Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to content

Commit 82511e3

Browse files
committed
In create_function there is a remark concerning SQL/PSM not
being ratified as yet. This is certainly no longer true, it wasn't even true in Q2/1998 when I did a little research for Date's book. SQL/PSM had been published on 1996-12-15 as ISO/IEC 9075:4. So you might want to update that section. Frank Wegmann
1 parent 651acda commit 82511e3

File tree

2 files changed

+4
-7
lines changed

2 files changed

+4
-7
lines changed

doc/src/sgml/ref/create_function.sgml

+2-5
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
11
<!--
2-
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_function.sgml,v 1.21 2000/12/25 23:15:26 petere Exp $
2+
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_function.sgml,v 1.22 2001/04/28 13:59:07 momjian Exp $
33
Postgres documentation
44
-->
55

@@ -384,10 +384,7 @@ Point * complex_to_point (Complex *z)
384384
<note>
385385
<para>
386386
PSM stands for Persistent Stored Modules. It is a procedural
387-
language and it was originally hoped that PSM would be ratified
388-
as an official standard by late 1996. As of mid-1998, this
389-
has not yet happened, but it is hoped that PSM will
390-
eventually become a standard.
387+
language. SQL/PSM is a standard to enable function extensibility.
391388
</para>
392389
</note>
393390

doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_function.sgml

+2-2
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
11
<!--
2-
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_function.sgml,v 1.9 2000/12/25 23:15:26 petere Exp $
2+
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_function.sgml,v 1.10 2001/04/28 13:59:07 momjian Exp $
33
Postgres documentation
44
-->
55

@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ DROP FUNCTION sqrt(int4);
168168
SQL/PSM
169169
</title>
170170
<para>
171-
SQL/PSM is a proposed standard to enable function extensibility.
171+
SQL/PSM is a standard to enable function extensibility.
172172
The SQL/PSM DROP FUNCTION statement has the following syntax:
173173

174174
<synopsis>

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)