From 6c0c49f7d37dc29775947ac6edbc494c32f43fa6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 15:09:27 +0300
Subject: Remove unused latch

It was left unused by commit bc971f4025, which replaced the latch
usage with a condition variable

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/391abe21-413e-4d91-a650-b663af49500c@iki.fi
---
 src/backend/replication/walsender.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/backend')

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walsender.c b/src/backend/replication/walsender.c
index c5f1009f370..866b69ec855 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walsender.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walsender.c
@@ -2935,7 +2935,6 @@ InitWalSenderSlot(void)
 			walsnd->flushLag = -1;
 			walsnd->applyLag = -1;
 			walsnd->sync_standby_priority = 0;
-			walsnd->latch = &MyProc->procLatch;
 			walsnd->replyTime = 0;
 
 			/*
@@ -2979,8 +2978,6 @@ WalSndKill(int code, Datum arg)
 	MyWalSnd = NULL;
 
 	SpinLockAcquire(&walsnd->mutex);
-	/* clear latch while holding the spinlock, so it can safely be read */
-	walsnd->latch = NULL;
 	/* Mark WalSnd struct as no longer being in use. */
 	walsnd->pid = 0;
 	SpinLockRelease(&walsnd->mutex);
-- 
cgit v1.2.3