Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to content

Commit fe186b4

Browse files
committed
Fix inconsistent markups in catalogs.sgml
Some fields related to pg_opclass and pg_opfamily were using incorrect markups, listing them as structname instead of structfield. Author: Fabien Coelho Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2006210903560.859381@pseudo
1 parent 9550ea3 commit fe186b4

File tree

1 file changed

+4
-4
lines changed

1 file changed

+4
-4
lines changed

doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml

Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -897,7 +897,7 @@
897897

898898
<para>
899899
An entry's <structfield>amopmethod</structfield> must match the
900-
<structname>opfmethod</structname> of its containing operator family (including
900+
<structfield>opfmethod</structfield> of its containing operator family (including
901901
<structfield>amopmethod</structfield> here is an intentional denormalization of the
902902
catalog structure for performance reasons). Also,
903903
<structfield>amoplefttype</structfield> and <structfield>amoprighttype</structfield> must match
@@ -5064,10 +5064,10 @@ SCRAM-SHA-256$<replaceable>&lt;iteration count&gt;</replaceable>:<replaceable>&l
50645064

50655065
<para>
50665066
An operator class's <structfield>opcmethod</structfield> must match the
5067-
<structname>opfmethod</structname> of its containing operator family.
5067+
<structfield>opfmethod</structfield> of its containing operator family.
50685068
Also, there must be no more than one <structname>pg_opclass</structname>
5069-
row having <structname>opcdefault</structname> true for any given combination of
5070-
<structname>opcmethod</structname> and <structname>opcintype</structname>.
5069+
row having <structfield>opcdefault</structfield> true for any given combination of
5070+
<structfield>opcmethod</structfield> and <structfield>opcintype</structfield>.
50715071
</para>
50725072

50735073
</sect1>

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)