Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
×
A general explanation is presented for a broad class of inconsistencies or preference reversal phenomena that occur in assessing preferences or utility ...
The discrepancy between certainty and probability equivalents studied by Hershey and Schoemaker (1985) appears to be a particular case of a general phenomenon.
People also ask
Combining reinforcer parameters may lead to more robust differences in responding and preferences. These types of outcomes are implied by the results of ...
The purpose of this study was to compare. PS, MSWO, and FO preference-assessment formats to determine problem behavior rates both during the assessment and ...
Inconsistency among these findings may stem from variations in the methods ... Second, preference responding may have been influenced by the preceding reinforcer ...
What kind of preference assessment is being used in the following video ? A. Single stimulus preference assessment. B. Paired choice. C. MSWO. D. MSW. Answer.
Mar 8, 2021 · 3, which indicates inconsistent responding from the initial to the follow-up preference assessment. ... responding across time or stimulus modes.
... inconsistent outcomes across children. The current study aimed to evaluate ... response‐restriction preference assessment. Article. Jul 2019.
Single Stimulus Preference Assessments, also known as “successive choice” assessments, are conducted by providing a single item to a child, and recording ...
Missing: inconsistencies | Show results with:inconsistencies
Conducted systematically, preference assessment can be used to identify enjoyable leisure activities or reinforcers for teaching programs (Ivancic, 2000).