There is a doctrinal divergence regarding the applicability of guilt in divorce, majority doctrin... more There is a doctrinal divergence regarding the applicability of guilt in divorce, majority doctrine argues that the investigation of guilt is something outdated before the new constitutional order and minority doctrine defends the possibility of using guilt to get certain legal effects, but only in exceptional cases. The legal effects that it intends to produce by imputation of the guilt of one of the spouses are some of those asked in the judicial separation litigious, the guilty spouse would have to pay food to the innocent or if it was pleaded by the guilty spouse should fix the only as necessary for their subsistence , As well as the loss of the right to use the surname of the innocent. Divorce does not currently require prerequisites, and both or only one or both may require the dissolution of marriage, gaining status as a right of appeal. Most defend the impossibility of the investigation of guilt and a minority party argues its applicability exceptionally.
There is a doctrinal divergence regarding the applicability of guilt in divorce, majority doctrin... more There is a doctrinal divergence regarding the applicability of guilt in divorce, majority doctrine argues that the investigation of guilt is something outdated before the new constitutional order and minority doctrine defends the possibility of using guilt to get certain legal effects, but only in exceptional cases. The legal effects that it intends to produce by imputation of the guilt of one of the spouses are some of those asked in the judicial separation litigious, the guilty spouse would have to pay food to the innocent or if it was pleaded by the guilty spouse should fix the only as necessary for their subsistence , As well as the loss of the right to use the surname of the innocent. Divorce does not currently require prerequisites, and both or only one or both may require the dissolution of marriage, gaining status as a right of appeal. Most defend the impossibility of the investigation of guilt and a minority party argues its applicability exceptionally.
Uploads
Papers by Natan Ribeiro