Term sheet: How to negotiate the terms and conditions of your startup funding

1. Understanding the Importance of Term Sheets

Understanding the importance of Term sheets is a crucial aspect when it comes to negotiating the terms and conditions of startup funding. In this section, we will delve into the significance of term sheets from various perspectives and provide in-depth information to help you navigate this process effectively.

1. Establishing Clear Expectations: Term sheets play a vital role in setting clear expectations between the startup investors. It outlines the key terms and conditions of the investment, such as the valuation, ownership stake, and voting rights. By having these details clearly defined in the term sheet, both parties can align their expectations and avoid potential conflicts in the future.

2. protecting Investor interests: Term sheets also serve as a means to protect the interests of the investors. It includes provisions related to liquidation preferences, anti-dilution rights, and board representation. These provisions ensure that the investors have certain safeguards in place to mitigate risks and maximize their returns on investment.

3. Providing Flexibility: Term sheets offer flexibility in negotiating the terms of the investment. It allows for discussions and negotiations between the startup and the investors to reach mutually agreeable terms. This flexibility enables both parties to tailor the terms to their specific needs and circumstances.

4. Highlighting Deal Structure: The term sheet provides an overview of the deal structure, including the type of investment (equity or debt), the investment amount, and the timeline for closing the deal. This information helps both parties understand the structure of the investment and plan accordingly.

5. Setting the stage for Due diligence: Once the term sheet is agreed upon, it sets the stage for conducting due diligence. due diligence is a comprehensive review of the startup's financials, operations, and legal documentation. The term sheet acts as a starting point for this process and helps streamline the due diligence phase.

Example: Let's say a startup is in discussions with multiple investors. The term sheet allows the startup to compare and evaluate the different offers based on the terms outlined. It provides a structured framework to assess the pros and cons of each offer and make an informed decision.

Understanding the importance of term sheets is crucial for startups seeking funding. It establishes clear expectations, protects investor interests, provides flexibility in negotiations, highlights the deal structure, and sets the stage for due diligence. By leveraging the insights and information provided in the term sheet, startups can navigate the funding process more effectively and secure the right investment for their growth.

2. Parties Involved in the Negotiation Process

1. Founders and Entrepreneurs:

- The heartbeat of any startup, founders and entrepreneurs are the visionaries who birthed the idea, nurtured it, and are now seeking capital to turn their dreams into reality. They wear multiple hats: CEO, product manager, marketer, and sometimes even janitor. Their passion and commitment drive the company forward.

- Insight: Founders often have an emotional attachment to their brainchild, which can color their negotiation strategies. They must balance their desire for growth with the need to retain control.

2. Investors:

- Investors come in various flavors: angel investors, venture capitalists (VCs), and strategic investors. They bring not only capital but also expertise, networks, and guidance. VCs, in particular, play a pivotal role in shaping the startup's trajectory.

- Insight: Investors seek returns on their investment. They analyze risk, evaluate market potential, and negotiate terms that protect their interests. For example, a VC might insist on a board seat or liquidation preferences.

3. Lawyers:

- Legal eagles are essential in the negotiation process. They draft term sheets, pore over legalese, and ensure compliance. Their job is to safeguard their client's interests while maintaining a delicate balance.

- Insight: Lawyers can be dealmakers or deal breakers. A well-versed startup lawyer can spot pitfalls and suggest creative solutions. However, their fees can add up, impacting the startup's runway.

4. Board of Directors:

- The board oversees the company's strategic direction. It includes both investor-appointed directors and founder-appointed directors. Board meetings are where major decisions happen.

- Insight: Board dynamics matter. A harmonious board fosters collaboration, while conflicts can hinder progress. Founders should carefully choose board members who align with their vision.

5. Advisors and Mentors:

- These unsung heroes provide sage advice, open doors, and share battle scars. They're not directly involved in negotiations but influence decisions.

- Insight: Advisors can be instrumental in connecting startups with investors or potential customers. Their endorsement carries weight.

6. Market Experts and Consultants:

- Sometimes, startups hire industry experts or consultants to guide them. These specialists offer insights into market trends, competitive landscapes, and growth strategies.

- Insight: While their input is valuable, startups must weigh the cost of hiring experts against the benefits gained.

7. Other Stakeholders:

- Suppliers, customers, and even competitors indirectly impact negotiations. For instance, a strategic investor might want exclusivity in the startup's supply chain.

- Insight: Consider the ripple effects. A decision made during negotiations can reverberate throughout the ecosystem.

Examples:

- Imagine a founder negotiating with a VC. The VC insists on a participating preferred stock clause, which ensures they get their investment back before common shareholders during an exit. The founder, aware of dilution concerns, pushes for a cap table that balances investor interests with future fundraising.

- An angel investor, impressed by a startup's disruptive technology, offers funding. The founder, keen on retaining control, negotiates for anti-dilution protection to safeguard against down rounds.

In this intricate dance, each player contributes their unique moves, striving for a harmonious crescendo—a term sheet that fuels growth while protecting everyone's interests. Remember, negotiation isn't a zero-sum game; it's a symphony where all players aim for a sweet melody of success.

3. Determining the Financial Terms

1. The Funding Amount: balancing Need and Equity dilution

- Entrepreneur's Perspective: As an entrepreneur, you're often torn between securing enough capital to fuel growth and minimizing equity dilution. While a larger funding amount can accelerate your business, it also means giving up a higher percentage of ownership. Striking the right balance is essential.

- Investor's Perspective: Investors evaluate the funding amount based on the startup's growth potential, market size, and competitive landscape. They want to ensure that the capital infusion aligns with the company's milestones and expansion plans.

- Example: Imagine a tech startup aiming to develop a groundbreaking app. It needs $1 million to hire top-notch engineers and launch the product. An investor offers $2 million, but at the cost of a 30% equity stake. The entrepreneur must weigh the benefits of additional capital against the dilution impact.

2. Valuation: The Art and Science of Pricing Your Startup

- pre-Money valuation: This refers to the startup's worth before any investment. It's determined by factors like market comparables, revenue projections, and intellectual property. A higher pre-money valuation means less dilution for existing shareholders.

- post-Money valuation: Calculated after the investment, it includes the funding amount. post-money valuation = Pre-money valuation + Funding amount. Investors focus on this figure to assess their ownership percentage.

- Valuation Methods: Startups use various methods—such as the discounted Cash flow (DCF) model, comparable Company analysis (Comps), and Multiples—to arrive at a fair valuation.

- Example: Suppose a healthtech startup seeks $5 million in funding. The investor agrees but wants a 20% ownership stake. If the pre-money valuation is $15 million, the post-money valuation becomes $20 million ($15M + $5M). The investor's share is $4 million (20% of $20M).

3. Negotiating the Terms: Protecting Interests

- Liquidation Preference: Investors often negotiate for a liquidation preference. It ensures they get their investment back (or a multiple) before other shareholders in case of an exit (acquisition or IPO).

- anti-Dilution provisions: These protect investors from dilution due to future down rounds. There are full ratchet and weighted average anti-dilution mechanisms.

- convertible Notes and SAFE agreements: Early-stage startups often raise funds through convertible notes or Simple Agreement for future Equity (SAFE). These allow for deferred valuation until a priced round occurs.

- Example: An investor agrees to invest $1 million in a startup via a convertible note. The note converts into equity during the next funding round at a discount. This protects the investor's interest while allowing flexibility for the startup.

4. Case Study: unicorn Startup valuation

- Company X, a fintech disruptor, raised $100 million at a $1 billion valuation. Investors received preferred shares with a 1x liquidation preference. The company grew rapidly, and within two years, it went public at a $5 billion valuation. Investors' early bet paid off handsomely due to the valuation surge.

In summary, funding amounts and valuations are intertwined. Entrepreneurs must weigh their capital needs against equity dilution, while investors evaluate startups based on growth potential and financial terms. Negotiating wisely ensures a win-win for both parties. Remember, each startup's journey is unique, and understanding these nuances is essential for successful fundraising.

Feel free to ask if you'd like further elaboration or have additional questions!

4. Allocating Ownership Stake

1. Founders' Equity: The Genesis of Ownership

- Founders' Shares: At the inception of a startup, founders typically allocate equity among themselves based on their contributions, roles, and responsibilities. These initial shares form the bedrock of ownership. For instance, if Alice and Bob co-found a tech company, they might split the equity equally (50% each) or based on their respective contributions (e.g., 60% for Alice and 40% for Bob).

- Vesting: To ensure commitment and alignment, founders' shares often vest over time. Vesting schedules prevent premature departures by requiring founders to stay with the company for a specified period (usually 3-4 years) before fully owning their shares. Example: A 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff means that after the first year, founders receive 25% of their shares, and then monthly vesting kicks in.

2. Investor Equity: Fueling Growth

- Seed investors and Angel investors: early-stage investors inject capital into startups in exchange for equity. Seed investors often receive convertible notes or SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity) instruments. Angels may negotiate equity directly. Example: An angel invests $100,000 for 10% equity.

- Venture Capital (VC): VCs invest at later stages. They negotiate terms such as valuation, preferred stock, and liquidation preferences. Series A, B, and C rounds dilute founders' equity but provide growth capital. Example: A VC invests $5 million for 20% equity at a $25 million valuation.

3. Employee Equity: attracting and Retaining talent

- Stock Options: Startups offer stock options to employees, allowing them to purchase shares at a predetermined price (the exercise price or strike price). Vesting applies here too. Example: An engineer receives 10,000 options with a 4-year vesting schedule.

- restricted Stock units (RSUs): RSUs grant actual shares, not options. They vest over time or upon achieving performance milestones. Example: A marketing manager receives 1,000 RSUs vesting over 3 years.

- employee Stock Purchase plans (ESPPs): ESPPs allow employees to buy company stock at a discount. Example: employees can purchase shares at 15% below market price.

4. dilution and Anti-dilution Measures

- Dilution: As a startup raises more capital, existing shareholders' ownership gets diluted. founders and early investors must balance growth with dilution. Anti-dilution provisions (such as weighted-average or full-ratchet) protect investors.

- Example: If an early investor holds 10% equity and a new funding round dilutes ownership by 20%, the investor's stake drops to 8%.

5. Exit Scenarios: Harvesting Equity

- IPOs: Going public allows shareholders to sell their equity on stock exchanges. Founders, employees, and investors benefit.

- Acquisitions: When a larger company acquires a startup, equity holders receive cash or stock. Example: Startup X is acquired for $100 million; founders' 30% equity yields $30 million.

- Secondary Sales: Some startups facilitate secondary sales, allowing employees and early investors to cash out before an IPO or acquisition.

Remember, equity distribution isn't just about numbers—it reflects trust, alignment, and the shared journey of building something remarkable. Whether you're negotiating terms or celebrating milestones, understanding equity dynamics empowers you to navigate the startup ecosystem wisely.

Raising capital is challenging. We can help!

FasterCapital's team works on matching you with the right funding sources and presents your startup to them through warm introductions

Join us!

5. Protecting Investor Interests

In the high-stakes world of startup funding, liquidation preferences play a crucial role in safeguarding investor interests. These provisions dictate how the proceeds from a company's exit (such as an acquisition or IPO) are distributed among shareholders. Let's dive into this complex topic from various perspectives, exploring its nuances and implications.

1. understanding Liquidation preferences:

- What Are They? Liquidation preferences determine the order in which investors receive their share of the pie when the company is sold. Investors with preferred stock (typically venture capitalists and angel investors) have priority over common stockholders.

- Types of Preferences:

- Participating Preferred: Investors receive their initial investment amount plus a proportionate share of the remaining proceeds. If there's anything left after that, they also get a share of the common stock pool.

- Non-Participating Preferred: Investors choose between either their initial investment amount or their share of the common stock pool (whichever is higher).

- Example: Imagine a startup raises $5 million from investors with participating preferred stock. If the company is acquired for $20 million, the investors might get their $5 million back first, plus a percentage of the remaining $15 million. If the company is sold for $10 million, they would still receive their $5 million, but no additional share of the remaining proceeds.

2. Founder's Perspective:

- Balancing Interests: Founders often grapple with dilution concerns. While liquidation preferences protect investors, they can significantly reduce the founders' potential upside. Striking the right balance is crucial.

- Negotiation Strategies: Founders can negotiate for a non-participating preferred structure or cap the multiple (e.g., 1x or 2x) to limit investor preferences.

- Example: A founder might argue for a 1x non-participating preference, ensuring that investors get their money back but don't participate further.

3. Investor's Perspective:

- Risk Mitigation: Investors view liquidation preferences as a safety net. They want assurance that their capital won't vanish in case of an unfavorable exit.

- Maximizing Returns: Participating preferred structures allow investors to benefit from both their initial investment and a share of the common stock pool.

- Example: An investor might push for a 2x participating preference to maximize their returns, especially if they're taking on significant risk.

4. Impact on Valuation and Attractiveness:

- Valuation Implications: High liquidation preferences can impact a startup's valuation. Potential acquirers may be wary of paying a premium when significant preferences are in place.

- Investor Perception: Excessive preferences can make a startup less attractive to subsequent investors, affecting future funding rounds.

- Example: A company with a 3x participating preference might struggle to raise additional capital at favorable terms.

5. Exit Scenarios:

- Acquisition: In an acquisition, liquidation preferences kick in. Investors receive their due before common stockholders.

- IPO: In an initial public offering, preferences matter less since all shareholders can participate equally.

- Example: If a startup goes public, the liquidation preferences become less relevant, and investors rely on stock price appreciation.

6. Mitigating Founder-VC Misalignment:

- Alignment of Interests: Liquidation preferences should align with the company's growth trajectory and founder vision.

- Communication: Transparent communication between founders and investors helps avoid surprises during exits.

- Example: A founder might explain the rationale behind a higher preference to maintain investor trust.

In summary, liquidation preferences are a critical aspect of term sheets. balancing investor protection with founder incentives is essential for a healthy startup ecosystem. As you negotiate funding terms, consider the impact of these preferences on your startup's future. Remember, it's not just about the money; it's about building a sustainable business that benefits all stakeholders.

6. Balancing Control

In the intricate dance of startup funding, the allocation of voting rights and board representation is a delicate waltz. Entrepreneurs, investors, and other stakeholders twirl around the central question: How do we balance control while ensuring the company's success? Let's step onto the polished floor and explore this multifaceted issue from various angles.

1. The Entrepreneur's Perspective:

- The Visionary: Founders often see their startup as an extension of themselves—a manifestation of their dreams and tireless efforts. They want to retain as much control as possible to steer the ship toward their vision. After all, it was their spark that ignited the venture.

- Fear of Dilution: Dilution is the specter that haunts every founder. As more investors come aboard, ownership percentages shrink. Entrepreneurs fear losing their voice in the decision-making process.

- Example: Imagine Sarah, the founder of a cutting-edge AI-driven healthtech startup. She's passionate about revolutionizing patient care. When negotiating with investors, she insists on protective provisions to safeguard her voting rights and board seat.

2. The Investor's Stance:

- Risk and Reward: Investors bring capital, expertise, and networks to the table. They seek returns on their investment and want a say in strategic matters. Voting rights and board seats are their leverage points.

- Mitigating Founder Risk: Investors argue that dilution is a natural consequence of growth. They emphasize the need for professional management and governance. A strong board can guide the ship through stormy seas.

- Example: Alex, a venture capitalist, invests in early-stage startups. He believes in hands-on involvement. When negotiating terms, he pushes for a board seat and voting rights proportional to his investment.

3. The Board's Role:

- Fiduciary Duty: The board acts as the company's guardian. Its members owe a fiduciary duty to shareholders. They must balance competing interests—founders, investors, employees, and customers.

- Independent Directors: Independent directors provide objectivity. They're not beholden to any particular group. Their role is to ensure strategic alignment and long-term sustainability.

- Example: The board of XYZ Robotics faces a critical decision: Should they pivot to a new market or double down on their existing product? The founder, investor representatives, and independent directors debate passionately during a marathon board meeting.

4. Creative Solutions:

- dual-Class structures: Some companies issue different classes of shares—one with super-voting rights for founders and another with regular voting rights for public investors. Google and Facebook employ this approach.

- Founder Veto Rights: Founders retain veto power over specific decisions (e.g., major acquisitions, IPOs). This strikes a balance between control and investor confidence.

- Example: At Acme Biotech, the founder holds veto rights over any change in the company's core technology. Investors respect this clause, knowing it protects the company's DNA.

5. navigating the Term sheet:

- Negotiation Dance: When drafting the term sheet, both sides tango. Founders push for protective provisions, while investors seek influence. The goal? A harmonious arrangement that fuels growth.

- Legal Counsel: Like seasoned choreographers, legal advisors guide the negotiation. They ensure clarity, fairness, and compliance.

- Example: In the term sheet for Quantum Innovations, the voting rights section becomes a focal point. The founder's attorney advocates for weighted voting based on tenure, while the lead investor's counsel insists on equal voting rights.

Remember, the dance of voting rights and board representation isn't a solo performance—it's a symphony where every note matters. As startups pirouette toward success, finding the right rhythm ensures that control remains balanced, and the company glides toward its destiny.

7. Safeguarding Investor Investments

In the high-stakes world of startup funding, investors are keenly aware of the risks they take. They pour their hard-earned capital into fledgling companies, hoping for exponential growth and substantial returns. However, the startup landscape is volatile, and unforeseen circumstances can lead to dilution of their ownership stakes. Enter anti-dilution protection, a crucial mechanism that aims to shield investors from the erosion of their equity positions.

Let's delve into this topic from various angles, exploring its nuances, implications, and practical applications.

1. Understanding Dilution: The Investor's Dilemma

- Dilution occurs when a company issues new shares, thereby reducing the percentage ownership of existing shareholders. For investors, this can be disheartening. Imagine holding a significant stake in a promising startup, only to see it diluted as more shares flood the market.

- Dilution can happen due to subsequent funding rounds, employee stock options, or convertible debt conversions. While these actions are essential for a growing business, they can leave investors feeling vulnerable.

- Consider an early-stage venture capital firm that invests $1 million for a 20% equity stake. If the company raises another $5 million at a higher valuation, the VC's ownership percentage decreases unless protective measures are in place.

2. Types of Anti-Dilution Provisions

- Full Ratchet: This aggressive approach adjusts the conversion price of preferred stock to the lowest price paid by any investor in subsequent rounds. Essentially, it retroactively resets the initial investment price. While it provides robust protection, it can be harsh on the company and other shareholders.

- Weighted Average: A more balanced method, the weighted average anti-dilution provision considers the new issuance price and the number of shares issued. It calculates a revised conversion price based on the weighted average of both.

- Example: Suppose an investor holds 100,000 shares at $10 per share. If the company issues 50,000 new shares at $8 per share, the weighted average formula adjusts the conversion price to $9.33.

- Broad-Based vs. Narrow-Based: Broad-based provisions include all outstanding shares (preferred and common), while narrow-based provisions exclude common stock. The latter is less favorable to investors but more palatable to founders and employees.

3. Scenarios and real-Life examples

- Down Rounds: When a company's valuation drops significantly in subsequent funding rounds, anti-dilution protection kicks in. Investors receive additional shares to maintain their ownership percentage.

- Imagine a startup valued at $20 million during the seed round. If it later raises funds at a $10 million valuation, anti-dilution protection ensures that early investors don't suffer.

- The Case of Facebook: In 2009, Facebook faced a down round due to economic turmoil. Existing investors, including Peter Thiel, benefited from anti-dilution provisions.

- Convertible Notes: anti-dilution clauses are common in convertible notes. If the notes convert into equity at a lower valuation than expected, investors receive additional shares.

- A startup raises $500,000 through convertible notes. Later, it raises $2 million at a lower valuation. Anti-dilution protection ensures that the note holders' equity remains intact.

4. Negotiating Anti-Dilution Terms

- Founders' Perspective: Founders often resist aggressive anti-dilution provisions, fearing they may hinder future fundraising. They prefer weighted average mechanisms.

- Investors' Stance: Investors seek robust protection, especially in risky ventures. They may push for full ratchet provisions.

- Balancing Act: Negotiations involve finding middle ground. Caps on the extent of adjustment and sunset provisions (where anti-dilution protection expires after a certain period) can strike a balance.

In summary, anti-dilution protection is a critical tool for investors navigating the startup ecosystem. While it safeguards their interests, it must be wielded judiciously to avoid stifling growth. As startups continue to disrupt industries, finding the right balance between investor protection and entrepreneurial agility remains paramount.

Remember, the startup journey is a rollercoaster, and anti-dilution provisions are the safety harness that keeps investors securely strapped in.

8. Planning for the Future

1. understanding Exit strategies:

- An exit strategy outlines how founders and investors plan to realize their investment and move on from the startup. It's not just about selling the company; it's about maximizing value for all stakeholders.

- Perspectives:

- Founder's View: founders should consider their long-term goals. Do they want to build a legacy business or create something that can be sold for a substantial return?

- Investor's View: Investors seek liquidity. They want to exit profitably within a reasonable timeframe.

- Example: Imagine a tech startup that develops cutting-edge AI software. The founders may envision an acquisition by a larger tech company that can leverage their technology.

2. Common Exit Strategies:

- Acquisition: Selling the company to a larger corporation. Pros: Quick liquidity, access to resources. Cons: Loss of control.

- IPO (Initial Public Offering): Going public on the stock exchange. Pros: Wider access to capital, visibility. Cons: Regulatory burden.

- Management Buyout (MBO): Existing management team buys out investors. Pros: Continuity, alignment. Cons: Funding challenges.

- Merger: Combining with another company. Pros: Synergies, market dominance. Cons: Integration risks.

- Liquidation: Selling assets and distributing proceeds. Pros: Quick exit. Cons: Minimal returns.

- Example: A biotech startup researching breakthrough cancer treatments might aim for an acquisition by a pharmaceutical giant.

3. Factors Influencing Exit Timing:

- Market Conditions: favorable market conditions can drive better valuations.

- Company Maturity: Some startups exit early, while others wait until they've achieved significant milestones.

- Investor Pressure: Investors may push for an exit if the company isn't meeting growth targets.

- Example: A fintech startup may choose to exit after securing a strategic partnership with a major bank.

4. Negotiating Exit Terms:

- Valuation: Determining the company's worth is crucial. Founders and investors must agree on a fair price.

- Earnouts: Structuring payments based on future performance. Example: If revenue reaches a certain level post-acquisition, additional payments kick in.

- Non-Compete Clauses: Preventing founders from launching a competing venture immediately after the exit.

- Example: Negotiating an acquisition deal involves balancing financial terms and ensuring alignment with the acquiring company's vision.

5. Communication and Transparency:

- Team: Keeping employees informed during the exit process is essential for morale.

- Stakeholders: Communicating openly with investors, customers, and partners maintains trust.

- Example: A SaaS startup planning an acquisition should prepare a clear communication strategy to address employee concerns.

6. Case Study: WhatsApp's Acquisition by Facebook:

- In 2014, Facebook acquired WhatsApp for $19 billion. WhatsApp had a massive user base but no clear monetization strategy.

- Facebook recognized WhatsApp's potential for growth and synergy with its existing platforms.

- The acquisition allowed WhatsApp to focus on user experience while benefiting from Facebook's resources.

- Lesson: Strategic acquisitions can transform a company's trajectory.

In summary, exit strategies are not one-size-fits-all. Founders and investors must align their goals, consider market dynamics, and negotiate terms wisely. Whether it's a graceful exit or a blockbuster acquisition, planning ahead ensures a smoother transition for everyone involved.

9. Addressing Other Considerations

1. vesting Schedules and founder Equity:

- What is Vesting? Vesting refers to the gradual acquisition of ownership rights over a specific period. In the startup world, it primarily applies to founder equity. Founders don't receive their entire equity stake upfront; instead, it vests over time.

- Why Vesting Matters:

- Mitigating Risk: Vesting protects the startup if a founder leaves prematurely. Unvested shares can be reclaimed by the company.

- Alignment: Vesting aligns founders' interests with the long-term success of the company.

- Example: Imagine a co-founder receives 25% equity but vests over four years with a one-year cliff. If they leave within the first year, they get nothing. After the cliff, they vest monthly.

2. Anti-Dilution Provisions:

- Purpose: Anti-dilution provisions protect investors from dilution caused by subsequent funding rounds at lower valuations.

- Types:

- Full Ratchet: Converts existing shares to the new lower price.

- Weighted Average: Adjusts the conversion price based on the new round's valuation.

- Example: If an investor holds 10% equity and the company raises a down round, anti-dilution provisions ensure their ownership remains intact.

3. drag-Along and Tag-Along rights:

- Drag-Along: Majority shareholders can force minority shareholders to sell their shares during an acquisition.

- Tag-Along: Minority shareholders have the right to join a sale initiated by majority shareholders.

- Importance: These provisions balance power dynamics during exit events.

- Scenario: Suppose Company A acquires Startup B. If Startup B's majority shareholders invoke drag-along rights, minority shareholders must sell their shares to Company A.

4. Liquidation Preferences:

- Definition: Liquidation preferences determine the order in which proceeds are distributed during an exit (sale or IPO).

- Types:

- Participating Preferred: Investors receive their preference plus a share of the remaining proceeds.

- Non-Participating Preferred: Investors choose either their preference or their pro-rata share.

- Example: If an investor has a 1x participating preference and the company sells for $10 million, they receive $10 million before common shareholders.

5. Right of First Refusal (ROFR) and Co-Sale Rights:

- ROFR: Existing shareholders have the right to buy new shares before external investors.

- Co-Sale: Allows shareholders to participate in a sale alongside a major shareholder.

- Use Case: If an early employee wants to sell shares, the company exercises ROFR, preventing external buyers from diluting existing shareholders.

6. Founders' Agreement and Shotgun Clauses:

- Founders' Agreement: A contract among co-founders outlining roles, responsibilities, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

- Shotgun Clause: If co-founders disagree irreparably, one can trigger a "shotgun" process: either buy the other out at a specified price or sell their own shares at that price.

- Example: Co-founders Alice and Bob disagree. Alice invokes the shotgun clause, offering to buy Bob's shares at $100,000 or sell her shares to Bob at the same price.

Remember, these legal terms shape the foundation of your startup's journey. seek professional advice, tailor agreements to your specific context, and negotiate thoughtfully.