Shareholder Activism: Voices for Change: The Surge of Shareholder Activism Through Resolutions

1. The Rising Tide of Shareholder Activism

In recent years, the landscape of corporate governance has been markedly transformed by a significant surge in shareholder activism. This phenomenon has seen a shift from passive investment strategies to more proactive approaches where shareholders are not just voting with their feet but also raising their voices for change. Shareholder activism is not a monolith; it encompasses a spectrum of strategies ranging from engaging in dialogue with management to submitting shareholder resolutions, and even running campaigns to replace company directors.

The motivations behind shareholder activism are as diverse as the activists themselves. Some are driven by the desire to enhance long-term shareholder value, while others are motivated by environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns. Regardless of the impetus, the common thread is the belief that shareholders, as part-owners of the company, have not only the right but also the responsibility to influence the direction and decisions of the company.

1. Historical Context: The roots of shareholder activism can be traced back to the 1940s and 1950s when investors first began to use their equity stakes to influence corporate behavior. However, it was not until the 1980s that activism became a significant force, with investors like Carl Icahn gaining notoriety for their aggressive tactics.

2. Types of Activists: Today's shareholder activists range from individual investors to large institutional investors, such as pension funds and mutual funds. Hedge funds have also emerged as key players, often seeking more immediate returns through changes in corporate strategy, financial restructuring, or management shake-ups.

3. Methods of Engagement: Activists engage with companies through various means. These include private conversations with management, public letters outlining their position, formal proposals submitted for vote at shareholder meetings, and, in some cases, proxy fights where they seek to replace members of the board of directors.

4. impact on Corporate governance: Shareholder activism has led to changes in corporate governance practices, with companies becoming more responsive to investor concerns. This includes the adoption of policies like majority voting for directors, the separation of the roles of CEO and chairman, and enhanced disclosure of financial and ESG-related information.

5. Case Studies: Examples of successful shareholder activism abound. In 2013, hedge fund Third Point successfully campaigned for a board shake-up at Yahoo!, which eventually led to the sale of its core internet business. More recently, in 2020, Engine No. 1, a relatively small investment firm, won three seats on the board of ExxonMobil, signaling a growing concern among investors about climate change.

The rising tide of shareholder activism reflects a broader democratization of finance where shareholders are leveraging their collective power to shape the future of the companies they invest in. As this trend continues to gain momentum, it is likely to redefine the corporate landscape in the years to come, making companies more accountable not just to their shareholders but also to society at large.

2. From Passive Investors to Active Influencers

The evolution of shareholder activism marks a significant shift in the dynamics of corporate governance. Traditionally, shareholders were seen as passive entities, content with the dividends and capital gains their investments yielded. They trusted the management's decisions and rarely questioned their strategies or intervened in the company's operations. However, this landscape began to change as shareholders started to realize the power of their collective voice.

1. The Rise of Institutional Investors: The first major change came with the rise of institutional investors like pension funds, mutual funds, and insurance companies. These entities, managing vast pools of capital, began to exert their influence on corporate boards. They pushed for changes that would maximize shareholder value, often advocating for strategies that prioritized short-term gains.

2. The Emergence of activist Hedge funds: The next wave saw the emergence of activist hedge funds. These funds would acquire significant stakes in companies they perceived as undervalued or poorly managed and then push for changes. Their tactics ranged from seeking representation on the board to demanding strategic shifts such as divestitures or mergers.

3. The Role of proxy firms: Proxy advisory firms also played a pivotal role. They provided recommendations to shareholders on how to vote on various issues, thereby shaping the outcome of shareholder resolutions. Their influence has been such that some argue they hold too much sway over the decision-making process.

4. Socially Responsible Investing: The growth of socially responsible investing (SRI) brought a new dimension to shareholder activism. Investors began to consider environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria when making investment decisions. This led to a surge in shareholder resolutions focused on issues like climate change, diversity, and corporate transparency.

5. The Impact of Technology: Technology has empowered shareholders like never before. With online platforms and social media, organizing campaigns and rallying support for a cause has become easier and more effective. Shareholder proposals can gain momentum quickly, forcing companies to take notice and respond.

6. legal and regulatory Changes: Legal and regulatory frameworks have evolved to facilitate greater shareholder engagement. For example, the "say on pay" regulations in various jurisdictions allow shareholders to vote on executive compensation, giving them a direct say in how the company is run.

7. High-Profile Success Stories: There have been several high-profile cases where shareholder activism has led to significant changes. One notable example is when an activist investor successfully lobbied for the spin-off of PayPal from eBay, arguing that both companies would thrive independently.

This transformation from passive investors to active influencers has not been without controversy. Some argue that activist shareholders prioritize their own interests over the long-term health of the company. Others contend that this active engagement leads to more accountable and transparent corporate practices. What is clear is that the role of the shareholder has fundamentally changed, and with it, the corporate world must adapt to a new era where the voices of shareholders carry more weight than ever before.

3. Understanding Shareholder Resolutions

Shareholder resolutions are a vital tool in the arsenal of shareholder activism, serving as a formal means of influencing company policy and shining a light on issues that may otherwise be overlooked. These resolutions, which can be proposed by any shareholder owning a minimum required amount of stock, are presented and voted on at a company's annual general meeting (AGM) or special meetings. They often address a wide range of concerns, from corporate governance and financial strategies to social responsibility and environmental impact.

The power of the proxy vote lies in its ability to bring about change without the need for direct confrontation. It is a democratic process that allows shareholders to express their views and push for action on specific issues. This method of activism is particularly appealing to institutional investors, such as pension funds and mutual funds, who hold significant stakes in many companies and whose resolutions can carry considerable weight.

1. The Process of Filing a Resolution: The journey of a shareholder resolution begins with the filing process. Shareholders must meet certain eligibility criteria, such as holding a minimum number of shares for a specified period. Once these conditions are met, the resolution is drafted and submitted to the company, often accompanied by a supporting statement that outlines the rationale behind the proposal.

2. Negotiation and Withdrawal: Not all resolutions make it to the ballot. Companies may engage with the proposing shareholders to reach a mutual agreement, leading to the withdrawal of the resolution. This negotiation phase can result in constructive dialogue and sometimes even more significant outcomes than a vote.

3. Voting and Outcomes: For those resolutions that do proceed to a vote, the outcomes can vary widely. While a resolution may not always achieve a majority, a substantial minority vote can still send a strong message to the board. In some cases, resolutions that initially fail to pass can gain momentum over time, reflecting changing attitudes among shareholders and the broader public.

4. Examples of Impactful Resolutions: One notable example is the resolution filed by a group of shareholders at ExxonMobil in 2017, which called for the company to assess and disclose the risks posed to its business by global climate change policies. Despite opposition from the board, the resolution passed with over 62% of the vote, marking a significant victory for environmental activists.

5. The role of Proxy Advisory firms: These firms provide recommendations on how to vote on shareholder resolutions, and their influence cannot be understated. Institutional investors often rely on the guidance of firms like Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis when deciding how to cast their votes.

Shareholder resolutions are a powerful mechanism for enacting change within corporations. They allow shareholders to voice their concerns and influence company policy in a structured and impactful way. As the landscape of corporate governance and investor priorities continues to evolve, the role of shareholder resolutions in shaping the future of businesses around the world will undoubtedly remain significant.

VC funding is important but is difficult to get!

FasterCapital's experts and internal network of investors help you in approaching, discussions, and negotiations with VCs

Join us!

4. Successful Shareholder Activism Campaigns

Shareholder activism has emerged as a powerful force in the corporate world, with investors not just seeking returns, but also influencing corporate governance, social responsibility, and environmental practices. This surge is marked by a shift from passive shareholding to active engagement, where shareholders are no longer silent spectators but vocal participants advocating for change. Through resolutions and voting power, they hold the potential to steer companies towards not only profit but also ethical and sustainable operations. The following case studies exemplify successful shareholder activism campaigns, showcasing the diverse strategies and impacts of these initiatives.

1. Climate Change Resolutions at ExxonMobil: In 2017, a watershed moment occurred when shareholders of ExxonMobil, one of the world's largest oil companies, passed a resolution demanding the company assess and disclose the risks it faces from climate change. This was a significant victory for environmental activists and responsible investors, as it signaled a growing concern among shareholders about the long-term sustainability of their investments in the face of global climate challenges.

2. Enhancing Diversity at Apple: In 2016, shareholders of Apple Inc. Filed a proposal urging the tech giant to accelerate diversity in its senior management and board – areas where the company had faced criticism. Although the proposal did not pass, it garnered a substantial 40% support and led to Apple publicly committing to increase diversity, which has been reflected in subsequent hiring and promotion practices.

3. Pharmaceutical Pricing Transparency at AbbVie: Shareholders of AbbVie, a pharmaceutical company, successfully pushed for greater transparency in the company's drug pricing strategies in 2018. The campaign highlighted concerns over the high costs of prescription drugs and the impact on consumers and the healthcare system. As a result, AbbVie agreed to provide detailed reports on price increases, contributing to a broader industry movement towards pricing transparency.

4. Opposing Political Contributions at Chevron: In a move to address corporate political influence, shareholders of Chevron Corporation brought forth a resolution to limit political contributions. While the resolution itself did not pass, it sparked a dialogue that led to Chevron reducing its political spending and enhancing disclosure, demonstrating how even unsuccessful resolutions can lead to positive outcomes.

These cases illustrate the multifaceted nature of shareholder activism, where success is not solely defined by the passage of a resolution but also by the conversations and changes it instigates. By leveraging their rights and voices, shareholders are increasingly becoming catalysts for change, influencing corporate behavior in profound ways. The trend towards more active participation is likely to continue, as shareholders seek to align their investments with their values and the broader societal good.

5. How Shareholders Are Making Their Voices Heard?

In the dynamic landscape of corporate governance, shareholders are no longer passive investors; they have become proactive agents of change. The surge in shareholder activism is a testament to the evolving relationship between corporations and their investors. Shareholders are leveraging a variety of strategies and tactics to ensure their voices are heard, influencing company policies and advocating for changes that align with their values and financial interests. This shift is not just about challenging management decisions; it's about shaping the future direction of the companies they are invested in.

From filing resolutions on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues to engaging in proxy fights, shareholders are asserting their rights and responsibilities. They are using their stakes to initiate dialogues with boards, propose changes, and even seek seats at the table. The following points delve deeper into the multifaceted approaches shareholders are adopting:

1. Filing Resolutions: Shareholders are increasingly filing resolutions on a range of issues, from climate change to diversity and inclusion. For example, a group of investors recently filed a resolution urging a major oil company to set more aggressive carbon emission reduction targets.

2. Proxy Battles: When dialogue fails, shareholders may resort to proxy battles as a means to force change. This involves rallying other shareholders to vote against management's recommendations at annual general meetings (AGM). An iconic case was when an activist investor successfully replaced the entire board of a well-known technology firm.

3. Collaborative Engagement: Shareholders often band together to form coalitions, amplifying their influence. The Climate Action 100+ initiative is a prime example, where investors collectively push for the world's largest greenhouse gas emitters to take necessary action on climate change.

4. Litigation: In some cases, shareholders may pursue legal action to protect their investments and push for change. Litigation can compel companies to disclose more information or rectify governance issues.

5. Public Campaigns: Activist shareholders sometimes launch public campaigns to sway opinion and pressure companies. These campaigns can involve open letters, social media blitzes, and even billboard advertisements to garner public and media attention.

6. Private Negotiations: Behind the scenes, shareholders often engage in private negotiations with company management. These discussions can lead to agreements on strategy, governance, or policy changes without the need for public confrontation.

7. Voting Strategies: Shareholders meticulously analyze and use their voting rights on director appointments, compensation policies, and other critical matters to steer company policies.

Through these methods, shareholders are not just passive capital providers but active participants in corporate governance, advocating for transparency, accountability, and sustainability. Their actions are reshaping the corporate world, making it more responsive to the needs of all stakeholders. The impact of these strategies is evident in the increasing number of companies that are revising their policies and practices to address shareholder concerns, demonstrating the power of collective investor action.

6. Rights and Responsibilities of Activist Shareholders

Activist shareholders play a pivotal role in the corporate governance landscape, wielding their equity stakes as a platform to influence company policy, operations, and strategy. These individuals or groups leverage their rights as shareholders to advocate for changes they believe will enhance shareholder value and promote corporate responsibility. The legal framework governing their activities is a complex tapestry of securities laws, corporate bylaws, and fiduciary duties that both empower and constrain their actions.

From a legal standpoint, activist shareholders are entitled to certain rights that enable them to engage with companies effectively. These include the right to attend shareholder meetings, vote on corporate matters, and propose shareholder resolutions. They can also request access to corporate records and engage in proxy fights to elect new directors. However, these rights come with corresponding responsibilities, such as the obligation to disclose significant shareholdings and adhere to regulations regarding market manipulation and insider trading.

1. Shareholder Meetings and Voting Rights: Activist shareholders often use shareholder meetings as a forum to voice their concerns and influence other investors. For example, at the 2020 Apple Inc. Annual meeting, a group of shareholders pushed for greater transparency in the company's sustainability practices.

2. Shareholder Resolutions: These are proposals submitted by shareholders for a vote at the company's annual meeting. While not all resolutions are binding, they can be a powerful tool for signaling investor sentiment. In 2019, a climate-related shareholder resolution at BP received a 99% vote in favor, leading to the company's commitment to align its business with the Paris climate agreement.

3. Proxy Battles: When activist shareholders seek to replace members of the company's board of directors, they engage in what is known as a proxy battle. A notable example is the 2013 proxy fight at Hess Corporation, where activist investor Elliott Management pushed for a new slate of directors to improve performance and governance.

4. Legal Obligations and Disclosure: Activist shareholders must navigate a regulatory environment that includes rules like the securities Exchange act of 1934, which requires investors to file a Schedule 13D with the SEC upon acquiring more than 5% of a company's stock, disclosing their intentions and any plans for corporate change.

5. Market manipulation and Insider trading: Activist shareholders must be cautious to avoid practices that could be construed as market manipulation or insider trading. The case of billionaire investor Carl Icahn illustrates the fine line activists walk, as he faced scrutiny for his actions related to his stake in Herbalife.

The interplay between the rights and responsibilities of activist shareholders is a dynamic and evolving area of corporate law. As companies and investors continue to navigate this terrain, the impact of shareholder activism on corporate governance and accountability is likely to grow, shaping the future of business practices and investor relations. The balance between empowering shareholder voices and ensuring the integrity of the market remains a critical consideration for regulators and participants alike.

7. Boardrooms Under Pressure

In recent years, the rise of shareholder activism has placed unprecedented pressure on corporate boardrooms. This phenomenon has transformed the landscape of corporate governance, compelling boards to engage more actively with shareholders and reconsider their strategies and policies. Shareholder activists employ resolutions as a tool to initiate change, influence management, and address a wide range of issues from financial performance to social responsibility and environmental impact.

Different Perspectives on Boardroom Pressure:

1. Shareholders' Viewpoint:

- Shareholders, especially institutional investors, are increasingly using their equity stakes to influence corporate decisions. They argue that active engagement and pressure on boards can lead to better governance practices, increased transparency, and ultimately, enhanced shareholder value.

- For example, a group of investors may push for changes in executive compensation structures to align them more closely with long-term performance metrics.

2. Corporate Boards' Viewpoint:

- Boards often view shareholder activism as a challenge to their authority and decision-making. However, they also recognize the need to adapt to the evolving expectations of corporate governance.

- A case in point is when a board decides to adopt a more comprehensive sustainability strategy following pressure from environmentally conscious shareholders.

3. Regulatory and Legal Viewpoint:

- Regulators and legal experts observe these developments with interest, as they have implications for the regulatory framework governing corporate behavior. Some advocate for clearer guidelines on shareholder engagement to prevent conflicts and ensure fair treatment of all stakeholders.

- An instance of regulatory response is the amendment of rules regarding proxy access, making it easier for shareholders to nominate directors.

4. Management's Viewpoint:

- Management teams are often caught in the middle, balancing the demands of activist shareholders with the strategic vision set by the board. They must navigate this dynamic carefully to maintain operational effectiveness.

- A notable example is when a CEO supports a shareholder resolution for more rigorous climate change disclosures, recognizing the long-term benefits despite short-term challenges.

In-Depth Insights:

1. Strategic Realignments:

- Companies are increasingly realigning their strategies to address the concerns raised by activist shareholders. This may involve divesting non-core assets, restructuring operations, or investing in new technologies.

- For instance, under shareholder pressure, a major oil company might invest in renewable energy sources to transition towards a more sustainable business model.

2. Board Composition and Diversity:

- Activists often advocate for greater board diversity, arguing that a range of perspectives can lead to more robust decision-making.

- A technology firm, for example, might add directors with cybersecurity expertise in response to shareholder concerns about digital risks.

3. Executive Compensation:

- Executive pay is a frequent target of shareholder resolutions, with calls for it to be tied more closely to performance and long-term value creation.

- A recent campaign led to a large corporation revising its CEO's compensation package to include more performance-based incentives.

4. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Issues:

- ESG concerns are at the forefront of shareholder activism, with resolutions pushing for better disclosure and action on climate change, diversity, and human rights.

- A landmark case saw shareholders of a mining company successfully demand a detailed report on the firm's environmental impact and mitigation plans.

The impact of shareholder activism on corporate governance is profound and multifaceted. It has prompted a reevaluation of the roles and responsibilities of boards, a shift towards more stakeholder-inclusive models of governance, and a greater emphasis on long-term sustainability. As this trend continues, boardrooms will likely face even greater scrutiny and pressure to evolve in response to the voices calling for change.

8. Trends and Predictions in Shareholder Activism

As we look towards the horizon of shareholder activism, it's clear that the landscape is evolving rapidly. The traditional view of shareholders as passive investors is giving way to a more engaged, vocal, and strategic presence within companies. This shift is driven by a confluence of factors, including the rise of social media, which has democratized information and galvanized collective action, and the increasing emphasis on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues, which are now seen as critical to long-term value creation. Shareholder activists are no longer just large institutional investors; they now include a diverse array of participants, from hedge funds to individual retail investors, all seeking to influence company strategy and advocate for change.

1. The Democratization of Activism: With the advent of technology platforms that facilitate collective action, we are witnessing a democratization of shareholder activism. Small investors can now band together to form a significant voice, leveraging tools like online petitions and social media campaigns to effect change.

2. ESG as a Catalyst: Environmental, social, and governance issues have become a major driver of shareholder activism. Investors are increasingly holding companies accountable for their impact on the planet and society. For instance, in 2021, a small hedge fund, Engine No. 1, successfully campaigned for seats on the board of ExxonMobil to steer the company towards a more sustainable future.

3. Regulatory Environment: The regulatory landscape is also shifting, with jurisdictions around the world enacting laws that empower shareholders. The European Union's Shareholder Rights Directive II, for example, strengthens the position of shareholders and encourages long-term engagement.

4. Technological Advancements: Technology is playing a pivotal role in shaping the future of shareholder activism. Blockchain, for example, has the potential to revolutionize proxy voting, making it more secure and transparent.

5. The Rise of Activist Networks: Shareholder activists are increasingly organizing into networks, sharing strategies, and pooling resources. This collective approach amplifies their influence and enables them to take on larger targets.

6. focus on Long-term Value: There is a growing recognition that short-term gains should not come at the expense of long-term value. Activists are pushing for strategies that ensure sustainable growth, such as advocating for R&D investments or opposing myopic cost-cutting measures.

7. Cross-Border Activism: As markets become more globalized, shareholder activism is crossing borders. Activists are targeting companies worldwide, and international coalitions of investors are forming to address global issues like climate change.

The future of shareholder activism is characterized by a more inclusive, strategic, and globally-minded approach. As activists leverage new tools and strategies to make their voices heard, companies will need to adapt, engaging more proactively with their shareholders and considering a wider range of stakeholders in their decision-making processes. The trends and predictions outlined above suggest that shareholder activism will continue to be a powerful force for change in the corporate world.

9. Empowering Shareholders for Sustainable Change

The surge of shareholder activism has marked a significant shift in corporate governance, with shareholders no longer passive investors but active participants seeking sustainable change. This transformation is rooted in the belief that long-term value creation requires attention to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. Shareholders have begun to recognize their power and responsibility to influence corporate behavior and ensure that companies are not only profitable but also accountable to a broader set of stakeholders and to the planet itself.

From this perspective, the role of shareholder resolutions becomes a pivotal tool for change. These resolutions, often seen as the voice of the minority, have the potential to bring about substantial shifts in company policies and practices. They serve as a formal means by which shareholders can express concerns, propose changes, and hold management accountable for the company's impact on society and the environment.

1. The power of Collective action: Shareholder resolutions are a testament to the power of collective action. When a group of investors comes together, their unified voice can be hard to ignore. For instance, the 2020 resolution at Chevron, where shareholders demanded a report on how the company's lobbying activities aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement, was a clear message that investors are watching and expect alignment with global sustainability efforts.

2. Financial Performance and Sustainability: There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that companies focusing on sustainability tend to outperform their less sustainable counterparts financially. Shareholders are increasingly using resolutions to push companies towards sustainable practices that can lead to better long-term financial performance. An example of this is the push for more sustainable supply chains, which not only reduces environmental impact but can also lead to cost savings and risk mitigation.

3. Enhancing Transparency: Shareholder resolutions often aim to enhance transparency in corporate operations. By demanding detailed disclosures on ESG matters, shareholders can better assess the risks and opportunities that companies face. A notable case is the 2019 resolution at ExxonMobil, where investors sought greater transparency on the financial risks posed by climate change, leading to a significant minority of shareholders voting in favor.

4. social Responsibility and corporate Impact: Investors are increasingly aware of the social impact of corporate activities. Resolutions can address issues such as human rights, labor practices, and community relations. The push for gender diversity on boards, for example, has gained momentum through shareholder resolutions, with companies like Goldman Sachs announcing they will no longer take companies public unless they have at least one diverse board member.

5. Engaging with Management: Shareholder resolutions can also serve as a starting point for dialogue with management. Even when resolutions do not pass, they can lead to constructive conversations and sometimes to voluntary changes by the company. This engagement is crucial for building a mutual understanding of priorities and for driving change from within.

Empowering shareholders through resolutions is a critical step towards sustainable change. It harnesses the collective influence of investors to hold corporations accountable and steer them towards a future where financial success is balanced with social and environmental responsibility. As this movement grows, it will continue to shape the landscape of corporate governance and the broader quest for a sustainable and equitable world.