@@ -907,3 +907,61 @@ TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
907
907
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
908
908
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
909
909
910
+ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M14652=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org Thu Oct 25 22:24:44 2001
911
+ Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M14652=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org>
912
+ Received: from rs.postgresql.org (server1.pgsql.org [64.39.15.238] (may be forged))
913
+ by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f9Q1Oim04694
914
+ for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 21:24:44 -0400 (EDT)
915
+ Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
916
+ by rs.postgresql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9Q1CeR31737
917
+ for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 20:21:26 -0500 (CDT)
918
+ (envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M14652=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org)
919
+ Received: from smaug.polygnosis.com (smaug.polygnosis.com [195.139.160.201])
920
+ by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9Q16NP39474
921
+ for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 21:06:23 -0400 (EDT)
922
+ (envelope-from gunnar@smaug.polygnosis.com)
923
+ Received: (from gunnar@localhost)
924
+ by smaug.polygnosis.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f9Q15nC01560;
925
+ Fri, 26 Oct 2001 03:05:49 +0200
926
+ To: tweekie <None@news.tht.net>
927
+ cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
928
+ Subject: Re: [HACKERS] java virtual machine
929
+ References: <3bd825e2_1@Usenet.com>
930
+ From: Gunnar =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F8nning?= <gunnar@polygnosis.com>
931
+ Date: 26 Oct 2001 03:05:49 +0200
932
+ In-Reply-To: <3bd825e2_1@Usenet.com>
933
+ Message-ID: <m28zdzmcr6.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com>
934
+ Lines: 19
935
+ User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
936
+ MIME-Version: 1.0
937
+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
938
+ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
939
+ Precedence: bulk
940
+ Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
941
+ Status: OR
942
+
943
+ * tweekie <None@news.tht.net> wrote:
944
+ |
945
+ | I asked this question a while back but got no response - is there any way of
946
+ | creating a Java stored procedure in a postgres database ? I can see that
947
+ | there is a built-in PL/sql type of environment and a python one but it would
948
+ | be nice if I could migrate Java stored procedures in an Oracle database into
949
+ | postgres.
950
+ |
951
+ | Any comments?
952
+
953
+
954
+ It would rock ;-) An Hungarian guy just sent a mail indicating that he
955
+ had a first prototype version of something with Kaffe up and running.
956
+ But I believe there is a lot of issues to be solved, especially
957
+ threading issues...
958
+
959
+ --
960
+ Gunnar R�nning - gunnar@polygnosis.com
961
+ Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/
962
+
963
+ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
964
+ TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
965
+
966
+ http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
967
+
0 commit comments