Point mutations within the ABL kinase domain are the most frequent mechanism for reactivation of ... more Point mutations within the ABL kinase domain are the most frequent mechanism for reactivation of kinase activity of the BCR-ABL gene and have been associated with clinical resistance to tyrosine kinases (TK) inhibitors in CML patients conferring in some of them a poor prognosis. The T315I (Treonine → Isoleucine) is a mutation described in exon 6 of BCR-ABL gene that makes the protein resistant to all kinase inhibitors most currently used for treating CML (imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib). D-HPLC allows for high throughput mutation screening. This technique is based on heteroduplex formation by PCR products amplified from wild type and mutant alleles. Under optimized denaturing conditions, these heteroduplexes can be distinguished from homoduplex. In this study we screened mutations in exon 6 of BCR-ABL gene in patients treated with kinase inhibitors, in different phases of the disease. We evaluated 85 patients: 9 at diagnosis, 81 in chronic phase, 3 in accelerated phase, one in blast crisis. Thirty four were resistant to imatinib, 10 of them to dasatinib and three had suboptimal response to imatinib. In 9 of 85 (10,5%) samples, D-HPLC showed an abnormal elution profile suggesting the presence of nucleotide changes. Automated sequencing confirmed the presence of two point mutations: T315I (two patients) and F359V (two patients). Five patients requires sequencing confirmation. Patients with T315I mutation failed to imatinib and dasatinib. One of them relapsed after bone marrow transplantation in blast crisis. Patients with F359V mutation were resistant to imatinib. One of them has partial hematological response with dasatinib and the other is in complete molecular response after bone marrow transplantation. D-HPLC seems to be a ship and practical method for routine clinical monitoring for emergence of kinase domain mutations and may be useful for optimizing therapy in CML. Early detection of emerging mutant clones may help in decision-making of alternative treatment.
Imatinib has profoundly change indication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) wor... more Imatinib has profoundly change indication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) worldwide for CML and is now the first line of treatment in most countries. However, in Brazil, Imatinib for CML in first chronic phase is provided by Federal Health Agency only for patients refractory/intolerant to interferon (IFN). In order to study results of treatment with imatinib and alloBMT in this particular scenario we retrospectively analyzed 266 patients treated for CML in first chronic phase (less than 60 years-old) in three different institutions in Brazil. End points were event free survival (EFS = absence of hematological response, lost of hematological/cytogenetic response, relapse in accelerated phase/blast crisis or death) and overall survival (OS). From jan/2001 to dec/2006, 176 patients received imatinib 400 mg after failure or intolerance to IFN. Median time from diagnosis to imatinib treatment was 19 months (range: 2 to 205). At the same period of time, 90 patients received an allo-BMT from an HLA-matched sibling (n=83) or an unrelated donor (n=7). Patients receiving peripheral blood stem cell or umbilical cord blood were excluded. Eighty-two patients received busulfan+cyclophsphamide as conditioning regimen and all patients received cyclosporin+methotrexate±steroids as GVHD prophylaxis. Median time from diagnosis to allo-BMT was 16 (range: 5 to 104) months. Gender distribution was similar between groups. Imatinib group had a higher median age (40.7 vs. 32.8 years, P<0.001). With a median follow up of 3 years, 5-year estimate EFS was 67.6% for patients receiving imatinib and 51.8% for patients receiving an allo-BMT (P=0.0002). Estimate overall survival at 5 years was 92.7% for patients treated with imatinib and 58.8% for patients receiving an allo-BMT (P<0.0001). Allo-BMT should be no more recommended as a first line alternative treatment, even if imatinib is available only for patients refractory/intolerant to IFN. Impressively, OS in Imatinib group were quite similar to those seen at the imatinib arm of IRIS study (Druker BJ et al. N Engl J Med2006; 355: 2408).
The most frequent causes of imatinib resistance are BCR-ABL mutations, usually selected during tr... more The most frequent causes of imatinib resistance are BCR-ABL mutations, usually selected during treatment. Most of them destabilize the inactive conformation necessary for imatinib binding. The T315I mutation, located at the ATP binding pocket is resistant to imatinib and other available kinase inhibitors and is associated with a poor outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of T315I mutation in patients with CML resistant to imatinib and to describe their outcome. Mutation analysis was performed in two institutions, through direct automated sequencing. Total RNA was extracted from peripheral blood or bone marrow and amplification of the kinase domain of ABL from BCR/ABL was performed, using a semi-nested RT-PCR, to cover amino acids 244–486. PCR product was submitted to direct automated sequencing and compared with normal sequences of BCR-ABL gene (M14752, GenBank). A total of 173 resistant imatinib resistant patients were analyzed. BCR-ABL mutations were detected in 47 out of 173 (27%) patients. Among these patients, 14 (30%) presented T315I mutation. The mutation was found in ten patients during imatinib treatment, in one before start of imatinib, in three after dasatinib (2) and nilotinib (1) failure. Three patients have more than one mutation analysis, performed during different time-points of treatment: imatinib resistance, dasatinib resistance (3) and bone marrow transplantation relapse (1). Overall survival from diagnosis was 39,5% and 17,5% from mutation detection, in a median time of 69 and 13 months respectively. After imatinib resistance, eight patients were treated with dasatinib, one with nilotinib and had no hematological response; tree were treated with Hydrea and two were submitted to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Five patients died due to disease progression in median time of 19 months after mutation detection. One patient died after bone marrow transplantation, due to GVHD and infection. Eight patients are alive, three in CP, two in BC, two in hematological response and one in complete cytogenetic response after bone marrow transplantation. In conclusion, in this study we confirmed the high frequency of T315I mutation in imatinib resistant patients and their poor prognosis. Most of them started imatinib in a late chronic or advanced phase, with exception of two patients which started imatinib 800mg in early chronic phase, suggesting that there was inhibition of Ph positive sensitive cells and selection of resistant clones.
FLT3 is a receptor tyrosine kinase involved in the proliferation and differentiation of hematopoi... more FLT3 is a receptor tyrosine kinase involved in the proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells. Recently, internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations of the FLT3 gene have been described in patients with AML and associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of FLT3-ITD in a series of 90 adults with de novo AML and correlate the presence of this mutation with biological characteristics and clinical response. We analyzed diagnostic peripheral blood or bone marrow specimens from 43 women and 47 men, with a median age of 38 years (16–83). Polymerase chain reaction was performed on genomic DNA using previously published primers for exons 11 and 12. An FLT3-ITD was found in 22/89 patients (25%). It was present in 37% (9/24) of the patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and in only 20% (13/65) of the patients with non-M3-AML (p=0.07). The FLT3-ITD was not detected in patients with M6 (n=1) and M7-AML (n=3), nor in patients with the AML1-ETO (n=2) or with the CBFb-MYH11 (n=4) fusion genes. The median WBC counts were higher in FLT3-ITD patients than in those without the mutation (37 X 109/L vs. 27 X 109/L, p=0.43). In APL, FLT3-ITD was found in 5 out of 6 patients with the short PML-RARa isoform, but in only 4 out of 18 patients with the non-short isoform (p=0.01). Univariate analysis showed an association between the presence of FLT3-ITD and both a lower complete remission (CR) rate (41% vs. 64%; p=0.05) and a shorter overall survival (14% vs. 34%; p=0.03). However, FLT3-ITD was not associated with the CR rate (p=0.18) or the OS (p=0.07) in the multivariate analysis. The clinical significance of FLT3-ITD in adult AML remains uncertain, and further investigation is clearly warranted.
7025 Background: With 24 mo f/u, ENESTcmr demonstrated higher rates of stable, deep MRs with nilo... more 7025 Background: With 24 mo f/u, ENESTcmr demonstrated higher rates of stable, deep MRs with nilotinib (NIL) vs IM in pts on long-term (≥ 2 y) IM with residual disease. Here, we present 36-mo results, including crossover from IM to NIL after 2 y on study. Methods: Pts with Philadelphia chromosome–positive CML-CP (N = 207) with complete cytogenetic response but detectable BCR-ABL (by RQ-PCR with a sensitivity of ≥ 4.5 logs) after ≥ 2 y on IM were randomized to NIL 400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 104) or IM 400 or 600 mg once daily (QD; n = 103). Crossover from IM to NIL was allowed for pts with detectable BCR-ABL after 24 mo, treatment failure, or confirmed (≥ 2 consecutive assessments) loss of response at any time. Results: Significantly more pts achieved MR4.5 by 36 mo with NIL (Table). Median time to MR4.5 was 24 mo in the NIL arm and not reached in the IM arm with 36 mo f/u. 46 of 103 (45%) pts randomized to IM crossed over to NIL. When accounting only for responses up to crossover, 47% and 24% of pts on ...
Abstract 606FN2 Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that about 40% of very highly select... more Abstract 606FN2 Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that about 40% of very highly selected CML-CP pts treated with imatinib achieve durable CMR and may be able to cease therapy without disease recurrence. However, most CML pts don't achieve CMR on imatinib even with long-term therapy. Results from ENESTnd demonstrated that significantly more patients achieved MMR (≤ 0.1%IS), CMR4 (≤ 0.01%IS), and CMR4.5 (≤ 0.0032%IS) with nilotinib vs imatinib by 12, 18, and 24 months (mo). No pt in ENESTnd who achieved CMR4.5 has progressed to AP/BC. In this study we asked whether pts on long-term imatinib would be more likely to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL levels if they switched to nilotinib, allowing for participation in potential cessation studies in the future. Methods: This open label, 1:1 randomized, prospective, multi-center, phase 3 study enrolled 207 pts with CML-CP who had achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) but were still BCR-ABL positive by RQ-PCR after ≥ 24 mo on imatinib. CMR (primary endpoint) was defined as undetectable BCR-ABL by RQ-PCR where there was no detectable BCR-ABL with a sample sensitivity of ≥ 4.5-logs. CMR4 and CMR4.5 were defined as BCR-ABL levels of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% expressed on the International Scale (IS), respectively and included patients with undetectable BCR-ABL levels with high sample sensitivity (4 or 4.5 logs). Patients were randomized to nilotinib 400 mg BID vs continuing imatinib 400 or 600 mg daily (same dose as at study entry.) The randomization was stratified by prior use of IFN (none, ≤ 12 mo, > 12 mo) and prior duration of imatinib therapy (> 36 mo or ≤ 36 mo). The primary endpoint was the rate of confirmed best cumulative CMR by 12 mo of study therapy with nilotinib or imatinib. Secondary objectives included the kinetics of CMR at different timepoints, duration of CMR, progression-free survival, and overall survival in both arms. During the study, RQ-PCR for BCR-ABL was performed at baseline (BL) and every 3 mo and expressed on the IS in national reference laboratories in Australia, Brazil, and Canada. For this report: BL, 6 mo, and 12 mo results were analyzed in a central laboratory in Australia. Assessment of the primary efficacy endpoint has not been completed for 2% of the randomized pts; unblinded data will be available for all pts and will be presented by treatment arm. Results: BL results were available for 205/207 randomized pts. Overall, 56% of pts had no prior IFN exposure, while 21% and 23% had IFN exposure of ≤ 12 mo or > 12 mo, respectively; 81% of pts had been on imatinib > 36 mos. At BL, 153 pts (74%) were known to be in MMR and 54 pts (26%) had < MMR (including 2 pts with missing PCR samples); 53 pts (26%), and 20 pts (10%) had CMR4 or CMR4.5 (with detectable BCR-ABL) at BL, respectively. Overall, 67 pts (32%) had at least a half-log reduction in BCR-ABL levels from BL by 12 mo. Of the 52 pts (25%) known not to have MMR at BL, 24 pts (46%) achieved MMR or better by 12 mo in the study. To date, no pt experienced a loss of MMR or CCyR on study. By 12 mo, 50% of pts with a molecular assessment had CMR4 and 27% had CMR4.5. Of the 152 pts who did not have CMR4 at baseline, 30% had achieved CMR4 (unconfirmed) by 12 mo. Of the 185 pts who did not have CMR4.5 at baseline, 21% had achieved CMR4.5 (unconfirmed) by 12 mo. Undetectable levels of BCR-ABL transcripts (with a test sensitivity of ≥ 4.5 log), were achieved by 12 mo by 12% of pts who did not have undetectable BCR-ABL transcript levels at BL. By 12 mo, 20 (10%) pts discontinued study (none due to progression, 1 due to death). Grade 3/4 adverse events were uncommon. Conclusions: ENESTcmr is the first phase 3 randomized study in CML-CP pts to assess the achievement of CMR as the primary endpoint. Unblinded results from this ongoing study will be presented and will provide information on the ability of pts to achieve confirmed CMR on nilotinib vs imatinib following extended treatment with imatinib. These aggregate data demonstrate that 12% of pts achieved undetectable BCR-ABL levels by 12 months after study entry. This is in contrast to observations in previous trials where the increase in the proportion of pts with undetectable BCR-ABL levels over time is more gradual. Further follow-up will identify pts with sustained CMR over time, which may offer these pts an opportunity to discontinue therapy. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lipton:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board…
7054Background: The ENESTop (NCT01698905) study explores the discontinuation of NIL therapy in pt... more 7054Background: The ENESTop (NCT01698905) study explores the discontinuation of NIL therapy in pts who achieved sustained MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS≤ 0.0032%) after switching from imatinib (IM) to NIL. Methods: The single-arm phase 2 study enrolled pts with CML-CP treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for ≥ 3 y (including IM for > 4 wk followed by NIL for ≥ 2 y) and achieved MR4.5 on NIL. On study, pts continued NIL for 1 y (consolidation phase [CONS]). After 1 y, pts without confirmed loss of MR4.5 (consecutive BCR-ABL1IS > 0.0032%), were eligible to stop NIL (TFR). RQ-PCR was monitored every 12 wk in CONS and every 4 wk during first 48 wk of TFR. Upon confirmed loss of MR4 (consecutive BCR-ABL1IS > 0.01%) or loss of MMR (BCR-ABL1IS> 0.1%), NIL was re-initiated (ReRx). Primary endpoint was the proportion of pts with successful TFR (neither loss of MMR nor confirmed loss of MR4 by 48 wk of TFR) after a ≥ 48 wk follow up (data cutoff, 26 Nov 2015). Results: Of the 163 pts in CONS, 126 entered TFR (median dur...
Abstract 694 Background: Superior rates of deeper molecular responses were achieved with nilotini... more Abstract 694 Background: Superior rates of deeper molecular responses were achieved with nilotinib vs imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials—newly diagnosed patients (ENESTnd) trial. In addition, the 12-month (mo) analysis of the ENEST—complete molecular response (ENESTcmr) study demonstrated that switching to nilotinib after a minimum of 2 years on imatinib led to increased rates of major molecular response (MMR) and deeper molecular responses vs remaining on imatinib. Results from ENESTcmr are presented here with minimum 24 mo of patient follow-up. Methods: Patients with Ph+ CML-CP who had achieved complete cytogenetic responses but still had persistent BCR-ABL positivity by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) after ≥ 2 years on imatinib were eligible. Patients (n = 207) were randomized to switch to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 104) or to continue on the same dose of imatinib (400 or 600 mg once daily [QD]; n = 103). Rates of MMR, MR4 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.01% according to the International Scale [IS], corresponding to a 4-log reduction), MR4.5 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.0032%IS, corresponding to 4.5-log reduction), and undetectable BCR-ABL via RQ-PCR with ≥ 4.5-log sensitivity were measured. Results: Among all randomized patients (intent-to-treat population), significantly more patients treated with nilotinib continued to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo (32.7% on nilotinib vs 16.5% on imatinib; P =.005; Table).The difference between the arms in achievement of this endpoint increased between 1 and 2 years (from 12.4% to 16.2%). The median time to MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL was also significantly faster on nilotinib than on imatinib (P = .005 and .003, respectively). Cumulative rates of MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL continued to be higher with nilotinib in patients without those responses at baseline, and the difference between arms appeared to increase over time. The safety profiles for nilotinib and imatinib were consistent with prior studies. By 24 mo, no patients in either arm progressed to accelerated phase/blast crisis. No patients on nilotinib died since the 12-mo analysis; 1 patient on imatinib died from metastatic prostate cancer in follow-up after discontinuation from the study. Conclusions: Switching to nilotinib led to significantly faster, deeper molecular responses in patients with minimal residual disease on long-term imatinib therapy. Since the 12-mo analysis, rates of deep molecular response (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) have remained significantly higher in patients who did not have the response at baseline and were switched to nilotinib (vs those remaining on imatinib). In fact, the difference in favor of nilotinib increased between 1 and 2 years. These results suggest that switching to the more potent, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib is beneficial in patients with minimal residual disease after long-term imatinib therapy. Achievement of these deeper molecular responses (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) after switching to nilotinib may enable a greater proportion of CML-CP patients to be eligible for future discontinuation studies. Cumulative rates of confirmed undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo will be presented as the confirmation assessments for several responders were not available at the time of this analysis. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; CSL: Research Funding. Lipton:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Spector:Novarits: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Leber:Novartis: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Schwarer:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Etienne:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Purkayastha:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Collins:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Szczudlo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Cervantes:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory…
sem informação1015232310th International Symposium on Hodgkin Lymphoma2016-10-22Cologne, Alemanha... more sem informação1015232310th International Symposium on Hodgkin Lymphoma2016-10-22Cologne, Alemanhasem informaçã
The ENESTop study evaluated treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients with chronic myeloid leuke... more The ENESTop study evaluated treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase who had received ≥3 years of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and achieved sustained deep molecular response only after switching from imatinib to nilotinib. After 1-year nilotinib consolidation, 126 patients attempted TFR. At 48 weeks (primary analysis), 57.9% (73/126) were in TFR. In the present analysis at 5 years, 42.9% (54/126) were in TFR. Since the 48-week analysis, among patients who left the TFR phase, 58% (11/19) did not have a loss of molecular response and discontinued for other reasons. Of the 59 patients who reinitiated nilotinib upon loss of major molecular response (MMR) or confirmed loss of MR4, 98.3% regained MMR, 94.9% regained MR4, and 93.2% regained MR4.5. Overall adverse event rates decreased over the 5 years of TFR. In patients reinitiating nilotinib, there was a cumulative increase in cardiovascular events with longer nilotinib exposure. No disease progression or CML-related deaths were reported. Overall, these results confirm the durability and safety of TFR for patients receiving second-line nilotinib. Cardiovascular risk should be carefully managed, particularly when reinitiating treatment after TFR.
Background: The ENESTop study (NCT01698905) evaluates treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients ... more Background: The ENESTop study (NCT01698905) evaluates treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) with sustained deep molecular response following second-line (2L) treatment with nilotinib (NIL). In the primary analysis, 57.9% of pts remained in TFR 48 weeks after stopping NIL and previous analysis at ≥3.7 years showed durability of TFR. The present analysis first assessed long-term TFR outcomes at ≥5 years and then a post-hoc analysis evaluated rates of regain of molecular response following NIL re-initiation in pts with loss of major molecular response (MMR) or confirmed loss of MR4.0 at a follow-up of 5 years. Methods: Eligible pts had received ≥3 years of treatment (including >4 weeks of imatinib followed by ≥2 years of NIL) and had achieved MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS ≤0.0032%) on NIL. Pts without confirmed loss of MR4.5 after 1 year of consolidation treatment (CONS) could attempt TFR. NIL was re-initiated upon loss of MMR (...
Purpose: Imatinib Mesilate is currently considered the most advanced therapy for CML due to its i... more Purpose: Imatinib Mesilate is currently considered the most advanced therapy for CML due to its innovative molecular targeting mechanism of action, resulting in a high level of efficacy with a favorable toxicity profile which results in health-related quality of life (HRQL) benefits. We therefore decided to evaluate 230 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with Imatinib Mesilate (Gleevec) as second line therapy, along 12 months, after failing Interferon (IFN) based therapy, due to lack of efficacy or toxicity, in an a Quality of Life (QoL) Study in Brazil, here presented as an interim analysis. Patients and Methods: From July 2002 until December 2003, 230 Patients from 21 Brazilian Medical Institutions, were enrolled in a Quality of Life (QoL) Study, where patients completed FACT-BRM questionnaire at baseline and during treatment. FACT-BRM includes 4 subscales appropriate for any chronic illness or treatment [physical (PWB), social/family (SFWB), emotional (EWB), fun...
Point mutations within the ABL kinase domain are the most frequent mechanism for reactivation of ... more Point mutations within the ABL kinase domain are the most frequent mechanism for reactivation of kinase activity of the BCR-ABL gene and have been associated with clinical resistance to tyrosine kinases (TK) inhibitors in CML patients conferring in some of them a poor prognosis. The T315I (Treonine → Isoleucine) is a mutation described in exon 6 of BCR-ABL gene that makes the protein resistant to all kinase inhibitors most currently used for treating CML (imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib). D-HPLC allows for high throughput mutation screening. This technique is based on heteroduplex formation by PCR products amplified from wild type and mutant alleles. Under optimized denaturing conditions, these heteroduplexes can be distinguished from homoduplex. In this study we screened mutations in exon 6 of BCR-ABL gene in patients treated with kinase inhibitors, in different phases of the disease. We evaluated 85 patients: 9 at diagnosis, 81 in chronic phase, 3 in accelerated phase, one in blast crisis. Thirty four were resistant to imatinib, 10 of them to dasatinib and three had suboptimal response to imatinib. In 9 of 85 (10,5%) samples, D-HPLC showed an abnormal elution profile suggesting the presence of nucleotide changes. Automated sequencing confirmed the presence of two point mutations: T315I (two patients) and F359V (two patients). Five patients requires sequencing confirmation. Patients with T315I mutation failed to imatinib and dasatinib. One of them relapsed after bone marrow transplantation in blast crisis. Patients with F359V mutation were resistant to imatinib. One of them has partial hematological response with dasatinib and the other is in complete molecular response after bone marrow transplantation. D-HPLC seems to be a ship and practical method for routine clinical monitoring for emergence of kinase domain mutations and may be useful for optimizing therapy in CML. Early detection of emerging mutant clones may help in decision-making of alternative treatment.
Imatinib has profoundly change indication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) wor... more Imatinib has profoundly change indication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) worldwide for CML and is now the first line of treatment in most countries. However, in Brazil, Imatinib for CML in first chronic phase is provided by Federal Health Agency only for patients refractory/intolerant to interferon (IFN). In order to study results of treatment with imatinib and alloBMT in this particular scenario we retrospectively analyzed 266 patients treated for CML in first chronic phase (less than 60 years-old) in three different institutions in Brazil. End points were event free survival (EFS = absence of hematological response, lost of hematological/cytogenetic response, relapse in accelerated phase/blast crisis or death) and overall survival (OS). From jan/2001 to dec/2006, 176 patients received imatinib 400 mg after failure or intolerance to IFN. Median time from diagnosis to imatinib treatment was 19 months (range: 2 to 205). At the same period of time, 90 patients received an allo-BMT from an HLA-matched sibling (n=83) or an unrelated donor (n=7). Patients receiving peripheral blood stem cell or umbilical cord blood were excluded. Eighty-two patients received busulfan+cyclophsphamide as conditioning regimen and all patients received cyclosporin+methotrexate±steroids as GVHD prophylaxis. Median time from diagnosis to allo-BMT was 16 (range: 5 to 104) months. Gender distribution was similar between groups. Imatinib group had a higher median age (40.7 vs. 32.8 years, P<0.001). With a median follow up of 3 years, 5-year estimate EFS was 67.6% for patients receiving imatinib and 51.8% for patients receiving an allo-BMT (P=0.0002). Estimate overall survival at 5 years was 92.7% for patients treated with imatinib and 58.8% for patients receiving an allo-BMT (P<0.0001). Allo-BMT should be no more recommended as a first line alternative treatment, even if imatinib is available only for patients refractory/intolerant to IFN. Impressively, OS in Imatinib group were quite similar to those seen at the imatinib arm of IRIS study (Druker BJ et al. N Engl J Med2006; 355: 2408).
The most frequent causes of imatinib resistance are BCR-ABL mutations, usually selected during tr... more The most frequent causes of imatinib resistance are BCR-ABL mutations, usually selected during treatment. Most of them destabilize the inactive conformation necessary for imatinib binding. The T315I mutation, located at the ATP binding pocket is resistant to imatinib and other available kinase inhibitors and is associated with a poor outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of T315I mutation in patients with CML resistant to imatinib and to describe their outcome. Mutation analysis was performed in two institutions, through direct automated sequencing. Total RNA was extracted from peripheral blood or bone marrow and amplification of the kinase domain of ABL from BCR/ABL was performed, using a semi-nested RT-PCR, to cover amino acids 244–486. PCR product was submitted to direct automated sequencing and compared with normal sequences of BCR-ABL gene (M14752, GenBank). A total of 173 resistant imatinib resistant patients were analyzed. BCR-ABL mutations were detected in 47 out of 173 (27%) patients. Among these patients, 14 (30%) presented T315I mutation. The mutation was found in ten patients during imatinib treatment, in one before start of imatinib, in three after dasatinib (2) and nilotinib (1) failure. Three patients have more than one mutation analysis, performed during different time-points of treatment: imatinib resistance, dasatinib resistance (3) and bone marrow transplantation relapse (1). Overall survival from diagnosis was 39,5% and 17,5% from mutation detection, in a median time of 69 and 13 months respectively. After imatinib resistance, eight patients were treated with dasatinib, one with nilotinib and had no hematological response; tree were treated with Hydrea and two were submitted to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Five patients died due to disease progression in median time of 19 months after mutation detection. One patient died after bone marrow transplantation, due to GVHD and infection. Eight patients are alive, three in CP, two in BC, two in hematological response and one in complete cytogenetic response after bone marrow transplantation. In conclusion, in this study we confirmed the high frequency of T315I mutation in imatinib resistant patients and their poor prognosis. Most of them started imatinib in a late chronic or advanced phase, with exception of two patients which started imatinib 800mg in early chronic phase, suggesting that there was inhibition of Ph positive sensitive cells and selection of resistant clones.
FLT3 is a receptor tyrosine kinase involved in the proliferation and differentiation of hematopoi... more FLT3 is a receptor tyrosine kinase involved in the proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells. Recently, internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations of the FLT3 gene have been described in patients with AML and associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of FLT3-ITD in a series of 90 adults with de novo AML and correlate the presence of this mutation with biological characteristics and clinical response. We analyzed diagnostic peripheral blood or bone marrow specimens from 43 women and 47 men, with a median age of 38 years (16–83). Polymerase chain reaction was performed on genomic DNA using previously published primers for exons 11 and 12. An FLT3-ITD was found in 22/89 patients (25%). It was present in 37% (9/24) of the patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and in only 20% (13/65) of the patients with non-M3-AML (p=0.07). The FLT3-ITD was not detected in patients with M6 (n=1) and M7-AML (n=3), nor in patients with the AML1-ETO (n=2) or with the CBFb-MYH11 (n=4) fusion genes. The median WBC counts were higher in FLT3-ITD patients than in those without the mutation (37 X 109/L vs. 27 X 109/L, p=0.43). In APL, FLT3-ITD was found in 5 out of 6 patients with the short PML-RARa isoform, but in only 4 out of 18 patients with the non-short isoform (p=0.01). Univariate analysis showed an association between the presence of FLT3-ITD and both a lower complete remission (CR) rate (41% vs. 64%; p=0.05) and a shorter overall survival (14% vs. 34%; p=0.03). However, FLT3-ITD was not associated with the CR rate (p=0.18) or the OS (p=0.07) in the multivariate analysis. The clinical significance of FLT3-ITD in adult AML remains uncertain, and further investigation is clearly warranted.
7025 Background: With 24 mo f/u, ENESTcmr demonstrated higher rates of stable, deep MRs with nilo... more 7025 Background: With 24 mo f/u, ENESTcmr demonstrated higher rates of stable, deep MRs with nilotinib (NIL) vs IM in pts on long-term (≥ 2 y) IM with residual disease. Here, we present 36-mo results, including crossover from IM to NIL after 2 y on study. Methods: Pts with Philadelphia chromosome–positive CML-CP (N = 207) with complete cytogenetic response but detectable BCR-ABL (by RQ-PCR with a sensitivity of ≥ 4.5 logs) after ≥ 2 y on IM were randomized to NIL 400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 104) or IM 400 or 600 mg once daily (QD; n = 103). Crossover from IM to NIL was allowed for pts with detectable BCR-ABL after 24 mo, treatment failure, or confirmed (≥ 2 consecutive assessments) loss of response at any time. Results: Significantly more pts achieved MR4.5 by 36 mo with NIL (Table). Median time to MR4.5 was 24 mo in the NIL arm and not reached in the IM arm with 36 mo f/u. 46 of 103 (45%) pts randomized to IM crossed over to NIL. When accounting only for responses up to crossover, 47% and 24% of pts on ...
Abstract 606FN2 Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that about 40% of very highly select... more Abstract 606FN2 Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that about 40% of very highly selected CML-CP pts treated with imatinib achieve durable CMR and may be able to cease therapy without disease recurrence. However, most CML pts don't achieve CMR on imatinib even with long-term therapy. Results from ENESTnd demonstrated that significantly more patients achieved MMR (≤ 0.1%IS), CMR4 (≤ 0.01%IS), and CMR4.5 (≤ 0.0032%IS) with nilotinib vs imatinib by 12, 18, and 24 months (mo). No pt in ENESTnd who achieved CMR4.5 has progressed to AP/BC. In this study we asked whether pts on long-term imatinib would be more likely to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL levels if they switched to nilotinib, allowing for participation in potential cessation studies in the future. Methods: This open label, 1:1 randomized, prospective, multi-center, phase 3 study enrolled 207 pts with CML-CP who had achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) but were still BCR-ABL positive by RQ-PCR after ≥ 24 mo on imatinib. CMR (primary endpoint) was defined as undetectable BCR-ABL by RQ-PCR where there was no detectable BCR-ABL with a sample sensitivity of ≥ 4.5-logs. CMR4 and CMR4.5 were defined as BCR-ABL levels of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% expressed on the International Scale (IS), respectively and included patients with undetectable BCR-ABL levels with high sample sensitivity (4 or 4.5 logs). Patients were randomized to nilotinib 400 mg BID vs continuing imatinib 400 or 600 mg daily (same dose as at study entry.) The randomization was stratified by prior use of IFN (none, ≤ 12 mo, > 12 mo) and prior duration of imatinib therapy (> 36 mo or ≤ 36 mo). The primary endpoint was the rate of confirmed best cumulative CMR by 12 mo of study therapy with nilotinib or imatinib. Secondary objectives included the kinetics of CMR at different timepoints, duration of CMR, progression-free survival, and overall survival in both arms. During the study, RQ-PCR for BCR-ABL was performed at baseline (BL) and every 3 mo and expressed on the IS in national reference laboratories in Australia, Brazil, and Canada. For this report: BL, 6 mo, and 12 mo results were analyzed in a central laboratory in Australia. Assessment of the primary efficacy endpoint has not been completed for 2% of the randomized pts; unblinded data will be available for all pts and will be presented by treatment arm. Results: BL results were available for 205/207 randomized pts. Overall, 56% of pts had no prior IFN exposure, while 21% and 23% had IFN exposure of ≤ 12 mo or > 12 mo, respectively; 81% of pts had been on imatinib > 36 mos. At BL, 153 pts (74%) were known to be in MMR and 54 pts (26%) had < MMR (including 2 pts with missing PCR samples); 53 pts (26%), and 20 pts (10%) had CMR4 or CMR4.5 (with detectable BCR-ABL) at BL, respectively. Overall, 67 pts (32%) had at least a half-log reduction in BCR-ABL levels from BL by 12 mo. Of the 52 pts (25%) known not to have MMR at BL, 24 pts (46%) achieved MMR or better by 12 mo in the study. To date, no pt experienced a loss of MMR or CCyR on study. By 12 mo, 50% of pts with a molecular assessment had CMR4 and 27% had CMR4.5. Of the 152 pts who did not have CMR4 at baseline, 30% had achieved CMR4 (unconfirmed) by 12 mo. Of the 185 pts who did not have CMR4.5 at baseline, 21% had achieved CMR4.5 (unconfirmed) by 12 mo. Undetectable levels of BCR-ABL transcripts (with a test sensitivity of ≥ 4.5 log), were achieved by 12 mo by 12% of pts who did not have undetectable BCR-ABL transcript levels at BL. By 12 mo, 20 (10%) pts discontinued study (none due to progression, 1 due to death). Grade 3/4 adverse events were uncommon. Conclusions: ENESTcmr is the first phase 3 randomized study in CML-CP pts to assess the achievement of CMR as the primary endpoint. Unblinded results from this ongoing study will be presented and will provide information on the ability of pts to achieve confirmed CMR on nilotinib vs imatinib following extended treatment with imatinib. These aggregate data demonstrate that 12% of pts achieved undetectable BCR-ABL levels by 12 months after study entry. This is in contrast to observations in previous trials where the increase in the proportion of pts with undetectable BCR-ABL levels over time is more gradual. Further follow-up will identify pts with sustained CMR over time, which may offer these pts an opportunity to discontinue therapy. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lipton:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board…
7054Background: The ENESTop (NCT01698905) study explores the discontinuation of NIL therapy in pt... more 7054Background: The ENESTop (NCT01698905) study explores the discontinuation of NIL therapy in pts who achieved sustained MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS≤ 0.0032%) after switching from imatinib (IM) to NIL. Methods: The single-arm phase 2 study enrolled pts with CML-CP treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for ≥ 3 y (including IM for > 4 wk followed by NIL for ≥ 2 y) and achieved MR4.5 on NIL. On study, pts continued NIL for 1 y (consolidation phase [CONS]). After 1 y, pts without confirmed loss of MR4.5 (consecutive BCR-ABL1IS > 0.0032%), were eligible to stop NIL (TFR). RQ-PCR was monitored every 12 wk in CONS and every 4 wk during first 48 wk of TFR. Upon confirmed loss of MR4 (consecutive BCR-ABL1IS > 0.01%) or loss of MMR (BCR-ABL1IS> 0.1%), NIL was re-initiated (ReRx). Primary endpoint was the proportion of pts with successful TFR (neither loss of MMR nor confirmed loss of MR4 by 48 wk of TFR) after a ≥ 48 wk follow up (data cutoff, 26 Nov 2015). Results: Of the 163 pts in CONS, 126 entered TFR (median dur...
Abstract 694 Background: Superior rates of deeper molecular responses were achieved with nilotini... more Abstract 694 Background: Superior rates of deeper molecular responses were achieved with nilotinib vs imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials—newly diagnosed patients (ENESTnd) trial. In addition, the 12-month (mo) analysis of the ENEST—complete molecular response (ENESTcmr) study demonstrated that switching to nilotinib after a minimum of 2 years on imatinib led to increased rates of major molecular response (MMR) and deeper molecular responses vs remaining on imatinib. Results from ENESTcmr are presented here with minimum 24 mo of patient follow-up. Methods: Patients with Ph+ CML-CP who had achieved complete cytogenetic responses but still had persistent BCR-ABL positivity by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) after ≥ 2 years on imatinib were eligible. Patients (n = 207) were randomized to switch to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 104) or to continue on the same dose of imatinib (400 or 600 mg once daily [QD]; n = 103). Rates of MMR, MR4 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.01% according to the International Scale [IS], corresponding to a 4-log reduction), MR4.5 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.0032%IS, corresponding to 4.5-log reduction), and undetectable BCR-ABL via RQ-PCR with ≥ 4.5-log sensitivity were measured. Results: Among all randomized patients (intent-to-treat population), significantly more patients treated with nilotinib continued to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo (32.7% on nilotinib vs 16.5% on imatinib; P =.005; Table).The difference between the arms in achievement of this endpoint increased between 1 and 2 years (from 12.4% to 16.2%). The median time to MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL was also significantly faster on nilotinib than on imatinib (P = .005 and .003, respectively). Cumulative rates of MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL continued to be higher with nilotinib in patients without those responses at baseline, and the difference between arms appeared to increase over time. The safety profiles for nilotinib and imatinib were consistent with prior studies. By 24 mo, no patients in either arm progressed to accelerated phase/blast crisis. No patients on nilotinib died since the 12-mo analysis; 1 patient on imatinib died from metastatic prostate cancer in follow-up after discontinuation from the study. Conclusions: Switching to nilotinib led to significantly faster, deeper molecular responses in patients with minimal residual disease on long-term imatinib therapy. Since the 12-mo analysis, rates of deep molecular response (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) have remained significantly higher in patients who did not have the response at baseline and were switched to nilotinib (vs those remaining on imatinib). In fact, the difference in favor of nilotinib increased between 1 and 2 years. These results suggest that switching to the more potent, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib is beneficial in patients with minimal residual disease after long-term imatinib therapy. Achievement of these deeper molecular responses (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) after switching to nilotinib may enable a greater proportion of CML-CP patients to be eligible for future discontinuation studies. Cumulative rates of confirmed undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo will be presented as the confirmation assessments for several responders were not available at the time of this analysis. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; CSL: Research Funding. Lipton:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Spector:Novarits: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Leber:Novartis: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Schwarer:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Etienne:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Purkayastha:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Collins:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Szczudlo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Cervantes:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory…
sem informação1015232310th International Symposium on Hodgkin Lymphoma2016-10-22Cologne, Alemanha... more sem informação1015232310th International Symposium on Hodgkin Lymphoma2016-10-22Cologne, Alemanhasem informaçã
The ENESTop study evaluated treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients with chronic myeloid leuke... more The ENESTop study evaluated treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase who had received ≥3 years of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and achieved sustained deep molecular response only after switching from imatinib to nilotinib. After 1-year nilotinib consolidation, 126 patients attempted TFR. At 48 weeks (primary analysis), 57.9% (73/126) were in TFR. In the present analysis at 5 years, 42.9% (54/126) were in TFR. Since the 48-week analysis, among patients who left the TFR phase, 58% (11/19) did not have a loss of molecular response and discontinued for other reasons. Of the 59 patients who reinitiated nilotinib upon loss of major molecular response (MMR) or confirmed loss of MR4, 98.3% regained MMR, 94.9% regained MR4, and 93.2% regained MR4.5. Overall adverse event rates decreased over the 5 years of TFR. In patients reinitiating nilotinib, there was a cumulative increase in cardiovascular events with longer nilotinib exposure. No disease progression or CML-related deaths were reported. Overall, these results confirm the durability and safety of TFR for patients receiving second-line nilotinib. Cardiovascular risk should be carefully managed, particularly when reinitiating treatment after TFR.
Background: The ENESTop study (NCT01698905) evaluates treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients ... more Background: The ENESTop study (NCT01698905) evaluates treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) with sustained deep molecular response following second-line (2L) treatment with nilotinib (NIL). In the primary analysis, 57.9% of pts remained in TFR 48 weeks after stopping NIL and previous analysis at ≥3.7 years showed durability of TFR. The present analysis first assessed long-term TFR outcomes at ≥5 years and then a post-hoc analysis evaluated rates of regain of molecular response following NIL re-initiation in pts with loss of major molecular response (MMR) or confirmed loss of MR4.0 at a follow-up of 5 years. Methods: Eligible pts had received ≥3 years of treatment (including >4 weeks of imatinib followed by ≥2 years of NIL) and had achieved MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS ≤0.0032%) on NIL. Pts without confirmed loss of MR4.5 after 1 year of consolidation treatment (CONS) could attempt TFR. NIL was re-initiated upon loss of MMR (...
Purpose: Imatinib Mesilate is currently considered the most advanced therapy for CML due to its i... more Purpose: Imatinib Mesilate is currently considered the most advanced therapy for CML due to its innovative molecular targeting mechanism of action, resulting in a high level of efficacy with a favorable toxicity profile which results in health-related quality of life (HRQL) benefits. We therefore decided to evaluate 230 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with Imatinib Mesilate (Gleevec) as second line therapy, along 12 months, after failing Interferon (IFN) based therapy, due to lack of efficacy or toxicity, in an a Quality of Life (QoL) Study in Brazil, here presented as an interim analysis. Patients and Methods: From July 2002 until December 2003, 230 Patients from 21 Brazilian Medical Institutions, were enrolled in a Quality of Life (QoL) Study, where patients completed FACT-BRM questionnaire at baseline and during treatment. FACT-BRM includes 4 subscales appropriate for any chronic illness or treatment [physical (PWB), social/family (SFWB), emotional (EWB), fun...
Uploads
Papers by Nelma Clementino