Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
×
In this paper, we show how to combine these two techniques by biasing the random generation in order to optimise the probability of satisfying a coverage ...
Nov 26, 2013 · Random Grammar-based Testing for Covering All. Non-Terminals. Alois ... This tool does not provide any random feature but is based on rule ...
Abstract. In the context of software testing, generating complex data inputs is frequently performed using a grammar-based specification. For combinatorial ...
In this paper, we show how to combine these two techniques by biasing the random generation in order to optimise the probability of satisfying a coverage ...
In the context of software testing, generating complex data inputs is frequently performed using a grammar-based specification. For combinatorial reasons ...
Mar 23, 2024 · The traditional test design objectives for syntax based testing are as follows: Covering all terminal symbols in the context-free grammar ...
Covering Grammar Elements¶. The aim of test generation is to cover all functionality of a program – hopefully including the failing functionality, of course.
This paper presents a coverage-guided grammar-based fuzzing technique for automatically generating a corpus of concise test inputs for programs such as ...
Random Grammar-based Testing for Covering All Non-Terminals. Overview of ... Random Grammar-based Testing for Covering All Non-Terminals. Published in.
May 16, 2024 · I'm currently learning about fuzzing and testing and there's a part that I'm not too sure how to do. I am given grammars like this: