Welcome item highlights itinerancy as a public question that lives in many societies and nations ... more Welcome item highlights itinerancy as a public question that lives in many societies and nations about the planet. This wonder has become one of the most generous public questions binding the world in the up-to-date. This heartened me to examine this phenomenon in welcome item. The item addresses few of the causes that lead to itinerancy from men's viewpoint, the results of it, and the problems of destitute population. The writer mentions two main reasons for itinerancy: lack of knowledge among destitute community and the use of drugs and intoxicating. Whilst me states that the disease in destitute crowd is deliberate ultimate important effect of itinerancy. As for the questions endured by destitute persons, I decides the three most important that are poverty, hungriness and isolation. This paper conducts a review of the literature on understanding homelessness including youth. It condemns approaches that ignore, distort, or diminish the humanity of homeless people, or that make little contribution to our understanding of that humanity. It specifically rejects "epidemiological" approaches that deny homeless people the possibility of agency, insofar as those approaches regard their situation as largely a "social fact" to be explained in terms of causal variables or "risk factors" of various kinds. It evaluates the concept of homelessness pathways as a means of making sense of research findings on homelessness. It takes issue with realist approaches, insofar as these approaches purport to identify "underlying" mechanisms that "cause" homelessness, and discusses ethnographic approaches focused on "homeless culture". With an assessment of two research projects based on the lives of homeless people. It then criticizes what is referred to as the "new orthodoxy" that claims to explain homelessness by combining "structural" and "individual" factors. The section that follows examines the literature on homelessness pathways in terms of entry, transit, and exit points. This section concludes that the concept of homelessness pathways is inherently ambiguous but potentially useful: evidence suggests the existence of a number of patterns that occur in some people's life courses, particularly those leading out of homelessness. Following that, the paper criticizes realist explanations for homelessness
Welcome item highlights itinerancy as a public question that lives in many societies and nations ... more Welcome item highlights itinerancy as a public question that lives in many societies and nations about the planet. This wonder has become one of the most generous public questions binding the world in the up-to-date. This heartened me to examine this phenomenon in welcome item. The item addresses few of the causes that lead to itinerancy from men's viewpoint, the results of it, and the problems of destitute population. The writer mentions two main reasons for itinerancy: lack of knowledge among destitute community and the use of drugs and intoxicating. Whilst me states that the disease in destitute crowd is deliberate ultimate important effect of itinerancy. As for the questions endured by destitute persons, I decides the three most important that are poverty, hungriness and isolation. This paper conducts a review of the literature on understanding homelessness including youth. It condemns approaches that ignore, distort, or diminish the humanity of homeless people, or that make little contribution to our understanding of that humanity. It specifically rejects "epidemiological" approaches that deny homeless people the possibility of agency, insofar as those approaches regard their situation as largely a "social fact" to be explained in terms of causal variables or "risk factors" of various kinds. It evaluates the concept of homelessness pathways as a means of making sense of research findings on homelessness. It takes issue with realist approaches, insofar as these approaches purport to identify "underlying" mechanisms that "cause" homelessness, and discusses ethnographic approaches focused on "homeless culture". With an assessment of two research projects based on the lives of homeless people. It then criticizes what is referred to as the "new orthodoxy" that claims to explain homelessness by combining "structural" and "individual" factors. The section that follows examines the literature on homelessness pathways in terms of entry, transit, and exit points. This section concludes that the concept of homelessness pathways is inherently ambiguous but potentially useful: evidence suggests the existence of a number of patterns that occur in some people's life courses, particularly those leading out of homelessness. Following that, the paper criticizes realist explanations for homelessness
Uploads
Books by Eric TUYISENGE
Papers by Eric TUYISENGE