Is there a reason why at(time, val) is not curried?

[semmel]

Apart from runEffects, at seems to be the only (n>1)-ary function which is not auto-curried.

I find that surprising.
Is there a reason for it?

[briancavalier]

Hey, @semmel. I don't think there's a reason--probably just an oversight. Sorry for the surprise. We'd happily accept a PR to curry it 😄

[TylorS]

It may be a good idea to start brainstorming what a 2.0 might look like now that we have something deferred there. Maybe we should create an issue dedicated to it so we can discuss our ideas?

Some off-the-cuff ideas I have:

• Utilize the ES native Disposable type, pretty minor change, but breaking
• Add support for asynchronous dispose, ideally with AsyncDisposable ES interface, fairly large change, but I have a number of usecases which rely on this behavior now, mostly undoing failures.
• Add additional type parameters, could be one or both
  • E parameter to explicitly track error types
  • R parameter to allow tracking the context a Stream is running within

[TylorS]

I created a discussion so we can have some amount of threading and such for conversation - #680