Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] Wstunnel (wss) + Wireguard #886

Open
vincent1890 opened this issue Jul 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Request] Wstunnel (wss) + Wireguard #886

vincent1890 opened this issue Jul 7, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@vincent1890
Copy link

Wstunnel (wss) + Wireguard which is the perfect combo but if we could have this integrate into the application this would be really top
erebe/wstunnel#292

Currently :
[(Windows/Linux) App_(file/chrome/other) -> Wireguard (UDP 51820) -> (IN - UDP 51820 )Wstunnel(Out - TCP 443) -> Internet World -> (In - TCP 443)Docker-RevProxy(Out - TCP 9442) -> (In - TCP 9442)Docker-WsTunnel(Out - UDP 51820) -> (In UDP 51820)_Wireguard-Server-VPN -> (Enterprise)Private-Lan] this works well

Originally posted by @vincent1890 in #182 (comment)

@vincent1890 vincent1890 changed the title Wstunnel (wss) + Wireguard which is the perfect combo but if we could have this integrate into the application this would be really top Wstunnel (wss) + Wireguard Jul 8, 2024
@vincent1890 vincent1890 changed the title Wstunnel (wss) + Wireguard [Request] Wstunnel (wss) + Wireguard Jul 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant