Abstract
The depletion of the unallocated IPv4 addresses and the slow pace of IPv6 deployment have given rise to the IPv4 transfer market, the trading of allocated IPv4 prefixes between organizations. Despite the policies established by RIRs to regulate the IPv4 transfer market, IPv4 transfers pose an opportunity for malicious networks, such as spammers and bulletproof ASes, to bypass reputational penalties by obtaining “clean” IPv4 address space or by offloading blacklisted addresses. Additionally, IP transfers create a window of uncertainty about the legitimate ownership of prefixes, which leads to inconsistencies in WHOIS records and routing advertisements. In this paper we provide the first detailed study of how transferred IPv4 prefixes are misused in the wild, by synthesizing an array of longitudinal IP blacklists, honeypot data, and AS reputation lists. Our findings yield evidence that transferred IPv4 address blocks are used by malicious networks to address botnets and fraudulent sites in much higher rates compared to non-transferred addresses, while the timing of the attacks indicate efforts to evade filtering mechanisms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
RIPE Stat also provides access to Spamhaus DROP snapshots which we do not use because it covers only directly allocated address space.
References
IPv4 Market Group. https://ipv4marketgroup.com/broker-services/buy
PeeringDB. https://www.peeringdb.com
AFRINIC: IPv4 Resources transfer within the AFRINIC Region. http://bit.ly/2sFjUZu
Alieyan, K., ALmomani, A., Manasrah, A., Kadhum, M.M.: A survey of botnet detection based on DNS. Neural Comput. Appl. 28(7), 1541–1558 (2017)
Anderson, T., Hutty, M.: Post depletion adjustment of procedures to match policy objectives, and clean-up of obsolete policy text. RIPE policy proposal, November 2013
APNIC: APNIC transfer, merger, acquisition, and takeover policy (2010). https://www.apnic.net/policy/transfer-policy_obsolete
APNIC blog, Huberman, D.: Seven steps to successful IPv4 transfers (2017)
APNIC blog, Huston, G.: IPv4 Address Exhaustion in APNIC (2015). https://blog.apnic.net/2015/08/07/ipv4-address-exhaustion-in-apnic
ARIN: ARIN Number Resource Policy Manual (Version 2010.1) (2009). https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html
ARIN: ARIN Number Resource Policy Manual (Version 2012.3) (2012). https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html
BadPackets: Cyber-Threat Intelligence: Botnet C2 Detections (2019). https://badpackets.net/botnet-c2-detections
BinaryEdge: HoneyPots/Sensors (2019). https://www.binaryedge.io/data.html
Böttger, T., Cuadrado, F., Uhlig, S.: Looking for hypergiants in peeringDB. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 48(3), 13–19 (2018)
CAIDA: Inferred AS to Organization Mapping Dataset. http://www.caida.org/data/as_organizations.xml
Cho, S., Fontugne, R., Cho, K., Dainotti, A., Gill, P.: BGP hijacking classification. In: 2019 TMA, pp. 25–32. IEEE (2019)
Dainotti, A., et al.: Estimating internet address space usage through passive measurements. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 44(1), 42–49 (2013)
Edelman, B.: Running out of numbers: scarcity of IP addresses and what to do about it. In: Das, S., Ostrovsky, M., Pennock, D., Szymanksi, B. (eds.) AMMA 2009. LNICST, vol. 14, pp. 95–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03821-1_16
Heidemann, J., Pradkin, Y., Govindan, R., Papadopoulos, C., Bartlett, G., Bannister, J.: Census and survey of the visible internet. In: Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 169–182. ACM, October 2008
Huberman, D.: Smarter purchasing of IPv4 addresses in the market. NANOG 68, October 2016. http://bit.ly/36H7LkJ
Huston, G.: How Big is that Network? October 2014. http://bit.ly/367t6DD
Huston, G.: IPv4 Address Report, October 2019. https://ipv4.potaroo.net
Huston, G.: IPv6/IPv4 Comparative Statistics, October 2019. http://bit.ly/36G7sGN
Livadariu, I., Elmokashfi, A., Dhamdhere, A.: On IPv4 transfer markets: analyzing reported transfers and inferring transfers in the wild. Comput. Commun. 111, 105–119 (2017)
Internet Archive: Wayback Machine (2001). https://archive.org/web
IPv4 Brokers: IPv4 blacklist removal service. https://ipv4brokers.net/ipv4-sales
IPv4 Market Group: IPv4 blacklist removal service. http://bit.ly/37dfDM3
Konte, M., Perdisci, R., Feamster, N.: ASwatch: an as reputation system to expose bulletproof hosting ASes. ACM SIGCOMM CCR 45(4), 625–638 (2015)
Kührer, M., Rossow, C., Holz, T.: Paint it black: evaluating the effectiveness of malware blacklists. In: Stavrou, A., Bos, H., Portokalidis, G. (eds.) RAID 2014. LNCS, vol. 8688, pp. 1–21. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11379-1_1
LACNIC: One-way interregional transfers to LACNIC (2017). http://bit.ly/369F5kd
Lehr, W., Vest, T., Lear, E.: Running on empty: the challenge of managing internet addresses. In: TPRC (2008)
Luckie, M., Huffaker, B., Dhamdhere, A., Giotsas, V., et al.: AS relationships, customer cones, and validation. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM IMC (2013)
Torres, M.: Purchasing IPv4 space - due diligence homework. NANOG mailing list, March 2018. http://bit.ly/36L5Trg
McMillen, D.: The inside story on botnets. IBM X-Force Research, September 2016
Mueller, M., Kuerbis, B.: Buying numbers: an empirical analysis of the IPv4 number market. In: Proceedings of iConference (2013)
Mueller, M., Kuerbis, B., Asghari, H.: Dimensioning the elephant: an empirical analysis of the IPv4 number market. In: GigaNet: Global Internet Governance Academic Network, Annual Symposium (2012)
Myers, E.W.: An O(ND) difference algorithm and its variations. Algorithmica 1(1–4), 251–266 (1986)
NANOG 68, Potter, A.: How to Navigate Getting IPv4 Space in a Post-Run-Out World (2017)
Nobile, L.: Who is accuracy. ARIN 39, April 2017
Ramachandran, A., Feamster, N.: Understanding the network-level behavior of spammers. In: ACM SIGCOMM CCR, vol. 36, pp. 291–302. ACM (2006)
Ramachandran, A., Feamster, N., Vempala, S.: Filtering spam with behavioral blacklisting. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference CCS. ACM (2007)
RAPID7: Project Sonar TCP Scans. RAPID7 Open Data (2019). https://opendata.rapid7.com/sonar.tcp
RAPID7: Project Sonar UDP Scans. RAPID7 Open Data (2019). https://opendata.rapid7.com/sonar.udp
Reddit Networking: What are your experiences with the IPv4 secondary market? March 2018. https://tinyurl.com/yyumhax5
Richter, P., Allman, M., Bush, R., Paxson, V.: A primer on IPv4 scarcity. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 45(2), 21–31 (2015). http://bit.ly/3b2878Q
Richter, P., Smaragdakis, G., Plonka, D., Berger, A.: Beyond counting: new perspectives on the active IPv4 address space. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM IMC (2016)
RIPE: Routing Information Service (RIS). http://www.ripe.net/ris
RIPE Labs, Wilhem, R.: Developments in IPv4 Transfers (2016). https://labs.ripe.net/Members/wilhelm/developments-in-ipv4-transfers
RIPE Labs, Wilhem, R.: Impact of IPv4 Transfers on Routing Table Fragmentation (2016). http://bit.ly/30NCBHj
RIPE Labs, Wilhem, R.: Trends in RIPE NCC Service Region IPv4 Transfers (2017). https://labs.ripe.net/Members/wilhelm/trends-in-ipv4-transfers
RIPE Labs, Wilhem, R.: A Shrinking Pie? The IPv4 Transfer Market in 2017 (2018). http://bit.ly/2topCQ1
RIPE NCC: Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal (2012). https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2012-03
RIPE NCC: Inter-RIR Transfers (2015). http://bit.ly/2v8kShV
RIPE NCC: RIPE Stat Data API: Blacklists (2019). http://bit.ly/2SafbId
RIPE NCC Address Policy Working Group: ASNs of organizations in reported IPv4 transfers. https://bit.ly/2v8Krzp
Shue, C.A., Kalafut, A.J., Gupta, M.: Abnormally malicious autonomous systems and their internet connectivity. IEEE/ACM TON 20(1), 220–230 (2012)
Sinha, S., Bailey, M., Jahanian, F.: Shades of grey: on the effectiveness of reputation-based “blacklists”. In: 3rd International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software (MALWARE), pp. 57–64. IEEE (2008)
Spamhaus: Don’t Route Or Peer List (DROP). https://www.spamhaus.org/drop
Streambank, H.: IPv4 Auctions. https://auctions.ipv4.global
WatchGuard Technologies: Internet Security Report: Q2 2019, September 2019
Testart, C., Richter, P., King, A., Dainotti, A., Clark, D.: Profiling BGP serial hijackers: capturing persistent misbehavior in the global routing table. In: Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 420–434. ACM (2019)
UCEPROTECT: Network Project. http://www.uceprotect.net/en
University of Oregon: The Route Views Project. http://www.routeviews.org
VirusTotal: Online Virus Malware and URL scanner. https://www.virustotal.com
Zhao, B.Z.H., Ikram, M., Asghar, H.J., Kaafar, M.A., Chaabane, A., Thilakarathna, K.: A decade of mal-activity reporting: a retrospective analysis of internet malicious activity blacklists. In: ASIACCS, pp. 193–205. ACM (2019)
Zhauniarovich, Y., Khalil, I., Yu, T., Dacier, M.: A survey on malicious domains detection through DNS data analysis. ACM Comput. Surv. 51(4), 67 (2018)
Acknowledgments
We thank our shepherd Taejoong Chung, the anonymous reviewers and Carlos Friaça for their constructive feedback. We also thank Randy Bush, and Jim Reid for their replies in our RIPE policy enquiries. Research supported, in part by, Security Lancaster, H2020 EC CONCORDIA GA #830927, Norwegian Research Council grant # 288744 GAIA, and the RIPE NCC Community Projects Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Giotsas, V., Livadariu, I., Gigis, P. (2020). A First Look at the Misuse and Abuse of the IPv4 Transfer Market. In: Sperotto, A., Dainotti, A., Stiller, B. (eds) Passive and Active Measurement. PAM 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12048. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44081-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44081-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44080-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44081-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)