Papers by dolores urquidi
The BIrth of the "venus" Glyph., 2019
A paper to explain how the "venus" glyph cannot be the Planet Venus; Basically, in the Dresen Cod... more A paper to explain how the "venus" glyph cannot be the Planet Venus; Basically, in the Dresen Codex, it shows the "venus" man falling from the sky and covering both the moon and the sun with his feet. Since the Venus Planet goes behind the sun it cannot eclipse the sun or even the moon of Earth.
Drafts by dolores urquidi
NASA has some interesting photos of stars. Bt they do not realize the postion of those stars chan... more NASA has some interesting photos of stars. Bt they do not realize the postion of those stars change from continent to continent.
An explanation about the who created the "dn" numbers and what they were actually used for. Also... more An explanation about the who created the "dn" numbers and what they were actually used for. Also included if Floyd Lounsbury's enigmatic 819 number used for 5 different coefficients with referenced to the rain god, [Tlaloc]. It also did not corrolate with the Julian count numeration. The Julian and the 819 concept were not equal and could not be equalized in Lounsbury's Calculus Mathematics.
The way I reached the errors in counting Maya Numbers.
Never did I expect it to be such a strong... more The way I reached the errors in counting Maya Numbers.
Never did I expect it to be such a strong reason to change the methods of learning.
The 819 cycle was created by Lounsbury who believed that it was part of an event of the rain god... more The 819 cycle was created by Lounsbury who believed that it was part of an event of the rain god, who is Tlaloc.
Is is correct? Or is it a great theory?
In order to clarify and not confuse the count of the Trecena I have only placed a quarter section... more In order to clarify and not confuse the count of the Trecena I have only placed a quarter section of the Sun stone as an example because, under the fire glyphs of the serpent, there are three units of four bound by a star-glyph that I believe indicates the actual count of the Vertical Trecena. The number 13 is only a " loop " to make a continuous count of three separate years. I have gone as far back as the Madrid Codex to emphasis the comparisons between various translators and their beliefs about the date and story changes that turn up when they rely on current documents for their theories. A decision was made by Rome, after the Friars, who accompanied the soldiers to Mesoamerica, reported the natives counted on their fingers and maybe even used their toes. They then inferred there was no way the natives could have known what a 360-day/year was or when a 365-day/year evolved. Only the glorious ancient Roman ruler, Julius Caesar, was supposedly capable of readjusting the agricultural stars by mandating a longer year of 445-days in the first century, so the seasons would realign with European farming methods. This was a strange belief since the comet that changed the calendars had never appeared in Caesar's 100 +/-BC era. There was another Julius Caesar in the 15th century who could have created such a calendar. But was this JC too late in years to do anything about an ancient calendar system? Was the whole of both Americas only inhabited by primitive natives? The Trecena was shown on the three sections directly under three fire glyphs of one of the two serpents on the stone. The large star under the four circles probably was meant to be a knot on the cords of a single year. So the 52-year cycle was a decision made for the strange stone with four Ages of the Sun, each determined to be 676-years. The number 676 multiplied by 4 equals 2704 which is the square of 52. But if the numbers of the Sun Stone are only 3 X 676, then what? The answer only equals 2028. Would that mean that the 52-year cycle is only a 39-year cycle?
In order to clarify and not confuse the count of the Trecena I have only placed a quarter section... more In order to clarify and not confuse the count of the Trecena I have only placed a quarter section of the Sun stone as an example because under the fire glyphs of the serpent, there are three units of four bound by a star-glyph that I believe indicates the actual count of the Vertical Trecena. The number 13 is only a " loop " to make a continuous count of three separate years. I have gone as far back as the Madrid Codex to emphasis the comparasions between various translators and their beliefs about the date and story changes that turn up when they rely on current docuents for their theories. A decision was made by Rome, after the Friars, who accompanied the soldiers to Mesoamerica, reported the natives counted only on their fingers and maybe even used their toes. They then inferred there was no way the natives could have known what a 360-day/year was or when a 365-day/year evolved. Only the glorious ancient Roman ruler, Julius Caesar, was supposedly capable of readjusting the stars by mandating a longer year of 445-days in the first century, so the seasons would realign with European farming methods. This was a strange belief since the comet that changed the calendards had not yet appeared in Caesar's era. Was the whole of both Americas only inhabited by primitive natives ? The Trecena was shown on the three sections directly under three fire glyphs of the two serpents on the stone. The large star under the four circles probably was meant to be a knot on the cords of a single year. So the 52-year cycle was a decision made for the strange stone with Age of the Sun determined to be 676-years and was thought to be very appropriate.
Abstract
Because the following monument has been renamed Coyolxauhque/Tlaltecuhtli, it is quite ... more Abstract
Because the following monument has been renamed Coyolxauhque/Tlaltecuhtli, it is quite possible this icon was not meant to be the Moon Reflected in the Lake called Texcoco. Yet, all the references I have read recently are of the Coyolxauhque/Tlaltecuhtli goddess, it has been stated multiple times Coyolxauhque was thought to be the Moon, Yet, Longhena, Maria inferred “this appears to be true, [but[ it is not certain.” Another more recent study [inferred] Coyolxauhque may instead be, the goddess of the Milky Way.” [Miller, M. and Taube, K. (1993. 68)]
Maps are of a great variety of formats. The oldest have circular forms but few have additions and... more Maps are of a great variety of formats. The oldest have circular forms but few have additions and the name of the cartographer/astronomer. This map has both.
A DISCLAIMER: First: I want everyone to know that I cannot read the dates on the monuments and st... more A DISCLAIMER: First: I want everyone to know that I cannot read the dates on the monuments and stelae very well. The simple structures, I can read, but when the glyphs change their faces, or become whole figures, I can not figure out what you all are talking about. My understanding of the glyphs is that each tells a different story which is pertinent to each of the placements on on a specific stela or monument., D. M. Urquidi, [2018, January. However, I do understand the MOD and the COEFFICIENT process in Calculus. I had a great teacher, who all but pounded the process into my ear over the telephone. With those two elements, I was able to understand the rest of a calculus statement and place it into a niumeric number-based problem, much easier to understand even with the brackets, parenthesis, super and subscripts. EXCEPT when I saw weeks made into yearly cycles that were not normal for our Earth's 360 degree orbit or its spinning ability to spin one degree per day to create a 360-day year. It also was aparent the the earth's spin adjusted iteself to make the daily degree into 1.0456 for the 364-day; 52 week YEAR that contains 26 + 13-weeks of a three-season for the Book of Destinies. " The question will be does one only add one day per week, or was it more than five days to the Native pre-conquest week: So, the main qurtu here, Is it nessary to put all the Erronious calculus in another paper, or do I assume, if you are really interested in the Orbital measure, Do I just show the abreviations from the original and put new explanitory details, and " Cut to the Quick. " If you want to disagree; I have no problem looking another piece of the puzzle, IF anyone can offer a better solution than bringing the measurements back to the 360-degree orbit the Earth itself is using to stay on course, no matter how the spin may change. [To Repeat the natural Earth Cycle one more time:: Since the orbit of earth is a constant 360 degrees , it was only the spin of one degree per 24 hours that must be changed. So the math should be 360 / 365.25 = 1,01458; therefore, the spin, in order to fit Earth's 360 orbit, when the 24-hour day was lengthened to 01.01458 of a degree for each 24-hour spin. Rome did not have calculus during those days. They decided to separate the five and a quarter days into a seperate entity, called a Wayeb that they implemented in 1584. See historical note about Fra Francisco de la Nava under " Veytia Calendar " 1975 edition of HMAI, IV, III p. 230. ]
Jasaw Chan K'awiil, "he who cleared the sky" had to be one person, not two. A complex man who did... more Jasaw Chan K'awiil, "he who cleared the sky" had to be one person, not two. A complex man who did not mind imposing himself as a stronger king of Tikal. His grave
is noted, but his body seems to have been buried in the tomb of Animal Skull "Great Sun." above the grave that was once buried in mu
THe Aztec Sun Stone is an amazing calendar about two Fire Serpent gods who reigned in the Heavens... more THe Aztec Sun Stone is an amazing calendar about two Fire Serpent gods who reigned in the Heavens. Now is the time to enter the Four Ages of the Sun Stone [ " Cuauhxicalli " = Eagle's Bowl [] exhibited at the INAH museum in Mexico City. The INAH museum produced an excellent brochure, both in English and Spanish, of every aspect of the Sun Stone. At this point, four coincidences with Maya Popol Vuh should be considered as a proper comparison with the Sun Stone. The main reason for this assumption is that the Sky is universal and should never be ignored when such an event is discribed. Linda Schele,called the event, Star Wars. The premise was that many of the Maya stelae had information about a sky battle when the planet Venus was promeevnt in the heavens. Many such conclusions have been based upon the 1950 book Worlds in Collision by Immanuel Velikovski. It was he who misconstrued the battle in the sky with the Greek/Roman Aphrodite (Venus) and Aries (Mars) who acrossed the orbit of our own plaent Earth in an impossible journey. A jorney which actually was a constellation/planet event. Venus goes retro at a time she is crossing the constellation Orion, the warrior, hence a conjunction in the sky. Possibly, they meet just after the eastern version of Venus begins to pass behind the sun as Orion is also dropping in the east: a nice neat sky observation and a great story for night travelers to remember at a certain time of year. Velikovsky's version has held adults and young teens interested enough to explore such possibilities for almost sixty-six years. Venus being the more prominent retrograde entity was chosen as the most likely candidate to have collided with something during some recordable century in the past. Computer programs succh as Voyager, suddenly became available for sky calculations by anyone with the click of a button. That search is still going on and papers abound with coefficients and the mod units that make it all seem more reasonable to date such improbable astronomy with numeric accuracy.
Uploads
Papers by dolores urquidi
Drafts by dolores urquidi
Never did I expect it to be such a strong reason to change the methods of learning.
Is is correct? Or is it a great theory?
Because the following monument has been renamed Coyolxauhque/Tlaltecuhtli, it is quite possible this icon was not meant to be the Moon Reflected in the Lake called Texcoco. Yet, all the references I have read recently are of the Coyolxauhque/Tlaltecuhtli goddess, it has been stated multiple times Coyolxauhque was thought to be the Moon, Yet, Longhena, Maria inferred “this appears to be true, [but[ it is not certain.” Another more recent study [inferred] Coyolxauhque may instead be, the goddess of the Milky Way.” [Miller, M. and Taube, K. (1993. 68)]
is noted, but his body seems to have been buried in the tomb of Animal Skull "Great Sun." above the grave that was once buried in mu
Never did I expect it to be such a strong reason to change the methods of learning.
Is is correct? Or is it a great theory?
Because the following monument has been renamed Coyolxauhque/Tlaltecuhtli, it is quite possible this icon was not meant to be the Moon Reflected in the Lake called Texcoco. Yet, all the references I have read recently are of the Coyolxauhque/Tlaltecuhtli goddess, it has been stated multiple times Coyolxauhque was thought to be the Moon, Yet, Longhena, Maria inferred “this appears to be true, [but[ it is not certain.” Another more recent study [inferred] Coyolxauhque may instead be, the goddess of the Milky Way.” [Miller, M. and Taube, K. (1993. 68)]
is noted, but his body seems to have been buried in the tomb of Animal Skull "Great Sun." above the grave that was once buried in mu