pest analysis is a strategic tool that examines the external factors affecting a business or an industry. It stands for Political, Economic, Social, and Technological factors, and it helps to identify the opportunities and threats that may arise from these factors. PEST analysis is useful for payment service providers (PSPs) because it helps them to understand the market trends and the payment services landscape from a holistic perspective. By conducting a PEST analysis, PSPs can:
- Assess the political environment and the regulatory frameworks that govern the payment services industry in different regions and countries. For example, PSPs need to comply with the payment Services directive (PSD2) in the European Union, which aims to increase competition, innovation, and security in the payment services market.
- Analyze the economic factors and the macroeconomic conditions that affect the demand and supply of payment services. For example, PSPs need to consider the inflation, interest rates, exchange rates, GDP growth, unemployment, consumer spending, and income levels of their target markets and customers.
- Evaluate the social factors and the demographic and cultural trends that influence the preferences and behaviors of payment service users. For example, PSPs need to cater to the diverse needs and expectations of different generations, such as millennials, Gen Z, and baby boomers, who have different payment habits and preferences.
- Examine the technological factors and the innovations and disruptions that shape the payment services industry. For example, PSPs need to keep up with the emerging technologies and trends such as mobile payments, biometric authentication, blockchain, artificial intelligence, and cloud computing, which offer new opportunities and challenges for payment service delivery.
The payment service industry is influenced by various political factors that shape its opportunities and challenges. These factors include the level of government intervention, the stability of the political environment, the regulatory framework, and the trade agreements that affect the cross-border transactions and the competitiveness of the industry. Some of the political factors that impact the payment service industry are:
- Government intervention: The degree of government involvement in the payment service industry varies across countries and regions. Some governments may promote the development and innovation of the industry by providing incentives, subsidies, or grants to the payment service providers (PSPs). For example, the European Union has established the Payment Services Directive (PSD) and the Revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2) to create a single market for payment services and foster competition and innovation. Other governments may impose restrictions or barriers on the entry and operation of the PSPs, such as licensing requirements, capital adequacy rules, or foreign ownership limits. For example, China has a closed-loop payment system that requires PSPs to obtain a license from the People's Bank of China (PBOC) and to connect to the China UnionPay (CUP) network, which limits the access of foreign PSPs to the Chinese market.
- political stability: The stability of the political environment affects the security and reliability of the payment service industry. Political instability, such as civil unrest, violence, terrorism, or war, may disrupt the infrastructure and networks that support the payment service industry, such as the internet, telecommunications, electricity, or transportation. This may result in service interruptions, delays, or failures that affect the customer experience and satisfaction. For example, in 2019, the internet shutdown in Kashmir, India, affected the online payment services and caused losses for the local businesses and consumers. Political instability may also increase the risk of fraud, cyberattacks, or sanctions that may compromise the data and funds of the PSPs and their customers. For example, in 2018, the US sanctions on Iran affected the international payment services and isolated the Iranian PSPs from the global financial system.
- regulatory framework: The regulatory framework defines the rules and standards that govern the payment service industry. The regulatory framework may vary across countries and regions, depending on the objectives and priorities of the regulators. Some of the common regulatory objectives are to ensure the safety and soundness of the payment service industry, to protect the rights and interests of the customers, to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing, to promote financial inclusion and literacy, and to support the digital transformation and innovation of the industry. For example, the general Data Protection regulation (GDPR) in the European Union aims to protect the personal data and privacy of the customers and to enhance their control over their data. The regulatory framework may also evolve over time, in response to the changing needs and expectations of the market and the society. For example, the Open Banking initiative in the United Kingdom aims to increase the competition and choice in the payment service industry by allowing customers to share their financial data and initiate payments through third-party providers.
- trade agreements: The trade agreements affect the cross-border transactions and the competitiveness of the payment service industry. trade agreements may facilitate or hinder the trade of goods and services, the movement of capital and labor, and the exchange of information and technology among countries and regions. Trade agreements may also create or reduce the tariffs, quotas, or non-tariff barriers that affect the cost and efficiency of the payment service industry. For example, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) aims to eliminate or reduce the tariffs and non-tariff barriers among 11 countries in the Asia-Pacific region, which may benefit the payment service industry by increasing the trade volume and lowering the transaction costs. Trade agreements may also create or resolve the disputes or conflicts that affect the payment service industry. For example, the US-China trade war has created uncertainties and tensions that affect the payment service industry, such as the ban on the Chinese PSP WeChat Pay in the US market.
In a world with many blockchains and hundreds of tradable tokens built on top of them, entire industries are automated through software, venture capital and stock markets are circumvented, entrepreneurship is streamlined, and networks gain sovereignty through their own digital currency. This is the next phase of the Internet.
While pest analysis can be a useful tool for understanding the external factors that affect the payment service industry, it also has some limitations and challenges that need to be considered. PEST analysis is not a one-size-fits-all approach, and it may not capture all the relevant aspects of the complex and dynamic environment that payment service providers operate in. Some of the drawbacks and challenges of using PEST analysis for payment service providers are:
- 1. PEST analysis can be too broad and general. PEST analysis covers four major dimensions: political, economic, social, and technological. However, these dimensions may not be equally important or relevant for different payment service providers, depending on their target markets, customer segments, product offerings, and competitive strategies. For example, a payment service provider that operates in a highly regulated market may need to pay more attention to the political and legal factors, while a payment service provider that focuses on innovation and differentiation may need to prioritize the technological and social factors. Therefore, PEST analysis may not provide enough depth or specificity for payment service providers to identify the most critical opportunities and threats in their external environment.
- 2. PEST analysis can be too static and outdated. PEST analysis is based on the assumption that the external factors are relatively stable and predictable, and that they can be analyzed at a given point in time. However, this may not be the case for the payment service industry, which is constantly evolving and changing due to the rapid advancement of technology, the emergence of new competitors and business models, the shifting consumer preferences and behaviors, and the changing regulatory and political landscape. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the payment service industry, as it has accelerated the adoption of digital and contactless payments, increased the demand for online and cross-border transactions, and raised the concerns over cybersecurity and data privacy. Therefore, PEST analysis may not capture the current or future trends and scenarios that payment service providers need to adapt to and prepare for.
- 3. PEST analysis can be too descriptive and passive. PEST analysis is mainly a descriptive and diagnostic tool, as it helps payment service providers to understand and evaluate their external environment. However, it does not provide any guidance or recommendations on how to respond to or influence the external factors, or how to leverage their internal strengths and capabilities. For example, a PEST analysis may reveal that there is a high level of competition and regulation in the payment service industry, but it does not suggest how a payment service provider can gain a competitive edge or comply with the regulatory requirements. Therefore, PEST analysis may not be sufficient for payment service providers to develop and implement effective strategies and actions that can enhance their performance and sustainability.
The PEST analysis of the payment service market reveals the complex and dynamic factors that influence the industry's growth and challenges. Based on the analysis, the following are some of the main takeaways and recommendations for payment service providers:
- Political factors: Payment service providers should be aware of the regulatory frameworks and policies that govern their operations in different countries and regions. They should comply with the laws and standards that protect the rights and interests of consumers, merchants, and governments. They should also monitor the political stability and security of the markets they operate in, as well as the potential risks of sanctions, trade wars, or cyberattacks. For example, payment service providers that operate in the European Union should adhere to the Payment Services Directive 2 (PSD2), which aims to enhance consumer protection, promote innovation, and foster competition in the payment service market.
- Economic factors: Payment service providers should leverage the opportunities and overcome the challenges posed by the economic conditions and trends of the markets they serve. They should adapt to the changing consumer preferences and behaviors, such as the increasing demand for digital and mobile payments, the growing e-commerce and cross-border transactions, and the rising financial inclusion and literacy. They should also consider the impact of the macroeconomic factors, such as the GDP growth, inflation, exchange rates, and interest rates, on their profitability and competitiveness. For example, payment service providers that operate in emerging markets should capitalize on the high potential and growth of the digital payment sector, while also addressing the barriers and risks of low infrastructure, security, and trust.
- social factors: Payment service providers should understand the social and cultural factors that affect the adoption and usage of their services by different segments of customers. They should cater to the diverse needs and expectations of customers, such as the convenience, speed, security, and affordability of payment services. They should also respect the values and norms of customers, such as the privacy, transparency, and social responsibility of payment service providers. For example, payment service providers that operate in Asia should recognize the popularity and influence of social media platforms, such as WeChat and Line, on the payment service market, and offer integrated and seamless payment solutions that enhance the customer experience and loyalty.
- Technological factors: Payment service providers should embrace the technological innovations and developments that shape the payment service industry. They should invest in the research and development of new and improved payment solutions, such as biometric authentication, blockchain, artificial intelligence, and cloud computing. They should also keep pace with the technological changes and disruptions that create new opportunities and threats for the payment service market, such as the emergence of new competitors, the evolution of customer expectations, and the occurrence of cybercrimes. For example, payment service providers that operate in the United States should respond to the growing competition and innovation from fintech companies, such as PayPal and Stripe, that offer alternative and advanced payment services that challenge the traditional payment methods and players.
Read Other Blogs