Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to content

Commit 2877c67

Browse files
committed
Fix bogus comment that claimed that the new BACKUP METHOD line in
backup_label was new in 9.0. Spotted by Fujii Masao.
1 parent 3b3f093 commit 2877c67

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed
  • src/backend/access/transam

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed

src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c

+3-3
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -9826,9 +9826,9 @@ read_backup_label(XLogRecPtr *checkPointLoc, bool *backupEndRequired)
98269826
(errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
98279827
errmsg("invalid data in file \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE)));
98289828
/*
9829-
* BACKUP METHOD line is new in 9.0. Don't complain if it doesn't exist,
9830-
* in case you're restoring from a backup taken with an 9.0 beta version
9831-
* that didn't emit it.
9829+
* BACKUP METHOD line is new in 9.2. We can't restore from an older backup
9830+
* anyway, but since the information on it is not strictly required, don't
9831+
* error out if it's missing for some reason.
98329832
*/
98339833
if (fscanf(lfp, "BACKUP METHOD: %19s", backuptype) == 1)
98349834
{

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)