Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis and eigenstate-to-eigenstate fluctuations

Jae Dong Noh
Phys. Rev. E 103, 012129 – Published 25 January 2021

Abstract

We investigate the extent to which the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) is valid or violated in the nonintegrable and the integrable spin-1/2 XXZ chains. We perform the energy-resolved analysis of statistical properties of matrix elements of observables in the energy eigenstate basis. The Hilbert space is divided into energy shells of constant width, and a block submatrix is constructed whose columns and rows correspond to the eigenstates in the respective energy shells. In each submatrix, we measure the second moment of off-diagonal elements in a column. The columnar second moments are distributed with a finite variance for finite-sized systems. We show that the relative variance of the columnar second moments decreases as the system size increases in the non-integrable system. The self-averaging behavior indicates that the energy eigenstates are statistically equivalent to each other, which is consistent with the ETH. In contrast, the relative variance does not decrease with the system size in the integrable system. The persisting eigenstate-to-eigenstate fluctuation implies that the matrix elements cannot be characterized with the energy parameters only. Our result explains the origin for the breakdown of the fluctuation dissipation theorem in the integrable system. The eigenstate-to-eigenstate fluctuations sheds a new light on the meaning of the ETH.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 21 August 2020
  • Accepted 6 January 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.012129

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Statistical Physics & Thermodynamics

Authors & Affiliations

Jae Dong Noh

  • Department of Physics, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Korea

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 103, Iss. 1 — January 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Illustration of the block submatrix structure. Each square corresponds to a block submatrix. In Sec. 3, we study the statistical properties of matrix elements in each shaded block. The columnar stripe represents matrix elements involving a given energy eigenstate. Statistical fluctuations from column to column, that is, the eigenstate-to-eigenstate fluctuations will be studied in Sec. 4.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Histograms of the matrix elements in the diagonal blocks Õ(0,0)(β=0) for Ô1 (upper row) and Õ(0,0)(β=0.2) for Ô2 (lower row). (a), (b), (e), and (f) are for the nonintegrable case with λ=1, and the others for the integrable case with λ=0. The energy shell widths are ΔE=0.1 (blue solid), 0.3 (green dashed), 0.5 (red dashed-dotted), and 1.0 (orange dotted). Diagonal and off-diagonal matrix elements of Ôi are denoted as di and oi, respectively. The numerical histograms are compared with the Gaussian distribution functions (circular symbols) and the stretched exponential functions (square symbols).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Scaled variance of off-diagonal elements within a diagonal block Õ(0,0)(β). The variance is multiplied by the density of states D(E¯(β)). (a) and (c) correspond to the nonintegrable case (λ=1), while the others corresponds to the integrable case (λ=0). The system sizes are L=20, 22, and 24.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Numerical data for the off-diagonal blocks Õ(b,b)(β) with ω=2bΔE with 2b=4 (blue solid), 8 (green dashed), 12 (red dashed dotted), and 16 (orange dotted) in the nonintegrable case. (a) and (c) show the histograms for Ô1 and Ô2, respectively, at L=24 and β=0. Each numerical histogram is compared with the Gaussian function, marked with circular symbols, of the same variance. The variance is plotted against the density of states D(E¯(β)) in (b) for Ô1 and (d) for Ô2 at β=0.0() and 0.2(). The thick straight line of slope 1 is a guide to the eye. The sizes of the block submatrices with 2b=4 are (1269×1226) at β=0.0 and (1182×912) at β=0.2 when L=24. The other block submatrices are of similar size.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    The same plots as in Fig. 4 for the integrable case. The sizes of the block submatrices with 2b=4 are (886×895) at β=0.0 and (808×678) at β=0.2 when L=24.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Histogram of the normalized columnar second moments, m=M2/M2, of off-diagonal elements within a block submatrix Õ(b,b)(β) with β=0.0 and b=8. When L=24, the sizes of the block submatrices are (921×829) in the nonintegrable case and (712×776) in the integrable case.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Standard deviation σm[Ôi] of the normalized columnar second moments of off-diagonal elements in Õb,b(β=0). The data are plotted as a function of ω=2bΔE. Lines with symbols represent the data with ΔE=0.3, while lines without symbols represent the data with ΔE=0.1. (a) and (c) are for the nonintegrable system, and (b) and (d) are for the integrable system.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×