Currently, obesity is one of the most worrisome diseases of humanity. Bariatric surgery is the go... more Currently, obesity is one of the most worrisome diseases of humanity. Bariatric surgery is the gold-standard therapy to address moderate and severe obesity, but it fails to achieve broad acceptance. In this sense, endoluminal alternatives to bariatric surgery are particularly opportune and may entail malabsorptive, evacuation, space-occupying, and endoluminal gastric reduction procedures. The aim of this chapter is to review current data on the latter modality, especially regarding the primary obesity surgery endoluminal (POSE) and the endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty procedures.
The surgical treatment of patients with morbid obesity first began in the mid-twentieth century. ... more The surgical treatment of patients with morbid obesity first began in the mid-twentieth century. Its inception was based upon the fundamental principles that malabsorption of food particles and restriction of intake could help obese patients lose significant amounts of weight and resolve their comorbid medical conditions.
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Sep 1, 2005
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most commonly performed bariatric operation i... more Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most commonly performed bariatric operation in the United States. Although rare, gastrogastric fistulas are an important complication of this procedure. We report a series of 1,292 consecutive patients who underwent a divided RYGB procedure at our institution between January 2000 and November 2004. Of the 1,292 patients, we identified 15 (1.2%) who presented with gastrogastric fistulas after surgery. The mean age, weight, and body mass index of these patients was 39.5 years, 377.5 lb, and 54.9 kg/m(2), respectively. The mean postoperative follow-up was 17.6 months. The overall follow-up success rate in this series at 1 and 2 years postoperatively was 85% and 77%, respectively. Of the 15 patients, 12 (80%) presented with symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and epigastric pain. Esophagogastroscopy revealed marginal ulcers in 8 (53%) of these symptomatic patients. The most sensitive test for the diagnosis of gastrogastric fistula was an upper gastrointestinal contrast study. The mean time to fistula diagnosis was 80 days. Four patients (27%) had had a known leak before their diagnosis of gastrogastric fistula. In all cases, the leaks were managed nonoperatively with drainage, parenteral nutrition, and bowel rest. In this subset of patients, the mean time to fistula diagnosis was 25 days. Four patients (27%) presented to the clinic unsatisfied with their weight loss. The mean excess percentage of weight loss was 60.9%. Of the 15 patients with a diagnosed gastrogastric fistula, 8 (53.3%) presented with concomitant marginal ulcers. When present, marginal ulcers were managed with chronic acid suppressive therapy consisting of proton pump inhibitors and sucralfate. Revisional surgery was performed in 5 (33.3%) of 15 patients because of the combination of constant pain and ulceration refractory to optimal medical treatment and in 1 patient (7%) because of refractory pain unresponsive to medical therapy and weight regain. All revisional procedures (100%) were performed laparoscopically. Gastrogastric fistulas are an uncommon, but worrisome, complication after divided RYGB. Most symptoms of gastrogastric fistula are related to epigastric pain and ulcerations around the anastomotic site, but the fistula can occur anywhere along the divided segment of the gastric wall. They can initially be managed with a conservative, nonoperative approach as long as the patient remains asymptomatic and weight regain does not occur. Refractory ulcers and pain are the main indications for revisional surgery. Weight loss failure or weight regain is an uncommon short-term finding with gastrogastric fistulas after divided RYGB that requires surgical revision as the definitive treatment option. Although we present one of the largest series to date, longer follow-up is needed to better define the management of this patient population and provide a more accurate incidence of its occurrence.
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Mar 1, 2006
It is common practice to close mesenteric defects in abdominal surgery to prevent postoperative h... more It is common practice to close mesenteric defects in abdominal surgery to prevent postoperative herniation and subsequent closed-loop obstruction. The aim of this study was to review our experience with antecolic antegastric laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (AA-LRYGBP) without division of the small bowel mesentery or closure of potential mesenteric defects. Data for 1400 patients who underwent AA-LRYGBP between January 2001 and December 2004 was prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed for the incidence of internal hernias. In all cases, an antecolic antegastric approach was performed without division of the small bowel mesentery or closure of potential hernia defects. Three patients (0.2%) developed a symptomatic internal hernia. Two of these patients had a 200-cm-long Roux limb, and the other had a 100-cm-long Roux limb. All three patients exhibited mild symptoms of partial small bowel obstruction. In all three cases the internal hernia was clinically manifested more than 10 months after the original AA- LRYGBP. Exploration revealed that the hernia site was between the transverse colon and the mesentery of the alimentary limb at the level of the jejunojejunostomy (Petersen's defect) in all three cases. All three patients underwent successful laparoscopic revision, hernia reduction, and mesenteric defect closure. AA-LRYGBP without division of the small bowel mesentery or closure of mesenteric defects does not result in an increased incidence of internal hernias. The laparoscopic approach for reexploration appears to be an effective and safe option.
Currently, obesity is one of the most worrisome diseases of humanity. Bariatric surgery is the go... more Currently, obesity is one of the most worrisome diseases of humanity. Bariatric surgery is the gold-standard therapy to address moderate and severe obesity, but it fails to achieve broad acceptance. In this sense, endoluminal alternatives to bariatric surgery are particularly opportune and may entail malabsorptive, evacuation, space-occupying, and endoluminal gastric reduction procedures. The aim of this chapter is to review current data on the latter modality, especially regarding the primary obesity surgery endoluminal (POSE) and the endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty procedures.
The surgical treatment of patients with morbid obesity first began in the mid-twentieth century. ... more The surgical treatment of patients with morbid obesity first began in the mid-twentieth century. Its inception was based upon the fundamental principles that malabsorption of food particles and restriction of intake could help obese patients lose significant amounts of weight and resolve their comorbid medical conditions.
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Sep 1, 2005
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most commonly performed bariatric operation i... more Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most commonly performed bariatric operation in the United States. Although rare, gastrogastric fistulas are an important complication of this procedure. We report a series of 1,292 consecutive patients who underwent a divided RYGB procedure at our institution between January 2000 and November 2004. Of the 1,292 patients, we identified 15 (1.2%) who presented with gastrogastric fistulas after surgery. The mean age, weight, and body mass index of these patients was 39.5 years, 377.5 lb, and 54.9 kg/m(2), respectively. The mean postoperative follow-up was 17.6 months. The overall follow-up success rate in this series at 1 and 2 years postoperatively was 85% and 77%, respectively. Of the 15 patients, 12 (80%) presented with symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and epigastric pain. Esophagogastroscopy revealed marginal ulcers in 8 (53%) of these symptomatic patients. The most sensitive test for the diagnosis of gastrogastric fistula was an upper gastrointestinal contrast study. The mean time to fistula diagnosis was 80 days. Four patients (27%) had had a known leak before their diagnosis of gastrogastric fistula. In all cases, the leaks were managed nonoperatively with drainage, parenteral nutrition, and bowel rest. In this subset of patients, the mean time to fistula diagnosis was 25 days. Four patients (27%) presented to the clinic unsatisfied with their weight loss. The mean excess percentage of weight loss was 60.9%. Of the 15 patients with a diagnosed gastrogastric fistula, 8 (53.3%) presented with concomitant marginal ulcers. When present, marginal ulcers were managed with chronic acid suppressive therapy consisting of proton pump inhibitors and sucralfate. Revisional surgery was performed in 5 (33.3%) of 15 patients because of the combination of constant pain and ulceration refractory to optimal medical treatment and in 1 patient (7%) because of refractory pain unresponsive to medical therapy and weight regain. All revisional procedures (100%) were performed laparoscopically. Gastrogastric fistulas are an uncommon, but worrisome, complication after divided RYGB. Most symptoms of gastrogastric fistula are related to epigastric pain and ulcerations around the anastomotic site, but the fistula can occur anywhere along the divided segment of the gastric wall. They can initially be managed with a conservative, nonoperative approach as long as the patient remains asymptomatic and weight regain does not occur. Refractory ulcers and pain are the main indications for revisional surgery. Weight loss failure or weight regain is an uncommon short-term finding with gastrogastric fistulas after divided RYGB that requires surgical revision as the definitive treatment option. Although we present one of the largest series to date, longer follow-up is needed to better define the management of this patient population and provide a more accurate incidence of its occurrence.
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Mar 1, 2006
It is common practice to close mesenteric defects in abdominal surgery to prevent postoperative h... more It is common practice to close mesenteric defects in abdominal surgery to prevent postoperative herniation and subsequent closed-loop obstruction. The aim of this study was to review our experience with antecolic antegastric laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (AA-LRYGBP) without division of the small bowel mesentery or closure of potential mesenteric defects. Data for 1400 patients who underwent AA-LRYGBP between January 2001 and December 2004 was prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed for the incidence of internal hernias. In all cases, an antecolic antegastric approach was performed without division of the small bowel mesentery or closure of potential hernia defects. Three patients (0.2%) developed a symptomatic internal hernia. Two of these patients had a 200-cm-long Roux limb, and the other had a 100-cm-long Roux limb. All three patients exhibited mild symptoms of partial small bowel obstruction. In all three cases the internal hernia was clinically manifested more than 10 months after the original AA- LRYGBP. Exploration revealed that the hernia site was between the transverse colon and the mesentery of the alimentary limb at the level of the jejunojejunostomy (Petersen's defect) in all three cases. All three patients underwent successful laparoscopic revision, hernia reduction, and mesenteric defect closure. AA-LRYGBP without division of the small bowel mesentery or closure of mesenteric defects does not result in an increased incidence of internal hernias. The laparoscopic approach for reexploration appears to be an effective and safe option.
Uploads
Papers by Natan Zundel