Thank you for your interest in PRX Life, a highly selective, fully open access journal that aims to showcase the most important findings in the physics of life sciences to a broad audience of quantitative life scientists.
This page guides you through all the steps in the peer-review process, from submission to publication.
Before you submit, be sure to:
Ready to submit?
Visit the APS Submission Server and follow these Web Submission Guidelines
To check the status of your paper at any time, visit the APS Manuscript Status page. You will need your manuscript’s 7-digit Accession Code and the last name of one of the first three authors on your paper.
If you need help with any aspect of the publishing process, please contact APS Help.
The guidelines listed here for preparing your paper for submission are similar across all Physical Review journals. For your convenience, these links take you to specific submission guidelines for PRX Life:
Research Articles present original research that:
Perspectives are forward-looking articles that present the influence of the author’s discoveries in the last five years, outlining their potential reach and impact, and shedding light on the challenges and opportunities ahead. Perspectives aim to highlight both the short- and long-term developments of the author’s recent contributions to the physics of living systems, reflecting their unique expert view.
Reviews focus on current developments in biological physics. The text should be of interest to and understandable by a broad community from across the physical and life sciences. Reviews should depict the current state of the art, focusing on 3–5 seminal papers published in the last three years. The articles should provide a brief historical background, and should not be dominated by the work of a single research group.
Tutorials are comprehensive articles designed to equip newcomers with foundational knowledge and the latest methodologies in their research areas. Tutorials help researchers transition to new fields, bridge knowledge gaps for interdisciplinary collaborators, and support the education and development of Ph.D. students and postdoctoral researchers. By elucidating key concepts, advanced techniques, and recent advancements, Tutorials offer a deep and technical view of the current research landscape.
Roadmaps aim to accelerate research and technological achievements by providing concrete guidance. They typically represent the consensus of a broad, active community on a timely topic within the journal’s scope, outlining current challenges, strategies to overcome them, and expected milestones. Roadmaps serve as a blueprint, held to very high standards and catering to a diverse audience from students to funding agencies.
Comments critique or correct papers by other authors that were previously published in PRX Life. Each Comment should contain an abstract and should state clearly the paper to which it refers. See more details about Comments.
An Erratum notifies readers about errors or omissions in previously published papers. See more details about Errata in the Policies and Practices.
Visit this Length Guide for information about length limits for all articles published in the Physical Review journals.
PRX Life aims to reach a broad range of scientists in quantitative life sciences. Please consider this diverse audience when writing your paper.
The key results of the paper should be properly contextualized with regards to related literature.
When preparing your manuscript, please communicate your results clearly, and reduce the use of acronyms, jargon, or any language barriers that could limit your paper’s impact. Choose a title that is indicative of your paper’s message yet not too detailed. Focus on emphasizing the importance of your findings to a broader audience and write an abstract that offers a preview of what is found in the paper. For tips on writing an effective paper, see this tutorial video on Writing Better Scientific Papers.
A PDF version of your paper is all that’s needed for it to be sent for peer review. However, submitting properly formatted source files in LaTeX (preferred) or Microsoft Word simplifies peer-review because information from your paper can be more easily extracted. These source files also allow your paper to be rapidly prepared for publication if accepted. Source files will be converted to a PDF on submission.
Detailed information on style and formatting is available at APS Journals Style Guide. These Style Basics offer essential tips on formatting and styling the following sections of your paper:
PRX Life requires authors to include titles in all references as an aid to the reader and to improve the accuracy of online searches. Titles must be provided when the paper is accepted for publication.
All articles in the Physical Review journals are published in American English. APS has partnered with Editage to offer the following Language Editing Author Services:
Authors with Chinese, Japanese, or Korean names may choose to have their names published in their native language alongside the English versions of their names in the author list of their publications. See Information About Author Names for details on how to prepare your manuscript.
APS complies with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, which make online content accessible to the broadest readership possible. Articles published online should meet the following guidelines:
Supplemental Material is useful information that is not essential to understanding an article’s main results, such as
Refer to the following guidelines when preparing Supplemental Material.
A paper must stand on its own and be understandable and convincing without Supplemental Material. Editors may ask you to incorporate Supplemental Material into a paper as main text or Appendices. Editors may also ask you to convert a Letter into a longer Article to allow for this extra information.
APS stores all Supplemental Material files for a published paper as a single deposit with a dedicated URL. Authors should cite the Supplemental Material in the paper’s reference list and explain its content as follows:
See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for [give brief description of material].
All references cited in the Supplemental Material should be listed in the reference section of the main text.
For editorial policies and more details about preparing and depositing Supplemental Material, see Supplemental Material Instructions.
The cover letter is an opportunity to explain why the manuscript is appropriate for the journal. It should include the following:
PRX Life does not require additional materials beyond what is mentioned above.
All Physical Review journals follow the single-anonymized peer review procedures outlined in the Editorial Policies and Practices.
PRX Life follows standard Policy and Practice in handling Comments and Replies.
The collaborative review process is designed to foster collaboration among referees and improve the quality and thoroughness of feedback for authors. During the first round of review, referees are given a short time window (max 2 days) to share feedback on each other’s reports with the editor. Referees are asked to comment on the major points made by other referees and evaluate how relevant those points are in assessing the overall quality, originality, and impact of the manuscript. This process ensures consistency in feedback and can lead to a more comprehensive and insightful review. Additionally, referees are allowed to revise their own reports based on the reports from others, which can lead to more consistent and well-rounded feedback for the author. By working together, referees can provide a more holistic and nuanced evaluation of the manuscript, ultimately improving its quality to fit the standards of the journal.
These standard tips will help you respond effectively to a referee report.
When resubmitting your paper in response to a positive editorial invitation, check the following to ensure your paper can be quickly prepared for publication if it’s accepted.
Resubmitting your article as soon as possible ensures the timely sharing of your results. The recommended time frame for submission is three to four weeks, but articles requiring more extensive revisions may take longer.
The Physical Review portfolio provides many publishing options and welcomes the transfer of a manuscript between journals. If a manuscript is not suitable for publication at a given Physical Review journal, the editors aim to support authors by suggesting another journal or journals, provided a suitable option exists.
To resubmit or transfer your paper, go to the APS Submission Server.
When resubmitting or transferring your paper, please provide the following:
If you are requesting to add or remove an author from the paper, please see the Editorial Policy and Practice on adding or removing authors.
APS partners with external vendors to copyedit and format accepted papers according to the APS Journals Style Guide and in collaboration with the relevant journal’s Editorial Team. This service improves the quality of papers by ensuring they are clear and readable, and that they carry the signature Physical Review brand.
Authors should expect to see proofs of their manuscript with marked changes within approximately two weeks of acceptance. Proofs are sent to the Corresponding Author, who is responsible for coordinating changes with all authors and directing them to the production vendor.
The production process generally requires two rounds of proofs; more rounds may be necessary for lengthy papers or papers that deviate significantly from Physical Review style.
Authors can find the status of their paper on the APS Manuscript Status page. You’ll need your 7-digit Accession Code and the last name of one of the first three authors on the paper.
The Important Notice to Authors provides essential instructions on how to check your proof. Authors should check the following:
Are they all present, in the correct order, and spelled correctly?
Do the links go to the correct records? To avoid delays, APS does not add ORCIDs to papers after the first set of proofs is returned.
Review grant numbers for accuracy.
APS converts the original source file to XML, which is used to create the online version and the PDF. This conversion works well for most cases, but please check equations and tables carefully.
Ensure there is a byline footnote giving the email address of the author to whom correspondence should be addressed (Contact author: author@email.com).
The journals offer a variety of ways to correct the scientific record after publication, including Corrections and Author Name Changes. Visit the Post Publication section of the Policies and Practices for details.
APS helps authors promote their work to peers in the research community and to the general public.
To ensure your paper is considered for promotion, consider sending a plain-text, nontechnical summary to explain your results and why they are of interest. See Guidelines for writing and submitting a summary. (Note that Author Summaries are for APS internal use and are distinct from the Popular Summaries appearing with each PRX Life article.)
Physics Magazine provides daily news and commentary about a selection of papers from the Physical Review collection, including those published in PRX Life.
APS issues a weekly tip sheet for reporters that highlights upcoming newsworthy research from the Physical Review journals. Unless otherwise noted, papers submitted to the Physical Review journals are not embargoed. Visit this information page about the APS Press Office to find out more about the tip sheet and the APS Embargo Policy.
The Physical Review journals provide authors with an online, web-based interface, SciPris™, to pay for various author charges, including article publication charges, charges for color figures, and reprints. Upon acceptance, authors will receive a unique link to the SciPris™ platform.
For more information about APCs in the hybrid and fully open-access Physical Review journals, see APC Pricing.
Color figures are free for the online version of any article.