Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
doc: fix for plurality typo on bgwriter doc sentence
authorBruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Wed, 6 Nov 2019 02:29:02 +0000 (21:29 -0500)
committerBruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Wed, 6 Nov 2019 02:29:02 +0000 (21:29 -0500)
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191106022353.GX4999@telsasoft.com

Backpatch-through: 11, 12

doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml

index 2bfc6eb9439faa723bc6f3c765dacea0105f2745..ad17b42c898b0cb12181bc7920ebcabd3e7a69e6 100644 (file)
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
    There are considerable robustness and security risks in using background
    worker processes because, being written in the <literal>C</literal> language,
    they have unrestricted access to data.  Administrators wishing to enable
-   modules that include background worker processs should exercise extreme
+   modules that include background worker processes should exercise extreme
    caution.  Only carefully audited modules should be permitted to run
    background worker processes.
   </para>