Royalty Payments: Understanding Royalty Payments: A Guide to Fair Revenue Sharing

1. Introduction to Royalty Payments

Royalty payments represent a vital element in the commercial exchange of intellectual property rights. They are the financial compensation awarded to creators, inventors, or original rights holders for the use of their work by others. This system of revenue sharing is designed to ensure that the individuals or entities who have invested time, effort, and resources into creating something unique and valuable continue to receive an equitable share of the profits generated from their work, even long after the initial act of creation.

From the perspective of the creator, royalties serve as a recognition of their ongoing contribution to the value of the intellectual property. For the licensee—the party using the creation—royalty payments are a way to legally and ethically benefit from someone else's work without infringing on their rights. Meanwhile, from a legal standpoint, royalty arrangements are carefully structured to comply with copyright laws and ensure fair practice.

Here are some key points that delve deeper into the intricacies of royalty payments:

1. Types of Royalties: There are various forms of royalties, such as mechanical royalties from music sales, performance royalties from music played in public, and patent royalties from the use of patented technology. Each type has its own method of calculation and distribution.

2. Calculation Methods: Royalties can be calculated as a percentage of gross or net revenues, a fixed amount per unit sold, or via profit-sharing agreements. For example, a book author might receive a royalty of 15% of the book's retail price for each copy sold.

3. Contracts and Agreements: The terms of royalty payments are specified in licensing agreements. These contracts outline the duration, scope, and method of payment, and they are legally binding. It's crucial for both parties to clearly understand and agree upon these terms to prevent disputes.

4. Collection Societies: In many industries, especially in music and publishing, collection societies exist to track usage and collect royalties on behalf of creators. For instance, ASCAP and BMI are two such organizations that manage performance royalties for songwriters.

5. International Royalties: With the globalization of media and technology, international royalty payments have become increasingly complex. Creators must navigate various international laws and treaties, such as the Berne Convention, to ensure they are compensated for the worldwide use of their work.

6. Digital Media and Streaming: The rise of digital media platforms and streaming services has transformed the landscape of royalty payments. New models, such as micro-royalties from streaming, are continually being developed to adapt to the changing ways content is consumed.

Examples help illustrate these points. Imagine a musician who writes a hit song. They may receive mechanical royalties when their song is sold as a digital download, performance royalties when it's played on the radio, and synchronization royalties if it's used in a TV show or commercial. Similarly, a software developer who patents a unique algorithm could license it to other companies and receive patent royalties each time the technology is implemented in a new product.

Royalty payments are a complex but essential aspect of the creative and innovative industries. They ensure that creators are fairly compensated for their work and encourage the ongoing production of new and original content. Understanding the nuances of royalty payments is crucial for anyone involved in the creation, distribution, or use of intellectual property.

2. The History of Royalty Payments in Various Industries

Royalty payments have long been a cornerstone of revenue sharing across various industries, serving as a financial embodiment of the value that intellectual property (IP) holds in the modern economy. From the arts to technology, these payments ensure that creators and inventors receive their fair share of the profits derived from their original works. The concept of royalties can be traced back to the Statute of Anne in early 18th-century Britain, which was the first statute to provide copyright protection. Since then, the evolution of royalty payments has mirrored the growth and diversification of industries, adapting to new forms of media, technological advancements, and international trade agreements.

1. Music Industry: The music industry's use of royalties began in the late 19th century with the advent of sheet music and mechanical reproduction technologies. Composers and lyricists were paid for each copy of their work sold, a practice that has evolved with the industry. Today, royalties are collected for digital downloads, streaming, and live performances, with organizations like ASCAP and BMI tracking usage and collecting payments.

2. Publishing: In book publishing, royalty payments to authors typically represent a percentage of the sales. This system has been in place since the 20th century and has expanded to include e-books and audiobooks. Notable examples include J.K. Rowling's earnings from the Harry Potter series, which demonstrate the potential for substantial royalties in the publishing industry.

3. Patents and Technology: The patent system, established to encourage innovation by granting inventors exclusive rights to their inventions, has led to a complex web of royalty payments in the tech industry. Licensing agreements often involve royalties, as seen in the smartphone industry where companies like Apple and Samsung have engaged in lengthy legal battles over patent infringements and associated royalties.

4. Film and Television: Royalties in the film and television industry, often referred to as residuals, are paid to actors, directors, and writers when their work is rerun or released on home video. The rise of streaming services has significantly impacted this area, with new agreements being negotiated to ensure fair compensation in the digital age.

5. Art and Photography: Visual artists and photographers also receive royalties, particularly when their work is reproduced or used commercially. The famous case of Shepard Fairey's "Hope" poster featuring Barack Obama highlighted the complexities of copyright and royalties in the art world.

6. Software and Gaming: Software developers and game designers receive royalties for their creations, especially when licensed to third parties. The success of games like Minecraft, which was acquired by Microsoft, showcases the lucrative potential of royalties in this sector.

7. Franchising: Franchise businesses operate under a royalty payment model, where franchisees pay a percentage of their revenue to the franchisor. This model is prevalent in fast-food chains like McDonald's and retail brands like Gap.

The history of royalty payments is a testament to the enduring need to balance the interests of creators with those of distributors and consumers. As industries continue to evolve, so too will the mechanisms for ensuring that all parties are fairly compensated for their contributions to the economic and cultural tapestry of society. The future of royalty payments may see further adaptations to accommodate emerging technologies like blockchain, which has the potential to streamline royalty distribution and enhance transparency.

3. Pros and Cons

Royalty agreements are pivotal in industries where intellectual property plays a central role, such as publishing, music, software, and patents. These agreements outline how creators are compensated for the use of their work, balancing the need for fair revenue sharing with the practicalities of business operations. They come in various forms, each tailored to specific circumstances and industries, and carry their own set of advantages and disadvantages. Understanding the nuances of these agreements is essential for both creators and licensees to ensure that the deal is equitable and promotes a sustainable business relationship.

1. Flat-Fee Royalty Agreements

Pros:

- Predictability: Both parties know exactly what financial obligations to expect.

- Simplicity: Easy to administer without the need for complex sales tracking.

Cons:

- Limited Earnings Potential: Creators may miss out on additional earnings if the product becomes highly successful.

Example: An author might receive a one-time payment for their book, regardless of how many copies are sold.

2. Percentage-Based Royalty Agreements

Pros:

- Earnings Scale with Success: Creators benefit financially as sales increase.

- Alignment of Interests: Encourages the licensee to maximize sales, benefiting both parties.

Cons:

- Complexity: Requires accurate sales reporting and auditing to ensure fair payment.

Example: A musician receives a percentage of each album sold, incentivizing the record label to promote the album.

3. Step-Deal Royalty Agreements

Pros:

- Flexibility: Allows for adjustments based on sales milestones.

- Incentive for Creators: Higher sales tiers can mean higher royalty rates.

Cons:

- Complexity: More difficult to administer due to varying rates at different sales levels.

Example: A software developer earns a higher royalty rate after their software surpasses 100,000 licenses sold.

4. Hybrid Royalty Agreements

Pros:

- Customization: Can be tailored to fit the unique needs of both parties.

- balance of Risks and rewards: Combines elements of flat-fee and percentage-based models.

Cons:

- Negotiation Difficulty: More complex terms can lead to longer negotiation periods.

Example: A video game designer might receive a flat fee plus a percentage of sales after a certain threshold is met.

5. Cross-Collateralized Royalty Agreements

Pros:

- Risk Distribution: Losses from one project can be offset by gains from another.

- Portfolio Approach: Encourages investment in multiple projects.

Cons:

- Diluted Earnings: Successful projects may subsidize less successful ones, reducing overall earnings.

Example: A film studio uses the profits from a hit movie to cover the losses of several other films under the same agreement.

While royalty agreements can be structured in numerous ways, each type has its own set of considerations. Creators and licensees must weigh the pros and cons carefully to choose an agreement that aligns with their goals, risk tolerance, and the projected success of the product or work in question. By doing so, they can foster a mutually beneficial relationship that respects the creator's rights while also driving business growth.

We need to intentionally invest in health, in home ownership, in entrepreneurship, in access to democracy, in economic empowerment. If we don't do these things, we shouldn't be surprised that racial inequality persists because inequalities compound.

Pete Buttigieg

4. Common Formulas and Practices

Calculating royalties can be a complex process, with various formulas and practices employed depending on the industry, type of intellectual property, and the agreement between the parties involved. Royalties are essentially the financial compensation paid to an individual or entity for the right to use their intellectual property (IP). This could include royalties for books, music, patents, trademarks, software, and more. The calculation of these payments is critical to ensure fair revenue sharing and to incentivize creators to continue producing work that can be enjoyed and utilized by others.

From the perspective of an author, royalties might be a percentage of the book's sale price, often ranging from 5% to 15%, depending on the publisher and the format of the book. For instance, hardcover books typically offer higher royalty rates than paperback editions. In the music industry, royalties are calculated differently, with factors such as the medium (physical, download, streaming), the artist's contract, and the country's laws playing a role. Performance royalties, mechanical royalties, and synchronization royalties are some of the types encountered by musicians.

Here are some common formulas and practices used in calculating royalties:

1. Percentage of gross or Net sales: This is one of the most straightforward methods, where the royalty is a fixed percentage of the sales revenue. For example, if an author has a 10% royalty rate on a book that sells for $20, the royalty per book sold would be $$ 10\% \times $20 = $2 $$.

2. Graduated Royalties: In this approach, the royalty percentage increases as sales volume increases. For example, an author might receive 10% for the first 10,000 copies, 12.5% for the next 10,000, and 15% beyond that.

3. Minimum Guarantee and Advances: Often, a creator will receive an advance against future royalties. This is a lump sum paid upfront, which is then "earned out" as sales occur. For example, an author might receive a $10,000 advance and earn royalties at a rate that would require the sale of 5,000 books to cover the advance.

4. Retail Price vs. Wholesale Price: Royalties can be based on the retail price (the price consumers pay) or the wholesale price (the price retailers pay to the distributor). For example, a $20 book with a wholesale price of $10 might offer a 10% royalty on the retail price ($2) or a 20% royalty on the wholesale price (also $2).

5. Performance Royalties: In the case of music, performance royalties are paid when a song is played publicly, such as on the radio, in a restaurant, or through a streaming service. These are typically collected and distributed by performance rights organizations.

6. Mechanical Royalties: These are paid to songwriters and publishers when a copy of their song is made, for example, when a song is pressed onto a CD or downloaded from the internet.

7. Synchronization Royalties: These are paid when music is used in sync with visual media, such as in movies, TV shows, commercials, or video games.

8. Patent Royalties: For inventions, royalties are often a percentage of the net profits made from the product that uses the patented technology. The rate can vary widely depending on the industry and the potential profitability of the invention.

To illustrate, let's consider a software developer who has created a new app. They may negotiate a royalty agreement with a company that stipulates a 15% royalty on net profits from sales of the app. If the app generates $100,000 in net profits, the developer would receive $$ 15\% \times $100,000 = $15,000 $$ in royalties.

While the methods of calculating royalties can vary, the underlying principle remains the same: to provide fair compensation to creators for the use of their IP. It's a delicate balance that requires careful negotiation and clear understanding of the terms involved to ensure that all parties feel the revenue sharing is equitable.

5. Understanding the Fine Print

Navigating the intricacies of the legal framework surrounding royalty payments is akin to unraveling a complex tapestry woven with various threads of legal statutes, case law, and contractual obligations. At its core, the legal framework serves as the backbone for ensuring that all parties involved in the creation, production, and distribution of intellectual property are fairly compensated for their contributions. This framework is not monolithic; it varies significantly across different jurisdictions, industries, and types of intellectual property. For instance, the royalties for a patented invention may be governed by different principles than those for a musical composition. Moreover, the framework is dynamic, often evolving in response to technological advancements and shifting market forces. Understanding this legal labyrinth requires a multi-faceted approach, considering perspectives ranging from the content creator who relies on royalties as a primary source of income, to the licensee who seeks to commercialize an intellectual property asset, to the legal professionals who draft and negotiate the terms of royalty agreements.

1. Statutory Royalties: In many jurisdictions, statutory laws set forth the conditions under which royalties must be paid. For example, in the music industry, statutory rates determine the minimum royalty payments for songwriters and publishers when their music is reproduced or distributed. These rates are often the subject of intense debate and lobbying, as they directly impact the revenue streams of artists and the cost structures of music platforms.

2. Contractual Royalties: Beyond statutory requirements, the specifics of royalty payments are typically outlined in contracts. These agreements can be highly customized to suit the particular needs and bargaining power of the parties involved. For instance, a bestselling author might negotiate a higher royalty rate for book sales compared to a debut novelist. Contracts may also include escalator clauses that increase royalty rates after certain sales milestones are reached, incentivizing both the creator and distributor to maximize the work's commercial success.

3. Cross-border Royalties: With the globalization of media and technology, intellectual property often crosses international borders, making the understanding of cross-jurisdictional legal frameworks essential. Different countries may have varying approaches to royalty collection and distribution, and international treaties such as the Berne Convention play a crucial role in harmonizing these laws to some extent. An example of this complexity can be seen in the case of streaming services, where a single platform may need to navigate the royalty laws of dozens of countries.

4. Dispute Resolution: Despite the best efforts to clearly define royalty terms, disputes are not uncommon. These disagreements may arise over the interpretation of contract language, the calculation of royalties due, or alleged breaches of agreement. Resolving these disputes can involve negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or litigation, each with its own set of procedural rules and potential outcomes. A notable case was the dispute between the band "Spinal Tap" and the film studio Vivendi, which centered around the alleged underpayment of music royalties.

5. Technological Impact: The advent of digital technology and the internet has dramatically altered the landscape of royalty payments. digital Rights management (DRM) systems, blockchain technology, and smart contracts are increasingly being explored as tools to automate and secure royalty transactions. For example, blockchain-based platforms promise to provide more transparent and efficient royalty distribution by directly linking creators with consumers, potentially bypassing traditional intermediaries.

The legal framework governing royalty payments is a multifaceted and evolving entity that requires careful consideration from all stakeholders involved. By understanding the fine print and staying abreast of legal developments, creators, licensees, and legal professionals can navigate this complex domain more effectively, ensuring that the spirit of fair revenue sharing is upheld.

6. Negotiating Fair Royalty Rates

Negotiating fair royalty rates is a critical component of ensuring equitable revenue sharing in any industry where intellectual property (IP) plays a central role. Whether it's music, literature, patents, or software, the creators of IP deserve to be compensated in a manner that reflects the value their work brings to the market. However, determining what constitutes a 'fair' rate is often a complex process that involves considering a multitude of factors, such as the industry standard, the anticipated revenue the IP will generate, and the bargaining power of each party involved. From the perspective of the creator, the goal is to secure a rate that provides sustainable income and acknowledges their contribution. On the other hand, licensees aim to maintain cost-effectiveness and profitability. This delicate balance requires careful negotiation and a deep understanding of the worth of the IP in question.

1. Industry Standards: One of the first steps in negotiating royalty rates is to look at the prevailing standards within the specific industry. For instance, in the music industry, streaming services typically pay out royalties based on a percentage of their revenue, which can vary widely. It's important for creators to be aware of these standards to set realistic expectations.

2. Projected Revenue: The potential earnings from the IP can significantly influence royalty rates. A best-selling book or a patent for a revolutionary product may command higher rates due to the expected financial return.

3. Exclusivity: Exclusive rights to use IP can drive up royalty rates. If a licensee is granted exclusive access to a creator's work, they're often expected to pay a premium for that privilege.

4. Duration of the License: The length of time for which the license is granted can also affect the rate. Longer terms may result in lower annual rates but provide long-term security for the creator.

5. Territory: The geographical scope of the license should be considered. Global rights will typically command higher rates than rights restricted to a smaller region.

6. Bargaining Power: The relative negotiating strength of each party can't be overlooked. A well-established author or a company holding a patent for in-demand technology may have the leverage to demand higher rates.

7. Legal Precedents: Previous legal cases and decisions can set precedents that impact royalty rate negotiations. Parties should be aware of relevant case law that may influence their agreement.

Example: Consider a novelist negotiating royalties for an e-book version of their latest work. If similar titles in the genre typically earn a 25% royalty rate from e-book sales, this sets a benchmark. However, if the novelist has a strong following and the book is highly anticipated, they might negotiate a higher rate, say 30%, reflecting their stronger bargaining position.

Negotiating fair royalty rates is a nuanced process that requires a strategic approach and a thorough understanding of the many factors at play. By considering industry standards, projected revenue, exclusivity, duration, territory, bargaining power, and legal precedents, creators and licensees can work towards agreements that are mutually beneficial and respect the value of the IP involved.

7. Royalty Payments in the Digital Age

In the digital age, royalty payments have become a complex yet vital aspect of the creative economy. With the proliferation of digital platforms, from streaming services to online marketplaces, the mechanisms for tracking and distributing royalties have evolved significantly. The traditional model, where royalties were often calculated based on physical sales or radio play, has been supplanted by sophisticated algorithms and digital tracking methods that account for online consumption patterns. This shift has brought about new challenges and opportunities for creators, publishers, and distributors alike.

From the perspective of content creators, the digital age offers unprecedented access to global audiences. However, this comes with the need for transparency and fairness in royalty distribution. Creators often rely on digital service providers to accurately report streams and downloads, which directly affect their earnings. The issue of micropayments, where creators receive a fraction of a cent per stream, highlights the need for equitable revenue models that ensure sustainable income for artists.

Publishers and rights holders face the challenge of managing and monetizing digital rights across various platforms. The implementation of Content ID systems and digital rights management (DRM) technologies helps protect intellectual property and track usage, but it also requires constant vigilance and adaptation to new forms of content consumption.

Consumers, on the other hand, benefit from the vast selection of content available at their fingertips. Yet, there's a growing awareness and concern about whether the artists they love are being fairly compensated for their work. This consumer awareness can influence the market, pushing platforms to adopt more artist-friendly policies.

Here's an in-depth look at the intricacies of royalty payments in the digital age:

1. Digital Rights Management (DRM): DRM technologies are employed to prevent unauthorized reproduction and distribution of digital media. While effective in protecting rights, they can sometimes limit legitimate usage and sharing, leading to a debate about the balance between protection and accessibility.

2. Streaming Royalties: Services like Spotify, Apple Music, and YouTube pay royalties based on a pro-rata model, where total revenue is pooled and then divided by total streams. This often benefits top artists disproportionately, leaving smaller artists with minimal payouts.

3. Performance Rights Organizations (PROs): PROs like ASCAP and BMI collect performance royalties for songwriters and publishers. The digital age has expanded their role to include online performances, which can range from a song played on a streaming service to a live concert broadcast on the internet.

4. Direct Licensing Deals: Some artists and labels bypass traditional distribution channels by striking direct deals with platforms. This can lead to better rates and more control over how content is used and monetized.

5. user-Generated content (UGC): Platforms like TikTok and Instagram have become hotbeds for UGC, where users incorporate music into their content. Negotiating how royalties are paid for such uses is an ongoing challenge.

6. Global Distribution and Collection: Digital platforms operate globally, which means royalties must be collected and distributed across different territories and jurisdictions. This requires a robust international network of collection societies and intermediaries.

7. blockchain and Smart contracts: Emerging technologies like blockchain and smart contracts promise greater transparency and efficiency in royalty distribution. They could potentially automate payments and ensure creators are paid fairly and promptly.

For example, consider the case of a mid-level indie band that releases their album on a streaming service. Despite garnering a million streams, their royalty check might only amount to a few thousand dollars, raising questions about the sustainability of the current streaming economy for artists.

Royalty payments in the digital age are a multifaceted issue that touches on technology, law, economics, and culture. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, so too must the systems that govern the fair distribution of revenue to ensure that all stakeholders in the creative process are recognized and rewarded for their contributions.

8. Successes and Pitfalls in Royalty Arrangements

Royalty arrangements are a critical component of the music, publishing, and technology industries, among others, where creators and owners of intellectual property (IP) can earn revenue from their work. These arrangements, however, come with their own set of challenges and opportunities. By examining various case studies, we can glean valuable insights into what constitutes a successful royalty agreement and what pitfalls to avoid. From the perspective of creators, a well-negotiated royalty deal can provide a steady income stream and recognition for their work. For businesses and IP owners, it can mean a profitable way to monetize their assets while fostering creative talent.

1. Success Story: The Beatles' Royalty Revolution

The Beatles' negotiation for higher royalty rates in the 1960s set a new precedent in the music industry. At a time when artists typically received a small percentage of record sales, The Beatles' success allowed them to renegotiate their contract with EMI for a significantly higher rate, which not only increased their earnings but also influenced the industry to value artists' contributions more fairly.

2. Pitfall: The 'Hollywood Accounting' Phenomenon

The term 'Hollywood Accounting' refers to the creative bookkeeping practices used by some studios to minimize reported profits and, consequently, royalties paid to creators. A famous case is that of the film "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix," which reported a loss despite grossing nearly $1 billion worldwide, affecting the royalties of those with profit-sharing agreements.

3. Success Through Diversification: J.K. Rowling's Wizarding World

J.K. Rowling's approach to royalty arrangements extended beyond book sales. She capitalized on her IP through movie adaptations, merchandise, theme parks, and more. This diversification ensured multiple revenue streams and greater control over how her work was used and monetized.

4. Pitfall: The Challenge of Streaming Services

Streaming services have transformed the way music and media are consumed, but they've also led to disputes over fair royalty rates. For instance, many musicians have voiced concerns about the per-stream payouts from platforms like Spotify, which they argue are too low and do not adequately compensate artists for their work.

5. Success in Collaboration: The Case of 'Fortnite' and Dance Creators

Epic Games, the creator of 'Fortnite,' faced backlash for using dance moves created by others without compensation. They addressed this by establishing the Icon Series, where creators could partner with the company to have their dances featured in the game, receiving recognition and a share of the profits.

These examples highlight the importance of clear, fair, and adaptable royalty arrangements that consider the evolving landscape of IP monetization. They underscore the need for creators to be vigilant and proactive in negotiating terms that reflect the value of their work, and for businesses to engage in practices that sustain long-term partnerships and innovation.

Entrepreneurs are misfits to the core. They forge ahead, making their own path and always, always, question the status quo.

Maximillian Degenerez

9. Predicting Changes in Royalty Distribution

The landscape of royalty distribution is poised for significant transformation in the coming years. Driven by technological advancements, evolving legal frameworks, and shifting cultural norms, the mechanisms and principles that govern how royalties are allocated and disbursed are expected to undergo substantial changes. These shifts will likely impact creators, rights holders, and consumers alike, necessitating a proactive approach to understanding and navigating the future of royalty payments.

From the perspective of technology, we are already witnessing the integration of blockchain and smart contracts in royalty management. These technologies promise to streamline the process, ensuring transparency and efficiency in transactions. For instance, a musician could use a smart contract to automatically distribute royalties to band members, producers, and songwriters each time their song is streamed or downloaded.

Legal changes are also on the horizon, with ongoing debates about copyright laws in the digital age. As countries grapple with these issues, we may see new legislation that better accommodates the realities of content creation and distribution in a digital ecosystem, potentially leading to more equitable royalty schemes.

Culturally, there is a growing recognition of the value of content creators in the digital economy. This could lead to new models of revenue sharing that reflect the contributions of all parties involved in the creative process. For example, video game developers might receive a percentage of in-game purchases as part of their royalty agreement.

Here are some key points that delve deeper into the future trends of royalty distribution:

1. Blockchain Adoption: The use of blockchain technology is expected to increase, providing a decentralized and immutable ledger for royalty transactions. This could reduce disputes and errors in royalty calculations.

2. Micropayments: As content consumption becomes more granular, micropayment systems could become more prevalent, allowing creators to receive royalties for small, individual uses of their work.

3. Global Standardization: Efforts to standardize royalty distribution processes across borders may gain traction, simplifying international transactions and protecting creators' rights worldwide.

4. Data Analytics: Enhanced data analytics tools will likely play a crucial role in royalty distribution, enabling more accurate tracking of content usage and more precise royalty calculations.

5. Direct-to-Creator Platforms: The rise of platforms that allow creators to distribute content directly to consumers could reshape the royalty landscape, with creators retaining a larger share of the revenue.

6. User-Generated Content: Platforms that host user-generated content will need to develop fair and transparent methods for distributing royalties to original creators when their work is used or remixed.

7. Performance Rights Organizations (PROs): PROs may evolve to offer more services and support to creators, including assistance with negotiating royalty rates and collecting payments.

To illustrate these points, consider the example of a streaming service that implements blockchain technology. Each time a song is played, the smart contract automatically splits the royalties between the artist, writer, and producer based on pre-agreed percentages. This ensures immediate and accurate compensation without the need for manual intervention.

The future of royalty distribution is likely to be characterized by increased automation, greater fairness, and more empowerment for creators. As these trends unfold, stakeholders in the royalty ecosystem must stay informed and adaptable to harness the opportunities presented by these changes.