Apr 30, 2007 · Most of them fall in three categories: global, symmetric and complementary. All these systems share an acyclicity property. As a consequence, ...
scholar.google.com › citations
Abstract. In this work we study preference systems suitable for the. Peer-to-Peer paradigm. Most of them fall in one of the three follow-.
May 2, 2007 · Abstra t: In this work we study preferen e systems natural for the Peer-to-Peer paradigm. Most of them fall in three ategories: global, ...
In this work we study preference systems natural for the Peer-to-Peer paradigm. Most of them fall in three categories: global, symmetric and complementary.
In this work we study preference systems suitable for the Peer-to-Peer paradigm. Most of them fall in one of the three following categories: global, ...
May 2, 2007 · Abstra t: In this work we study preferen e systems natural for the Peer-to-Peer paradigm. Most of them fall in three ategories: global, ...
The representation of such preference systems suitable for the Peer-to-Peer paradigm is analyzed and it is shown that any acyclic system can be represented ...
In this work we study preference systems suitable for the Peer-to-Peer paradigm. Most of them fall in one of the three following categories: global, ...
We considered preference systems natural for the P2P paradigm, and showed that most of them fall into three categories: global, symmetric, and complementary. We ...
In this work we study preference systems suitable for the Peer-to-Peer paradigm. Most of them fall in one of the three following categories: global, ...