Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it possible to add partial deletion for singular species in dsmcDeletionPatch? #135

Open
PrikMushi opened this issue Apr 6, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@PrikMushi
Copy link

I am working on a project where I want the dsmcDeletionPatch to delete particles, but at the same time reflect some particles backwards. Is it possible to add some probability here, where some particles hitting the deletion patch do not get detelted but get reflected?

I have only one gas species in the study.

@timteichmann
Copy link
Contributor

Take a look at dsmcAbsorbingWallPatch and associated mixed boundaries, e.g. dsmcAbsorbingDiffuseWallPatch.

@PrikMushi
Copy link
Author

Thank you.

From my understanding, absorbing doesn't equate to deletion from the domain? I would still like to implement something sort of deletion patch plus some particles being reflected back.

@timteichmann
Copy link
Contributor

From my understanding, absorbing doesn't equate to deletion from the domain?

Yes, it does. For more details please have a look at the source code.

@PrikMushi
Copy link
Author

Thank you again.

I have never used the Absorption patch. Is the syntax for absorption probability as such? For 50% absorption of Argon.

absorptionProbabilities = 50_[Ar];

@du-zhihua
Copy link

How to use this boundary condition? I just need to use dsmcAbsorbingDiffuseWallPatch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants