Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
×
Abstract: We prove tight bounds on the time needed to solve k-set agreement, a natural generalization of consensus. We analyze this problem in a syn- chronous, ...
Abstract: We prove tight bounds on the time needed to solve k-set agreement, a natural generalization of consensus. We analyze this problem in a synchronous ...
Abstract: We prove tight bounds on the time needed to solve k-set agreement, a natural generalization of consensus. We analyze this problem in a syn-.
Abstract. We prove tight bounds on the time needed to solve k-set agreement. In this problem, each processor starts with an arbitrary input value taken from ...
We prove tight bounds on the time needed to solve k-set agreement. In this problem, each processor starts with an arbitrary input value taken from a fixed set.
We prove a lower bound of [f/k]+1 rounds of communication for solutions to k-set agreement that tolerate f failures.
A lower bound of [f/k]+1 rounds of communication for solutions to k-set agreement that tolerate f failures is proved, and shows that there is an inherent ...
Oct 22, 2024 · We prove tight bounds on the time needed to solve k-set agreement. In this problem, each processor starts with an arbitrary input value ...
We prove a tight lower bound on the running time of oblivious solutions to k-set agreement. In k-set agreement, processors start with input values from a given ...
We prove tight bounds on the time needed to solve k-set agreement, a natural generalization of consensus. We analyze this problem in a synchronous, ...