GroupBy & Time Gap Fixes#975
Merged
benjchristensen merged 1 commit intoReactiveX:masterfrom Mar 20, 2014
Merged
Conversation
I ran head-on into the "time gap" (ReactiveX#844) issue while working on a stream processing use case (and new 'pivot' operator I'm writing). This is a solution. It's still not ideal as the Javadocs of BufferUntilSubscriber mention, but this is working better than nothing and does not require blocking threads. A better solution will come as part of the back pressure work where BufferUntilSubscriber will evolve to have a bounded buffer.
benjchristensen
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2014
GroupBy & Time Gap Fixes
|
RxJava-pull-requests #914 FAILURE |
Member
Author
|
I should probably fix that random compilation error sitting in master branch ... |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I ran head-on into the "time gap" (#844) issue while working on a stream processing use case (and new 'pivot' operator I'm writing).
This is a solution. It's still not ideal as the Javadocs of BufferUntilSubscriber mention, but this is working better than nothing and does not require blocking threads.
A better solution will come as part of the back pressure work where BufferUntilSubscriber will evolve to have a bounded buffer.