Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
×
Abstract. Several different frameworks have been proposed to model and reason about knowledge in dy- namic multi-agent settings, among them the logic-.
In this paper, we formally study the expressiveness of GDL-III vs. DEL. We clarify the commonalities and differences between those languages.
In this paper, we formally study the expressiveness of GDL-III vs. DEL. We clarify the commonalities and differences between those languages.
Abstract. Several different frameworks have been proposed to model and reason about knowledge in dy- namic multi-agent settings, among them the logic-.
DEL. We clarify the commonalities and differences between those languages, demonstrate how to bridge the differences where possible, and identify large ...
DEL. We clarify the commonalities and differences between those languages, demonstrate how to bridge the differences where possible, and identify large ...
This paper identifies large fragments of GDL-III and DEL that are equivalent in the sense that they can be used to encode games or planning tasks that admit ...
GDL-III and DEL have complementary strengths and weaknesses in terms of ease of modeling and simplicity of semantics. In this paper, we formally study the ...
Citations of: Game description language and dynamic epistemic logic compared · Thorsten Engesser, Robert Mattmüller, Bernhard Nebel & Michael Thielscher.
Game description language and dynamic epistemic logic compared. 作者:. 摘要. Several different frameworks have been proposed to model and reason about ...