As startups grow and expand their operations across borders, they may encounter various legal disputes with their partners, customers, suppliers, or competitors. These disputes can be costly, time-consuming, and damaging to the reputation and goodwill of the startups. To avoid these risks, many startups opt for international business arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution that allows parties to resolve their conflicts in a private, efficient, and flexible manner.
International business arbitration has several advantages for startups expanding globally, such as:
- Choice of arbitrators: The parties can choose the arbitrators who will decide their case, based on their expertise, experience, and impartiality. This can ensure that the arbitrators are familiar with the industry, the legal issues, and the cultural context of the dispute.
- Choice of law and venue: The parties can also choose the law and the venue that will govern their arbitration, according to their convenience and preferences. This can avoid the uncertainty and complexity of dealing with different legal systems and jurisdictions.
- Confidentiality: Unlike court proceedings, arbitration proceedings are confidential and not open to the public. This can protect the sensitive information and trade secrets of the startups, as well as their reputation and relationships with their stakeholders.
- Enforceability: Arbitral awards are generally easier to enforce than court judgments, especially in foreign countries. This is because most countries are signatories to the New York Convention, which requires them to recognize and enforce arbitral awards, subject to limited exceptions.
- Finality: Arbitral awards are usually final and binding, and not subject to appeal or review by courts. This can save time and money for the startups, and prevent prolonged litigation.
Some examples of international business arbitration involving startups are:
- In 2019, Uber Technologies Inc. And its subsidiary Raiser LLC agreed to pay $20 million to settle a class-action arbitration brought by more than 13,000 drivers in California and Massachusetts, who claimed that they were misclassified as independent contractors and denied minimum wage, overtime, and other benefits.
- In 2020, Spotify Technology S.A. And Warner Music Group Corp. Reached a settlement in an arbitration initiated by Warner in India, over Spotify's launch of its streaming service in the country without a license from Warner. The terms of the settlement were not disclosed, but it was reported that Spotify agreed to pay Warner a significant amount of royalties and to remove some songs from its platform in India.
- In 2021, Airbnb Inc. And the city of Paris agreed to end their dispute in an arbitration administered by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), over Airbnb's alleged violation of the city's regulations on short-term rentals. The details of the agreement were not made public, but it was said that Airbnb agreed to cooperate with the city in enforcing the rules and to pay a fine of €8 million.
There is no greater country on Earth for entrepreneurship than America. In every category, from the high-tech world of Silicon Valley, where I live, to University R&D labs, to countless Main Street small business owners, Americans are taking risks, embracing new ideas and - most importantly - creating jobs.
Arbitration is a popular alternative to litigation for resolving international business disputes. It offers many advantages for startups expanding globally, such as speed, flexibility, confidentiality, and enforceability. However, arbitration also has some potential pitfalls and drawbacks that startups should be aware of before choosing this method of dispute resolution. Some of these challenges are:
- Cost: Arbitration can be expensive, especially if the parties choose a reputable arbitral institution, appoint multiple arbitrators, or engage in extensive discovery. The parties have to pay for the fees and expenses of the arbitrators, the administrative costs of the institution, and the legal fees of their own counsel. In some cases, the cost of arbitration may exceed the cost of litigation in domestic courts.
- Lack of appeal: Arbitration awards are generally final and binding, and the grounds for challenging them are very limited. Unlike court judgments, arbitration awards cannot be appealed on the merits or on questions of law. This means that the parties have to accept the arbitrators' decision, even if they disagree with it or find it erroneous. The only recourse for the parties is to seek annulment or enforcement of the award in a national court, which may involve additional time and expense.
- Complexity: Arbitration can be complex, especially if the dispute involves multiple parties, contracts, or jurisdictions. The parties have to agree on the applicable rules, procedures, and laws governing the arbitration, as well as the number and qualifications of the arbitrators. The parties may also face difficulties in coordinating their positions, evidence, and arguments, and in dealing with procedural issues such as joinder, consolidation, or bifurcation. Moreover, the parties have to comply with the laws and regulations of the seat of arbitration, which may differ from their own legal systems.
- Uncertainty: Arbitration can be uncertain, especially if the parties choose ad hoc arbitration or an unfamiliar arbitral institution. The parties may not know in advance the quality, expertise, or impartiality of the arbitrators, or the efficiency, transparency, or consistency of the arbitral institution. The parties may also face uncertainty regarding the interpretation and application of the arbitration agreement, the scope and validity of the arbitration clause, and the enforceability of the arbitration award. These uncertainties may increase the risk of disputes, delays, or challenges in the arbitration process.
These are some of the challenges of arbitration that startups should be aware of when considering this option for resolving international business disputes. Arbitration is not a one-size-fits-all solution, and it may not be suitable for every case or situation. Startups should carefully weigh the pros and cons of arbitration, and consult with legal experts before entering into an arbitration agreement. By doing so, they can avoid potential pitfalls and drawbacks, and maximize the benefits of arbitration.
One of the most crucial aspects of international business arbitration is the preparation for the arbitration hearing. This involves gathering and presenting evidence, preparing witnesses, and drafting submissions for the arbitration tribunal. These tasks require careful planning, strategy, and execution, as they can have a significant impact on the outcome of the dispute. In this section, we will discuss some of the best practices and tips for preparing for the arbitration hearing, from both the claimant's and the respondent's perspectives.
- Gathering and presenting evidence: Evidence is the foundation of any arbitration case, as it supports the parties' factual and legal arguments. Therefore, it is important to gather relevant, reliable, and persuasive evidence that can prove or disprove the claims and defenses. Evidence can be in the form of documents, witness statements, expert reports, or physical exhibits. Depending on the applicable arbitration rules and the tribunal's directions, the parties may need to disclose, exchange, and submit their evidence in advance of the hearing, or present it at the hearing. Some of the key considerations for gathering and presenting evidence are:
- Identify the issues in dispute and the applicable law: The parties should identify the main issues in dispute and the applicable law that governs them, as this will determine the type and scope of evidence that is needed. For example, if the dispute involves a breach of contract, the parties will need to provide evidence of the existence and terms of the contract, the performance or non-performance of the obligations, the causation and quantification of the damages, and any defenses or counterclaims. The applicable law may also affect the admissibility, relevance, and weight of the evidence, as different legal systems may have different rules and standards for evidence.
- Conduct a thorough and timely document review: The parties should conduct a thorough and timely document review, which involves identifying, collecting, reviewing, and analyzing all the documents that are relevant to the dispute. This may include contracts, invoices, correspondence, emails, memos, reports, financial statements, and any other records that relate to the facts and circumstances of the case. The parties should also consider any potential sources of documents, such as third parties, public records, or electronic devices. The document review should be done as early as possible, as it can help the parties to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their case, identify the key witnesses and experts, and formulate their strategy and arguments.
- Prepare clear and concise witness statements and expert reports: The parties may also rely on witness statements and expert reports to provide evidence of the facts and opinions that support their case. Witness statements are written statements of the witnesses who have personal knowledge of the relevant facts, such as the parties, their employees, or their business partners. Expert reports are written reports of the experts who have specialized knowledge or expertise in a relevant field, such as accounting, engineering, or valuation. The parties should prepare clear and concise witness statements and expert reports that address the issues in dispute, explain the basis and reasoning of the evidence, and provide references to the supporting documents. The parties should also ensure that the witnesses and experts are available and prepared to testify at the hearing, if required.
- Follow the rules and directions of the arbitration tribunal: The parties should follow the rules and directions of the arbitration tribunal regarding the gathering and presenting of evidence. The arbitration tribunal may issue procedural orders or guidelines that specify the format, content, timing, and procedure of the evidence submission and presentation. For example, the tribunal may require the parties to submit a list of documents, a bundle of documents, a summary of witness statements, or a joint expert report. The tribunal may also set limits on the number, length, or scope of the evidence, or exclude or disregard any evidence that is irrelevant, immaterial, or inadmissible. The parties should comply with the tribunal's rules and directions, as failing to do so may result in sanctions or adverse inferences.
- Preparing witnesses: Witnesses are persons who provide oral testimony at the arbitration hearing, based on their personal knowledge or expertise. Witnesses can be either factual witnesses or expert witnesses. Factual witnesses are those who have direct or indirect knowledge of the facts and circumstances of the dispute, such as the parties, their employees, or their business partners. Expert witnesses are those who have specialized knowledge or expertise in a relevant field, such as accounting, engineering, or valuation. Preparing witnesses is a vital task, as it can enhance the credibility and persuasiveness of the evidence and the arguments. Some of the best practices and tips for preparing witnesses are:
- Select the appropriate witnesses: The parties should select the appropriate witnesses who can provide relevant, reliable, and persuasive testimony on the issues in dispute. The parties should consider the quality and quantity of the witnesses, as well as the balance and diversity of the witness pool. The parties should avoid selecting witnesses who are redundant, irrelevant, or biased, as this may undermine the effectiveness and efficiency of the arbitration. The parties should also consider the availability and willingness of the witnesses, as well as the potential risks and costs of calling them.
- Prepare the witness statements: The parties should prepare the witness statements, which are written statements of the witnesses that summarize their testimony. The witness statements should be clear and concise, and reflect the witness's own words and recollection. The witness statements should also be consistent and coherent, and provide references to the supporting documents. The witness statements should not contain any arguments, opinions, or legal conclusions, unless the witness is an expert. The witness statements should also be signed and dated by the witnesses, and submitted to the tribunal and the other party in advance of the hearing, according to the tribunal's directions.
- Conduct the witness interviews: The parties should conduct the witness interviews, which are oral sessions with the witnesses that aim to prepare them for the hearing. The witness interviews should be conducted by the party's counsel or representative, and may involve the party, the expert, or the interpreter. The witness interviews should be done in a respectful and professional manner, and respect the witness's autonomy and integrity. The witness interviews should cover the following topics:
- The background and role of the witness: The party's counsel or representative should explain the background and role of the witness, such as the witness's name, occupation, relationship to the party, involvement in the dispute, and purpose of the testimony.
- The arbitration process and procedure: The party's counsel or representative should explain the arbitration process and procedure, such as the nature and scope of the arbitration, the applicable rules and law, the composition and role of the tribunal, the format and schedule of the hearing, and the rights and obligations of the witness.
- The witness statement and the documents: The party's counsel or representative should review the witness statement and the documents with the witness, and ensure that the witness understands and agrees with the content and accuracy of the evidence. The party's counsel or representative should also clarify any ambiguities, inconsistencies, or gaps in the evidence, and address any questions or concerns that the witness may have.
- The examination and cross-examination: The party's counsel or representative should explain the examination and cross-examination with the witness, and provide guidance and tips on how to testify effectively and confidently. The party's counsel or representative should also conduct a mock examination and cross-examination with the witness, and provide feedback and suggestions on how to improve the witness's performance.
- Drafting submissions: Submissions are written or oral statements of the parties that present their arguments and evidence to the arbitration tribunal. Submissions can be in the form of pleadings, memorials, briefs, or oral submissions. Drafting submissions is a key task, as it can influence the tribunal's understanding and assessment of the case. Some of the best practices and tips for drafting submissions are:
- Identify the audience and the objective: The parties should identify the audience and the objective of the submissions, as this will determine the tone, style, and structure of the submissions. The audience is the arbitration tribunal, which may consist of one or three arbitrators, who may have different backgrounds, experiences, and preferences. The objective is to persuade the tribunal to accept the party's position and grant the party's relief. Therefore, the submissions should be tailored to the audience and the objective, and address the tribunal's expectations and concerns.
- Organize the submissions logically and systematically: The parties should organize the submissions logically and systematically, and follow a clear and coherent outline. The submissions should have an introduction, a body, and a conclusion, and use headings, subheadings, and paragraphs to divide the submissions into sections and subsections. The introduction should provide an overview of the case, the main issues, and the party's position and relief. The body should provide a detailed analysis of the facts, the law, and the evidence, and support the party's arguments and claims. The conclusion should summarize the main points, restate the party's position and relief, and request the tribunal's decision.
- Use clear and concise language and style: The parties should use clear and concise language and style, and avoid any ambiguity, complexity, or redundancy. The parties should use plain and simple words, sentences, and paragraphs, and avoid any jargon, acronyms, or technical terms, unless necessary and defined. The parties should also use consistent and accurate terminology, grammar, spelling, and punctuation, and follow the same citation and referencing system throughout the submissions. The parties should also use persuasive and respectful language and style, and avoid any exaggeration, speculation, or aggression.
- Support the submissions with evidence and authority: The parties should support the submissions with evidence and authority,
In this article, we have explored the benefits and challenges of international business arbitration for startups expanding globally. We have also discussed some of the best practices and strategies to ensure a successful and cost-effective arbitration process. Here are some of the main takeaways from this article:
- International business arbitration is a flexible, confidential, and enforceable alternative to litigation for resolving cross-border disputes. It can help startups avoid the risks and costs of dealing with multiple legal systems and jurisdictions.
- Startups should consider several factors when choosing an arbitration clause, such as the scope, the seat, the rules, the institution, the language, the number and qualifications of arbitrators, and the applicable law. These factors can have a significant impact on the outcome and efficiency of the arbitration.
- Startups should also be aware of the potential pitfalls and challenges of arbitration, such as the lack of interim measures, the limited grounds for appeal, the possibility of parallel proceedings, and the enforcement difficulties in some countries. These challenges can be mitigated by careful planning and preparation, as well as by seeking expert advice and assistance.
- Startups should adopt a proactive and strategic approach to arbitration, by conducting a thorough risk assessment, selecting the most suitable dispute resolution mechanism, preparing the necessary evidence and arguments, and engaging with the other party and the arbitrators in a constructive and respectful manner.
We hope that this article has provided you with some useful insights and tips on how to use international business arbitration as a tool for resolving your cross-border disputes. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact us or leave a comment below. We would love to hear from you and help you with your arbitration needs. Thank you for reading and happy arbitrating!
Read Other Blogs