scholar.google.com › citations
Machine performance degrades further below that of humans in noise, with channel variability, and for spontaneous speech. Humans can also recognize quiet, clearly spoken nonsense syllables and nonsense sentences with little high-level grammatical information.
We present a study which is concerned with word recognition rates for heavily degraded documents. We compare human with machine read(cid:173) ing capabilities ...
Dec 1, 1997 · We present a study which is concerned with word recognition rates for heavily degraded documents. We compare human with machine reading ...
People also ask
What is the comparison of human and machine translation?
How is word recognition measured?
We present a study which is concerned with word recognition rates for heavily degraded documents. We compare human with machine read-.
Holistic Urdu Handwritten Word Recognition Using Support Vector Machine. ICPR '10: Proceedings of the 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.
PDF | We present a study which is concerned with word recognition rates for heavily degraded documents. We compare human with machine reading.
We present a study which is concerned with word recognition rates for heavily degraded documents. We compare human with ma- chine reading capabilities in a ...
Abstract: Humans are more effective than machines at recognizing speech. This advantage for human listeners is particularly pronounced for speech that is heard ...
Machine performance degrades further below that of humans in noise, with channel variability, and for spontaneous speech. Humans can also recognize quiet, ...
Sep 1, 2024 · The QuickSIN test is used by audiologists to measure the ability of humans to recognize continuous speech in noise. This test yields the signal- ...
Missing: Word | Show results with:Word