Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research, Oct 1, 2020
Oral biofilm, a tribulation encountered on a general basis is known to associate and contribute t... more Oral biofilm, a tribulation encountered on a general basis is known to associate and contribute to many oral and systemic diseases. Eradication of these biofilms is a primary step in treatment of the underlying malady. Management of a biofilm is governed by various factors: the microenvironment within a biofilm, bond between the adhered surface and the biofilm, location of the biofilm, access to the biofilm for removal. Though annihilation is the priority, the mode of approach to achieve the same is equally important, because biofilm's heterogenic nature and location govern the strategical treatment required. Literature supports that the consequences of oral biofilms is not restricted to its home ground, but disseminated to other systems of the body. This contemplates us to procure knowledge on its development, structure and progression to aim its eradication. Therefore, this review attempts to recognize the type of biofilm based on location and enumerate all the possible chemical modes of management for the specific type of oral biofilms encountered. In addition, to the traditional strategies prescribed or administered, newer approaches which are gaining popularity due to their ease and efficiency are also addressed. Frontiers in the above field, under investigation and promising in near future are also compiled. Thus, the present review aims to provide a comprehensive elucidation of chemical management of oral biofilms, both the conventional and novel approaches under investigation.
Background: Acute appendicitis is still known as one of the most common abdominal emergencies, on... more Background: Acute appendicitis is still known as one of the most common abdominal emergencies, one of the challenges encountered by the emergency physician is accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis. In a trial to overcome these difficulties, this study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of readily available and inexpensive inflammatory markers serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, white blood cells (WBCs), and neutrophils count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Methods: This is a retrospective study. Two hundred and forty-one participants who performed appendectomy in King Abdulaziz University Hospital from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017, were included in this study, of which 148 (61.4%) were males and 93 (38.6%) were females. Chi-square and t-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The study included 241 patients; the median CRP, WBCs, and neutrophils were significantly higher in patients who underwent open surgery and in complicated appendicitis compared to noncomplicated ones. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed higher accuracy of CRP in discrimination of acute appendicitis with a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 57%, respectively. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the CRP is greater than the WBCs and neutrophil count. Thus, high serum CRP levels support the surgeon's clinical diagnosis. However, none of the studied markers is 100% diagnostic for acute appendicitis. It is recommended to include CRP measurement as a routine laboratory test in patients with suspected diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
SummaryPeri‐operative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this stu... more SummaryPeri‐operative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre‐operative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30‐day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30‐day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre‐operative SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30‐day mortality in patients without SARS‐CoV‐2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4–1.5). In patients with a pre‐operative SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery wi...
SummarySARS‐CoV‐2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critica... more SummarySARS‐CoV‐2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri‐operative or prior SARS‐CoV‐2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub‐study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnosis was defined as peri‐operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1–6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre‐operative anti‐coagulation for baseline comorbidities was no...
Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2018
Pharmacovigilance is vital to public health. Adopting a robust spontaneous reporting system for a... more Pharmacovigilance is vital to public health. Adopting a robust spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug events can counteract most hazards that arise from utilizing medicinal products. Prior to the establishment of the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), the number of pharmacovigilance-related activities in Saudi Arabia was limited. In 2009, the SFDA established the National Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety Center (Saudi Vigilance). The pharmacovigilance system has remarkably improved during the past few years. Several initiatives have been taken to improve the program's performance. These initiatives include initiation of pharmacovigilance guidelines, enhancement of communication and reporting tools, training sessions for concerned staff and healthcare providers, and compliance from stakeholders. This review article provides an overview of what the Saudi Vigilance program is, focusing on the scope, mission and vision, hierarchy, operational themes, and overall work proc...
Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research, Oct 1, 2020
Oral biofilm, a tribulation encountered on a general basis is known to associate and contribute t... more Oral biofilm, a tribulation encountered on a general basis is known to associate and contribute to many oral and systemic diseases. Eradication of these biofilms is a primary step in treatment of the underlying malady. Management of a biofilm is governed by various factors: the microenvironment within a biofilm, bond between the adhered surface and the biofilm, location of the biofilm, access to the biofilm for removal. Though annihilation is the priority, the mode of approach to achieve the same is equally important, because biofilm's heterogenic nature and location govern the strategical treatment required. Literature supports that the consequences of oral biofilms is not restricted to its home ground, but disseminated to other systems of the body. This contemplates us to procure knowledge on its development, structure and progression to aim its eradication. Therefore, this review attempts to recognize the type of biofilm based on location and enumerate all the possible chemical modes of management for the specific type of oral biofilms encountered. In addition, to the traditional strategies prescribed or administered, newer approaches which are gaining popularity due to their ease and efficiency are also addressed. Frontiers in the above field, under investigation and promising in near future are also compiled. Thus, the present review aims to provide a comprehensive elucidation of chemical management of oral biofilms, both the conventional and novel approaches under investigation.
Background: Acute appendicitis is still known as one of the most common abdominal emergencies, on... more Background: Acute appendicitis is still known as one of the most common abdominal emergencies, one of the challenges encountered by the emergency physician is accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis. In a trial to overcome these difficulties, this study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of readily available and inexpensive inflammatory markers serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, white blood cells (WBCs), and neutrophils count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Methods: This is a retrospective study. Two hundred and forty-one participants who performed appendectomy in King Abdulaziz University Hospital from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017, were included in this study, of which 148 (61.4%) were males and 93 (38.6%) were females. Chi-square and t-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The study included 241 patients; the median CRP, WBCs, and neutrophils were significantly higher in patients who underwent open surgery and in complicated appendicitis compared to noncomplicated ones. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed higher accuracy of CRP in discrimination of acute appendicitis with a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 57%, respectively. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the CRP is greater than the WBCs and neutrophil count. Thus, high serum CRP levels support the surgeon's clinical diagnosis. However, none of the studied markers is 100% diagnostic for acute appendicitis. It is recommended to include CRP measurement as a routine laboratory test in patients with suspected diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
SummaryPeri‐operative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this stu... more SummaryPeri‐operative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre‐operative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30‐day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30‐day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre‐operative SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30‐day mortality in patients without SARS‐CoV‐2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4–1.5). In patients with a pre‐operative SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery wi...
SummarySARS‐CoV‐2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critica... more SummarySARS‐CoV‐2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri‐operative or prior SARS‐CoV‐2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub‐study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnosis was defined as peri‐operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1–6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre‐operative anti‐coagulation for baseline comorbidities was no...
Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2018
Pharmacovigilance is vital to public health. Adopting a robust spontaneous reporting system for a... more Pharmacovigilance is vital to public health. Adopting a robust spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug events can counteract most hazards that arise from utilizing medicinal products. Prior to the establishment of the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), the number of pharmacovigilance-related activities in Saudi Arabia was limited. In 2009, the SFDA established the National Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety Center (Saudi Vigilance). The pharmacovigilance system has remarkably improved during the past few years. Several initiatives have been taken to improve the program's performance. These initiatives include initiation of pharmacovigilance guidelines, enhancement of communication and reporting tools, training sessions for concerned staff and healthcare providers, and compliance from stakeholders. This review article provides an overview of what the Saudi Vigilance program is, focusing on the scope, mission and vision, hierarchy, operational themes, and overall work proc...
Uploads
Papers by Mubarak Alshahrani