loses 30% of its customers, which is $15,000. This means that the startup can expect to lose at most $15,000 in 95% of the cases, and its monthly profit will be -$5,000 in the worst-case scenario.

The ES is the average loss that the startup will incur in the worst 5% of the cases, which means that it is the weighted average of the losses that exceed the VaR. To find the ES, we need to multiply the customer loss rates that are greater than or equal to 30% by their probabilities, and divide the sum by 5%. The result is 38%, which means that the startup can expect to lose 38% of its customers on average in the worst 5% of the cases. The ES is the loss that the startup will incur if it loses 38% of its customers, which is $19,000. This means that the startup can expect to lose $19,000 in the worst 5% of the cases, and its monthly profit will be -$9,000 in the worst-case scenario.

The difference between the VaR and the ES is $4,000, which represents the additional loss that the startup can face in the extreme cases that are beyond the VaR. This shows that the ES is more informative and realistic than the VaR, as it captures the tail risk of the startup. The ES also shows that the startup is more vulnerable to risk than the VaR suggests, and it may need to take more precautions and measures to reduce its risk exposure and ensure its survival and growth.

2. How to calculate and report ES for different types of startups and industries?

One of the most important aspects of managing risk in the business world is to measure and report the potential losses that could occur due to adverse events. Expected Shortfall (ES) is a risk measure that captures the average loss beyond a certain threshold, such as the 95th or 99th percentile of the loss distribution. ES is also known as Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) or Tail Value at Risk (TVaR), and it is widely used by financial institutions, regulators, and investors to assess the riskiness of different portfolios and assets.

However, ES is not only applicable to the financial sector, but also to other types of businesses, especially startups. Startups are inherently risky ventures, as they face uncertainty, competition, and resource constraints. Moreover, startups often have asymmetric loss distributions, meaning that they have a high probability of losing a small amount of money, but also a low probability of losing a large amount of money or even going bankrupt. Therefore, ES can be a useful tool to evaluate the downside risk of startups and to compare them across different industries and stages.

To calculate and report ES for startups, there are several steps that need to be followed:

1. Define the loss variable. This could be the net income, the cash flow, the revenue, or any other metric that reflects the performance of the startup. The loss variable should be negative when the startup is profitable and positive when it is unprofitable.

2. Estimate the loss distribution. This could be done using historical data, simulation, or expert judgment. The loss distribution should capture the variability and skewness of the loss variable, as well as the possible extreme outcomes.

3. Choose the confidence level. This is the probability that the loss will exceed a certain threshold. For example, a 95% confidence level means that there is a 5% chance that the loss will be higher than the threshold. The confidence level should reflect the risk appetite and the regulatory requirements of the startup and its stakeholders.

4. Calculate the threshold. This is the value of the loss variable that corresponds to the chosen confidence level. For example, if the loss distribution is normal with mean 0 and standard deviation 10, and the confidence level is 95%, then the threshold is $$1.645 \times 10 = 16.45$$.

5. Calculate the ES. This is the average loss beyond the threshold, weighted by the probability of exceeding the threshold. For example, if the loss distribution is normal with mean 0 and standard deviation 10, and the confidence level is 95%, then the ES is $$\frac{1}{0.05} \int_{16.45}^{\infty} x \phi(x) dx = 18.62$$, where $$\phi(x)$$ is the standard normal density function.

6. Report the ES. This could be done using a table, a chart, or a narrative. The ES should be accompanied by the confidence level, the threshold, and the loss variable. The ES should also be compared to the ES of other startups in the same or different industries, or to the ES of a benchmark portfolio or asset.

To illustrate the calculation and reporting of ES for startups, let us consider two hypothetical examples:

- Startup A is a software company that develops a mobile app for online shopping. It has a monthly net income of -10,000 USD, with a standard deviation of 20,000 USD. The net income follows a normal distribution with a mean of -10,000 USD and a standard deviation of 20,000 USD. The startup wants to calculate and report its ES at a 95% confidence level.

- Startup B is a biotechnology company that develops a new drug for cancer treatment. It has a monthly net income of -50,000 USD, with a standard deviation of 100,000 USD. The net income follows a lognormal distribution with a mean of -50,000 USD and a standard deviation of 100,000 USD. The startup wants to calculate and report its ES at a 99% confidence level.

The following table summarizes the results of the ES calculation for both startups:

| Startup | Loss Variable | Confidence Level | Threshold | ES |

| A | Net Income (USD) | 95% | -50,900 | -58,240 |

| B | Net Income (USD) | 99% | -386,900 | -1,019,600 |

The following chart shows the loss distributions and the ES values for both startups:

![ES chart](https://i.imgur.com/9XZwQ7O.

3. How to balance risk and reward in a dynamic and uncertain environment?

Innovation is the driving force of any successful startup, but it also comes with inherent risks. How can entrepreneurs balance the potential rewards of innovation with the possible losses? One way to approach this question is to use the concept of Expected Shortfall (ES), a measure of risk that captures the worst-case scenarios. ES is defined as the average loss that would occur in a given period of time if the loss exceeds a certain threshold, usually set at a high confidence level. For example, if the ES of a startup's monthly revenue is $10,000 at 95% confidence level, it means that there is a 5% chance that the startup will lose more than $10,000 in a month, and the average of those losses is $10,000.

ES can help startups to evaluate their innovation strategies in several ways:

- ES can help startups to identify and prioritize the most risky aspects of their innovation process. By calculating the ES of different stages or components of their innovation, startups can focus on reducing the likelihood and severity of the worst outcomes. For example, a startup that is developing a new software product can estimate the ES of each feature, module, or release, and allocate more resources and attention to the ones that have the highest ES.

- ES can help startups to compare and select the most promising innovation opportunities. By estimating the ES of different innovation projects or ideas, startups can weigh the potential benefits and costs of each option. For example, a startup that is considering expanding to a new market can compare the ES of entering that market with the ES of staying in the current market, and decide which one has a better risk-reward trade-off.

- ES can help startups to monitor and adjust their innovation performance. By tracking the ES of their innovation outcomes over time, startups can evaluate their progress and identify any deviations or anomalies. For example, a startup that is testing a new product in a pilot market can measure the ES of the customer feedback, sales, or retention, and adjust their product features or marketing strategies accordingly.

4. How to align ES with social and environmental goals and values?

One of the most important aspects of managing risk in the business world is to align it with the social and environmental goals and values of the organization. This is especially true for startups, which often face high uncertainty and volatility in their markets and operations. Expected Shortfall (ES), also known as Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR), is a measure of risk that captures the average loss beyond a certain threshold, such as the 95th or 99th percentile. Unlike Value at Risk (VaR), which only considers the worst-case scenario, ES takes into account the entire tail of the loss distribution, thus providing a more comprehensive and realistic assessment of risk.

However, ES alone is not sufficient to ensure that the risk management strategy of a startup is aligned with its sustainability objectives. There are several challenges and opportunities that need to be considered, such as:

1. Defining the risk appetite and tolerance of the startup. This involves determining the acceptable level of ES for the startup, based on its vision, mission, values, and stakeholder expectations. For example, a startup that aims to provide clean energy solutions may have a lower risk appetite than a startup that focuses on developing innovative gaming applications. The risk appetite and tolerance of the startup should also be communicated clearly and consistently to all the relevant parties, such as investors, employees, customers, and regulators.

2. Choosing the appropriate time horizon and frequency for measuring and reporting ES. This depends on the nature and maturity of the startup, as well as the availability and reliability of data. For example, a startup that operates in a fast-changing and competitive market may need to measure and report ES on a daily or weekly basis, while a startup that has a more stable and long-term outlook may do so on a monthly or quarterly basis. The time horizon and frequency of ES should also reflect the potential impact of social and environmental factors on the startup's performance and risk exposure.

3. Incorporating social and environmental criteria into the ES calculation and analysis. This involves identifying and quantifying the potential sources of social and environmental risk and opportunity for the startup, such as climate change, human rights, diversity and inclusion, and corporate social responsibility. For example, a startup that produces or consumes a large amount of greenhouse gas emissions may face higher ES due to the increased likelihood and severity of regulatory fines, reputational damage, or physical disruptions. On the other hand, a startup that adopts sustainable practices and contributes to social causes may benefit from lower ES due to the enhanced customer loyalty, employee engagement, or competitive advantage.

4. Using ES as a tool for decision making and optimization. This involves applying ES to evaluate and compare different alternatives and scenarios for the startup, such as product development, market entry, financing, or partnership. For example, a startup that wants to expand its operations to a new country may use ES to assess the potential risks and returns of different options, such as exporting, licensing, franchising, or joint venture. The startup may also use ES to optimize its portfolio of products, services, or assets, by selecting the combination that maximizes the expected return for a given level of ES, or minimizes the ES for a given level of expected return.

5. Monitoring and reviewing the ES performance and strategy of the startup. This involves tracking and analyzing the actual and expected ES of the startup over time, and identifying and explaining any deviations or anomalies. For example, a startup that experiences a higher than expected ES may need to investigate the root causes and take corrective actions, such as adjusting its business model, strategy, or operations. The startup may also need to review and update its ES methodology, assumptions, and parameters, to ensure that they are still valid and relevant for the current and future conditions of the startup and its environment.

By following these steps, a startup can align its ES with its social and environmental goals and values, and achieve a balance between risk and reward, innovation and responsibility, and growth and sustainability.

Need Investments and got no clue how to start?

FasterCapital matches you with a wide network of angels and VCs and provides you with everything you need to close your funding round successfully

Join us!

5. How to use Expected Shortfall (ES) as a strategic advantage and a competitive edge for startups?

Here is a possible segment that meets your criteria:

In the dynamic and uncertain world of startups, risk management is a crucial skill that can make or break a venture. While traditional measures of risk, such as Value at Risk (VaR), can provide some guidance, they are often inadequate and misleading in capturing the true extent and impact of potential losses. Expected Shortfall (ES), on the other hand, is a more robust and comprehensive measure of risk that accounts for the severity and probability of extreme events. By using ES, startups can gain a strategic advantage and a competitive edge in the following ways:

- ES can help startups optimize their capital allocation and budgeting. By estimating the worst-case scenario losses for different projects, activities, or assets, startups can prioritize the most profitable and least risky ones, and allocate their limited resources accordingly. For example, a startup that is developing a new product can use ES to compare the potential returns and losses of different features, markets, or pricing strategies, and decide which ones to pursue or avoid.

- ES can help startups communicate their risk profile and performance to investors and stakeholders. By reporting their ES, startups can demonstrate their awareness and management of risk, and provide a more realistic and transparent picture of their financial health and potential. For example, a startup that is seeking funding can use ES to show how their expected returns outweigh their expected losses, and how they have mitigated the impact of extreme events on their cash flow and valuation.

- ES can help startups learn from their failures and improve their decision-making. By analyzing the sources and drivers of their ES, startups can identify the factors that contribute to their risk exposure, and the areas where they need to improve or innovate. For example, a startup that has experienced a large loss due to a market crash can use ES to understand how their business model, product, or customer segments were affected, and how they can adapt or diversify their offerings or strategies.

Finding the right investors is the first step to getting funded!

FasterCapital matches your startup with potential investors who are interested in the industry, stage, and market of your startup

Join us!